What is the best way to determine whether or not a field's value is an integer in SQL Server (2000/2005/2008)?
IsNumeric returns true for a variety of formats that would not likely convert to an integer. Examples include '15,000' and '15.1'.
You can use a like statement but that only appears to work well for fields that have a pre-determined number of digits...
select * where zipcode like '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]'
I could write a user defined function that attempts to convert a varchar parameter to an int within a try/catch block but I'm checking with the community to see if someone has come across any succient methods to achieve this goal - preferably one that can be used within the where clause of a SQL statement without creating other objects.
Late entry that handles negative
ISNUMERIC(zipcode + '.0e0') --integer
ISNUMERIC(zipcode + 'e0') --decimal
For more see this
1 approach is
zipcode NOT LIKE '%[^0-9]%'
Double negatives, got to love 'em!
If SQL Server 2005+, I'd enable CLR and create the function to support regexes. For SQL Server 2000, see this article for creating a UDF to do the same thing.
Then I'd use the regex: ^\d{5}$
This expression gives 1 for an integer value and 0 otherwise
floor((floor(abs(zipcode)))/abs(zipcode))
Why not just use the following? I can't see to find any cases where it fails.
1 = integer
0 = not integer
null = non-numeric
DECLARE #TestValue nvarchar(MAX)
SET #TestValue = '1.04343234e5'
SELECT CASE WHEN ISNUMERIC(#TestValue) = 1
THEN CASE WHEN ROUND(#TestValue,0,1) = #TestValue
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
ELSE null
END AS Analysis
It looks like this question needs an updated answer.
Limiting the answer to the question title:
where ISNUMERIC(zipcode) = 1
and zipcode - FLOOR(zipcode) = 0
Expounding based on the text of the question...
Currently-supported versions of SQL Server all support/include the TRY-CONVERT function.
declare #a varchar(100)
set #a = '-1.2a'
--set #a = '-1.2'
--set #a = '-1'
--set #a = '-1.0'
--set #a = '-0'
--set #a = '0'
--set #a = '1'
select #a as 'Value'
, ISNUMERIC(#a) as ISNUMERIC
, case when ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 and #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
, case when try_convert(int, #a) >= 0 and left(#a, 1) <> '-' then 1 else 0 end as ISWHOLENUMBER
, case when try_convert(int, #a) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISCOUNTINGNUMBER
You'll notice that TRY_CONVERT(INT, -1.0) returns NULL. So TRY_CONVERT(INT, #a) IS NOT NULL is not quite right for ISINTEGER.
case when ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 and #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
...works because if ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 is false, FLOOR(#a) is not evaluated. Reversing the order...
case when #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 and ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
...generates an error when the value (#a) is not numeric.
So, for the case of zipcode, assuming you want to verify that a 5-digit zip code is a number and it must be 5 digits (so it can't be zero or less) and would never contain a decimal point (so you don't need to know if 12345.000 is an integer):
where try_convert(int, zipcode) > 0
and len(zipcode) = 5
I came up with the perfect answer for this on another StackO question.
It also proves you cannot use ".0e0" like one user suggests here.
It does so without CLR or non-scalar functions.
Please check it out: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10645764/555798
After moving to sql 2008, I was struggling with isnumeric('\8') returning true but throwing an error when casting to an integer. Apparently forward slash is valid currency for yen or won - (reference http://www.louiebao.net/blog/200910/isnumeric/)
My solution was
case when ISNUMERIC(#str) > 0 and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '[^0-9]%' and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '%[^0-9]' and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '[^0-9]%' then rtrim(#str) else null end
See whether the below code will help.
In the below values only 9, 2147483647, 1234567 are eligible as
Integer. We can create this as function and can use this.
CREATE TABLE MY_TABLE(MY_FIELD VARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO MY_TABLE
VALUES('9.123'),('1234567'),('9'),('2147483647'),('2147483647.01'),('2147483648'), ('2147483648ABCD'),('214,7483,648')
SELECT *
FROM MY_TABLE
WHERE CHARINDEX('.',MY_FIELD) = 0 AND CHARINDEX(',',MY_FIELD) = 0
AND ISNUMERIC(MY_FIELD) = 1 AND CONVERT(FLOAT,MY_FIELD) / 2147483647 <= 1
DROP TABLE MY_TABLE
I did it using a Case statement:
Cast(Case When Quantity/[# of Days]= Cast(Quantity/[# of Days] as int) Then abs(Quantity/[# of Days]) Else 0 End as int)
To test whether the input value is an integer or not we can use SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY function of SQL SERVER.
