I'm using SQLite ADO.NET in my project so that I can unit test using an in-memory database. I want a copy of my real database but it is across the server. From what I've read, it looks like I have to specify ":memory" for the data source for the SQLite connection string. My problem is that I don't even know if it's possible to load a remote database into memory that is not a SQLite database, or how to do it? Any thoughts on how this could be done? It's not a large db--maybe 5 megs at most. Thanks for the input!
Actually, figured out it doesn't matter--I can't use SQLite with ADO.NET because my queries are all T-SQL.
You don't really need an in-memory database, you can use SQL Server Express on your PC, or a unit-testing VM.
You could overwrite the database file each time you run the test.
Related
I have several large SQL queries that I need to run against a Postgres data source. I am using SSIS on SQL Server 2008 R2 to move the data. Because of the way our system is set up, I have to use a tunnel via PuTTY and set up local port redirection.
In the SSIS package, I am using ADO.NET source and destination. I have PostgreSQL drivers installed, and we were able to get the 32-bit version working. My package runs, I am getting the data, but the data transformation tasks run painfully slow ... about 2,000 records per second.
Does anyone have experience making a trip to Postgres with static queries and dumping the results into a SQL Server? Any tips / best practices?
You should try to get the data and store it in a ssis raw file.
Then make your transformation and whatever you like on the raw file data.
After that send it back to DB.
General try not to have many calls to the database.
We have a server with SQL database (8 database) working in LAN, Now we are planning to make a backup server connected through LAN.
What we need is, when user enter data it should save in both database, so that we have all the data in both database.
I am a newbie so pls give me some detail information. I have seen some replication option, is it better option for us.
We have SQL Server 2005.
Which database engine are you using?
There're several ways to build a distributed/replicated database, I'm sure you'll find out how to do it by reading your engine documentation, but we cannot help here without more info.
Yes, you can backup your database from one server to other by multiple way.. Following are those
1) Make script of complete database with schema and data..Technique is here
2) Export your database to excel file and import it to other server (Use only in required conditions).
3) communicate two server by addlink.. Technique here
Now if you want dump data in two different server then its depend on code logic written for dumping database and connection string provided for it. By adding Trigger to one server database you can dump data on different server or database.. Trigger
I have a website developed using a SQL Server database. But I need to port it to a new web server that doesn't have access to a database.
I therefore need an alternative solution, preferably without rewriting all the database queries. I would prefer being able to run the same queries against a sqlite file or just a plain textfile.
As far as storage goes it won't be storing large amounts of data, so performance won't be an issue.
Thanks for your time!,
Kind regards
Solved it by using Sql Server Compact Edition (see comments in OP).
I want to setup replication between SQL Server and MySQL, in which SQL Server is the primary database server and MySQL is the slave server (on linux).
Is there a way to setup such scenario? Help me .
My answer might be coming too late, but still for future reference ...
You can use one of the heterogeneous replication solutions like SymmetricDS: http://www.symmetricds.org/. It can replicate data between any SQL database to any SQL database, altough the overhead is higher than using a native replication solution.
of course you can replicate MSSQL database to MYSQL
By using Linked Server in MSSQL.
for that you need to download ODBC drivers. and you can further search regarding how to create Linked server on SQL SERVER.
This option is very easy and Totally free. You can use OPEN QUERY FOR THIS.
By using SSIS Packages.
for that you need the Business Intelligence service of SQL SERVER. you can create SSIS Packages on Visual Studio and run them for replication.
No. At least not without doing a lot of dirty, bad things. MSSQL and MySQL speak different replication protocols, so you won't be able to set it up natively (which is the way you'd want to handle it). At best, you could hack together some sort of proxy that forwards insert/update/delete/create/alter, etc. queries from one to the other. This is a terrible idea as they don't speak the same SQL except in the most common case. Even database dumps which wouldn't really be replication are generally incompatible between vendors.
