The below inner SELECT returns huge amount of rows (1000000+) and the outer SELECTs(alpha BETWEEN #startRec# AND #endRec#) is used for PAGINATION
to display data with 25 in each page.
Issue is:-This PAGINATION done below is very slow and slows the entire display of data.So could all please help me on doing this below
pagination in a BETTER WAY? COde about pagination would be best.
**I am very sorry to put in this way but i am very new to Pagination concepts and so need your help.
/*********ORIGINAL QUERY ****/
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
beta.*, rownum as alpha
FROM
(
SELECT
p.lastname, p.firstname, porg.DEPARTMENT,
porg.org_relationship,
porg.enterprise_name,
(
SELECT
count(*)
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
) AS results
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
ORDER BY
upper(p.lastname), upper(p.firstname)
) beta
)
WHERE
alpha BETWEEN #startRec# AND #endRec#
My tried implementation below
(1)The inner most query..is the 1st QUERY fetching the data.
(2)Then,we do a total COUNT on the above data.
Now,main issue is running the query goes on forever....and finally i have to forcibly cancel it.
I feel there is something missing in the below query for which it hangs off.
Also,I came to know doing the COUNT outside is the best approach for performance.So,could you please correct the query below so that I am able return the COUNT
*** DATA using Pagination,rownum etc.Mainly with the aliases below,rownum and getting data.
select * from
( select x.* ,rownum rnum
from ( SELECT
count(*) as results /****2nd QUERY is OUTSIDE to get total count**/
Question is here,how do i access the data selected inside the 1st query below
from ( /****1st query to SELECT data***/
SELECT
p.lastname, p.firstname, porg.DEPARTMENT,
porg.org_relationship,
porg.enterprise_name
FROM
t_person p, t_contact c1, t_o_person porg
WHERE rownum <10
and
p.person_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.person_id = porg.o_person_id
ORDER BY
upper(p.lastname), upper(p.firstname)
) y ------------------>alias defined Y from data of the 1st query
)x ------------------>alias defined X
where rownum <= 20 )
where rnum >= 1
To do pagination quickly, you need to limit the query results returned. eg. in mysql you can use limit and calc_rows.
You'd have to check your DB, however it'd be easier to break those 2 into separate queries if you don't have those helper functions.
Maybe I've missed something, but have you looked into use the LIMIT and OFFSET clauses?
http://www.sql.org/sql-database/postgresql/manual/queries-limit.html
I usually do this as two separate queries, e.g.,:
-- get page of data
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT
p.lastname, p.firstname, porg.DEPARTMENT,
porg.org_relationship,
porg.enterprise_name
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
ORDER BY
upper(p.lastname), upper(p.firstname)
) beta
WHERE
rownum BETWEEN #startRec# AND #endRec#
--get total count
SELECT count(*) as Count
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
You could also return the total count in the first row of data in your results, like this:
SELECT null, null, null, null, null, count(*) as Count
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT
p.lastname, p.firstname, porg.DEPARTMENT,
porg.org_relationship,
porg.enterprise_name, null
FROM
test_person p, test_contact c1, test_org_person porg
WHERE
p.p_id = c1.ref_id(+)
AND p.p_id = porg.o_p_id
$where_clause$
ORDER BY
upper(p.lastname), upper(p.firstname)
) beta
WHERE
rownum BETWEEN #startRec# AND #endRec#
What database are you using? If Oracle the ideas suggested by others will not work, Oracle does not support the LIMIT syntax for SQL.
For Oracle you wrap your query in this syntax:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT a.*,
ROWNUM rnum
FROM ( [your query] ) a
WHERE ROWNUM <= [endRow] )
WHERE rnum >= [startRow]
These are specifically intended for ASP, but can be adapted without much trouble:
http://databases.aspfaq.com/database/how-do-i-page-through-a-recordset.html
Personally, I implemented the "#Temp table" stored procedure method when I recently needed a paging solution.
My suggestion is :
Create an index on test_person by lastname + firstname (in this order)
If possible, remove the upper functions (some DBs allow creating indexes using functions)
Remove the external SELECT and do the pagination in the client (not in DB)
I suspect that the internal subquery must be resolved first, and that's costly if there are no proper indexes. Usually ordering by computed columns do not use indexes, temporal tables are created etcetera.
Cheers
In Oracle there are a couple of options:
Using ROWNUM in an inner query with a wrapping to get the pagination (as you've tried)
Using analytic functions.
Both approaches have been described well by Tom Kyte:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/07-jan/o17asktom.html
Hope this helps.
