here is a simple problem. I have a table of 500 rows and what to be able to select a given row number n. This is what I am doing:
select *
from table
where table.arg1 ='A'
and time_stamp=to_date('1/8/2010','MM/DD/YYYY')
and rownum = n
But it would only work for the row 1, for the rest it doesn't return anything. Any idea?
The reason why where rownum = 3 returns an empty rowset is that the condition is not true for the first row. For the second row, there is still no first row in the resultset, and rownum is still 1. So the condition fails again. See this page for a more detailed explanation.
You can use row_number() in a subquery:
select *
from (
select row_number() over (order by col1) as rn, yt.*
from YourTable yt
) sub
where rn = 3
Or even simpler, but perhaps more confusing, using rownum itself:
select *
from (
select rownum as rn, yt.*
from YourTable yt
) sub
where rn = 3
Related
I would like to write a query that returns the first row immediately after the last row with a given property (ordered by id). Id's may not be consecutive.
Ideally it would look something like this:
...
JOIN (select max(id) id from my_table where CONDITION) m
JOIN (select min(id) from my_table where id > m.id) n
However, I can not use identifier m in the second subselect.
It is possible to use nested queries in nested queries, but is there an easier way?
Thank you.
You could use lead() to get the next id before applying the condition:
select t.*
from my_table t join
(select max(next_id) as max_next_id
from (select t.*, lead(id) over (order by id) as next_id
from my_table t
) t
where <condition>
) tt
on t.id = tt.max_next_id;
You could also do:
select t.*
from my_table t
where t.id > (select max(t2.id) from my_table t2 where <condition>)
order by t2.id asc
fetch first 1 row only;
I am not sure how this is getting woven into the rest of your query, so I have used a CTE
WITH max_next AS (
SELECT r.id as max_id
,r.next_id
FROM (
SELECT m.id
,m.next_id
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY m.id DESC) AS rn
FROM (
SELECT n.* -- to provide data to satisfy CONDITIONS
,LEAD(n.id) OVER(ORDER BY n.id) as next_id
FROM my_table AS n
) AS m
WHERE CONDITIONS
) AS r
WHERE r.rn = 1
)
I would also shrink the n.* to the columns needed by CONDITIONS to a, not be implicit as the * slows the compile time down (or historically has) as all meta data needs to be read to understand what columns is in the ANY, and the while the compile can also prune not used columns, it's faster if you just ask for what you want (in best case just a compile time savings, worse case, it read all the data when you only need x number of columns read)
And borrowing from Gordon solution, the ROW_NUMBER part could be simpler
WITH max_next AS (
SELECT m.id
,m.next_id
--, plus what ever other things you want from m
FROM (
SELECT n.* -- to satisfy CONDITIONS needs
,LEAD(n.id) OVER(ORDER BY n.id) as next_id
FROM my_table AS n
) AS m
WHERE CONDITIONS
ORDER BY m.id DESC LIMIT 1
)
So for an example for #PIG,
WITH my_table AS (
SELECT column1 AS id
,column2 AS con1
,column3 AS other
FROM VALUES (1,'a',123),(2,'b',234),(3,'a',345),(5,'b',456),(7,'a',567),(10,'c',678)
)
SELECT m.id
,m.next_id
,m.other
FROM (
SELECT n.* -- to satisfy CONDITIONS needs
,LEAD(n.id) OVER(ORDER BY n.id) as next_id
FROM my_table AS n
) AS m
WHERE m.con1 = 'b'
ORDER BY m.id DESC LIMIT 1;
gives 5, 7, 456 which is the last 'b' and the new row, and an extra value on my_table for entertainment purposes (and run on Snowflake to, which means I fixed the prior SQL also.)
This should work, it's pretty straightforward (easy), and it's good that you know records may not be stored in a ordered/consecutive fashion.
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE id = (
SELECT min(id)
FROM my_table
WHERE id > (
SELECT max(id)
FROM my_table
WHERE CONDITION));
In pseudo-code, what I mean is, can you do something like this (similar to TOP):
SELECT Row 2
*
FROM Table
WHERE Column1 = Condition
I wanted to do something for testing - I can't think of a real world scenario for this. Just curious if it's possible. I can't find anything on the Interwebz about it.
This would give you the 9th row:
select top 1 *
from (
select top 9 *
from MyTable
order by 1) as x
order by 1 desc
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY col2) rn
FROM mytable
WHERE col1 = condition
) q
WHERE rn = 4
WITH QUERY AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY Column1) AS RowNumber
FROM Table
)
SELECT * FROM QUERY WHERE ROWNUMBER = N
How can I get the n-th row of a TSQL query results?
Let's say, I want to get the 2nd row of this SELECT:
SELECT * FROM table
ORDER BY 2 ASC
What version of SQL Server are you targeting? If 2005 or greater, you can use ROW_NUMBER to generate a row number and select using that number. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186734.aspx
WITH orderedtable AS
(
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY <your order here>) AS 'RowNumber'
FROM table
)
SELECT *
FROM orderedtable
WHERE RowNumber = 2;
You can use a trick combining TOP with ORDER BY ASC/DESC to achieve an effect similar to MySQL's LIMIT:
SELECT TOP 2 * INTO #temptable FROM table
ORDER BY 2 ASC
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM #temptable
ORDER BY 2 DESC
or without temptable, but nested statements:
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM
(
SELECT TOP 2 * FROM table
ORDER BY 2 ASC
) sub
ORDER BY 2 DESC
The first time you select all rows up to the one you want to actually have, and in the second query you select only the first of the remaining when ordering them reversely, which is exactly the one you want.
