VB.NET / VSTO2008 fails; can't find runtime - vb.net

I'm trying to deploy a VB.NET app which is an extension to Excel using VSTO. It works fine in the development environment, but when someone else (without a dev environment installed, just the .NET framework) installs it, they get:
The common language runtime could not be loaded by <application>. Contact your administrator for further assistance.
Google pops up the microsoft help page for this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/6s0wczt9.aspx
But I've verified that the .NET versions are the same on both machines. For VSTO apps in 2k5 there was a specific vsto runtime library users needed to install -- is there something similar for VS2008 that I haven't found yet? Any ideas besides that?
Thanks in advance!

For VSTO apps built with Visual Studio 2008, The VSTO version 3.0 Runtime is required.
Here is the download page: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=54eb3a5a-0e52-40f9-a2d1-eecd7a092dcb&DisplayLang=en

Make sure they have the correct version of the .NET framework. If they have .NET 1.1 (or even 2.0) installed, and you're targetting the 3.5 framework, you can get this error message.

We had the same problem. It's all to do with security policy.
There are issues with the security policy for your DLL's when running VSTO projects.
Namely you need to grant 'full trust' to your assemblies. What this means you have to A) sign your projects with a key, and B) register your assemblies as having full trust during deployment (which can be done easily with CASPOL.exe: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cb6t8dtz.aspx)
Its very easy to do. Alternatively you can roll your own security-setting assembly which you integrate into your msi (thats what we did)
Check out this MSDN Article for the full details:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zdc263t0.aspx

Install VSTO runtime 3.0
Then update it to VSTO 3.0 SP1
also install VSTO_PTExtLibs.exe (PIA extension libs for runtime) if you are referencing these in your project.

Related

VB.NET application compiled to target 4.6.1 framework does't run successfully on Computer with only 4.8 .Net framewor

I intend to build simple Winform application just to allow user to automate their file creation and store the last filled form in a file to keep it for next run.
thus, I'm not interested in creating installer for this simple Winform application. I expected to only compile it to .exe and let it run on other computers.
I develop the application using VS2019 community with target .net 4.6.1
It won't run on computer with Windows 10 with only .net framework 4.8
We are not able to install framework 4.6.1 since it says an earlier version of .net framework is already installed.
Should I recompile my application with target .net framework 4.8?
Can't I compile my application to run on any computer which at least has 4.6.1 or newer? without installer.
(I don't really understand the .net framework backward compatibility truly mean)
my application uses:
library of user32.dll for SetForegroundWindow function
to create .ini file
Finally it works. Even compiled to target .NET 4.6.1 still work on .NET 4.8 computer actually.
The issue is because my application is targeting to another application using interope COM interface, while the license is not sufficient for the user to allow COM interface.
we notice it when we finally create a pure simple windows form, then step-by-step compiling while adding each feature.
Sorry Every Body for this silly case. And my special apologize to evry1falls for spending your time.
I'm thinking to change this Question or delete it. because it is not the issue at all
The Actual Issue is:
I created Windows Form Application starting from a blank Project. And I don't know that the .NET Unhandled Exception is not activated by default.
When created from Windows Form Project Template, the Unhandled Exception message shown.
I created another Question about it: Here

ASP.NET Core with .NET 4.6.2 and VS 2017 RC

Using Visual Studio 2017 (RC), I am trying to setup a project that uses ASP.NET Core, but with the .NET 4.6.2 library.
This is a supported configuration:
Visual Studio will then create a default project; but it doesn't run:
This is without changing a single line in the project: the VC2017 template just does not work.
I tried the following:
- Different versions of the .NET framework
- x86, x64, AnyCPU
- Clear the NuGet cache
- 'Repair' options on Visual Studio's installer.
My understanding is that the error is a x86/x64 mismatch. But since I didn't change a single file from the template, there has to be something else wrong.
Installing ASP.NET Core on .NET Core works perfectly, so the problem is limited to using the regular .NET framework.
Any ideas?
I have the same problem too. But I just found the solution.
In ".csproj" I change some things:
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net462</TargetFramework>
<!--<RuntimeIdentifier>win7-x86</RuntimeIdentifier>-->
<RuntimeIdentifier>win10-x64</RuntimeIdentifier></PropertyGroup>
And I enable the 64-bit version of IIS Express.
I had problems like these when I restored stuff to a new laptop.
I mindlessly I copied files from my old profile directory to a directory with the same name, but that isn’t a profile directory on the new machine.
A part of this process involved a cloud backup service that my wife bought for me but that I never actually set up right. That also copied files to new locations without my paying attention to what was happening.
I still don’t know (yet) exactly how the machine keeps track of which versions of frameworks and tools to use in the various application directories, but I can report what I did that finally allowed me to create new .NET Core apps on the new machine.
I deleted everything in this directory that was older than today.
%USERPROFILE%.nuget\packages
Again, pretty mindless. I don’t know, (yet) if all that was necessary. Maybe just deleting one or two of the files/directories would have worked. Regardless, I was very happy to see that I could create and develop .NET Core apps on my new machine.