Related
This is the query:
SELECT
[Code]
FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY [OrderNo], [ProductNo] ORDER BY [Quantity] DESC) AS [RowNumber],
SUBSTRING(P.[ProductNo], 1, 2) AS [Code]
FROM [LESMESPRD].[FlexNet_prd].[dbo].[ORDER_DETAIL] AS OD
INNER JOIN [LESMESPRD].[FlexNet_prd].[dbo].[WIP_COMPONENT] AS WC ON [WC].[WiporderNo] = OD.[OrderNo]
AND WC.[WipOrderType] = OD.[OrderType]
AND WC.[Active] = 1
INNER JOIN [LESMESPRD].[FlexNet_prd].[dbo].[COMPONENT] AS C ON C.[ID] = WC.[ComponentID]
INNER JOIN [LESMESPRD].[FlexNet_prd].[dbo].[PRODUCT] AS P ON P.[ID] = C.[ProductID]
WHERE SUBSTRING(P.[ProductNo], 1, 2) IN ('43', '72')
) AS OrderBrandComponents
WHERE [RowNumber] = 1
Executing time is 1 minute and 16 seconds, maybe you can help me optimize it somehow? This query is just small piece of the code, but I found that exactly this part is slowing the process.
I tried to think that maybe problem is in sub select when I try to get my rownumber, from these tables that are linked servers data is executing in seconds, I think problem is with the functions. I hope that this query could be optimized.
I believe the delay is because your query is not sargable based on the SUBSTRING( P.[ProductNo], 1,2 ). The engine can not utilize an index on a function call. But by using the full column and using LIKE based on the first 2 characters Plus wild-card anything after, you get the same records, but able to use an index.
Now, because you are looking for 2 specific product type codes (43 and 72), I reversed the query to START with that table, then find orders the products were used. This may help optimize speed, especially if you have 100 orders with these products, but 1000s of orders otherwise. Thus, starting with a smaller set to begin with.
Also, you dont need all the square brackets all over. Typically, those are only used if you have a column name based on a "reserved" keyword, such as naming a column "from" which is an obvious keyword in a SQL statement. Or things that are known data types, function names, etc.
Finally indexes to help optimize this. I would ensure you have indexes on the following tables
table index
Product ( ProductNo, Id ) -- specifically this order
Component ( ProductID, Id
WIP_COMPONENT ( ComponentId, Active, WipOrderNo, WipOrderType )
ORDER_DETAIL ( OrderNo, OrderType )
SELECT
Code
FROM
(SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(PARTITION BY OrderNo, ProductNo
ORDER BY Quantity DESC) AS RowNumber,
SUBSTRING(P.ProductNo, 1, 2) Code
FROM
LESMESPRD.FlexNet_prd.dbo.PRODUCT P
JOIN LESMESPRD.FlexNet_prd.dbo.COMPONENT C
ON P.ID = C.ProductID
JOIN LESMESPRD.FlexNet_prd.dbo.WIP_COMPONENT WC
ON C.ID = WC.ComponentID
AND WC.Active = 1
JOIN LESMESPRD.FlexNet_prd.dbo.ORDER_DETAIL OD
ON WC.WiporderNo = OD.OrderNo
AND WC.WipOrderType = OD.OrderType
WHERE
P.ProductNo like '43%'
OR P.ProductNo like '72%' ) AS OrderBrandComponents
WHERE
OrderBrandComponents.RowNumber = 1
I have 2 tables (Opportunity and Stage). I need to get each opportunity with the most recent stage by StageTypeId.
Opportunity: Id, etc
Stage: Id, CreatedOn, OpportunityId, StageTypeId.
Let's suppose I have "opportunity1" and "opportunity2" each one with many Stages added.
By passing the StageTypeId I need to get the opportunity which has this StageTypeId as most recent.
I'm trying the following query but it´s replicating the same Stage for all the Opportunities.
It seems that it's ignoring this line: "AND {Stage}.[OpportunityId] = ID"
SELECT {Opportunity}.[Id] ID,
{Opportunity}.[Name],
{Opportunity}.[PotentialAmount],
{Contact}.[FirstName],
{Contact}.[LastName],
(SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT {Stage}.[StageTypeId]
FROM {Stage}
WHERE {Stage}.[StageTypeId] = #StageTypeId
AND {Stage}.[OpportunityId] = ID
ORDER BY {Stage}.[CreatedOn] DESC
)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1) AS StageTypeId
FROM {Opportunity}
LEFT JOIN {Contact}
ON {Opportunity}.[ContactId] = {Contact}.[Id]
Thank you
Most of DBMS support fetch first clause So, you can do :
select o.*
from Opportunity o
where o.StageTypeId = (select s.StageTypeId
from Stage s
where s.OpportunityId = o.id
order by s.CreatedOn desc
fetch first 1 rows only
);
you can try below way all dbms will support
select TT*. ,o*. from
(
select s1.OpportunityId,t.StageTypeId from Stage s1 inner join
(select StageTypeId,max(CreatedOn) as createdate Stage s
group by StageTypeId
) t
on s1.StageTypeId=t.StageTypeId and s1.CreatedOn=t.createdate
) as TT inner join Opportunity o on TT.OpportunityId=o.id
I have a SQL Server 2005 query that I'm trying to assemble right now but I am having some difficulties.
