Opening an MS-Cash Drawer, Wrong Code? Bad Code? - vb.net

Humbling expierence here and I think this one will make a fool of me, but...I'm trying to convert an ancient cash register program to .net. Conquered everything else, but I can't pop open the cash register. Its connected to COM1, you are supposed to send a "trigger" text down COM1 that will cause the register to open.
Here is the .net code.
MsgBox("Opening Drawer")
Dim port As System.IO.Ports.SerialPort
port = New System.IO.Ports.SerialPort("Com1")
port.PortName = "COM1"
port.BaudRate = 9600
port.Parity = IO.Ports.Parity.None
port.DataBits = 8
port.StopBits = IO.Ports.StopBits.One
'port.Handshake = IO.Ports.Handshake.RequestToSend
port.RtsEnable = True
'port.DtrEnable = True
port.Open()
If port.IsOpen Then
'MsgBox("Attempt 1")
port.Write("####################")
MsgBox("Signal Sent: " & Chr(65))
Else
MsgBox("Port is not open")
End If
port.Close()
MsgBox("Pop, durn it!")
I get msgboxes "Signal Sent", "Done Pop Drawer"
Dang thing, just won't pop. It's an MS-Cash Drawer (EP125KC). Definitely connected to COM1, definitely has power. Chr(65) is the old code used to pop drawer and it works:
Open drawerComPort For Output Access Write As #1
Print #1, Chr$(65); "A";
Close #1
NOTE: The above code worked successfully. The root problem was caused by a reveresed power cord (negative was on the wrong side).
Thanks for all the help guys!

You've set your handshake to None but the cash drawer probably has its own idea. Also set DtrEnable to True. Chr(65) is the ASCII code for an "A", your VB code suggests the real command is "AA".
The manual documents that the cash drawer auto-tunes its baudrate. It recommends sending at least 20 # characters. And that the real command is Ctrl+G (Chr(7)). The "AA" command might have worked previously due to a baudrate mismatch. Perhaps.

If I remember my very rusty BASIC.
Print #1, Chr$(65); "A";
means print to port1 the character 65 followed by the string "A", Now the character 65 is 'A', so this looks to me like you should be sending "AA" to port1
port.Write("AA");
or alternately,
port.Write(new byte[]{65,'A'}, 0, 2);

It might be sending Unicode 65, which would be 0065, which would not end well.
Just a thought, can you try sending a raw int?

I dont use .net, but is the port buffered? do you need to send a flush/fflush()?

Are you sure you're supposed to send out this code? I would have always thought that the code is prefixed by ESC i.e. 0x1b hexadecimal...for cash drawers...
"\x1bA"
Interesting that double 'A' is used...oh well... :)
Edit: After thinking about this I realized there is another way of doing it, read on...
I have modified your original BASIC code with a bit of bullet-proofing...save it to opendrawer.bas
Sub OpenDrawer()
drawerComPort = "COM1"
Open drawerComPort For Output Access Write As #1
REM ADDED ERROR HANDLING
ON ERROR GOTO ErrHandler
Print #1, Chr$(65); "A";
Close #1
print "Drawer Ok"
OpenDrawer_Exit:
On Error Goto 0
Exit Sub
ErrHandler:
print "Oops, Write Failed"
Goto OpenDrawer_Exit
End Sub
REM The Main....
OpenDrawer
Download the old QB4.5 MS-Quick Basic compiler, and compile that to an executable, into opendrawer.exe, the QB4.5 can be found here. Now, the onus is on you to make this bulletproof, i.e. what happens if writing to COM1 fails, issue a message like in the example BASIC code I modified
Then you can use the System.Diagnostics.Process to shell out using a hidden window
public class TestDrawer
{
private StringBuilder sbRedirectedOutput = new StringBuilder();
public string OutputData
{
get { return this.sbRedirectedOutput.ToString(); }
}
public void Run()
{
System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo ps = new System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo();
ps.FileName = "opendrawer";
ps.ErrorDialog = false;
ps.CreateNoWindow = true;
ps.UseShellExecute = false;
ps.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
ps.WindowStyle = System.Diagnostics.ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden;
using (System.Diagnostics.Process proc = new System.Diagnostics.Process())
{
proc.StartInfo = ps;
proc.Exited += new EventHandler(proc_Exited);
proc.OutputDataReceived += new System.Diagnostics.DataReceivedEventHandler(proc_OutputDataReceived);
proc.Start();
proc.WaitForExit();
proc.BeginOutputReadLine();
while (!proc.HasExited) ;
}
}
void proc_Exited(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("proc_Exited: Process Ended");
if (this.sbRedirectedOutput.ToString().IndexOf("Oops, write failed") > -1){
MessageBox.Show(this, "Error in opening Cash Drawer");
}
if (this.sbRedirectedOutput.ToString().IndexOf("Drawer Ok") > -1){
MessageBox.Show(this, "Drawer Ok");
}
}
void proc_OutputDataReceived(object sender, System.Diagnostics.DataReceivedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Data != null) this.sbRedirectedOutput.Append(e.Data + Environment.NewLine);
//System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("proc_OutputDataReceived: Data: " + e.Data);
}
The process shells out to a hidden window and all output is redirected and handled in the event handler...that should do the trick. Notice, how the redirected output goes into the sbRedirectedOutput (a StringBuilder instance). In the proc_ProcExited event handler, it checks the sbRedirectedOutput for the message 'Oops Write failed' which would be issued from the QB4.5 program.
Be aware, that you may need to include the QB4.5's run-time library in the same directory...not 100% sure...it's being years...
What do you think?
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
Tom.

