I'm facing a the following situation:
I created a simple full trust XBAP application that refers to unmanaged c++ COM server (isolated).
After deployment I expect that XBAP application will discover the COM server dll that is placed in the same directory, but it is not.
I'm getting the following error:
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80040154): Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {970599E0-2673-11D3-A8A8-00105AA943DF} failed due to the following error: 80040154.
at Generation888.Generation888.Simple(Int32 num1, Int32 num2)
I verified that the folder where the XBAP was deployed contains the DLL and XBAP manifest that contains proper CLSID
If I created a simple C# Windows Form application and refers to the same COM dll, it works fine.
My question is does XBAP support Side-by-Side mechanism.
Thanks
I'm not terribly familiar with XBAPs so these are some general suggestions.
If your XBAP is in fact being launched as a separate executable since it's fulltrust (what does taskmgr say?), try using the "sxstrace.exe" tool from an elevated command line on Windows Vista or later to determine whether the XBAP manifest is actually being interpreted by the system. It's possible that if you first tried your application without a manifest or changed the manifest, the system cached this old information and you'll need to clear this manifest-state cache by touching the timestamp of both the manifest and the executable.
It's also possible that your executable has an embedded manifest, which would mean that the external manifest is being ignored. To check this open the executable up in Visual Studio and see if it has an RT_MANIFEST resource of ID 1.
Related
Running an application from Visual Studio 2012 on 64-bit computers, displays the following error message:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {F2D4F4E5-EEA1-46FF-A83B-A270C92DAE4B} failed due to the following error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG))
I am using Inventor packandgo dll library in visualstudio.
Anyone know what is the error?
My problem and the solution
I have a 32 bit third party dll which I have installed in 2008 R2 machine which is 64 bit.
I have a wcf service created in .net 4.5 framework which calls the 32 bit third party dll for process. Now I have build property set to target 'any' cpu and deployed it to the 64 bit machine.
When Ii tried to invoke the wcf service got error "80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG"
Now Ii used ProcMon.exe to trace the com registry issue and identified that the process is looking for the registry entry at HKLM\CLSID and HKCR\CLSID where there is no entry.
Came to know that Microsoft will not register the 32 bit com components to the paths HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID in 64 bit machine rather it places the entry in HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID paths.
Now the conflict is 64 bit process trying to invoke 32 bit process in 64 bit machine which will look for the registry entry in HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID. The solution is we have to force the 64 bit process to look at the registry entry at HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID.
This can be achieved by configuring the wcf service project properties to target to 'X86' machine instead of 'Any'.
After deploying the 'X86' version to the 2008 R2 server got the issue "System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assembly"
Solution to this badimageformatexception is setting the 'Enable32bitApplications' to 'True' in IIS Apppool properties for the right apppool.
The problem is that the DLL is registered on the 32 bit version of the windows registry, and the application is using the 64 bit version.
Solution: Go into the Project Properties, Compile tab and click "Advanced Compile Options...". Change "Target CPU" to x86, click OK, save and try again.
Source:
http://www.theogray.com/blog/2009/10/comexception-regdbeclassnotreg-on-64-bit-windows
Has worked for me with an VB 6 COM DLL invoked from a .Net 4 Winforms application
Somewhere in the code you are using, there is a call to the Win32 API, CoCreateInstance, to dynamically load a DLL and instantiate an object from it.
The mapping between the component ID and the DLL that is capable of instantiating that object is usually found in HEKY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID in the registry. To discuss this further would be to explain a lot about COM in Windows. But the error indicates that the COM guid is not present in the registry.
I don't much about what the PackAndGo DLL is (an Autodesk component), but I suspect you simply need to "install" that component or the software package it came with through the designated installer to have that DLL and appropriate COM registry keys on your computer you are trying to run your code on. (i.e. go run setup.exe for this product).
In other words, I think you need to install "Pack and Go" on this computer instead of just copying the DLL to the target machine.
Also, make sure you decide to build your code appropriate as 32-bit vs. 64-bit depending on the which build flavor (32 or 64 bit) of Pack And Go you install.
I had the same problem. I tried lot of ways but at last solution was simple.
Solution:
Open IIS, In Application Pools, right click on the .net framework that is being used.
Go to settings and change 'Enable 32-Bit Applications' to 'True'.
