Can a file already in use be cloned in VB.NET? - vb.net

Can a file already in use be cloned in VB.NET?
Is it possible to load a file into memory even if that file is already in use by another program?

It should be possible, but only if the other application doesn't have the file open with a file share mode of None or "exclusive" Write (FileShare.None or FileShare.Write in .NET)
Here is a list of possible windows file sharing modes. It is for C++, but the same principles apply across the board since file sharing is an operating system level concept.
For .NET, the same principles apply. See the FileShare enumeration (although the discussion from the link above is more useful to understand what types of file locks are involved with the different types of file share modes)

If the other program is .NET it depends how it opened the file. If it opened it with FileShare.None then you will be out of luck, otherwise it is possible.

When I can't open a file in notepad/ultra-edit because an application has locked the file, I can copy the locked file and the copy opens without any problem.
Maybe the same strategy can be used in c# code?

Related

Implement a self extracting archive?

I know i can use 7z or winrar but i want to learn this for myself.
How would i implement a self extracting archive? I can use C# or C++ but let me run down the problem.
When i open the exe i need some kind of GUI asking where to extract the files. Once the user says ok I should obviously extract them. I implemented a simple example in C# winforms already BUT my problem is HOW do i get the filenames and binary of the files into an exe?
One upon a time i ask Is it safe to add extra data to end of exe? and the answer suggested if i just add data to the end of the exe it may be picked up by a virus scanner. Now its pretty easy to write the length of the archive as the last 4bytes and just append the data to my generic exe and i do believe my process can read my own exe so this could work. But it feels hacky and i rather not have people accuse me of writing virus just because i am using this technique. Whats the proper way to implement this?
Note: I checked the self-extracting tag and many of the question is how to manipulate self extracting and not how to implement. Except this one which is asking something else Self-extracting self-checking executable
-edit- I made two self extracting with 7z and compared them. It looks like... well it IS the 7z.sfx file but with a regular 7z archive appended. So... there is nothing wrong with doing this? Is there a better way? I'm targeting windows and can use the C# compiler to help but i don't know how much extra work or how difficult it may be programmatically and maybe adding data to end of exe isnt bad?
It is possible. I used the following technique once, when we needed to distribute updates for the application, but the computers were configured so that the end user had no permissions to change application files. The update was supposed to log on to administrator account and update required files (so we came across identical problem: how to distribute many files as a single executable).
The solution were file resources in C#. All you need to do is:
Create a resource file in your C# project (file ending with .resx).
Add new resource of type "file". You can easily add existing files as byte[] resources.
In program you can simply extract resource as file:
System.IO.FileStream file = new System.IO.FileStream("C:\\PathToFile",
System.IO.FileMode.OpenOrCreate);
System.IO.BinaryWriter writer = new System.IO.BinaryWriter(file);
writer.Write(UpdateApplication.Data.DataValue, 0, UpdateApplication.Data.DataValue.Length);
(Here UpdateApplication.Data denotes binary resource).
Our solution lacked compression, but I believe this is easily achieved with libraries such as C#ZipLib.
I hope this solution is virus-scanner-safe, as this method creates complete, valid executable file.

How to decode .gz files using Microsoft Access VBA?

I have some files which need reading using Access / VBA. They are compressed using ".gz" compression. How can I read those files in?
I figure this must be a solved problem but alas can't find anything. Command-line would be one option but it would involve the users of the VBA application having to have particular tools installed. Perhaps there is a library I can just include, which I can then ship with my VBA application (.accdr)?
There are quite a few libraries around, however, probably the most popular is zlib. A nice example using zlib, albeit written in VB6 (which shouldn't be too difficult to convert to VBA) is located here. One nice point about zlib is that it doesn't need registering (i.e. REGSVR*), so you should be able to drop it into the same folder as your DB (or even embed it into the DB then extract it automatically).

Creating File Associations in VB.NET?

How would one go about associating a file type with his application? I know how to read the command line arguments but I am not sure how I can "register" the file extension with Windows. Furthermore, my application is a stand-alone executable, so how would I keep Windows up-to-date on the location of my program?
I did a fair amount of searching and all I could find were old articles that didn't explain everything. How can I create file associations to a stand-alone executable in VB.NET?
Everything is handled by the registry. If you want to make your program self-register it's current location when run see this example.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/System_File_Association.aspx

Writing to files in bundle?

If you scroll down to the section 'Writing to Files and URLs' at this link, would the path varaible have to be a file on disk? Is it possible to write to a file in the bundle or must it always be deployed first?
You can write files to the application bundle as much as you'd like. Just get the path of the file through NSBundle's pathForResource:ofType: method and you can write to that file. If you want just the directory of the bundle, use resourcePath.
You don't want to do this, though. There are various reasons, but you'll break code signing, which is a big one. You should use the established conventions instead (such as writing to Library:Application Support:Your App).
EDIT: For a (possibly) more convincing reason of not to do this... When I was first learning Cocoa programming, I saved to the bundle because I didn't want to bother with the Library. It got really annoying, though, because every time you make a change to your program, you lose all of your saved data/settings for that program (assuming you're not using NSUserDefaults for preferences). I kept having to move it over from the old version to the new one. By using the Library, you don't have to worry about this.
The bundle is on disk; it's just the ".app" directory. You should not write to files in this directory, however. While currently possible on Mac, it will break code signing. On iPhone, you already can't write into your own bundle, and we should expect to see this limitation in the future on Mac. You should write your application files into various directories under ~/Library or ~/Documents as appropriate. See the File System Programming Guide for guidance.

Cross platform file-access tracking

I'd like to be able to track file read/writes of specific program invocations. No information about the actual transactions is required, just the file names involved.
Is there a cross platform solution to this?
What are various platform specific methods?
On Linux I know there's strace/ptrace (if there are faster methods that'd be good too). I think on mac os there's ktrace.
What about Windows?
Also, it would be amazing if it would be possible to block (stall out) file accesses until some later time.
Thanks!
The short answer is no. There are plenty of platform specific solutions which all probably have similar interfaces, but they aren't inherently cross platform since file systems tend to be platform specific.
How do I do it well on each platform?
Again, it will depend on the platform :) For Windows, if you want to track reads/writes in flight, you might have to go with IFS. If you just want to get notified of changes, you can use ReadDirectoryChangesW or the NTFS change journal.
I'd recommend using the NTFS change journal only because it tends to be more reliable.
On Windows you can use the command line tool Handle or the GUI version Process Explorer to see which files a given process has open.
If you're looking for a get this information in your own program you can use the IFS kit from Microsoft to write a file system filter. The file system filter will show all file system operation for all process. File system filters are used in AV software to scan files before they are open or to scan newly created files.
As long as your program launches the processes you want to monitor, you can write a debugger and then you'll be notified every time a process starts or exits. When a process starts, you can inject a DLL to hook the CreateFile system calls for each individual process. The hook can then use a pipe or a socket to report file activity to the debugger.