I'm doing some fairly complex queries against a remote linked server, and it would be useful to be able to store some information in temp tables and then perform joins against it - all with the remote data. Creating the temp tables locally and joining against them over the wire is prohibitively slow.
Is it possible to force the temp table to be created on the remote server? Assume I don't have sufficient privileges to create my own real (permanent) tables.
This works from SQL 2005 SP3 linked to SQL 2005 SP3 in my environment. However if you inspect the tempdb you will find that the table is actually on the local instance and not the remote instance. I have seen this as a resolution on other forums and wanted to steer you away from this.
create table SecondServer.#doll
(
name varchar(128)
)
GO
insert SecondServer.#Doll
select name from sys.objects where type = 'u'
select * from SecondServer.#Doll
I am 2 years late to the party but you can accomplish this using sp_executeSQL and feeding it a dynamic query to create the table remotely.
Exec RemoteServer.RemoteDatabase.RemoteSchema.SP_ExecuteSQL N'Create Table here'
This will execute the temp table creation at the remote location..
It's not possible to directly create temporary tables on a linked remote server. In fact you can't use any DDL against a linked server.
For more info on the guidelines and limitations of using linked servers see:
Guidelines for Using Distributed Queries (SQL 2008 Books Online)
One work around (and off the top of my head, and this would only work if you had permissions on the remote server) you could:
on the remote server have a stored procedure that would create a persistent table, with a name based on an IN parameter
the remote stored procedure would run a query then insert the results into this table
You then query locally against that table perform any joins to any local tables required
Call another stored procedure on the remote server to drop the remote table when you're done
Not ideal, but a possible work around.
Yes you can but it only lasts for the duration of the connection.
You need to use the EXECUTE AT syntax;
EXECUTE('SELECT * INTO ##example FROM sys.objects; WAITFOR DELAY ''00:01:00''') AT [SERVER2]
On SERVER2 the following will work (for 1 minute);
SELECT * FROM ##example
but it will not work on the local server.
Incidently if you open a transaction on the second server that uses ##example the object remains until the transaction is closed. It also stops the creating statement on the first server from completing. i.e. on server2 run and the transaction on server1 will continue indefinately.
BEGIN TRAN
SELECT * FROM ##example WITH (TABLOCKX)
This is more accademic than of practical use!
If memory is not much of an issue, you could also use table variables as an alternative to temporary tables. This worked for me when running a stored procedure with need of temporary data storage against a Linked Server.
More info: eg this comparison of table variables and temporary tables, including drawbacks of using table variables.
Related
I have a session created in my vb.net codes and running some SQL queries, there are some local temp tables like #T1, #T2 , ...
Execution process has some steps and I need to know which data changes in my local tables in each step.
Currently I use this to view the data in my code:
select * into ##T1 from #T1
I can't use sp_getbindtoken because there is no active transaction. I can not use DBCC because I don't have permission.
I can run sys.dm_exec_sessions view and therefor I have active session_id,
I also have connection Index of active sql connection
is there any way to connect to a active session and access local temp tables?
or is there any way to get those data of #T1, #T2,...?
EDIT1:
according to the comment which commented by #SeanLange
I have some temp tables as I said, and in the steps mentioned before I do some calculations on these temp tables, for tracing these calculations I need to know what happens in these steps, and I want to execute a simple select statement on these temp tables. what I wanted to do was connect to the active session created in my source code from an external project called Tracer, and perform select statements while my source is on the fly and meanwhile trace the data created in these session
You can't do it. Sorry. (at least without sa privileges).
Run your queries from within a stored procedure and add code to log whatever you need to a table, then query the log table as needed.
Execution process has some steps and I need to know which data changes in my local tables in each step.
If you have permission, you can create a trigger to do the logging for you
I am attempting to create one single database to store all login errors.
insert into [dbo].[SQL_ErrorLog]
exec sp_readerrorlog 0, 1, 'error'
The above code gets me the information that I need for the current long and I understand that changing the 0 to a 1,2....etc will get me the previous days logs.
I have 4 different environments and instead of setting this same job up on each environment, I would like to control it all from 1 single job. I intend to add a field to determine which environment the log information is coming from.
I know that I could also set up staging tables on each environment and then run a select statement to pull in data from each staging table to the final table, however again I am trying to complete all the work from one environment if possible.
I have linked the other environments using the linked servers and can select data from any of them without a problem.
My question is more related on how I can run the exec sp_readerror stored procedure on the other server and insert that data into my master table.
An example would be:
Env0 - This is where the master table would be and where I would like to set everything up
Env1
Env2
Env3
I would like to be able to pull sp_readerror 0, 1, 'error' information from Env1, Env2, and Env3 and populate it on Env0 without using staging tables on each individual environment if possible.
Please let me know if this is not 100% clear. It makes sense in my head, however that does not always come out in text form. :)
Thanks in Advance.
If you are using linked servers it seems like you could link together multiple calls using go from the main source server. This will work assuming your linked servers are linked off one server.