Related

Error - Unexpected } at the end of While Loop

I'm using while true loop to constantly check run this script. After adding the if expression with whitelist ahk gives an error about unexpected } at the end of code. As far as I know there should be }.
Using Loop command gives the same error.
Removing the problematic } at the end causes the code running in background but not doing anything.
;Setup
Sleep, 1000
whiteList = "none"
;Main Loop
While True
{
siteName = YouTube
WinGetActiveTitle, tabName
Sleep, 10000
if tabName = %whiteList%{
Continue
}
;If current website is Youtube, ask if am I supposted to be here
if InStr(tabName, siteName){
Sleep, 10000
MsgBox, 292, Reality Check, Should you do this?
IfMsgBox, Yes
{
whiteList = tabName
}
;Close tab in mozilla
else
{
WinActivate, %tabName%
Sleep, 10
Send ^w
}
}
}
Code is unfinished, It should run in background and when the user is using YouTube fore some time it should ask him whether is he supposted to watch Youtube.
If he clicks yes, the program should ignore that specific page.
Else it should close it.
The % around the whiteList-var shouldn't be there. When I wrote it like below it seems to work:
if tabName = whiteList
Continue
Also the whiteList = tabName will just assign the string "tabName" to whiteList. Use whiteList := tabName for assigning, and if var1 = var2 for comparison.

Editor.GetEntity does not wait for user input (click)

I have two dwg files: PID.dwg & 3D.dwg
The use case is to run a function on PID.dwg and then on 3D.dwg -- particularly in this order.
The commands used in SendCommand below are from a separate DLL file that I load using NETLOAD prior to this function's execution.
Dim app As AcadApplication = CType(Application.AcadApplication, AcadApplication)
' Ctype( Autodesk.AutoCAD.ApplicationServices.Application.AcadApplication,
' Autodesk.AutoCAD.Interop.AcadApplication )
If isPidAnd3dOpened() Then
' Activate PID document
app.ActiveDocument = acDocPid
'acDocPid.Activate()
acDocPid.SendCommand("DOSOMETHINGONPID" & vbCrLf)
' Activate 3D document
app.ActiveDocument = acDoc3d
'acDoc3d.Activate()
acDoc3d.SendCommand("DOSOMETHINGON3D" & vbCrLf)
End If
The function of "DOSOMETINGON3D" requires and input from the user using Editor.GetEntity.
However, when acDoc3d.SendCommand("DOSOMETHINGON3D" & vbCrLf) is executed, it does not pause to wait for user input.
What am I missing?
Probably You have to wait until the command DOSOMETHINGONPID is finished.
In ARX it would be something like this:
CString activeCMDName = _T("DOSOMETHINGONPID");
bool EOL = false;
while (!EOL)
{
CString cmds = Variable::Get(_T("CMDNAMES") );
if (cmds.Find( activeCMDName ) > 0 ) {
Command::Wait();
}
else {
EOL = true;
}
}
where
CString Variable::Get( CString name )
{
CString OutVal;
resbuf rb ;
acedGetVar(name, &rb);
OutVal.SetString(rb.resval.rstring);
acutDelString(rb.resval.rstring);
return OutVal ;
}
void Command::Wait()
{
ResBuf rb;
rb.Add(RTSTR , _T("\\"));
int ret = acedCmd(rb.GetFirst());
}
Sorry, I don't have this code in .net. Hope You will handle this.
First answer is correct, SendCommand cannot handle asynchronous commands. Here is a suggested solution in .Net:
//Create AutoCAD instance, then...
acadApp.ActiveDocument.SendCommand("(command \"NETLOAD\""+#"""C:\\acad\\networkdll\\SecondAssembly.dll"") ");
acadApp.ActiveDocument.SendCommand("#MYCOMMAND 0 ");
//Register EndCommand handler.
_DAcadApplicationEvents_EndCommandEventHandler handler = new
_DAcadApplicationEvents_EndCommandEventHandler(CommandEnded);
acadApp.EndCommand += handler;
waitHandle = new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.ManualReset);
waitHandle.WaitOne();
acadApp.EndCommand -= handler;
//Close the startup drawing (this requires waiting # SendCommand) because
//Drawing will cause a COMException otherwise. 'Drawing is busy'
//Mostly likely since the ActiceDocument is the startup drawing.
Event Handler:
public void CommandEnded(string globalCommandName)
{
System.Windows.MessageBox.Show(globalCommandName + " just ended.");
waitHandle.Set();
}