Don't do it. If you must use different OSes on your servers, standardize the database to something that runs on both.
These two databases are from two different vendors. While I cannot say for sure, it is unlikely Microsoft has any interest in allowing replication to a different vendor's database server.
I work with Informix and MySQL. Both those databases have commands that dump the entire database to an ascii file format. You would need to see how that is done on MS SQL Server; ftp the dump to the server hosting the MySQL server; and then convert the dump into something MySQL can import.
I am writing code to migrate data from our live Access database to a new Sql Server database which has a different schema with a reorganized structure. This Sql Server database will be used with a new version of our application in development.
I've been writing migrating code in C# that calls Sql Server and Access and transforms the data as required. I migrated for the first time a table which has entries related to new entries of another table that I have not updated recently, and that caused an error because the record in the corresponding table in SQL Server could not be found
So, my SqlServer productions table has data only up to 1/14/09, and I'm continuing to migrate more tables from Access. So I want to write an update method that can figure out what the new stuff is in Access that hasn't been reflected in Sql Server.
My current idea is to write a query on the SQL side which does SELECT Max(RunDate) FROM ProductionRuns, to give me the latest date in that field in the table. On the Access side, I would write a query that does SELECT * FROM ProductionRuns WHERE RunDate > ?, where the parameter is that max date found in SQL Server, and perform my translation step in code, and then insert the new data in Sql Server.
What I'm wondering is, do I have the syntax right for getting the latest date in that Sql Server table? And is there a better way to do this kind of migration of a live database?
Edit: What I've done is make a copy of the current live database. Which I can then migrate without worrying about changes, then use that to test during development, and then I can migrate the latest data whenever the new database and application go live.
I personally would divide the process into two steps.
I would create an exact copy of Access DB in SQLServer and copy all the data
Copy the data from this temporary SQLServer DB to your destination database
In that way you can write set of SQL code to accomplish second step task
Alternatively use SSIS
Generally when you convert data to a new database that will take it's place in porduction, you shut out all users of the database for a period of time, run the migration and turn on the new database. This ensures no changes to the data are made while doing the conversion. Of course I never would have done this using c# either. Data migration is a database task and should have been done in SSIS (or DTS if you have an older version of SQL Server).
If the databse you are converting to is just in development, I would create a backup of the Access database and load the data from there to test the data loading process and to get the data in so you can do the application development. Then when it is time to do the real load, you just close down the real database to users and use it to load from. If you are trying to keep both in synch wile you develop, well I wouldn't do that but if you must, make a nightly backup of the file and load first thing in the morning using your process.
You may want to look at investing in a tool like SQL Data Compare.
I believe it has support for access databases too, and you can download a trial.
I you are happy with you C# code, but it fails because of the constraints in your destination database you temporarily can disable them and then enable after you copy the whole lot.
I am assuming that your destination database is brand new DB with no data, and not used by anyone when the transfer happens
It sounds like you have two problems:
You're migrating data from one database to another.
You're changing your schema.
Doing either of these things is tricky if you are trying to migrate the data while people are using the data.
The simplest approach is to migrate the data based on a static copy of the data, and also to queue updates to that data from the moment you captured the static copy. I don't know how easy this is in Access, but in SQLServer or Oracle you can use the redo logs for this or a manual solution using triggers. The poor-man's way of doing this is to make triggers for all the relevant tables that log the primary key of the records that have changed. Then after the old database is shut off you can iterate over those keys and get those records from the old database and put them into the new database. Just copy the whole record; if the record was deleted then delete it from the new database.
Your problem is compounded by the fact that you can't simply copy the data, you have to transform it. This means you probably have to shut down both databases and re-migrate the records based on the change list. It will take a lot of planning to ensure you get things right and I'd recommend writing a testing script that can validate that the resulting data is correct.
Also I'd ensure that the code for the migration runs inside one of the databases if possible. Otherwise you are copying the data twice and this will significantly harm the performance.