This may be a dumb question. But I just received permissions to read/write to this DB. I see the tables of the DB, except for one. I can select from it, But I cannot see it in the Object Explorer. I restarted my computer, refreshed the object explorer and everything. Is there a restriction on viewing this table?
I"m so sorry I had to check the connection of the query. I was looking at two different versions of the same DATABASE. gosh. Should I take this question down?
The query
SELECT type, type_desc FROM sys.objects WHERE name = 'my_table_name'
should tell you what type of object your table really is.
Could it be a synonym, or a view? Check under the synonyms node and the views node. Also check the schema... if you are just saying SELECT * FROM table, try with SELECT * FROM dbo.table. It may be under a different schema.
You need to use the schema name in your create table query(eg. dbo.table name). By default it is getting created under your local server and hence it is available for you when you use the select query but once you check on server ita is not available.
When all else fails, right click on Tables and click Refresh.
Related
I usually use Toad to manipulate my Oracle databases, but I even tried SQL manager for this one and it still would not work. I have a table with a few hundred records, and even running a simple
SELECT * FROM customer
will not work. There are no errors, and the data grid that displays pulls all the correct field column names but there are no records shown. What could be causing this?
Does your login schema own the table? If not, verify that any synonym is actually pointing to the object that you think it is. Preface the table name with its owning schema to rule out any conflicts.
How do I query the database name in Oracle SQL Developer? I have tried the following and they all fail:
SELECT DB_NAME();
SELECT DATABASE();
Why do these basic MySQL queries fail in SQL Developer? Even this one fails too:
show tables;
EDIT: I can connect to the database and run queries such as:
select * from table_name_here;
EDIT 2: The database type is Oracle, this is why MySQL queries are failing. I thought it was related to the database client not the database itself. I was wrong. I'll leave the question as is for other as lost as I was.
Once I realized I was running an Oracle database, not MySQL, I found the answer
select * from v$database;
or
select ora_database_name from dual;
Try both. Credit and source goes to: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=520376.
try this:
select * from global_name;
You can use the following command to know just the name of the database without the extra columns shown.
select name from v$database;
If you need any other information about the db then first know which are the columns names available using
describe v$database;
and select the columns that you want to see;
I know this is an old thread but you can also get some useful info from the V$INSTANCE view as well. the V$DATABASE displays info from the control file, the V$INSTANCE view displays state of the current instance.
Edit: Whoops, didn't check your question tags before answering.
Check that you can actually connect to DB (have the driver placed? tested the conn when creating it?).
If so, try runnung those queries with F5
To see database name,
startup;
then type
show parameter db_name;
DESCRIBE DATABASE NAME; you need to specify the name of the database and the results will include the data type of each attribute.
I've hit a bit of an impasse. I have a query that is generated by some C# code. The query works fine in Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio when run against the same database.
However when my code tries to run the same query I get the same error about an invalid column and an exception is thrown. All queries that reference this column are failing.
The column in question was recently added to the database. It is a date column called Incident_Begin_Time_ts .
An example that fails is:
select * from PerfDiag
where Incident_Begin_Time_ts > '2010-01-01 00:00:00';
Other queries like Select MAX(Incident_Being_Time_ts); also fail when run in code because it thinks the column is missing.
Any ideas?
Just press Ctrl + Shift + R and see...
In SQL Server Management Studio, Ctrl+Shift+R refreshes the local cache.
I suspect that you have two tables with the same name. One is owned by the schema 'dbo' (dbo.PerfDiag), and the other is owned by the default schema of the account used to connect to SQL Server (something like userid.PerfDiag).
When you have an unqualified reference to a schema object (such as a table) — one not qualified by schema name — the object reference must be resolved. Name resolution occurs by searching in the following sequence for an object of the appropriate type (table) with the specified name. The name resolves to the first match:
Under the default schema of the user.
Under the schema 'dbo'.
The unqualified reference is bound to the first match in the above sequence.
As a general recommended practice, one should always qualify references to schema objects, for performance reasons:
An unqualified reference may invalidate a cached execution plan for the stored procedure or query, since the schema to which the reference was bound may change depending on the credentials executing the stored procedure or query. This results in recompilation of the query/stored procedure, a performance hit. Recompilations cause compile locks to be taken out, blocking others from accessing the needed resource(s).