The following SQL Script will take input and test it whether the data type turns out to be integer or not
declare #convertedTempValue bigint, #inputValue nvarchar(255) = '1' --Change '1' to any input value
set #convertedTempValue = TRY_PARSE(#inputValue as bigint) --we trying to convert to bigint
declare #var3 nvarchar(255) = cast (SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(#convertedTempValue,'BaseType') as nvarchar(255)) --we using SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY to find out datatype
if ( #var3 like '%int%')
begin
print 'value is integer'
end
else
begin
print 'value is non integer'
end
go
Really late to this but would this work?
select * from from table
where (ISNUMERIC(zipcode) = 0 OR zipcode like '%.%')
Filters out items that are integers.
Maybe you should only store integer data in integer datatypes.
Related
Check if the string is following the correct format or not. The correct format is as follows:
2 upper case letters; 2 digits; 1 to 30 characters alpha-numerical (case insensitive)
e.g. GB29RBOS60161331926819,
GB29RBOS60161331926819A,
GB29RBOS60161331926819B1
So far this is what i have got...
declare #accountNumber varchar(1000) = 'GB99AERF12FDG8AERF12FDG8AERF12FDG8'
select
case when #accountNumber not like '[A-Z][A-Z][0-9][0-9][0-9a-zA-Z]{30}$'
then 'ERROR' else null end
First, your structure assumes a case sensitive collation. Second, SQL Server doesn't recognize {} or $, so you have to repeat the pattern. However, you want up to 30 characters, so splitting the pieces apart is probably the best solution:
select (case when len(#accountNumber) not between 5 and 34 or
#accountNumber not like '[A-Z][A-Z][0-9][0-9]%' or
right(#accountNumber, 34) like '%[^A-Za-z0-9]%'
then 'ERROR'
end)
I think this should work... taking some tips from John.
declare #table table (i varchar(36))
insert into #table
values
('GR09xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'), --30 x's
('GR09xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'), --28 x's
('GR09xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'), --31 x's
('Gx09xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'), --lower case 2'd letter
('G509xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'), --digit second letter
('GRg9xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx') --charcater first number (3rd index)
select
case
when i + replicate('a',case when 34-len(i) < 0 then 0 else 34-len(i) end) not like '[A-Z][A-Z][0-9][0-9]' + replicate('[a-zA-Z0-9]',30)
then 'ERROR' else null end
from #table
What is the best way to determine whether or not a field's value is an integer in SQL Server (2000/2005/2008)?
IsNumeric returns true for a variety of formats that would not likely convert to an integer. Examples include '15,000' and '15.1'.
You can use a like statement but that only appears to work well for fields that have a pre-determined number of digits...
select * where zipcode like '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]'
I could write a user defined function that attempts to convert a varchar parameter to an int within a try/catch block but I'm checking with the community to see if someone has come across any succient methods to achieve this goal - preferably one that can be used within the where clause of a SQL statement without creating other objects.
Late entry that handles negative
ISNUMERIC(zipcode + '.0e0') --integer
ISNUMERIC(zipcode + 'e0') --decimal
For more see this
1 approach is
zipcode NOT LIKE '%[^0-9]%'
Double negatives, got to love 'em!
If SQL Server 2005+, I'd enable CLR and create the function to support regexes. For SQL Server 2000, see this article for creating a UDF to do the same thing.
Then I'd use the regex: ^\d{5}$
This expression gives 1 for an integer value and 0 otherwise
floor((floor(abs(zipcode)))/abs(zipcode))
Why not just use the following? I can't see to find any cases where it fails.
1 = integer
0 = not integer
null = non-numeric
DECLARE #TestValue nvarchar(MAX)
SET #TestValue = '1.04343234e5'
SELECT CASE WHEN ISNUMERIC(#TestValue) = 1
THEN CASE WHEN ROUND(#TestValue,0,1) = #TestValue
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
ELSE null
END AS Analysis
It looks like this question needs an updated answer.
Limiting the answer to the question title:
where ISNUMERIC(zipcode) = 1
and zipcode - FLOOR(zipcode) = 0
Expounding based on the text of the question...