I have a group by clause based on 5 columns: Project, Area, Name, User, Engineer.
Engineer is coming from another table and is a one to many relationship
WITH TempCTE
AS (
SELECT htce.HardwareProjectID AS ProjectId
,area.AreaId AS Area
,hs.NAME AS 'Status'
,COUNT(*) AS Amount
,MAX(htce.DateEdited) AS DateModified
,UserEditing AS LastModifiedName
,Engineer
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
PARTITION BY htce.HardwareProjectID
,area.AreaId
,hs.NAME
,htce.UserEditing ORDER BY htce.HardwareProjectID
,Engineer DESC
) AS row
FROM HardwareTestCase_Execution AS htce
INNER JOIN HardwareTestCase AS htc ON htce.HardwareTestCaseID = htc.HardwareTestCaseID
INNER JOIN HardwareTestGroup AS htg ON htc.HardwareTestGroupID = htg.HardwareTestGroupId
INNER JOIN Block AS b ON b.BlockId = htg.BlockId
INNER JOIN Area ON b.AreaId = Area.AreaId
INNER JOIN HardwareStatus AS hs ON htce.HardwareStatusID = hs.HardwareStatusId
INNER JOIN j_Project_Testcase AS jptc ON htce.HardwareProjectID = jptc.HardwareProjectId AND htce.HardwareTestCaseID = jptc.TestcaseId
WHERE (htce.DateEdited > #LastDateModified)
GROUP BY htce.HardwareProjectID
,area.AreaId
,hs.NAME
,htce.UserEditing
,jptc.Engineer
)
The gist of what I want is to be able to deal with empty Engineer columns. I don't want this column to have a blank second entry (where row=2).
What I want to do:
Group the items with "row" value of 1 & 2 together.
Select the Engineer that isn't empty.
Do not deselect engineers where there is not a matching row=2.
I've tried a series of joins to try and make things work. No luck so far.
Use j_Project_Testcase PIVOT( MAX(Engineer) for Row in ( [1], [2] ) then select ISNULL( [1],[2]) to select the Engineer value
I can give you a more robust example if you set up a SQL fiddle
Try reading this: PIVOT and UNPIVOT
I am new to PostgreSQL and I have a problem with the following query:
WITH relevant_einsatz AS (
SELECT einsatz.fahrzeug,einsatz.mannschaft
FROM einsatz
INNER JOIN bergefahrzeug ON einsatz.fahrzeug = bergefahrzeug.id
),
relevant_mannschaften AS (
SELECT DISTINCT relevant_einsatz.mannschaft
FROM relevant_einsatz
WHERE relevant_einsatz.fahrzeug IN (SELECT id FROM bergefahrzeug)
)
SELECT mannschaft.id,mannschaft.rufname,person.id,person.nachname
FROM mannschaft,person,relevant_mannschaften WHERE mannschaft.leiter = person.id AND relevant_mannschaften.mannschaft=mannschaft.id;
This query is working basically - but in "relevant_mannschaften" I am currently selecting each mannschaft, which has been to an relevant_einsatz with at least 1 bergefahrzeug.
Instead of this, I want to select into "relevant_mannschaften" each mannschaft, which has been to an relevant_einsatz WITH EACH from bergefahrzeug.
Does anybody know how to formulate this change?
The information you provide is rather rudimentary. But tuning into my mentalist skills, going out on a limb, I would guess this untangled version of the query does the job much faster:
SELECT m.id, m.rufname, p.id, p.nachname
FROM person p
JOIN mannschaft m ON m.leiter = p.id
JOIN (
SELECT e.mannschaft
FROM einsatz e
JOIN bergefahrzeug b ON b.id = e.fahrzeug -- may be redundant
GROUP BY e.mannschaft
HAVING count(DISTINCT e.fahrzeug)
= (SELECT count(*) FROM bergefahrzeug)
) e ON e.mannschaft = m.id
Explain:
In the subquery e I count how many DISTINCT mountain-vehicles (bergfahrzeug) have been used by a team (mannschaft) in all their deployments (einsatz): count(DISTINCT e.fahrzeug)
If that number matches the count in table bergfahrzeug: (SELECT count(*) FROM bergefahrzeug) - the team qualifies according to your description.
The rest of the query just fetches details from matching rows in mannschaft and person.
