I'm not very experienced with lower level things such as howmany bytes a character is. I tried finding out if one character equals one byte, but without success.
I need to set a delimiter used for socket connections between a server and clients. This delimiter has to be as small (in bytes) as possible, to minimize bandwidth.
The current delimiter is "#". Would getting an other delimiter decrease my bandwidth?
It depends on what character encoding you use to translate between characters and bytes (which are not at all the same thing):
In ASCII or ISO 8859, each character is represented by one byte
In UTF-32, each character is represented by 4 bytes
In UTF-8, each character uses between 1 and 4 bytes
In ISO 2022, it's much more complicated
US-ASCII characters (of whcich # is one) will take only 1 byte in UTF-8, which is the most popular encoding that allows multibyte characters.
It depends on the encoding. In Single-byte character sets such as ANSI and the various ISO8859 character sets it is one byte per character. Some encodings such as UTF8 are variable width where the number of bytes to encode a character depends on the glyph being encoded.
The answer of course is that it depends. If you are in a pure ASCII env, then yes, every char takes 1 byte, but if you are in a Unicode env (all of Windows for example), then chars can range from 1 to 4 bytes in size.
If you choose a char from the ASCII set, then yes your delimter is a small as possible.
No, all characters are 1 byte, unless you're using Unicode or wide characters (for accents and other symbols for example).
A character is 1 byte, or 8 bits, long which gives 256 possible combination to form characters with. 1 byte characters are called ASCII characters. They only use 7 bits (even though 8 are available, but you can't use this 8th bit) to form the standard alphabet and various symbols used when teletypes and typewriters were still common.
You can find an ASCII chart and what numbers correspond to what characters here.
Related
This is a basic question, but I can't find anything on it, since I don't know what to search — each of my tries have come up with unrelated results.
If I use Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes to convert a string into ASCII, does each byte represent exactly one character? Does the following code work as exactly intended in all circumstances (for all Strings other than the examples)?
Dim t1() As Byte = Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("Hello ")
Dim t2() As Byte = Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("World")
Dim msg As String = Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(t1.Concat(t2).ToArray)
Now msg should be "Hello World".
I would like this to work as I don't want to have to convert data I receive back to Strings in order to manipulate it before it is sent again.
What if I used something other than ASCII (like UTF-8, for example)?
If I use Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes to convert a string into ASCII, does each byte represent exactly one character?
Yes. ASCII is a 7bit encoding, it does not support multi-byte characters. Any Unicode codepoint above U-007F will get converted to a ? character in ASCII.
If you were to use UTF-7 instead, for instance, it can encode individual Unicode codepoints into a sequence of multiple ASCII characters.
Does the following code work as exactly intended in all circumstances (for all Strings other than the examples)?
In your particular example, yes (provided you are using LINQ's Concat() method - there are other ways to concat arrays together). There is no data loss.
But for other examples, just know that you will have data loss if you convert non-ASCII characters to ASCII, or otherwise mismatch encodings between GetBytes() and GetString().
You can certainly manipulate byte arrays. Just make sure the arrays are in the same encoding if you merge them together.
.NET strings are counted sequences of UTF-16 code units (char), one or two of which encode a Unicode codepoint (int Char.ConvertToUtf32 ). Some codepoints are "combining characters", which when applied to a preceding "base character" form a grapheme (which is then rendered by a font into a glyph).
An encoder from Unicode to an encoding of another character set should attempt to preserve graphemes. In .NET, a grapheme is called a "text element."
So, yes, you can combine encoded byte sequences as long as you haven't defeated the encoder by converting parts of a grapheme into different byte sequences. If you are breaking a string into two before encoding, see TextElementEnumerator and StringInfo class.
I am a .NET Developer and I do not believe I know enough about encoding. I have read this article: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html.
Say I declare this string:
Dim TestString As String = "1"
I believe this will be represented as a Unicode character. Say I declare this integer:
Dim TestInt As Integer = 1
How is this represented? I assume that Unicode is not used? i.e. it is only used for String and Chars? Is that correct? Therefore I believe that on a 32 bit machine 1 would simply be represented as:
00000000 0000000 0000000 00000001
Do numeric data types have byte order marks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark ?
All strings in .NET are UTF-16. From the language spec:
Visual Basic .NET defines the following primitive types:
...
The Char value type, which represents a single Unicode character and
maps to System.Char...
The String reference type, which
represents a sequence of Unicode characters and maps to System.String...
Why should an integral value types like an integer be represented with Unicode in computer memory? Unicode is (citing from Wikipedia):
a computing industry standard for the consistent encoding, representation and handling of text expressed in most of the world's writing systems.
