I have VB6 ActiveXDLL called A.dll , I am referencing this DLL into my VB.Net Application.
Now I am calling a function of A.dll in this project. A.dll function is referring to the function of B.dll, C.dll, C.dll further referrer to Z.dll and so on.
when I am executing application it gives an error from B.dll that ActiveX component can't create an object.
My first thought would be to make sure all dlls are registered.
Assuming the ActiveX DLL is VB6 and you have access to the VB6 IDE, ensure the class's Instancing property is set to Multiuse.
Use OLE View (comes with visual studio) to browse ther TypeLib entry and check it has the correct GUID and that there is onely one registration. Can you create an object instance from the DLL with CreateObject? If not it is not registered correctly.
Also check any dependencies / references used by A.dllIf it can't find something then it's going to fail.These are the four common causes of the error:
1. You do not have a required TLB or ActiveX DLL/OCX file.
2. A TLB or ActiveX DLL/OCX needed by the project is present but not registered on your system.
3. The VB runtimes are an earlier version than the one you need to run the project.
4. A required TLB or ActiveX DLL/OCX file is corrupt.
Related
The situation is that. I run Labview and from one via ActiveX pallet call my COM object method. And it works, I walk through my code with debugger.
But when I start to use (uncomment) code from side dll I see "class is not registered" error in Labview. My additional dll and its dependencies located in separate directory. So I tried to set PATH environment variable to this directory and after that run Labview. But is still doesn't work.
So the question is how to debug this situation? I looked through event logger but didn't found anything related.
P.S. I created my own synthetic application in C++ which calls the same method as Labview via COM too. And it works.
The problem was in hard defined base dll address. Labview used this address and COM dlls couldn't use that space.
I suppose report is incorrect ("class is not registered") because class is registered, but corresponding dll couldn't be loaded.
i have create a c++ DLL with COM interface with Visual Studio 2013.
The DLL get's installed along with registration.
In the Ole Object Viewer, i can see typelibrary of this DLL with all
exported functions.
regsvr32 completes without any error.
Just within C# i can't use, because creation fails with error 0x80040154 -
class not found or not registered.
It is not a platform issue. The 64bit version is in system32 and the 32bit
version in syswow64 and they are registered there and typelibary information
in OLE Object Viewer confirms this.
But the class is not listed in the OLE Object Viewer tree.
Habe noe idea what's missing or wrong.
More over, i have a simliar VC++ project and this COM/DLL can be seen
in the view in the OLE Object viewer. It is compiled, linked
and installed in exactly the same manner.
I already compared all Compiler, Linker and MIDL settings, checked the .idl
file in the projects, the .rgs files... all seems to be the same, except
different names and guids.
So it is really strange: One is shown as COM object in the tree
of OLE Object viewer and can be used in C# program, the other not.
Please note: There is no compiler error in C# project using this DLL/COM.
There is a runtime error on creation 0x80040154.
Summary: i have to COM/DLL, both visual studion projects, deployed in the same
manner, the one can be seen in the OLE object tree and can be used in C#, the other not.
Are there any key points i could check and which are required for a successfull
listing as OLE COM object ?
PS: The only difference is the MSIL compiler version indicated in the type library view: The good COM/DLL has MSIL 7.xxx the bad one 8.xxx
but i don't know where at all to selected MSIL compiler. Both DLL/COM are built
by VS2013
OLE/COM Object Viewer shows the registration. When an application attempts to create an instance, there are further steps involved: registration points to server implementation, the library is loaded, class factory is located, class factory is called to created an instance. A failure in these steps results in instantiation failure nevertheless the registration itself is present and valid.
Your typical steps to troubleshoot the problems are:
Setting a break point in constructor of your COM class, in class factory construction, in DllGetClassObject exported function of your DLL, finally in its DllMain - to find out how close the system reaches trying to create an instance. Then step from there to get to the root of the problem.
Using Process Monitor to track registry/file activity around instantiation call and identify issues there (esp. if your DLL with COM server implementation is not even loaded).
If the class is not even listed in OLE/COM Object Viewer, then there is a problem even at registration stage. Your first troubleshooting attempt is to re-register manually and see if you have any registration error, or if it fixes the problem. There is a number of reasons for the registration to fail, a typical is that you have your COM class in your type library, however there is no implementation connected and referenced by OBJECT_ENTRY. With failed registration instantiation is expectedly not working because system cannot pick your implementation up and you see what you see: REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG error code.
Found the problem: The typelibrary was not associated with object, because the typelibrary CLSID in .rgs file was different from that in .idl file, just by a space which was most likey introduced accidently.
in .rgs file:
TypeLib = s '{7DAA7049 -AAB2-4689-8635-FB6E03423F34}'
in .idl
uuid(7DAA7049-AAB2-4689-8635-FB6E03423F34),
Now i can use the DLL as COM in my C# project.
The COM/DLL was not listed in the object tree, because in the .rgs file was no name defined. This is a definition with name and this is the name of the COM/DLL in object viewer; the name follows to s which was previously empty (s'').