Unable to resolve assemblies that use Portable Class Libraries

I'm having a problem with assembly resolution on an end-user machine and I believe it's related to using Portable Class Libraries....
I have a .NET 4.0 application that was originally written in Visual Studio 2010. Recently we upgraded to Visual Studio 2012 and we've created a few projects that are Portable Class Libraries. I don't believe we need these features now, but we're also building a Windows 8 Store application that might benefit from these libraries.
When I compile my project, what exactly does the portable library feature do? I expect that it allows me to run it on different frameworks without modification or recompiling.
When I look at the library in reflector dotPeek it shows the Platform attribute as:
.NETPortable,Version=v4.0,Profile=Profile5
And the references seem 2.0-ish:
mscorlib, Version=2.0.5.0
System, Version=2.0.5.0
System.Runtime.Serialization, Version=2.0.5.0
When I run the application on this end-user's machine, I see an error in the log file:
Could not load file or assembly, 'System.Core, Version=2.0.5.0...'
Googling System.Core 2.0.5.0 seems to refer to SilverLight -- which appears to be one of the targeted frameworks.
This machine does not have Visual Studio installed, but has .NET 4.0 (4.0.3 update)
Is there something I should be doing differently to compile, something I should investigate in my dependencies or something I should be looking to install on the end-user machine? What does the 2.0.5.0 refer to?
For .NET 4, you need an update (KB2468871) for Portable Class Libraries to work. From the KB Article:
Feature 5
Changes to the support portable libraries. These changes include API
updates and binder modifications. This update enables the CLR to bind
successfully to portable libraries so that a single DLL can run on the
.NET Framework 4, on Silverlight, on Xbox, or on the Windows Phone.
This update adds public Silverlight APIs to the .NET Framework 4 in
the same location. The API signatures will remain consistent across
the platform. All modifications are 100 percent compatible and will
not break any existing code.
Also see the "Deploying A .NET Framework App" section of the MSDN Portable Class Library Documentation.
EDIT: Actually, if the machine has .NET 4.0.3 installed as you mention, that should be sufficient. Can you double-check to make sure that it is actually installed?

VSIS installer for outlook plug in using VSTO 4.0, Download VSTO 4.0 x86 and x64

I am building a outlook plugin, for the installer, I decided to use NSIS install script. I have place a check for .Net 4.0 and I am able to download and install .Net Framework 4.0. But, I need some guidance regarding downloading and installing VSTO 4.0 runtime if not present on the client machine.
Basically runtimes that can be downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=20479
I could always check for the presence of VSTO and detect OS and then using hard coded download location which is
for x64
http://download.microsoft.com/download/F/3/9/F395E3C2-28A0-4F0D-9E20-FF4D1ADB08D8/vstor40_x64.exe
and
for x86
http://download.microsoft.com/download/F/3/9/F395E3C2-28A0-4F0D-9E20-FF4D1ADB08D8/vstor40_x86.exe
Download and run the installer.
But, is there any better way of doing this.
Try this, it might help: Microsoft Office 2010 Primary Interop Assemblies Bootstrapper Package 1.0 2010-9-7.

How to make vb.net apps portable?

Is it possible to make an vb.net application portable?
It is portable - build your .exe and copy it on your flash drive. Assuming it will be run where there is .net framework, there is no problem!
EDIT: A similar topic here: Writing USB Drive Portable Applications in C#
"portable" has more than one meaning, but if you mean a program that could also run on linux or mac than you need to think mono. Specifically, look at their migration analyzer.
Depends on what you mean by "portable". Certainly, you can build them without external dependencies on things like config files, registry settings, etc. You'll still need the .NET runtime installed on the target computer, though.
I seem to recall that you can use vb.net to write Silverlight apps; once compiled, this should be fairly portable (onto all Silverlight / Moonlight enabled browsers).
Of course, if you talk about web apps, the client (html) should already be portable, regardless of the server.
Whether it's a desktop application or a web application, the .Net framework needs to be installed on the machine that the app is run on. Generally, the .Net framework is installed with Windows.
It has to be the same version of the .Net framework as the app was developed in (1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, 3.5). Which version of the framework is installed depends on the version of Windows.
Just a thought!
Maybe you can make your app executable the normal way (with setup) and then make it into a portable application online using service described at
http://www.abtevrythng.com/2011/12/make-portable-applications-online-for.html#ixzz1flSBi6dZ
You can try to use the online portable app "converter" Cameyo to do it. Just install the Cameyo app, launch it, then install the application you made.
You must use VS 2015. Make all your reference dll's to be local copied. Build your solution (with no deploy file extension (publish-> options->deployment))and merge the exe file with your dll with ilmerge ( http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=17630 ) (download ILmerge-GUI too) from the Microsoft web site. And have good luck