Hi I'm running into the following problem on SQlite3
I have a simple table
CREATE TABLE TestTable (id INT, cnt INT);
There are some rows already in the table.
I have some data I want to be inserted into the table: {(id0, cnt0), (id1, cnt1)...}
I want to insert data into the table, on id conflict, update TestTable.cnt = TestTable.cnt + value.cnt
(values.cnt is cnt0, cnt1 ... basically my data to be inserted)
*** But the problem is, there is no primary or unique constraint on id, and I am not allowed to change it!
What I currently have :
In my program I loop through all the values
UPDATE TestTABLE SET count = count + value.cnt WHERE id = value.id;
if (sqlite3_changes() == 0)
INSERT INTO MyTable (id, cnt) values (value.id, value.cnt);
But the problem is, with a very large dataset, doing 2 queries for each data entry takes too long. I'm trying to bundle multiple entries together into one call.
Please let me know if you have questions about my description, thank you for helping!
If you are able to create temporary tables, then do the following. Although I don't show it here, I suggest wrapping all this in a transaction. This technique will likely increase efficiency even if you are also able to add a temporary unique index. (In that case you could use an UPSERT with source data in the temporary table.)
CREATE TEMP TABLE data(id INT, cnt INT);
Now insert the new data into the temporary table, whether by using the host-language data libraries or crafting an insert statement similar to
INSERT INTO data (id, cnt)
VALUES (1, 100),
(2, 200),
(5, 400),
(7, 500);
Now update all existing rows using the single UPDATE statement. SQLite does not have a convenient syntax for joining tables and/or providing a source query for an UPDATE statement. However, one can use nested statement to provide similar convenience:
UPDATE TestTable AS tt
SET cnt = cnt + ifnull((SELECT cnt FROM data WHERE data.id == tt.id), 0)
WHERE tt.id IN (SELECT id FROM data);
Note that the two nested queries are independent of each other. In fact, one could eliminate the WHERE clause altogether and get the same results for this simple case. The WHERE clause is simply to make it more efficient, only attempting to update matching id's. The other subquery in the SET clause also specifies a match on id, but alone it would still allow updates of rows that don't have a match, defaulting to a null value and being converted to 0 (by isnull() function) for a no-op. By the way, without the isnull() function, the sum would result in null and would overwrite non-null values.
Finally, insert only rows with non-existing id values:
INSERT INTO TestTable (id, cnt)
SELECT data.id, data.cnt
FROM data LEFT JOIN TestTable
ON data.id == TestTable.id
WHERE TestTable.id IS NULL;
I am trying to insert values into 1 column of a table when a condition is satisfied.
Note: The table already contains data for all the columns but for 1 which is empty. I would like to insert value into this 1 column depending on the WHERE clause.
I have this query:
INSERT INTO <TABLE_NAME>
(COLUMN_NAME)
(VALUE)
WHERE <CONDITION>
I am getting an exception:
Incorrect Syntax Near WHERE Keyword
I am able to do this using UPDATE:
UPDATE <TABLE_NAME>
SET <COL_NAME>
WHERE <CONDITION>
But was wondering why the INSERT query was failing. Any advise appreciated.
As I understand your problem, you already have data in one row, and one column in that row does not have value, so you want to add value in to that column.
This the scenario for Update existing row, not the insert new row. You have to use UPDATE clause when data already present and you want to modify record(s). Choose insert when You want to insert new row in table.
So in your current scenario, Update Clause is your friend with Where Clause as you want to modify subset of records not all.
UPDATE <TABLE_NAME>
SET <COL_NAME>
WHERE <CONDITION>
INSERT Clause does not have any Where Clause as per any RDBMS syntax(I think). Insert is condition less sql query, While SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE all are conditional commands, you can add Where Clause in all later ones.
In order to add a value into the one column when the rows are already populated, you will need to use the update statement.
If you need to insert a new row that has a where clause, you will need to use an insert into select statement:
INSERT INTO <table> (<columns>)
SELECT <columns>
FROM <table>
WHERE <condition>;
The SQL Insert dont accept where parameters, you could check this: SQL Insert Definition...