You don't need this line at all, if there are no other vehicles in play than bergfahrzeuge:
JOIN bergefahrzeug b ON b.id = e.fahrzeug
Basically, this is a special application of relational division. A lot more on the topic under this related question:
How to filter SQL results in a has-many-through relation
Do not know how to explain it, but here is an example how I solved this problem, just in case somebody has the some question one day.
WITH dfz AS (
SELECT DISTINCT fahrzeug,mannschaft FROM einsatz WHERE einsatz.fahrzeug IN (SELECT id FROM bergefahrzeug)
), abc AS (
SELECT DISTINCT mannschaft FROM dfz
), einsatzmannschaften AS (
SELECT abc.mannschaft FROM abc WHERE (SELECT sum(dfz.fahrzeug) FROM dfz WHERE dfz.mannschaft = abc.mannschaft) = (SELECT sum(bergefahrzeug.id) FROM bergefahrzeug)
)
SELECT mannschaft.id,mannschaft.rufname,person.id,person.nachname
FROM mannschaft,person,einsatzmannschaften WHERE mannschaft.leiter = person.id AND einsatzmannschaften.mannschaft=mannschaft.id;
I'm trying to make a query to retrieve the region which got the most sales for sweet products. 'grupo_produto' is the product type, and 'regiao' is the region. So I got this query:
SELECT TOP 1 r.nm_regiao, (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Dw_Empresa
WHERE grupo_produto='1' AND
cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao) as total
FROM Dw_Empresa d
INNER JOIN tb_regiao r ON r.cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao ORDER BY total DESC
Then when i run the query, MS-Access asks for the "total" parameter. Why it doesn't consider the newly created 'column' I made in the select clause?
Thanks in advance!
Old Question I know, but it may help someone knowing than while you cant order by aliases, you can order by column index. For example, this will work without error :
SELECT
firstColumn,
IIF(secondColumn = '', thirdColumn, secondColumn) As yourAlias
FROM
yourTable
ORDER BY
2 ASC
The results would then be ordered by the values found in the second column wich is the Alias "yourAlias".
Aliases are only usable in the query output. You can't use them in other parts of the query. Unfortunately, you'll have to copy and paste the entire subquery to make it work.
You can do it like this
select * from(
select a + b as c, * from table)
order by c
Access has some differences compared to Sql Server.
Why it doesn't consider the newly
created 'column' I made in the select
clause?
Because Access (ACE/Jet) is not compliant with the SQL-92 Standard.
Consider this example, which is valid SQL-92:
SELECT a AS x, c - b AS y
FROM MyTable
ORDER
BY x, y;
In fact, x and y the only valid elements in the ORDER BY clause because all others are out of scope (ordinal numbers of columns in the SELECT clause are valid though their use id deprecated).
However, Access chokes on the above syntax. The equivalent Access syntax is this:
SELECT a AS x, c - b AS y
FROM MyTable
ORDER
BY a, c - b;
However, I understand from #Remou's comments that a subquery in the ORDER BY clause is invalid in Access.
Try using a subquery and order the results in an outer query.
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM
(
SELECT
r.nm_regiao,
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Dw_Empresa
WHERE grupo_produto='1' AND cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao) as total
FROM Dw_Empresa d
INNER JOIN tb_regiao r ON r.cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao
) T1
ORDER BY total DESC
(Not tested.)
How about:
SELECT TOP 1 r.nm_regiao
FROM (SELECT Dw_Empresa.cod_regiao,
Count(Dw_Empresa.cod_regiao) AS CountOfcod_regiao
FROM Dw_Empresa
WHERE Dw_Empresa.[grupo_produto]='1'
GROUP BY Dw_Empresa.cod_regiao
ORDER BY Count(Dw_Empresa.cod_regiao) DESC) d
INNER JOIN tb_regiao AS r
ON d.cod_regiao = r.cod_regiao
I suggest using an intermediate query.
SELECT r.nm_regiao, d.grupo_produto, COUNT(*) AS total
FROM Dw_Empresa d INNER JOIN tb_regiao r ON r.cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao
GROUP BY r.nm_regiao, d.grupo_produto;
If you call that GroupTotalsByRegion, you can then do:
SELECT TOP 1 nm_regiao, total FROM GroupTotalsByRegion
WHERE grupo_produto = '1' ORDER BY total DESC
You may think it's extra work to create the intermediate query (and, in a sense, it is), but you will also find that many of your other queries will be based off of GroupTotalsByRegion. You want to avoid repeating that logic in many other queries. By keeping it in one view, you provide a simplified route to answering many other questions.
How about use:
WITH xx AS
(
SELECT TOP 1 r.nm_regiao, (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Dw_Empresa
WHERE grupo_produto='1' AND
cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao) as total
FROM Dw_Empresa d
INNER JOIN tb_regiao r ON r.cod_regiao = d.cod_regiao
) SELECT * FROM xx ORDER BY total