I'm trying to track down a problem on our test environment. Previously it was set to use InProc Session State Type, but I've added in the SQLServer type for one specific Web App. I did this because we use the SQLServer type in our production environment and I want our test env to match as closely as possible.
However, after changing it to SQLServer I do not get any errors when trying to store unserializable data in session like I would expect. It works just fine, even though I would think it shouldn't. I'm a relative newbie when it comes to configuring this, but from the various tutorials I googled, I thought I covered all the bases.
I was wondering if there's any code snippets to verify which session state type an application is actively using.
Thanks
Ok, found it by accessing:
System.Web.SessionState.HttpSessionState.Mode
Was also able to look at the tables in the ASPState database to see sessions being added/removed.
Apparently it was just the test code we were using that we expected to break that was not behaving as we expected..
Related
We've made use of environment specific migrations for things like seeding data, data correction, applying table grants. There are times when we'd like to take a copy of production, for example, and import it to another lower environment, either as a periodic refresh, or to start a new test environment. However, as expected, we end up with various failures like Detected applied migration not resolved locally and Detected resolved migration not applied to database. I see there are various flags (ignoreIgnoredMigrations, ignoreMissingMigrations and outOfOrder) to allow us to bypass these issues.
Are there best practices for handling scenarios like I described? Is there a way to run an environment specific migration that doesn't file an entry in the flyway_schema_history table? Other approaches to this issue that I haven't mentioned?
Thanks in advance for any insights.
We have used ignoreMissingMigrations as one approach around this issue.
I know that similar topics have been already raised, but maybe there are some latest news or ideas?
I want to migrate Datazen users/sources/dashboards etc. to another server (production one) in a smooth way. I was trying to do that via backup/restore, but then I couldn't access the control panel on the target server. I received an error
401 unauthorized access.
Maybe I should change something in logs/config files on the destination server?
Any ideas? I would be grateful for any help!
I dont think there is a way to do this out of the box. However, the files are quite simple XML, so can be pointed at a different server if you know PowerShell (and work out the correct values from the server).
You will have to re-point the GUID, ServerGUID and ServerURI within the sources.xml file and then rezip (as .datazen). Providing you have your hubs set up the same, Datazen will then believe the file belongs to your prod environment and you will be able to publish
I am having a very hard time making RavenFS behave properly and was hoping that I could get some help.
I'm running into two separate issues, one where uploading files to the ravenfs while using an embedded db inside a service causes ravendb to fall over, and the other where synchronizing two instances setup in the same way makes the destination server fall over.
I have tried to do my best in documenting this... Code and steps to reproduce these issues are located here (https://github.com/punkcoder/RavenFSFileUploadAndSyncIssue), and video is located here (https://youtu.be/fZEvJo_UVpc). I tried looking for these issues in the issue tracker and didn't find something directly that looked like it related, but I may have missed something.
Solution for this problem was to remove Raven from the project and replace it with MongoDB. Binary storage in Mongo can be done on the record without issue.
I'm using MigratorDotNet to manage Rails-style migrations for my web app. I have a workflow where, if I delete all the tables in the database, I can access an installation view that will run MigratorDotNet and create all the necessary tables.
This works locally. For some reason, when I upload my code to my Arvixe hosting, the migrations just never run. I get this odd error:
There is already an object named 'SchemaInfo' in the database.
This is odd because, prior to running migrations, I manually deleted all the tables in the database (to make sure it wasn't left over from a previous install).
My code essentially boils down to:
new Migrator.Migrator("SqlServer", connectionString.ToString(), migrationsAssembly).MigrateToLastVersion();
I've already verified by logging that the connection string is correct (production/hosting settings), and the assembly is correctly loaded (name and version).
Works locally, but not on Arvixe. How do I troubleshoot this?
This is a dark day.
It turns out (oddly) that the root cause was my hosting company used a schema other than dbo for my database. Because of this, the error message I saw (SchemaInfo already exists) was talking about their table.
My solution, unfortunately, was to rip out MigratorDotNet and go with FluentMigator instead. not only did this solve the problem, but it also gave me a more intelligible error message (one referring to the schema names).
While it doesn't seem possible to auto-set the schema, and while I need to switch the schema on my dev vs. production machine, it's still a solvable problem (and a better API, IMO). I googled, but did not find any way to change the default schema in migratordotnet.
I'm sorry for the issues that you were having. On shared hosting, unfortunately the only way that we may be able to change the schema is manually. If you are still looking for a solution that requires our assistance, please forward your ticket ID to qa .at. arvixe.com as well as arvand .at. arvixe.com and we can look into the best way to resolve this.
I'm trying to amend our content management system so it'll handle SQL database failures more gracefully. It's a bunch of ASMX pages, and a Helpers.vb file in which I've written a SQL connection tester function.
Each of the ASMX pages call the same function.
I need to create a variable I can check that's persistent and performant, otherwise I'm going to have fall back on something disasterously slow like reading a text file every time I set up a sql connection string.
I've tried using application caching, but either it doesn't work in the context of my helpers.vb file, or I've made a mess of the syntax. One problem that's already stymied some of the approaches I've found via google - I can't use 'Import System.Web.Caching' - IntelliSense doesn't show the 'Caching' part.
Has anyone got any example code that might get me up and running? Or an alternative approach?
#Mike,
Many thanks, now I'm using HttpRuntime.Cache correctly... it works!
Thanks everyone for taking the time to post :)