php-smpp Library not working and fails after two to three SMS

it is very first time i'm messing with sockets , and read many quotes that this is not for newbies.
so problem is i'm using php smpp library for sending SMS which works fine but after delivering two to three SMS delivery fails with following warning
Warning: stream_socket_sendto() [function.stream-socket-sendto]: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host', and to make it work again i need to restart` apache.
Following is write function which throwing exception
public function write($buf) {
$null = null;
$write = array($this->handle_);
// keep writing until all the data has been written
while (strlen($buf) > 0) {
// wait for stream to become available for writing
$writable = #stream_select($null, $write, $null, $this->sendTimeoutSec_, $this->sendTimeoutUsec_);
if ($writable > 0) {
// write buffer to stream
$written = stream_socket_sendto($this->handle_, $buf);
if ($written === -1 || $written === false) {
throw new TTransportException('TSocket: Could not write '.$written.' bytes '.
$this->host_.':'.$this->port_);
}
// determine how much of the buffer is left to write
$buf = substr($buf, $written);
} else if ($writable === 0) {
throw new TTransportException('TSocket: timed out writing '.strlen($buf).' bytes from '.
$this->host_.':'.$this->port_);
} else {
throw new TTransportException('TSocket: Could not write '.strlen($buf).' bytes '.
$this->host_.':'.$this->port_);
}
}
}
Please anyone can put some light
It was the bug which i won't able to identify/ rectify. then i used an other library from http://www.codeforge.com/read/171085/smpp.php__html and it really saved me.

Lua script - Coding a scenario

Situation :
There are two sensors and I want to save the data of values of each sensor in the certain file..But it's not working. I am working on linux system and the file is still empty.
What's wrong with my code? any suggestion please?
my code is:
--Header file
require("TIMER")
require("TIMESTAMP")
require("ANALOG_IN")
function OnExit()
print("Exit code...do something")
end
function main()
timer = "TIMER"
local analogsensor_1 = "AIR_1"
local analogsensor_2 = "AIR_2"
local timestr = os.data("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
-- open the file for writing binary data
local filehandle = io.open("collection_of_data.txt", "a")
while true do
valueOfSensor_1 = ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn(analogsensor_1);
valueOfSensor_2 = ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn(analogsensor_2);
if (valueOfSensor_1 > 0 and valueOfSensor_2 > 0) then
-- save values of sensors
filehandle:write(timestr, " -The Value of the Sensors: ", tostring(valueOfSensor_1), tostring(valueOfSensor_2)"\n");
end
TIMER.sleep(timer,500)
end
-- close the file
filehandle:close()
end
print("start main")
main()
I do not know what this libs realy do.
But this code is incorrect;
1) you do not close while statement.
if in real code you close it before filehandle:close() then try call filehandle:flush()
2) you forgot comma:
filehandle:write(timestr, " -The Value of the Sensors: ", tostring(valueOfSensor_1), tostring(valueOfSensor_2)"\n")
(it should seay something like attemt call a number value).
3) try print out valueOfSensor_1 and valueOfSensor_2 values. May be there no data.
Beside the typos pointed out by #moteus, shouldn't this:
if (valueOfSensor_1 and valueOfSensor_2 > 0) then
be like this?
if (valueOfSensor_1 > 0 and valueOfSensor_2 > 0) then
Edit, in response to your comment to another answer:
still error..it says "attempt to call field 'data' (a nil value)
I can't be sure without the stack trace, but, most likely, something bad happens in the ANALOG_IN library code. You may not be using it properly.
try to turn this:
valueOfSensor_1 = ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn(analogsensor_1);
valueOfSensor_2 = ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn(analogsensor_2);
into this:
success, valueOfSensor_1 = pcall(ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn, analogsensor_1);
if not success then
print("Warning: error reading the value of sensor 1:\n"..valueOfSensor_1)
valueOfSensor_1 = 0
end
success, valueOfSensor_2 = pcall(ANALOG_IN.readAnalogIn, analogsensor_2);
if not success then
print("Warning: error reading the value of sensor 2:\n"..valueOfSensor_2)
valueOfSensor_2 = 0
end
If the failure in ANALOG_IN is not systematic, it will work around it. If the call fails systematically, you'll get a huge warning log, and an empty collection_of_data.txt.
Please note that ANALOG_IN is not a standard Lua library. You should check its documentation , and pay attention to the details of its usage.