So yes, it's only used for Strings and Chars.
Also note that an Integer will always be 4-byte signed integer, no matter if you use a 32 bit or 64 bit machine.
Byte order marks are an entire different topic. As already said in a comment, it's used in text file or stream.
Is there a way to detect if the Base 64 string contained in an NSData instance is an image or a text or any other object?
You can't generally just look at the base 64 string and decide, but you can decode the first few bytes of data, look at the hex codes (you can do this by decoding your base-64 string into a NSData and just NSLog it or examining it in the debugger), and draw some conclusions. For example:
Image files generally start with special byte sequences (e.g. JPEG start with the hex bytes FF D8; PNG generally start with hex bytes 89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A (e.g. 89 "PNG" CR LF EOF LF, etc.). Note, there are a dizzying number of different image formats, so this is a non-trivial exercise, but sometimes you can get lucky and it will be self-evident that it's one of these common format when you glance at the first few bytes.
NSKeyedArchiver archives generally start with the string "bplist".
ASCII text consists of codes between 20 and 7F (with linefeeds represented by 0A; carriage return and linefeeds represented by OD 0A; tab characters as 09; etc.). Then, again, if it was a text, it's unlikely they'd be base-64 encoding it.
If it was UTF-8 it would conform to the coding pattern outlined here. For example, you can look at the first few high bits of the first byte that might conceivably represent a UTF-8 character, and conclude (a) how many bytes the character is represented by and (b) what high bits will be turned on those subsequent bytes. You can often quickly look at it and confirm whether the data conforms to this UTF-8 pattern or not (especially easy to do for most western languages)
If the first three characters were EF BB BF, that often indicates a UTF-8 byte order mark.
This is, by no means, an exhaustive list of codes, but just a few that leapt out at me.
To do this programmatically and do so exhaustively would be a non-trivial exercise. But if you're just "eye-balling" a base-64 string and trying to draw some logical inferences, decode it and look at the hex bytes and you can quickly narrow down the possibilities, at the very least. If you're unsure about how to interpret it, update your question with the hex representation of the decoded base-64 string (just the first 16-32 bytes, please), and we might be able to point you in the right direction.
It is impossible to clearly distinguish text string and Base64 image encoding string. The only way - check if your string is valid Base 64 encoding string. If it is - probably it is an image. If not - you can be sure it is a text.
How to check if string is valid Base 64 you can ere How to check whether the string is base64 encoded or not.
Encoding with hexadecimal numbers seems to be different from using hexadecimals to represent numbers. For example, then hex number 0x40 to me should be equal to 64, or BA_{64}, but when I put it through this hex to base64 converter, I get the output: QA== which to me is equal to some number times 64. Why is this?
Also when I check the integer value of the hex string deadbeef I get 3735928559, but when I check it other places I get: 222 173 190 239. Why is this?
Addendum: So I guess it is because it is easier to break the number into bit chunks than treat it as a whole number when encoding? That is pretty confusing to me but I guess I get it.
You may wish to read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64
In summary, base64 specifies a specific encoding, which involves using different values for letters than their ASCII encoding.
For the second part, one source is treating the entire string as a 32 bit integer, and the other is dividing it into bytes and giving the value of each byte.
I noticed my generated XHTML5 numbered section titles have a  between the number and the title string. I thought this was a generation error. But no, the gentext file of my DocBook distribution, common/en.xml, actually specifies this.
Line 338 of common/en.xml:
<l:template name="section" text="%n. %t"/>
The dot and space following the %n are, when viewed in a hex editor, ASCII character codes C2 and A0, which are the  and NBSP characters respectively. I can understand NBSP. But why the �
I understand I can change this in my customization layer. But the default seems odd.
I'm using docbook-xsl-ns-1.77.1.
That is because the encoding is UTF-8, which is the normal Unicode encoding for text these days. In UTF-8, any character above 0x7F is represented by a sequence of 2, 3, or 4 bytes depending on how many significant code bits it contains.
The 0xC2 is one of the chars that starts a 2-byte sequence. In binary, it's 1100 0010. The two 1 bits denote a 2-char sequence, and the bottom five bits are the first five of the encoded character. The second one, 0xA0, is 1001 0000. The single leading 1 bit (followed by a 0 bit) denotes a continuation of the sequence, and the bottom 6 bits are the bottom bits of the encoded character.
Putting the bottom five bits from the first byte together with the bottom six bits from the second, we get 000 1001 0000, in hex U+A0, which is indeed the nonbreaking space.