In 64 bit windows machines the COM components need to register itself in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID (64 bit component) OR HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Wow6432Node\CLSID (32 bit component) . If your application is a 32 bit application running on 64-bit machine the COM library would typically look for the GUID under Wow64 node and if your application is a 64 bit application, the COM library would try to load from HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID. Make sure you are targeting the correct platform and ensure you have installed the correct version of library(32/64 bit).
Long solved I'm sure but this might help some other poor soul.
This error can ocurre if the DLL you are deploying in the install package is not the same as the DLL you are referencing (these will have different IDs)
Sounds obvious but can easily happen if you make a small change to the dll and have previously installed the app on your own machine which reregisters the dll.
I had run into the same problem. I added reference of Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel COM component's dll but Office was not installed on my system it wont give compile time error. I moved my application to another system and ran it..it worked successfully.
So, I can say in my case it was the system environment which was causing this issue.
I had this problem and I solved it when I understood that it was looking for the Windows Registry specified in the brackets.
Since the error was happening only in one computer, what I had to do was export the registry from the computer that it was working and install it on the computer that was missing it.
I was getting the below error in my 32 bit application.
Error: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID
{4911BB26-11EE-4182-B66C-64DF2FA6502D} failed due to the following
error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT:
0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)).
And on setting the "Enable32bitApplications" to true in defaultapplicationpool in IIS worked for me.
For me, I had to install Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable and restart my computer.
This happened to me when I startup eclipse for a workspace and not other workspaces. In that workspace I had a *.ts file opened with "JS editor". Error occurred in spite of having correct file association in Preferences. Other *.ts file opened without error. To get around this, in "Open Resource" (ctrl-shift-r), I used the "Open With" button and selected "JS Editor", and the file opened without problem. After that eclipse knows the editor to use for that file. I solved the problem for one particular file type, but solution probably applies to all file types. Hope this helps someone. Thanks for reading
Check if the MS Office and MS Excel is installed on that server.
I have a COM+ application that has been exported to an MSI using Component Services and then installed on a test server. The web application (ASP) is unable to instantiate any of the objects it uses from the COM+ application.
The COM+ application consists of three DLLs built in VB6. There is one DLL each for data, application and presentation layers. The web application only uses objects from the presentation layer. The COM+ DLLs call into a couple of .NET DLLs exposed via COM.
When the web application runs, an HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error is returned. No errors appear in the application or system log.
I've tried instantiating the objects from VBScript using WSH.CreateObject and it works only for objects in the data layer. When trying to create object in the application or presentation layer I get the following error:
Error: Could not create object named "My.ProgId"
Code: 800A801D
Source: WScript.CreateObject
Because it fails from VBScript, I suspect that the ASP app is fine and that it is the COM+ application that has issues.
Extra Info
If I uninstall the COM+ application and try to run my VBScript to test instantiation, I get a different error.
Error: Could not locate automation class named "My.ProgId"
Code: 80020009
Source: WScript.CreateObject
Since the errors are different, it seems that COM is at least finding the COM+ objects when they're installed, it's just not able to instantiate them.
I've also tried monitoring the script with ProcessMon. I can see WScript.exe (via COM) querying the registry for the ProgID, and then the CLSID. Eventually the path to the DLL is pulled back and then svchost.exe and dllhost.exe query the registry for the same information using the CLSID and also getting back the path to the DLL. Eventually the DLL has a Load Image operation against it followed by the same for msvbvm60.dll. I don't see anything that points to a failure accessing the COM+ DLL.
I've now tried installing the COM+ application to another Win2k3 server and a Windows XP desktop. I'm getting the same result with being able to instantiate objects from the data layer DLL, but not from the application and presentation layer DLLs. I've also tried getting an old copy of the application layer DLL and I am able to successfully instantiate objects from it. However, when I compare the project files for the two different versions, nothing stands out as being a possible cause of this problem.
The application layer DLL was referencing a struct defined in a .NET assembly. The error was caused by the type library containing the struct not being registered on the deployment machine.
When building the .NET assembly in Visual Studio, it would create a type library for the assembly and register it. When the app was deployed, the .NET assemblies were registered using regasm /codebase <assemblyname.dll>. That would register the classes so that they could be instantiated, but it did not register any structs.
The solution was to use regtlib.exe to register the type library on the test server.
The error messages were of no help at all when trying to discover the cause of the problem. Come on Microsoft!!
