Naive question with the answer "No" , I believe, but still would like to ask.
Table_parent
pk_parent_surrogate
parent_natural_unique_key
Table_child
pk_child_surrogate
child_natural_NOT_unique
Is that true that the only possible declarative relationship among main database vendors is
pk_parent_surrogate ----------< pk_child_surrogate
and we can't have declarative constraint or foreign key in other words for pair
parent_natural_unique_key -------< child_natural_NOT_unique
My answer here is based on my MS SQL knowledge - although I believe the same answer is correct for ANSI standards as well, i'm not 100% sure...
YES - you CAN do this as long as you've got a unique constraint on the column in your parent table that you want to use as the anchor column for the key.
You can create a FOREIGN KEY constraint as part
of the table definition when you create a table.
If a table already exists, you can add a
FOREIGN KEY constraint, provided that the
FOREIGN KEY constraint is linked to an existing
PRIMARY KEY constraints or UNIQUE constraint in
another, or the same, table. A table can contain
multiple FOREIGN KEY constraints.
And as an example of this sort of key...
use tempdb
CREATE TABLE parent(
pk int identity primary key,
candidate_key int unique not null)
CREATE TABLE child(
pk int identity primary key,
join_key int references parent(candidate_key))
See here for more information.
Try code like this:
create table testunique (id int identity(1,1) primary key, otherid int)
go
create unique index ixOther on testunique(otherid)
go
create table testFK (id int identity(1,1) primary key, someid int)
go
alter table testFK add constraint fkTest foreign key (someid) references testunique(otherid)
Rob
Related
this is probably a simple question but I am quite new to SQL and databases, so I have been following this site: https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/postgresql-foreign-key/ to try and create a table that consist of primary keys from other tables.
Here I have the structure of the database in an excel overview. With colors showing the relations. i am having problems with the One-To-Many tables. As I get the same error every time "ERROR: column "id" referenced in foreign key constraint does not exist
SQL state: 42703".
The SQL query:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS ingredient_to_unit_relations;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS ingrediens;
CREATE TABLE ingrediens (
id serial,
name_of_ingredient varchar(255),
price_per_unit int,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
CREATE TABLE ingredient_to_unit_relations (
ingredient_relation_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY,
PRIMARY KEY (ingredient_relation_id),
constraint Fk_ingredient_id
FOREIGN KEY (id)
REFERENCES ingrediens (id)
);
You need to define the column in order to declare it as a foreign key:
CREATE TABLE ingredient_to_unit_relations (
ingredient_relation_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY,
ingredient_id int,
PRIMARY KEY (ingredient_relation_id),
constraint Fk_ingredient_id FOREIGN KEY (ingredient_id) REFERENCES ingrediens (id)
);
I might recommend some somewhat different naming conventions (I changed the name id in the table above):
CREATE TABLE ingredients (
ingredient_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
name varchar(255),
price_per_unit int
);
CREATE TABLE ingredient_to_unit_relations (
ingredient_relation_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
ingredient_id int,
CONSTRAINT Fk_ingredient_id FOREIGN KEY (ingredient_id) REFERENCES ingredients (ingredient_id)
);
Notes:
I am a fan of naming primary keys after the table they are in. That way, foreign keys and primary keys usually have the same name (and you can use using if you choose).
Avoid SERIAL. GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY is now recommended.
You can inline primary key constraints (as well as other constraints).
There is not generally a need to repeat the table name in a column (other than the primary key). So, name instead of name_of_ingredient.
Using int for a monetary column is suspicious. It doesn't allow smaller units. That might work for some currencies but in general I would expect a numeric/decimal type.
For example
create table Equipment (
Equipmenttype nvarchar(1,
Description nvarchar(10),
Primary Key (Equipmenttype)
)
Create table Room (
RoomID nvarchar(8),
Capacity numeric(3),
Roomtype(fk,nvarchar(2)
)
I want to create the following table...
create table RoomEquipment(
(RoomID here)
(Equipmenttype here)
but Equipmenttype is not a primary key.