I do not know the whole question of what you want to do, but just using the INSERT statement is not possible, however it is possible to condition the insertion of data into a table, if this data is dependent on another table or comes from another table ... check here... SQL Insert explain in wikipedia
like this:
Copying rows from other tables
INSERT INTO phone_book2
SELECT *
FROM phone_book
WHERE name IN ('John Doe', 'Peter Doe')
or
INSERT INTO phone_book2 ( [name], [phoneNumber] )
SELECT [name], [phoneNumber]
FROM phone_book
WHERE name IN ('John Doe', 'Peter Doe')
Based on your question I have the feeling that you are trying to UPDATE a column in a table rather than insert.
Something like:
UPDATE column SET value WHERE different_column_value = some_value
I know this is kinda late, for those who still want to use the where clause in an insert query, it's kinda possible with a hack.
My understanding is that, you want to insert only if a condition is true. Let's assume you have a column in your database "surname" and you want to insert only if a surname doesn't exist from the table.
You kinda want something like INSERT INTO table_name blha blha blah WHERE surname!="this_surname".
The solution is to make that cell unique from your admin panel.
Insert statement will insert a new record. You cannot apply a where clause to the record that you are inserting.
The where clause can be used to update the row that you want.
update SET = where .
But insert will not have a where clause.
Hope this answers your question
INSERT syntax cannot have WHERE clause. The only time you will find INSERT has WHERE clause is when you are using INSERT INTO...SELECT statement.
I take it the code you included is simply a template to show how you structured your query. See the SO questions here, here and the MSDN question here.
In SQL Server (which uses Transact-SQL aka T-SQL) you need an UPDATE query for INSERT where columns already have values - by using the answer #HaveNoDisplayName gave :)
If you are executing INSERT / UPDATE from code (or if you need it regularly) I would strongly recommend using a stored procedure with parameters.
You could extend the procedure further by adding an INSERT block to the procedure using an IF-ELSE to determine whether to execute INSERT new record or UPDATE an existing, as seen in this SO answer.
Finally, take a look at SQLFiddle for a sandbox playground to test your SQL without risk to your RDMS :-)
Private case I found useful: Conditional insert which avoids duplications:
-- create a temporary table with desired values
SELECT 'Peter' FirstName, 'Pan' LastName
INTO #tmp
-- insert only if row doesn't exist
INSERT INTO Persons (FirstName, LastName)
SELECT *
FROM #tmp t
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM Persons where FirstName=t.FirstName and LastName=t.LastName)
If the data need to be added for a column for an existing row then it’s UPDATE.
INSERT is creating a new row in the table.
For conditional INSERT, you can use the MERGE command.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upsert
Insert Update stored proc on SQL Server
Is there some clever way to do this in SQLite that I have not thought of?
Basically I want to update three out of four columns if the record exists,
If it does not exists I want to INSERT the record with the default (NUL) value for the fourth column.
The ID is a primary key so there will only ever be one record to UPSERT.
(I am trying to avoid the overhead of SELECT in order to determine if I need to UPDATE or INSERT obviously)
Suggestions?
I cannot confirm that Syntax on the SQLite site for TABLE CREATE.
I have not built a demo to test it, but it doesn't seem to be supported.
If it was, I have three columns so it would actually look like:
CREATE TABLE table1(
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
Blob1 BLOB ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
Blob2 BLOB ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
Blob3 BLOB
);
but the first two blobs will not cause a conflict, only the ID would
So I assume Blob1 and Blob2 would not be replaced (as desired)
UPDATEs in SQLite when binding data are a complete transaction, meaning
Each sent row to be updated requires: Prepare/Bind/Step/Finalize statements
unlike the INSERT which allows the use of the reset function
The life of a statement object goes something like this:
Create the object using sqlite3_prepare_v2()
Bind values to host parameters using sqlite3_bind_ interfaces.
Run the SQL by calling sqlite3_step()
Reset the statement using sqlite3_reset() then go back to step 2 and repeat.
Destroy the statement object using sqlite3_finalize().
UPDATE I am guessing is slow compared to INSERT, but how does it compare to SELECT using the Primary key?
Perhaps I should use the select to read the 4th column (Blob3) and then use REPLACE to write a new record blending the original 4th Column with the new data for the first 3 columns?
Assuming three columns in the table: ID, NAME, ROLE
BAD: This will insert or replace all columns with new values for ID=1:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, name, role)
VALUES (1, 'John Foo', 'CEO');
BAD: This will insert or replace 2 of the columns... the NAME column will be set to NULL or the default value:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, role)
VALUES (1, 'code monkey');
GOOD: Use SQLite On conflict clause
UPSERT support in SQLite! UPSERT syntax was added to SQLite with version 3.24.0!