ForceRemove {4763F309-D922-227A-A1A8-CDFF29893BBD} = s 'myDllCom Class'
I have a VB6 program that calls a VB6 DLL which in turn calls another VB6 DLL. When I execute the calling program there is an application error which I am unable to pinpoint so I researched how if it was possible to "see" the error in the dll.
I read Stackoverflow entry question about debugging VB6 dll
and followed the directions of Booji Boy to create a vbg. I also followed his directions and removed the two DLLs from he Reference list. The calling program takes a .txt file as input. When I executed the exe I received this error:
Error Number: 13Description: Type mismatch
The error isn't being generated by the application.
What does this mean? How can I debug this issue?
You must have all the source code for the EXE and the two DLLs. You add all the projects into single group file i.e. the VBG. You must have a reference in the EXE project to the first DLL. I have no idea why you have been told you have to remove them. You must have a reference in the first DLL project to the second DLL project. VB is clever enough to silently replace the DLL reference with the project reference. It is also clever enough to silently replace the project reference with the DLL reference if you remove a DLL project from the project group.
Make sure you have error handling set to "Break on All Errors" or "Break in Class".
The type mismatch error can occur from simple things like assign a non-numeric string to an numeric variable. It gets more complicated if you are passing object references around. If you see this error occurs on something like:
Set myObject = someOtherObject
... and it looks as if they should be the same type, this might get very complicated. But first, I'll let you do the debug.
You can use an open source project made in Visual Basic 6.0. It is called "Debuggy v2".This project has multiple roles:
-debugger
-disassembler
-Windows resource extractor
-file hex editor
-window sniffer
-API spy
all rolled into one. I may be useful for what you need.
When starting to work in a VBG a type mismatch can arise if the library references are inconsistent. One library may be referencing another IN the VBG; a second may be referencing the compiled version. Passing objects between them can result in this error.
Concrete example:
VBG contains code for: A.DLL, B.DLL, C.DLL
A references B in the VBG
C references B which is compiled
Code in A calls code in C passing an object defined by a class in B.
Type mismatch
C should have referenced B in the VBG.
I have several C# projects in one solution which reference some isolation-mode (regfree) COM DLLs. Some projects reference the same DLL, and when I build, I get error [MSB3180][1]: COM component 'SomeDll.dll' is defined in both 'Native.SomeProject.manifest' and 'Native.SomeOtherProject.manifest'".
The projects must reference the same COM DLL, since they both use it, and both are completely independent of one another. It gets more complicated since I want to support non-isolation mode for Debug builds.
Any ideas or suggestions?
All those projects could reference a new DLL that acts as a wrapper to the singular DLL that references the Reg-Free COM.
I am trying to create an instance of a COM object. I have the class name that implements the interface and I get a CLSID by using CLSIDFromProgID(). So since I am getting a CLSID I thought everything should be fine from now on. However when I do a call to CreateInstance and pass in the CLSID, I get an error saying "Class not registered". Also I get this error only in some computers. It runs error free on several computers. I don't understand where the problem could be. Is my registry dirty? Does anyone know what is going on here? Thanks for your help!
I just want to add that this is a .NET COM class. The appropriate entries are in the registry and the DLL is in the GAC.
CLSIDFromProgId is simply looking up the ProgId's name in the registry and translating it to a CLSID, it doesn't have to look at anything beyond the registry or even check that something is actually implementing that CLSID.
When you call CreateInstance on the CLSID, Windows will look up in the registry to find out how the object should be instantiated (usually a exe or dll). It will then try to load the dll (or start up the exe) and create the object from it.
There is a lot of documentation in MSDN on the processes involved, for example see "COM Class Objects and CLSIDs", and if you do a lot of COM work it is worthwhile learning the process from first principals since it can save a lot of time and hassle when debugging this type of issue.
It's a two step process in the registry. You used the ProgID to get the CLSID. Then, when you call CreateInstance, COM then uses the CLSID to find the path to the dll. You can used regedit yourself to lookup the CLSID and see what that entry looks like.
Thanks for your answers. The .Net assemblies were registered properly and were present in the GAC. One application that absolutely confirmed this was Process Explorer. You can view the dlls that are loaded by each application. So from here I was able to see if the application that was instantiating the COM objects was actually able to load the DLLs or not. I found out that this was indeed happening. The problem was due to different Regional settings. We found that the application threw an exception when the region was not set to US. This issue was fixed. The error message "Class not registered" was not very helpful. Thankfully it was a quick fix.
Using shell32 as an example, you can create a new instance like so;
var shl = (Shell) Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetTypeFromProgID("Shell.Application"));
This will aquire a refernce to an existing component;
var shl2 = (Shell) Marshal.GetActiveObject("Shell.Application");
Here's a reference to how to do the same in IronPython.
** Note, this used the progid, clsid would be nearly identical, just use Type.GetTypeFromCLSID({GUID}).