Source: http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=850&lngWId=5
One way;
;with T(rownumber, col1, colN) as (
select
row_number() over (order by ACOLUMN) as rownumber,
col1,
colN
from
atable
)
select * from T where rownumber = 2
I figure I might just be missing some obvious syntax but what is the sql (oracle) to select the first 10 records, then the next 10, and so on?
I tried using rownum but can seem to get rownum > X and rownum < Y to work.
llcf
There is only a rather convoluted way to do this, which is a real pain with Oracle. They should just implement a LIMIT/OFFSET clause...
The rownum gets assigned after the row has been selected by the where clause, so that a rownum must always start with 1. where rownum > x will always evaluate to false.
Also, rownum gets assigned before sorting is done, so the rownum will not be in the same order as your order by says.
You can get around both problems with a subselect:
select a,b,c, rn from
( select a,b,c, rownum rn from
( select a,b,c from the_table where x = ? order by c)
where rownum < Y)
where rn > X
If you do not need to sort (but only then), you can simplify to
select a,b,c, rn from
( select a,b,c, rownum rn from the_table where rownum < Y )
where rn > X
You could use ROW_NUMBER() function... for example
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT A.*, ROW_NUMBER( ) OVER (ORDER BY MYFIELD) AS MYROW FROM MYTABLE A )
WHERE MYROW < X
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT A.*, ROW_NUMBER( ) OVER (ORDER BY MYFIELD) AS MYROW FROM MYTABLE A )
WHERE MYROW BETWEEN X AND Y
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT A.*, ROW_NUMBER( ) OVER (ORDER BY MYFIELD) AS MYROW FROM MYTABLE A )
WHERE MYROW BETWEEN Y AND Z
You could also select all rows, and only fetch 10 at a time. This works only if you can keep the cursor between the fetches, of course.
I'm using SQL Server 2005 and I'm trying to achieve something like this:
I want to get the first x rows and the last x rows in the same select statement.
SELECT TOP(5) BOTTOM(5)
Of course BOTTOM does not exist, so I need another solution. I believe there is an easy and elegant solution that I'm not getting. Doing the select again with GROUP BY DESC is not an option.
Using a union is the only thing I can think of to accomplish this
select * from (select top(5) * from logins order by USERNAME ASC) a
union
select * from (select top(5) * from logins order by USERNAME DESC) b
Check the link
SQL SERVER – How to Retrieve TOP and BOTTOM Rows Together using T-SQL
Did you try to using rownumber?
SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order BY columnName) as TopFive
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order BY columnName Desc) as BottomFive
FROM Table
)
WHERE TopFive <=5 or BottomFive <=5
http://www.sqlservercurry.com/2009/02/select-top-n-and-bottom-n-rows-using.html
I think you've two main options:
SELECT TOP 5 ...
FROM ...
ORDER BY ... ASC
UNION
SELECT TOP 5 ...
FROM ...
ORDER BY ... DESC
Or, if you know how many items there are in the table:
SELECT ...
FROM (
SELECT ..., ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ... ASC) AS intRow
FROM ...
) AS T
WHERE intRow BETWEEN 1 AND 5 OR intRow BETWEEN #Number - 5 AND #Number
Is it an option for you to use a union?
E.g.
select top 5 ... order by {specify columns asc}
union
select top 5 ... order by {specify columns desc}
i guess you have to do it using subquery only
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT id ORDER BY columnName LIMIT 5) OR
(SELECT id ORDER BY columnName DESC LIMIT 5)
)
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT TOP(5) id ORDER BY columnName) OR
(SELECT TOP(5) id ORDER BY columnName DESC)
)
EDITED
select * from table where id in (
(SELECT TOP 5 id ORDER BY columnName) OR
(SELECT TOP 5 id ORDER BY columnName DESC)
)
No real difference between this and the union that I'm aware of, but technically it is a single query.
select t.*
from table t
where t.id in (select top 5 t2.id from table t2 order by MyColumn)
or
t.id in (select top 5 t2.id from table t2 order by MyColumn desc);
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT x, rank() over (order by x asc) as rown
FROM table
) temp
where temp.rown = 1
or temp.rown = (select count(x) from table)
Then you are out - doing the select again IS the only option, unless you want to pull in the complete result set and then throwing away everything in between.
ANY sql I cna think of is the same way - for the bottom you need to know first either how many items you have (materialize everything or use count(*)) or a reverse sort order.
Sorry if that does not suit you, but at the end.... reality does not care, and I do not see any other way to do that.
I had to do this recently for a very large stored procedure; if your query is quite large, and you want to minimize the amount of queries you could declare a #tempTable, insert into that #tempTable then query from that #tempTable,
DECLARE #tempTable TABLE ( columns.. )
INSERT INTO #tempTable
VALUES ( SELECT.. your query here ..)
SELECT TOP(5) columns FROM #tempTable ORDER BY column ASC -- returns first to last
SELECT TOP(5) columns FROM #tempTable ORDER BY column DESC -- returns last to first