UPSERT is a special syntax addition to INSERT that causes the INSERT to behave as an UPDATE or a no-op if the INSERT would violate a uniqueness constraint. UPSERT is not standard SQL. UPSERT in SQLite follows the syntax established by PostgreSQL.
GOOD but tedious: This will update 2 of the columns.
When ID=1 exists, the NAME will be unaffected.
When ID=1 does not exist, the name will be the default (NULL).
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, role, name)
VALUES ( 1,
'code monkey',
(SELECT name FROM Employee WHERE id = 1)
);
This will update 2 of the columns.
When ID=1 exists, the ROLE will be unaffected.
When ID=1 does not exist, the role will be set to 'Benchwarmer' instead of the default value.
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, name, role)
VALUES ( 1,
'Susan Bar',
COALESCE((SELECT role FROM Employee WHERE id = 1), 'Benchwarmer')
);
INSERT OR REPLACE is NOT equivalent to "UPSERT".
Say I have the table Employee with the fields id, name, and role:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee ("id", "name", "role") VALUES (1, "John Foo", "CEO")
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee ("id", "role") VALUES (1, "code monkey")
Boom, you've lost the name of the employee number 1. SQLite has replaced it with a default value.
The expected output of an UPSERT would be to change the role and to keep the name.
Eric B’s answer is OK if you want to preserve just one or maybe two columns from the existing row. If you want to preserve a lot of columns, it gets too cumbersome fast.
Here’s an approach that will scale well to any amount of columns on either side. To illustrate it I will assume the following schema:
CREATE TABLE page (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT UNIQUE,
title TEXT,
content TEXT,
author INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES user (id),
ts TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
Note in particular that name is the natural key of the row – id is used only for foreign keys, so the point is for SQLite to pick the ID value itself when inserting a new row. But when updating an existing row based on its name, I want it to continue to have the old ID value (obviously!).
I achieve a true UPSERT with the following construct:
WITH new (name, title, author) AS ( VALUES('about', 'About this site', 42) )
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO page (id, name, title, content, author)
SELECT old.id, new.name, new.title, old.content, new.author
FROM new LEFT JOIN page AS old ON new.name = old.name;
The exact form of this query can vary a bit. The key is the use of INSERT SELECT with a left outer join, to join an existing row to the new values.
Here, if a row did not previously exist, old.id will be NULL and SQLite will then assign an ID automatically, but if there already was such a row, old.id will have an actual value and this will be reused. Which is exactly what I wanted.
In fact this is very flexible. Note how the ts column is completely missing on all sides – because it has a DEFAULT value, SQLite will just do the right thing in any case, so I don’t have to take care of it myself.
You can also include a column on both the new and old sides and then use e.g. COALESCE(new.content, old.content) in the outer SELECT to say “insert the new content if there was any, otherwise keep the old content” – e.g. if you are using a fixed query and are binding the new values with placeholders.
This answer has been updated and so the comments below no longer apply.
2018-05-18 STOP PRESS.
UPSERT support in SQLite! UPSERT syntax was added to SQLite with version 3.24.0 (pending) !
UPSERT is a special syntax addition to INSERT that causes the INSERT to behave as an UPDATE or a no-op if the INSERT would violate a uniqueness constraint. UPSERT is not standard SQL. UPSERT in SQLite follows the syntax established by PostgreSQL.
alternatively:
Another completely different way of doing this: in my application I set my in memory rowID to be long.MaxValue when I create the row in memory. (MaxValue will never be used as an ID you won't live long enough....) Then if rowID is not that value then it must already be in the database so needs an UPDATE if it is MaxValue then it needs an insert. This is only useful if you can track the rowIDs in your app.
If you are generally doing updates I would ..
Begin a transaction
Do the update
Check the rowcount
If it is 0 do the insert
Commit
If you are generally doing inserts I would
Begin a transaction
Try an insert
Check for primary key violation error
if we got an error do the update
Commit
This way you avoid the select and you are transactionally sound on Sqlite.
