I have a VB6 app that access's a database thru a ODBC Connection. It will run fine for a few hours then I get the following Error. Any Ideas?
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionWrite(WrapperWrite())
From Googling the error, it sounds like that's just ADO's way of saying it can't connect - that the server is unreachable. Are there are any other services on that server or that use the database that become unavailable at the same time as this error? It sounds like the client is just losing its connection, so I'd look for anything around that - dropped network connectivity, or a downed/overwhelmed server, to name a few examples.
Does your program have to reach across a network to get to the Access file?
If so I'd look into any intermittent network connectivity issues, especially if your program is always connected to the data source.
Check any logs you can to see what's happening on your network at the time of the error.
If possible change your app to connect to the data source only when you need to access it and then disconnect when done.
Is there more than one instance of the program running on the same and/or different machines? If so, do they all get the error at the same time?
If possible try to have more than one instance of you program running on the same machine and see if they all get the error at the same time.
Also:
Does the error happen about the same amount of time after initial connection?
Does the error happen about the same amount of inactivity in your application?
Related
I have a service fabric service (guest executable), using entityframework core, talking to sql azure.
From time to time I see the following error:
A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection
to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the
instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections.
(provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
It seems transient as there are numerous database transactions that occur without errors. This seems to occur more when a node is busy.
I've added code in start up to set EnableRetryOnFailure to set the SqlServerRetryingExecutionStrategy:
services.AddEntityFrameworkSqlServer()
.AddDbContext<MyDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(_configuration.GetConnectionString("MyDbConnection"),
o => o.EnableRetryOnFailure()))
One major caveat, is at the moment I'm losing context so I don't know what data was attempting to be updated/inserted, so I don't know if it was eventually successful or not.
Couple of questions:
From the Transient Detection Code it doesn't look like error: 40 is caught, but my understanding is that error 40 may actually be another error (unclear). Is that correct?
Is this really a transient issue or does it mean I have another problem?
Without additional logging (working on it), do we know if the retry strategy logs the error, but still retry's and in fact may have been successful?
If this is a transient error, but it's not caught in the default execution strategy, why not? and what would be unintentded consequences of sub classing the SqlAzureExecutionStrategy to include this error.
I've seen this question: Sql Connection Error 40 Under Load, and it feels familiar, but he seems to have resolved it by tuning his database - which I will look at doing, I'm trying to make my code more resilient in the case of database issues.
There is a certain version of EF Core that caches the query or requests if the time span between two database transactions is very small, so update your packages to make sure you are using the most recent.
Query: Threading issues cause NullReferenceException in SimpleNullableDependentKeyValueFactory #5456
check these other links
https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFramework/issues/5456
https://github.com/aspnet/Security/issues/739
https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFramework/issues/6347
https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFramework/issues/4120
this may be a simply question but I hope its not.
I run some very long winded SQL operations on my local PC, which is hard wired to an ADSL modem for internet. The SQL Server and databases are ALL local on my PC, and the processing seems fine. (as fast as normal).
However, if my internet drops out - which happens perhaps a few times a night (at later hours usually), my SQL connection also drops with the familiar Connection lost error. (An error one would get if connecting to SQL over a network)
For me this does not make sense, my SQL connection string refers to the local instance only and no processing is over a network of any kind (I have VPN sometimes active, but not always when this happens)
I can run the same SQL processing without the modem connected with no issues at all. (Although sometimes it can take many many hours so I prefer to have the modem connected)
Could this possibly be due to the extra SQL Services ie Browser - that is somehow affected by the modem losing its internet connection?
(I would like to know that my ISP-provided modem is not doing any funny business in the background - like examining my data / traffic / etc)
Any help appreciated
Try this connection string:
Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=DATABASE_I_USE;Data Source=127.0.0.1\INSTANCENAME
This should force the traffic onto the loopback adapter, which will allow it to avoid cases where your physical card's network link may drop.
If that does not work, try explicitly installing a loopback adapter.
Just had a bizarre issue with SQL Azure, and it's happened in a small phase just before full go live with some users doing some data entry.
"Database 'dbname' on server 'xxx' is not currently available. Please rety the connection later. If the problem persists, contact customer support."
When I tried to connect via SQL Azure database website I got:
"Firewall check failed.
Resource ID : 1. The request minimum guarantee is 0,
maximum limit is 180 and the current usage for the database is 0.
However, the server is currently too busy to support request greater than 0 for this database."
Looking at the databases section of the Azure Management website the site reported it couldn't access the DB, but I didn't capture the exact error message unfortunately.