Name resolution slows down query execution as two probes must be made to resolve to the likely version of the object (that owned by 'dbo'). This is the usual case. The only time a single probe will resolve the name is if the current user owns an object of the specified name and type.
[Edited to further note]
The other possibilities are (in no particular order):
You aren't connected to the database you think you are.
You aren't connected to the SQL Server instance you think you are.
Double check your connect strings and ensure that they explicitly specify the SQL Server instance name and the database name.
In my case I restart Microsoft SQL Sever Management Studio and this works well for me.
If you are running this inside a transaction and a SQL statement before this drops/alters the table you can also get this message.
I eventually shut-down and restarted Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio; and that fixed it for me. But at other times, just starting a new query window was enough.
If you are using variables with the same name as your column, it could be that you forgot the '#' variable marker. In an INSERT statement it will be detected as a column.
Just had the exact same problem. I renamed some aliased columns in a temporary table which is further used by another part of the same code. For some reason, this was not captured by SQL Server Management Studio and it complained about invalid column names.
What I simply did is create a new query, copy paste the SQL code from the old query to this new query and run it again. This seemed to refresh the environment correctly.
In my case I was trying to get the value from wrong ResultSet when querying multiple SQL statements.
In my case it seems the problem was a weird caching problem. The solutions above didn't work.
If your code was working fine and you added a column to one of your tables and it gives the 'invalid column name' error, and the solutions above doesn't work, try this: First run only the section of code for creating that modified table and then run the whole code.
Including this answer because this was the top result for "invalid column name sql" on google and I didn't see this answer here. In my case, I was getting Invalid Column Name, Id1 because I had used the wrong id in my .HasForeignKey statement in my Entity Framework C# code. Once I changed it to match the .HasOne() object's id, the error was gone.
I've gotten this error when running a scalar function using a table value, but the Select statement in my scalar function RETURN clause was missing the "FROM table" portion. :facepalms:
Also happens when you forget to change the ConnectionString and ask a table that has no idea about the changes you're making locally.
I had this problem with a View, but the exact same SQL code worked perfectly as a query. In fact SSMS actually threw up a couple of other problems with the View, that it did not have with the query. I tried refreshing, closing the connection to the server and going back in, and renaming columns - nothing worked. Instead I created the query as a stored procedure, and connected Excel to that rather than the View, and this solved the problem.
I'm trying to pull user data from 2 tables, one locally and one on a linked server, but I get the wrong results when querying the remote server.
I've cut my query down to
select * from SQL2.USER.dbo.people where persId = 475785
for testing and found that when I run it I get no results even though I know the person exists.
(persId is an integer, db is SQL Server 2000 and dbo.people is a table by the way)
If I copy/ paste the query and run it on the same server as the database then it works.
It only seems to affect certain user ids as running for example
select * from SQL2.USER.dbo.people where persId = 475784
works fine for the user before the one I want.
Strangely I've found that
select * from SQL2.USER.dbo.people where persId like '475785'
also works but
select * from SQL2.USER.dbo.people where persId > 475784
brings back records with persIds starting at 22519 not 475785 as I'd expect.
Hope that made sense to somebody
Any ideas ?
UPDATE:
Due to internal concerns about doing any changes to the live people table, I've temporarily moved my database so they're both on the same server and so the linked server issue doesn't apply. Once the whole lot is migrated to a separate cluster I'll be able to investigate properly. I'll update the update once this happens and I can work my way through all the suggestions. Thanks for your help.
The fact that LIKE operates is not a major clue: LIKE forces integers to string (so you can say WHERE field LIKE '2%' and you will get all records that start with a 2, even when field is of integer type). Your incorrect comparisons would lead me to think your indexes are corrupt, but you say they work when not used via the link... however, the selected index might be different depending on the use? (I seem to recall an instance when I had duplicate indexes and only one was stale, although that was too long ago to recall the exact cause).
Nevertheless, I would try rebuilding your index using the DBCC DBREINDEX (tablenname) command. If it turns out that doing so fixes your query, you may want to rebuild them all: here is a script for rebuilding them all easily.