Using Rx to Geocode an address in Bing Maps

I am learning to use the Rx extensions for a Silverlight 4 app I am working on. I created a sample app to nail down the process and I cannot get it to return anything.
Here is the main code:
private IObservable<Location> GetGPSCoordinates(string Address1)
{
var gsc = new GeocodeServiceClient("BasicHttpBinding_IGeocodeService") as IGeocodeService;
Location returnLocation = new Location();
GeocodeResponse gcResp = new GeocodeResponse();
GeocodeRequest gcr = new GeocodeRequest();
gcr.Credentials = new Credentials();
gcr.Credentials.ApplicationId = APP_ID2;
gcr.Query = Address1;
var myFunc = Observable.FromAsyncPattern<GeocodeRequest, GeocodeResponse>(gsc.BeginGeocode, gsc.EndGeocode);
gcResp = myFunc(gcr) as GeocodeResponse;
if (gcResp.Results.Count > 0 && gcResp.Results[0].Locations.Count > 0)
{
returnLocation = gcResp.Results[0].Locations[0];
}
return returnLocation as IObservable<Location>;
}
gcResp comes back as null. Any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
The observable source you are subscribing to is asynchronous, so you can't access the result immediately after subscribing. You need to access the result in the subscription.
Better yet, don't subscribe at all and simply compose the response:
private IObservable<Location> GetGPSCoordinates(string Address1)
{
IGeocodeService gsc =
new GeocodeServiceClient("BasicHttpBinding_IGeocodeService");
Location returnLocation = new Location();
GeocodeResponse gcResp = new GeocodeResponse();
GeocodeRequest gcr = new GeocodeRequest();
gcr.Credentials = new Credentials();
gcr.Credentials.ApplicationId = APP_ID2;
gcr.Query = Address1;
var factory = Observable.FromAsyncPattern<GeocodeRequest, GeocodeResponse>(
gsc.BeginGeocode, gsc.EndGeocode);
return factory(gcr)
.Where(response => response.Results.Count > 0 &&
response.Results[0].Locations.Count > 0)
.Select(response => response.Results[0].Locations[0]);
}
If you only need the first valid value (the location of the address is unlikely to change), then add a .Take(1) between the Where and Select.
Edit: If you want to specifically handle the address not being found, you can either return results and have the consumer deal with it or you can return an Exception and provide an OnError handler when subscribing. If you're thinking of doing the latter, you would use SelectMany:
return factory(gcr)
.SelectMany(response => (response.Results.Count > 0 &&
response.Results[0].Locations.Count > 0)
? Observable.Return(response.Results[0].Locations[0])
: Observable.Throw<Location>(new AddressNotFoundException())
);
If you expand out the type of myFunc you'll see that it is Func<GeocodeRequest, IObservable<GeocodeResponse>>.
Func<GeocodeRequest, IObservable<GeocodeResponse>> myFunc =
Observable.FromAsyncPattern<GeocodeRequest, GeocodeResponse>
(gsc.BeginGeocode, gsc.EndGeocode);
So when you call myFunc(gcr) you have an IObservable<GeocodeResponse> and not a GeocodeResponse. Your code myFunc(gcr) as GeocodeResponse returns null because the cast is invalid.
What you need to do is either get the last value of the observable or just do a subscribe. Calling .Last() will block. If you call .Subscribe(...) your response will come thru on the call back thread.
Try this:
gcResp = myFunc(gcr).Last();
Let me know how you go.
Richard (and others),
So I have the code returning the location and I have the calling code subscribing. Here is (hopefully) the final issue. When I call GetGPSCoordinates, the next statement gets executed immediately without waiting for the subscribe to finish. Here's an example in a button OnClick event handler.
Location newLoc = new Location();
GetGPSCoordinates(this.Input.Text).ObserveOnDispatcher().Subscribe(x =>
{
if (x.Results.Count > 0 && x.Results[0].Locations.Count > 0)
{
newLoc = x.Results[0].Locations[0];
Output.Text = "Latitude: " + newLoc.Latitude.ToString() +
", Longtude: " + newLoc.Longitude.ToString();
}
else
{
Output.Text = "Invalid address";
}
});
Output.Text = " Outside of subscribe --- Latitude: " + newLoc.Latitude.ToString() +
", Longtude: " + newLoc.Longitude.ToString();
The Output.Text assignment that takes place outside of Subscribe executes before the Subscribe has finished and displays zeros and then the one inside the subscribe displays the new location info.
The purpose of this process is to get location info that will then be saved in a database record and I am processing multiple addresses sequentially in a Foreach loop. I chose Rx Extensions as a solution to avoid the problem of the async callback as a coding trap. But it seems I have exchanged one trap for another.
Thoughts, comments, suggestions?