Bizarrely, a couple of my users were still able to login to our system website that access the DB, and view and save data. Eventually they lost connection too however.
After an hour or so, the databases came back to life and we could fully access them again.
I have looked at the servers master db event table using queries from here and there was a couple of connection failures but nothing interesting. No throttling or deadlocks, a couple of failed connections that said "Client may have timed out when establishing connection. Try increasing the connection timeout." in the description
Any ideas where else to look?
Business users have had a massive drop in confidence because of this.
What your describing normally occurs because of :
1) SQL Connection limit being hit. Assuming you don't see this often you unlikely to be the cause. But worth checking putting a limit on your connection pool can help.
2)You neighbours being extremely noisy and thus the node re-adjusts.
3) Hardware failure and Microsoft bringing your database back online in a different node. This can take some time.
Normally I have seen this when Microsoft have throttled or had problems with a box and had to recover everyone over. Because you are on a shared system you have to keep in mind that they are recovering everyone else also in that node also and thus sometimes this takes time.
The best bet if you are worried and need to get a resolution for the business is to open a support ticket with MS and give them the time and error message you saw this. They will investigate and generally they have really good back end telemetry that will point to a reason. This will allow you to give the business a resolution and then you can make a call on future plans and contingencies. You have to keep in mind though that SQL Azure is shared system and transient errors can happen, you might need to design more failover into your designs.
We are facing the SQL Timed out issue and I found that the Error event ID is either Event 5586 or 3355 (Unable to connect / Network Issue), also could see few other DB related error event ids (3351 & 3760 - Permission issues) reported at different times.
what could be the reason? any help would be appreciated..
Can you elaborate a little? When is this happening? Can you reproduce the behavior or is it sporadic?
It appears SharePoint is involved. Is it possible there is high demand for a large file?
You should check for blocking/locking that might be preventing your query from completing. Also, if you have lots of computed/calculated columns (or just LOTS of data), your query make take a long time to compute.
Finally, if you can't find something blocking your result or optimize your query, it's possible to increase the timeout duration (set it to "0" for no timeout). Do this in Enterprise Manager under the server or database settings.
Troubleshooting Kerberos Errors. It never fails.
Are some of your webapps running under either the Local Service or Network Service account? If so, if your databases are not on the same machine (i.e. SharePoint is on machine A and SQL on machine B), authentication will fail for some tasks (i.e. timerjob related actions etc.) but not all. For instance it seems content databases are still accessible (weird, i know, but i've seen it happen....).
Question: Is it possible to stop SSMS from monitoring the service status of registered servers?
Details:
SSMS 2008 monitors the service status of every registered server. From what I have seen it seems to reach out to every registered server every minute or so to check it's status, in my case that is over 100 servers. This process has raised issues with our Security and Network departments. Network identified it initially as suspicious traffic due to the fact that it appeard as an unknown utility was scanning the network for SQL Servers. Security was concerned because the Security Event Logs on each server are being filled up with my logon events.
I have looked all over for a setting but can't seem to find one. Am I missing it somewhere?
TIA,
Brian
I finally found an answer!!
While it is not possible (at least that I've found) to stop SSMS from checking the service status of registered servers it is possible to change the interval at which it checks it.
The short version is to create the following registry keys (DWORD):
(SQL Server 2008)
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\Shell | PollingInterval = 600 (decimal)
(SQL Server 2005)
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Shell | PollingInterval = 600 (decimal)
This will make SSMS connect automatically every minute instead of every few seconds.
See this MS Connect Post for details.
Since it doesn't appear that there's any way to stop these status checks by SSMS, can you focus on helping them to see their harmlessness?
Can the network group allow certain exceptions to this particular rule (pinging servers on port 1433) in their scanning software, which would allow you and your group to monitor SQL Server uptime? Even if you weren't using SSMS, this type of sweeping monitoring activity is pretty common, and you'll know the requests will only ever come from a handful of workstations.
I don't think these SQL status checks generate any more events in the security log than any other activity, so maybe they were just concerned because it was something they weren't expecting. Could the security group be convinced that these events aren't dangerous, again as long as they're coming from certain approved workstations?
If neither of these is an option (or even if it is), you could help mitigate the problem by not connecting to all your SQL servers at once. Maybe just connect to the ones you need at the time - it looks like loading the entire list actively connects to each of them, but just connecting to the ones you intend to use in that session might help reduce the number of network sessions open.
I hope this helps - if it doesn't, or you've got some additional input that might help find a workaround, please post it!