Currently-supported versions of SQL Server all support/include the TRY-CONVERT function.
declare #a varchar(100)
set #a = '-1.2a'
--set #a = '-1.2'
--set #a = '-1'
--set #a = '-1.0'
--set #a = '-0'
--set #a = '0'
--set #a = '1'
select #a as 'Value'
, ISNUMERIC(#a) as ISNUMERIC
, case when ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 and #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
, case when try_convert(int, #a) >= 0 and left(#a, 1) <> '-' then 1 else 0 end as ISWHOLENUMBER
, case when try_convert(int, #a) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISCOUNTINGNUMBER
You'll notice that TRY_CONVERT(INT, -1.0) returns NULL. So TRY_CONVERT(INT, #a) IS NOT NULL is not quite right for ISINTEGER.
case when ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 and #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
...works because if ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 is false, FLOOR(#a) is not evaluated. Reversing the order...
case when #a - FLOOR(#a) = 0 and ISNUMERIC(#a) = 1 then 1 else 0 end as ISINTEGER
...generates an error when the value (#a) is not numeric.
So, for the case of zipcode, assuming you want to verify that a 5-digit zip code is a number and it must be 5 digits (so it can't be zero or less) and would never contain a decimal point (so you don't need to know if 12345.000 is an integer):
where try_convert(int, zipcode) > 0
and len(zipcode) = 5
I came up with the perfect answer for this on another StackO question.
It also proves you cannot use ".0e0" like one user suggests here.
It does so without CLR or non-scalar functions.
Please check it out: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10645764/555798
After moving to sql 2008, I was struggling with isnumeric('\8') returning true but throwing an error when casting to an integer. Apparently forward slash is valid currency for yen or won - (reference http://www.louiebao.net/blog/200910/isnumeric/)
My solution was
case when ISNUMERIC(#str) > 0 and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '[^0-9]%' and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '%[^0-9]' and not rtrim(#str) LIKE '[^0-9]%' then rtrim(#str) else null end
See whether the below code will help.
In the below values only 9, 2147483647, 1234567 are eligible as
Integer. We can create this as function and can use this.
CREATE TABLE MY_TABLE(MY_FIELD VARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO MY_TABLE
VALUES('9.123'),('1234567'),('9'),('2147483647'),('2147483647.01'),('2147483648'), ('2147483648ABCD'),('214,7483,648')
SELECT *
FROM MY_TABLE
WHERE CHARINDEX('.',MY_FIELD) = 0 AND CHARINDEX(',',MY_FIELD) = 0
AND ISNUMERIC(MY_FIELD) = 1 AND CONVERT(FLOAT,MY_FIELD) / 2147483647 <= 1
DROP TABLE MY_TABLE
I did it using a Case statement:
Cast(Case When Quantity/[# of Days]= Cast(Quantity/[# of Days] as int) Then abs(Quantity/[# of Days]) Else 0 End as int)
To test whether the input value is an integer or not we can use SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY function of SQL SERVER.
The following SQL Script will take input and test it whether the data type turns out to be integer or not
declare #convertedTempValue bigint, #inputValue nvarchar(255) = '1' --Change '1' to any input value
set #convertedTempValue = TRY_PARSE(#inputValue as bigint) --we trying to convert to bigint
declare #var3 nvarchar(255) = cast (SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(#convertedTempValue,'BaseType') as nvarchar(255)) --we using SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY to find out datatype
if ( #var3 like '%int%')
begin
print 'value is integer'
end
else
begin
print 'value is non integer'
end
go
Really late to this but would this work?
select * from from table
where (ISNUMERIC(zipcode) = 0 OR zipcode like '%.%')
Filters out items that are integers.
Maybe you should only store integer data in integer datatypes.
Ok, so I am tring to get the first of the last 2 digits of a number. Take for instance 12345601, I want to know if the second to last numeric is a 0. If 0 then I need it to select only the last digit of the int, if different than 0 select the last 2 digits. this is what I have :
declare #myint int
set #myint= 12345601
select case when substring(cast (#myint as varchar(50) ) , len(#myint)-1, len(#myint)-1 ) = 0 then right(#myint, 1)
else right(#myint, 2) end
Unfortunately, it isn't working and this is where:
substring(cast (#myint as varchar(50)), len(#myint)-1, len(#myint)-1 )
that substring is coming out at 01, but I need it to come out as 0. Any ideas?