Is dbo.people a table or a view? I've seen something similar where the underlying table schema had been changed and dropping and recreating the view fixed the problem, although the fact that the query works if run directly on the linked server does indicate something index based..
Is the linked server using the same collation? Depending on the index used, I could see something like this perhaps happening if the servers were not collation compatible, but the linked server was set up with collation compatible (which tells Sql Server it can run the query on the remote server).
I would check the following:
Check your definition on the linked server, and confirm that SQL2 is the
server you expect it to be
Check and compare the execution plans both from the remote and local servers
Try linking by IP address rather than name, to ensure you have the proper machine
Put the code into a stored procedure on the remote machine, and try calling that instead
Sounds like a bug to me - I;ve read of some issues along these lines, btu can't remember specifically what. What version of SQL Server are you running?
select * from SQL2.USER.dbo.people where persId = 475785
for a PersID which fails how does:
SELECT *
FROM OpenQuery(SQL2, 'SELECT * FROM USER.dbo.people WHERE persId = 475785')
behave?
I am trying to archive some of my tables into another database on the same server. However the INSERT INTO...SELECT...FROM gives me an error (SQLSTATE=42704) on build. The table exists in the second database.
Can anyone help with this?
It's not clear from your question what version of DB2 is being used. I'll presume that it's the Linux, Unix & Windows version. You look to be using federation to link the two databases.
Does the SELECT part of your query work from LS2DB001? It's worth trying to pin down which database you have the issue with.
Presuming that the problem is on LS2DB001, if the user you have defined the federated link with has permissions on the base tables in the query, check also that they have permissions on the system catalog tables. If not, they would not be able to parse and validate that you can run the query.
We've cracked it! If the following script is used then it works. The LOAD works without having to COMMIT in between batches of rows copied. ('Transaction Log full...' error problem is also solved)
CONNECT TO LS2DB001;
EXPORT TO "C:\temp\TIN_TRIGGER_OUT.IXF" OF IXF
MESSAGES "C:\temp\TIN_TRIGGER_OUT.EXM"
SELECT * FROM LS2USER.TIN_TRIGGER_OUT;
CONNECT RESET;
CONNECT TO LQIFCOLD;
LOAD FROM "C:\temp\TIN_TRIGGER_OUT.IXF" OF IXF
MESSAGES "C:\temp\TIN_TRIGGER_OUT.IMM"
INSERT INTO LS2USER.TIN_TRIGGER_OUT COPY NO INDEXING MODE AUTOSELECT;
COMMIT;
CONNECT RESET;
I found this on http://www.connx.com/products/connx/Connx%208.6%20UserGuide/CONNXCDD32D/DB2_SQL_States.htm:
42704 Undefined object or constraint name. Revise SQL syntax and retry.
For more help try to be more specific, eg paste the full sql statement, the table scheme etc.
You can do
Select 'insert into tblxxxx (blabla,blabal) values(' + fld1 + ',' + fld2 + ',' ...... + ')'
From tblxxxxxx
copy the result as a text script and execute it in the other DB.
The best way to do this would be to create a custom script. Depending on the size of the tables (how many records) you could either do a select of all of the data into memory and then roll over them inserting them into a copy of the table you create first, or you could export the data out as a csv file or some other text based file and then roll over that to insert the data into the other table.
If you do not have some sort of formal backup procedures that could do this already, this would be your best bet.
Note: some db2 databases, such as those on an iSeries do not actually have "databases", they have libraries. With the right user profile you can access two libraries at the same time, joining tables from them together or doing a
create table library/newFilename as
(select * from originallibrary/originalfilename) with data
But this only applies to the iSeries I believe.
I'm writing this response as another answer so I have more space.
I can only suggest breaking the steps down to their components, and working through to see where the error is occuring. Again, I'm assuming you're using federation:
a) In your FROM db, connecting as the user you're using for the federated link, does your select work?
b) In your TO db, using the link, does the select work?
c) In your TO db, using the link via a stored proc, does the select work?
d) In your TO db, using an INSERT...values(x,y,z), can you insert into the table?
e) In your TO db, via a stored proc, using INSERT...values(x,y,z), can you insert?
Without more information, this is the best line of attack I can suggest.