I have one problem in vb6. I created a .tlb file in VB.net 2005 by adding Com class to project. I built the project, I got .tlb file and .dll files while building project, i selected "Register for Com interop" from project properties and built. It registered autometically and I can use created .tlb file in that PC in Vb6 working fine. if I deploy application to another PC and run I am getting "Error 429 ActiveX Component Can't create object" run time error. What I need to do? Please help me as soon as possible. I can't deploy the application to client due to above error.
one possible solution is to install .net frame work on client pc i never want to install .net framework any other solution will be most appreciatable.
If you've created a DLL in a .NET language (such as VB.NET), the target computer must have the .NET Framework installed in order to use the DLL.
This a hard and fast requirement, irrelevant of how you're utilizing the DLL, whether from a VB 6 application through COM interop or otherwise. It is also a hurdle you'll have to jump over first, before you worry about things like registering COM components, as Uday's answer suggests.
If you don't want a dependency on .NET, you need to use another environment to create the ActiveX DLL; either C++ or VB 6 are possible choices.
One option may be that, while deployment, you need to register that .tlb file in System Registry using regsvr32 command in command-prompt. Generally static libraries does not work until they are registered with System Registry.
You might have seen many programs register components during installation like 'Registering Type Components' or 'Registering COM Components' (for those who do networking especially). Those components are nothing but native COM dlls and tlbs.
so when creating deployment project, add some scripting login to register thode dlls and tlb to System registry using:
regsvr32 <path to tlb/dll>
you have to recursivey call this command for every dll/tlb you want to register with system. For example, if you have 4 dlls and 2 tlbs then you have to call it 6 times providing the path of dll and tlb one at a time.
We have a Powerbuilder 10 application that is using .Net COM assemblies. We are trying to embed the manifest in the PB application (to invoke COM assemblies without registration). The merged manifest file has added sections for dependecies on the .Net COM assemblies. We have tries various tools to inject the new manifest with different results
- using GenMan32 to inject truncates the application from 6MB to 45KB.
- using ResourceTuner, the file size looks okay, but trying to launch application gives "Fatal Disk Error".
Any suggestions on invoked .Net ComEnabled assembly from PB without registration?
Have you tried it with an external manifest and ensured that works? If an external manifest doesn't work, then the manifest information isn't correct.
Once you have a valid external manifest, you might try the Manifest Tool (MT.EXE) from the .Net SDK. It works well with true EXE files. As Terry noted though, the PB generated executable contains additional information that tools that manipulate the EXE need to respect or they will break it.
http://blogs.msdn.com/patricka/archive/2009/12/09/answers-to-several-application-manifest-mysteries-and-questions.aspx
This is more a redirection than an answer. One thing you need to be aware of is that PowerBuilder produces executables that do not follow standards for Windows executable files. Essentially they are a bootstrap routine to load the PowerBuilder virtual machine, plus a collection of class definitions (objects). The cases you've brought up are not the first I've heard of where utilities meant to modify executables don't work on PowerBuilder executables.
As for a positive contribution on what other directions to follow, I don't really know enough to give qualified advice. If it were me, I'd try to register the COM object if ConnectToNewObject() fails, but I've got no idea if that possible or if that route is a dead end.
Good luck,
Terry.
I'm trying to reference a COM dll in visual studio by using the Browse tab and selecting the DLL. I noticed that if the DLL is registered on the system with regsvr32 I can reference it, but if it's not registered I receive an error selecting the dll file "A reference to 'file.DLL' could not be added. Please make sure that the file is accessible, and that it is a valid assembly or COM component."
We would like to keep the DLL not registered, so that we have less configuration needed on other development machines and on the development environments.
Is it too much to ask?
Thanks!
you need to register dll. you can set registration in your setup project or create a batch file for all these type of processes.
Note: Don't forget to unregister dll on uninstallation.
You'll need to register the dll because otherwise it would not be able to find the type library.
Adding the dll afterwards as a reference to you project will create the interop.XXXXmethod.dll assembly.
You need to have the COM server registered, period. You could take some measures to automate the process though and to unregister the COM server when it is not needed.
The same applies to daily builds. If you build a COM server and a .NET based client during the build you have to register the server prior to building the client. And you better unregister it as soon as the client is built. Adding these steps to the build sequence is not a problem at all.
You might be able to use Registration Free Com