Try this:
SELECT CASE WHEN LEFT(RIGHT(#myint,2),1) = 0 THEN RIGHT(#myint,1) ELSE RIGHT(#myint,2) END
Try this instead:
SELECT CAST(RIGHT(#myint,2) as int)
If you cast it as an int it should strip the leading zero anyway...
You can see it in action with the code below:
declare #myint int
set #myint= 12345601
SELECT CAST(RIGHT(#myint,2) as int)
set #myint= 12345611
SELECT CAST(RIGHT(#myint,2) as int)
Is there an equivalent to VB's AndAlso/OrElse and C#'s &&/|| in SQL (SQL Server 2005). I am running a select query similar to the following:
SELECT a,b,c,d
FROM table1
WHERE
(#a IS NULL OR a = #a)
AND (#b IS NULL OR b = #b)
AND (#c IS NULL OR c = #c)
AND (#d IS NULL OR d = #d)
For example, if the "#a" parameter passed in as NULL there is no point in evaluating the 2nd part of the WHERE clause (a = #a). Is there a way to avoid this either by using special syntax or rewriting the query?
Thanks,
James.
The only way to guarantee the order of evaluation is to use CASE
WHERE
CASE
WHEN #a IS NULL THEN 1
WHEN a = #a THEN 1
ELSE 0
END = 1
AND /*repeat*/
In my experience this is usually slower then just letting the DB engine sort it out.
TerrorAustralis's answer is usually the best option for non-nullable columns
Try this:
AND a = ISNULL(#a,a)
This function looks at #a. If it is not null it equates the expression
AND a = #a
If it is null it equates the expression
AND a = a
(Since this is always true, it replaces the #b is null statement)
The query engine will take care of this for you. Your query, as written, is fine. All operators will "short circuit" if they can.
Another way is to do:
IF (#a > 0) IF (#a = 5)
BEGIN
END
Another if after the condition will do an "AndAlso" logic.
I want to emphesise that this is just a short way to write:
IF (#a > 0)
IF (#a = 5)
BEGIN
END
Take this example:
SELECT * FROM Orders
WHERE orderId LIKE '%[0-9]%'
AND dbo.JobIsPending(OrderId) = 1
Orders.OrderId is varchar(25)
dbo.JobIsPending(OrderId) UDF with int parameter
No short circuit is made as the conversion fails in dbo.JobIsPending(OrderId) when
Orders.OrderId NOT LIKE '%[0-9]%'
tested on SQL Server 2008 R2
Simple query, possibly impossible but I know there are some clever people out there :)
Given a boolean parameter, I wish to define my where clause to either limit a certain column's output - or do nothing.
So, given parameter #bit = 1 this would be the result:
where column = 1
given parameter #bit = 0 this would be the result:
where column = 1 or 0
i.e. have no effect/show all results (column is a bit field)
I'm not wanting dynamic sql - I can settle for fixing this in code but I just wondered if there's some clever magic that would make the above neat and simple.
Is there? I'm using sql server.
cheers :D
The answer column = 1 or #bit = 0 works if column may only be 0 or 1. If column may be any value you want: column = 1 or #bit = 0 and column = 0.
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE column = 1 OR #bit = 0
If you have an index on column1, this one will be more efficient:
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE column = 1 AND #bit = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE #bit = 0
See this article in my blog for performance comparison of a single WHERE condition vs. UNION ALL:
IN with a comma separated list: SQL Server
where column BETWEEN #bit AND 1
select *
from MyTable
where (#bit = 0 OR MyColumn = 1)
select ...
from [table]
where #bit = 0 or (column = #bit)
I had come up with a different answer and felt dumb when seeing the consensus answer.
So, just for yucks, compared the two using my own database. I don't really know if they are really comparable, but my execution plans give a slight advantage to my goofy answer:
select *
from MyTable
where column <> case #bit when 1 then 0 else -1 end
I realize indices, table size, etc. can affect this.
Also, realized you probably can't compare a bit to a -1...
Just thought I'd share.
try this
select ...
from table
where column = case when #bit = 0 then 0 else column end
this works no matter what the datatype of column is (could even be a string, for example). If it were, of course, it would be a different default value (not 0)
WHERE column >= #bit
However, this only works for > 0 values in a numeric column. #bit will be implicitly cast to int, smallint etc because of data type precedence.