Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Hi I have recently set up an amazon s3 account for a personal project.
I have successfully uploaded some image(jpg) files and have set the ACL for the bucket to public however when trying to view a file via the browser, the following xml is returned instead of the jpg.
<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>
<RequestId>77293A7937279B15</RequestId>
−
<HostId>
cQ3FXKg7ZU4z80QqUGMBheG0FRrFJP4HQx1pCy6UTFDk4pbjR8oYuCa1BmS6jnpe
</HostId>
</Error>
Am I missing something here? Do I need to set up a distribution, or should I be able to access the files regardless?
Any hints much appreciated.
You need to set the ACP of the resource (object) to anonymous ("public"), as well.
Note that this is not a programming question. If you need S3 support, check out the Amazon S3 forum.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
On my remote server A, I have a bunch of .py files.
I drag those files to a Windows machine, B, via WinSCP.
I work on these files on the Windows machine and want to import them back to server A via WinSCP.
When I try that, it says "cannot overwrite".
Obviously it's a permissions issue. I am not sure how much permission I need to give in order to have the overwrite access.
Currently, I have -r--r--r-- on these files for reading.
I am guessing I need write access? Or do I need execute access as well?
Will chmod 755 * be sufficient? I want to be careful with permissions so I am asking on here.
That depends on what users are owner of the files and the one you connect with SCP.
If they are the same, then '-rw-r--r--' should be enough.
If they are on the same group then -rw-rw-r--
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I was wondering how you could make tomcat show the files in a directory when an index.html is not in the root directory? Currently it gives me an error page.
description The requested resource
(/Tutorials/ios/exercise-files/Ex_Files_iOS4_Web_Apps/Ch02/) is not available.
Open Tomcat's own /conf/web.xml file (or the one in Servers project if you're using Eclipse), find the <servlet> entry of the DefaultServlet and change the listings initialization parameter from false to true.
<init-param>
<param-name>listings</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</init-param>
See also:
Tomcat 7.0 documentation - the default servlet
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I know that amazon-S3 supports BitTorrent and that we can download files using a torrent client. My question is,
Is it possible to upload files from my pc to s3 via torrent, either directly or using ec2 ?
Note:
I have a website where users upload large size video files which are stored in S3. It would be helpful if they could just upload a torrent file so that they can seed whenever they want and also have multiple seeders for the same file which decreases their upload time...
You'll have to install a BitTorrent client on EC2 (or on your own system), download the torrent file, and upload it to S3. S3 does not natively support fetching BitTorrent files from other sources and storing them in a bucket.
you can set a PUBLIC s3 file as downloadable by torrent if you add ?torrent at the end of the url.
For example, I just now uploaded following file:
http://mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com/Install/hexagon4.png
if you set the link to
http://mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com/Install/hexagon4.png?torrent
it will be downloaded as torrent.
I don't know if this is possible to do for closed files
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a 7GB file I need to download and store in a S3 bucket.
Can I transload it directly to S3 without having to download it to my computer?
AFAIK this is not possible. Here's another to confirm this: Is it possible to upload to S3 by just providing a URL?
You can make it appear that your files are using a different server to be accessed from or uploaded by playing with the CNAME record though: Using amazon s3, upload files using their servers but URL should appear to be from mine
But I don't think this is what you want.
You could however download the file to one of Amazon's EC2 servers and upload from there to S3.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have some video files stored on S3, and I want to get video information on them using ffmpeg. However, when I do a command such as :
$ ffmpeg -i 'http://test.s2.amazonaws.com/video.mov
I get a HTTP error 403 Forbidden response. How would I do this command? I also want to make sure not anyone can execute stuff on these files. Thank you.
Update: I was able to do this after making the ACL public-read=everyone for the video, didn't need to use s3fs after all.
You have two options:
You can download the file and run ffmpeg on localfile,
or you can use s3fs to mount your s3 bucket as a filesystem.