INSERT INTO [Linked Server Name]. [some database name].[dbo].[SQL_ErrorLog]
EXEC [Linked Server Name].[some database name].[dbo].sp_readerrorlog
GO
INSERT INTO [Linked Server Name2]. [some database name].[dbo].[SQL_ErrorLog]
EXEC [Linked Server Name2].[some database name].[dbo].sp_readerrorlog
GO
INSERT INTO [Linked Server Name3]. [some database name].[dbo].[SQL_ErrorLog]
EXEC [Linked Server Name3].[some database name].[dbo].sp_readerrorlog
GO
INSERT INTO [Linked Server Name4]. [some database name].[dbo].[SQL_ErrorLog]
EXEC [Linked Server Name4].[some database name].[dbo].sp_readerrorlog
I think this will be your best bet. You can use the agent and then put all of these into the agent job and run the job. They will need to be fully qualified in order to run on the correct linked server.
i created a linked Mysql server on SQL server 2008 r2. i'm trying to create a trigger on sql table that automatically updates a field in the linked server table, i have a table called "QFORCHOICE" in sql that has fields "Prodcode,prodname and avqty" and a table "que_for_choie" in mysql that has fields "procode,proname and avqty"
i want the trigger to update the value of "procode" in the linked server if the value of "prodcode" in sql server changes. this is what i have so far but it has errors,
create trigger [QFORCHOICE]
ON dbo.QFORCHOICE
FOR INSERT
AS
DECLARE #prodcode numeric(18,0)
DECLARE #prodname varchar(50)
DECLARE #avqty numeric(18,0)
BEGIN
SELECT
#procode = procode,
#proname = proname,
#avqty = avqty
FROM inserted
update [LINKED_MYSQL].[que_for_choice]
SET prodname=#prodname,avqty=#avqty
WHERE prodcode = #prodcode
end
can anybody please help.
thanks in advance
1- From within a trigger, you shouldn't attempt to access anything external to the current database. It will severely slow down any insert activity, and if there are any networking issues or the remote server is down for any reason, you'll then cause the original transaction to roll back. This is rarely the right thing to do
2- you're making the reliability of your system dependent on the reliability of two servers rather than one (say they both have 99% reliability - your system that ties them together with a trigger now has 98% overall reliability).
I have 2 SQL Servers:
temp1 XX.13.23.2
temp2 XX.23.45.6
The temp1 server has a database called db1 and contains a procedure called p1.
I want that procedure to insert the value on Temp2 server Database name db2 on table T1.
Is it possible to use procedure to insert value on another server's database?
If this is this possible then can someone provide me with an idea or some examples on how to achieve this?
Yes, please look into linked servers:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188279%28SQL.90%29.aspx
You can call a remote stored procedure from the instance you want to insert to:
exec [RemoteServer].DatabaseName.DatabaseOwner.StoredProcedureName
You need to have the RemoteServer set up as a linked server.
Another option, especially if you're going to have a development version of the procedure where you're going to want to do tests and you don't want touching a production environment, would be to use SQL Server synonyms: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177544.aspx.
I personally like using them because once the proc is initially setup to use them, you won't have to change the SQL in the procedure.
Our organization has a lot of its essential data in a mainframe Adabas database. We have ODBC access to this data and from C# have queried/updated it successfully using ODBC/Natural "stored procedures".
What we'd like to be able to do now is to query a mainframe table from within SQL Server 2005 stored procs, dump the results into a table variable, massage it, and join the result with native SQL data as a result set.
The execution of the Natural proc from SQL works fine when we're just selecting it; however, when we insert the result into a table variable SQL seems to be starting a distributed transaction that in turn seems to be wreaking havoc with our connections.
Given that we're not performing updates, is it possible to turn off this DTC-escalation behavior?
Any tips on getting DTC set up properly to talk to DataDirect's (formerly Neon Systems) Shadow ODBC driver?
Check out SET REMOTE_PROC_TRANSACTIONS OFF which should disable it.
Or sp_serveroption to configure the linked server generally, not per batch.
Because you are writing on the MS SQL side, you start a transaction.
By default, it escalates whether it needs to or not.
Even though the table variable does not particapate in the transaction.
I've had similar issues before where the MS SQL side behaves differently based on if MS SQL writes, in a stored proc and other stuff. The most reliable way I found was to use dynamic SQL calls to my Sybase linked server...
The following code sets the "Enable Promotion of Distributed Transactions" for linked servers:
USE [master]
GO
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption #server=N'REMOTE_SERVER', #optname=N'remote proc transaction promotion', #optvalue=N'false'
GO
This will allow you to insert the results of a linked server stored procedure call into a table variable.
I'm not sure about DTC, but DTSX (Integration Services) may be useful for moving the data. However, if you can simply query the data, you may want to look at adding a linked server for direct access. You could then just write a simple query to populate your table based on a select from the linked server's table.
That's true. As you might guess, the Natural procedures we want to call do lookups and calculations that we'd like to keep at that level if possible.