You can create foreign key on columns that are PK or Unuque:
So you have to create a unique index on RoomID:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX UI_Room_RoomID ON dbo.Room(RoomID);
Now you can create a foreign key in table RoomEquipment.
A FOREIGN KEY constraint does not have to be linked only to a PRIMARY KEY constraint in another table; it can also be defined to reference the columns of a UNIQUE constraint in another table.
Source: Foreign Key to non-primary key
Equipmenttype is a primary key, in its own table Equipment, and RoomID should be a primary key for Room.
So RoomEquipment is a standard many-to-many relationship table.
In my case, I have only 1 candidate may go with 1 job at the time so they are must be 2 primary key.
Then, a column is as JobApplicationId use for the table CandidateDetail as a foreign key.
Is that correct when I decide to set these 3 columns above as primary key or there are other ways to address my problem here?
CREATE TABLE Candidate(
CandidateId int identity primary key,
FullName nvarchar(50)
)
CREATE TABLE Job(
JobId int identity primary key,
JobTitle nvarchar(50)
)
CREATE TABLE JobApplication(
JobApplicationId int identity,
JobId int,
CandidateId int,
CreatedDate datetime,
primary key(JobApplicationId, JobId, CandidateId)
)
CREATE TABLE CandidateDetail(
CandidateDetailId int identity primary key,
JobApplicationId int,
[Description] nvarchar(300)
)
ALTER TABLE JobApplication ADD CONSTRAINT fk_JobApplication_Job FOREIGN KEY (JobId) REFERENCES Job(JobId)
ALTER TABLE JobApplication ADD CONSTRAINT fk_JobApplication_Candidate FOREIGN KEY (CandidateId) REFERENCES Candidate(CandidateId)
ALTER TABLE CandidateDetail ADD CONSTRAINT fk_CandidateDetail_JobApplication FOREIGN KEY (JobApplicationId) REFERENCES JobApplication(JobApplicationId)
Instead of a primary key with three columns you could just have JobApplicationId as the primary key and a unique constraint on JobId, CandidateId.
Otherwise, two rows with JobApplicationId=1, JobId=1, CandidateId=1 and JobApplicationId=2, JobId=1, CandidateId=1 would still be valid in terms of your current primary key approach, but would be invalid in terms of the business case.
From both a performance and usability perspective, a compound primary key can be a hassle and can create performance issues. Personally, I would choose JobApplicationId as the primary key (because this is an identity column and will be unique for each record). Then, if you need to constrain the table so that JobId and CandidateId are always unique (not allowing more than 1 record for any given candidate and the job they've applied for) then I would use a compound Unique Constraint.
However, I would suggest that you evaluate those requirements more closely because what if a candidate applies for the same position in a different time frame? It might stand to reason that having the same candidate applied to the same job more than once in that table might be valid data.
I have not seen any clear, concise examples of this anywhere online.
With an existing table, how do I add a foreign key which references this table? For example:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Projects(
ProjectsID INT IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
Name varchar(50)
);
How would I write a command to add a foreign key which references the same table? Can I do this in a single SQL command?
I'll show you several equivalent ways of declaring such a foreign key constraint. (This answer is intentionally repetitive to help you recognise the simple patterns for declaring constraints.)
Example: This is what we would like to end up with:
Case 1: The column holding the foreign keys already exists, but the foreign key relationship has not been declared / is not enforced yet:
In that case, run this statement:
ALTER TABLE Employee
ADD FOREIGN KEY (ManagerId) REFERENCES Employee (Id);
Case 2: The table exists, but it does not yet have the foreign key column:
ALTER TABLE Employee
ADD ManagerId INT, -- add the column; everything else is the same as with case 1
FOREIGN KEY (ManagerId) REFERENCES Employee (Id);
or more succinctly:
ALTER TABLE Employee
ADD ManagerId INT REFERENCES Employee (Id);
Case 3: The table does not exist yet.
CREATE TABLE Employee -- create the table; everything else is the same as with case 1
(
Id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
ManagerId INT
);
ALTER TABLE Employee
ADD FOREIGN KEY (ManagerId) REFERENCES Employee (Id);
or, declare the constraint inline, as part of the table creation:
CREATE TABLE Employee
(
Id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
ManagerId INT,
FOREIGN KEY (ManagerId) REFERENCES Employee (Id)
);
or even more succinctly:
CREATE TABLE Employee
(
Id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
ManagerId INT REFERENCES Employee (Id)
);
P.S. regarding constraint naming: Up until the previous revision of this answer, the more verbose SQL examples contained CONSTRAINT <ConstraintName> clauses for giving unique names to the foreign key constraints. After a comment by #ypercube I've decided to drop these clauses from the examples, for two reasons: Naming a constraint is an orthogonal issue to (i.e. independent from) putting the constraint in place. And having the naming out of the way allows us to focus on the the actual adding of the constraints.
In short, in order to name a constraint, precede any mention of e.g. PRIMARY KEY, REFERENCES, or FOREIGN KEY with CONSTRAINT <ConstraintName>. The way I name foreign key constraints is <TableName>_FK_<ColumnName>. I name primary key constraints in the same way, only with PK instead of FK. (Natural and other alternate keys would get the name prefix AK.)
You can add the column and constraint in one operation
ALTER TABLE dbo.Projects ADD
parentId INT NULL,
CONSTRAINT FK FOREIGN KEY(parentid) REFERENCES dbo.Projects
Optionally you could specify the PK column in brackets after the referenced table name but it is not needed here.
If the table already exists: Assuming you don't already have a column to store this data. If you do then skip this step.
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[project]
ADD [fkProjectsId] INT;
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[projects]
ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Projects_ProjectsId] FOREIGN KEY ([fkProjectsId]) REFERENCES [dbo].[Projects] ([ProjectsID])
GO
I want to create tables in SQL Server 2008, but I don't know how to create composite primary key. How can I achieve this?
create table my_table (
column_a integer not null,
column_b integer not null,
column_c varchar(50),
primary key (column_a, column_b)
);
CREATE TABLE UserGroup
(
[User_Id] INT NOT NULL,
[Group_Id] INT NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT PK_UserGroup PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED ([User_Id], [Group_Id])
)
Via Enterprise Manager (SSMS)...
Right Click on the Table you wish to create the composite key on and select Design.
Highlight the columns you wish to form as a composite key
Right Click over those columns and Set Primary Key
To see the SQL you can then right click on the Table > Script Table As > Create To
I know I'm late to this party, but for an existing table, try:
ALTER table TABLE_NAME
ADD CONSTRAINT [name of your PK, e.g. PK_TableName] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (column1, column2, etc.)
For MSSQL Server 2012
CREATE TABLE usrgroup(
usr_id int FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES users(id),
grp_id int FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES groups(id),
PRIMARY KEY (usr_id, grp_id)
)
UPDATE
I should add !
If you want to add foreign / primary keys altering, firstly you should create the keys with constraints or you can not make changes. Like this below:
CREATE TABLE usrgroup(
usr_id int,
grp_id int,
CONSTRAINT FK_usrgroup_usrid FOREIGN KEY (usr_id) REFERENCES users(id),
CONSTRAINT FK_usrgroup_groupid FOREIGN KEY (grp_id) REFERENCES groups(id),
CONSTRAINT PK_usrgroup PRIMARY KEY (usr_id,grp_id)
)
Actually last way is healthier and serial. You can look the FK/PK Constraint names (dbo.dbname > Keys > ..) but if you do not use a constraint, MSSQL auto-creates random FK/PK names. You will need to look at every change (alter table) you need.
I recommend that you set a standard for yourself; the constraint should be defined according to the your standard. You will not have to memorize and you will not have to think too long. In short, you work faster.
First create the database and table, manually adding the columns. In which column to be primary key. You should right click this column and set primary key and set the seed value of the primary key.
To create a composite unique key on table
ALTER TABLE [TableName] ADD UNIQUE ([Column1], [Column2], [column3]);
CREATE TABLE UserGroup
(
[User_Id] INT Foreign Key,
[Group_Id] INT foreign key,
PRIMARY KEY ([User_Id], [Group_Id])
)