I realize this is an old thread but I've been working in sqlite3 as of late and came up with this method which better suited my needs of dynamically generating parameterized queries:
insert or ignore into <table>(<primaryKey>, <column1>, <column2>, ...) values(<primaryKeyValue>, <value1>, <value2>, ...);
update <table> set <column1>=<value1>, <column2>=<value2>, ... where changes()=0 and <primaryKey>=<primaryKeyValue>;
It's still 2 queries with a where clause on the update but seems to do the trick. I also have this vision in my head that sqlite can optimize away the update statement entirely if the call to changes() is greater than zero. Whether or not it actually does that is beyond my knowledge, but a man can dream can't he? ;)
For bonus points you can append this line which returns you the id of the row whether it be a newly inserted row or an existing row.
select case changes() WHEN 0 THEN last_insert_rowid() else <primaryKeyValue> end;
Beginning with version 3.24.0 UPSERT is supported by SQLite.
From the documentation:
UPSERT is a special syntax addition to INSERT that causes the INSERT to behave as an UPDATE or a no-op if the INSERT would violate a uniqueness constraint. UPSERT is not standard SQL. UPSERT in SQLite follows the syntax established by PostgreSQL. UPSERT syntax was added to SQLite with version 3.24.0 (pending).
An UPSERT is an ordinary INSERT statement that is followed by the special ON CONFLICT clause
Image source: https://www.sqlite.org/images/syntax/upsert-clause.gif
Example:
CREATE TABLE t1(id INT PRIMARY KEY, c TEXT);
INSERT INTO t1(id, c) VALUES (1,'a'), (2, 'b');
SELECT * FROM t1;
INSERT INTO t1(id, c) VALUES (1, 'c');
-- UNIQUE constraint failed: t1.id
INSERT INTO t1(id, c) VALUES (1, 'c')
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;
SELECT * FROM t1;
INSERT INTO t1(id, c)
VALUES (1, 'c')
ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET c = excluded.c;
SELECT * FROM t1;
db<>fiddle demo
Here is a solution that really is an UPSERT (UPDATE or INSERT) instead of an INSERT OR REPLACE (which works differently in many situations).
It works like this:
1. Try to update if a record with the same Id exists.
2. If the update did not change any rows (NOT EXISTS(SELECT changes() AS change FROM Contact WHERE change <> 0)), then insert the record.
So either an existing record was updated or an insert will be performed.
The important detail is to use the changes() SQL function to check if the update statement hit any existing records and only perform the insert statement if it did not hit any record.
One thing to mention is that the changes() function does not return changes performed by lower-level triggers (see http://sqlite.org/lang_corefunc.html#changes), so be sure to take that into account.
Here is the SQL...
Test update:
--Create sample table and records (and drop the table if it already exists)
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS Contact;
CREATE TABLE [Contact] (
[Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] TEXT
);
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name) VALUES (1, 'Mike');
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name) VALUES (2, 'John');
-- Try to update an existing record
UPDATE Contact
SET Name = 'Bob'
WHERE Id = 2;
-- If no record was changed by the update (meaning no record with the same Id existed), insert the record
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name)
SELECT 2, 'Bob'
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT changes() AS change FROM Contact WHERE change <> 0);
--See the result
SELECT * FROM Contact;
Test insert:
--Create sample table and records (and drop the table if it already exists)
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS Contact;
CREATE TABLE [Contact] (
[Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] TEXT
);
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name) VALUES (1, 'Mike');
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name) VALUES (2, 'John');
-- Try to update an existing record
UPDATE Contact
SET Name = 'Bob'
WHERE Id = 3;
-- If no record was changed by the update (meaning no record with the same Id existed), insert the record
INSERT INTO Contact (Id, Name)
SELECT 3, 'Bob'
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT changes() AS change FROM Contact WHERE change <> 0);
--See the result
SELECT * FROM Contact;
Updates from Bernhardt:
You can indeed do an upsert in SQLite, it just looks a little different than you are used to. It would look something like:
INSERT INTO table_name (id, column1, column2)
VALUES ("youruuid", "value12", "value2")
ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE
SET column1 = "value1", column2 = "value2"
The best approach I know is to do an update, followed by an insert.
The "overhead of a select" is necessary, but it is not a terrible burden since you are searching on the primary key, which is fast.
You should be able to modify the below statements with your table & field names to do what you want.
--first, update any matches
UPDATE DESTINATION_TABLE DT
SET
MY_FIELD1 = (
SELECT MY_FIELD1
FROM SOURCE_TABLE ST
WHERE ST.PRIMARY_KEY = DT.PRIMARY_KEY
)
,MY_FIELD2 = (
SELECT MY_FIELD2
FROM SOURCE_TABLE ST
WHERE ST.PRIMARY_KEY = DT.PRIMARY_KEY
)
WHERE EXISTS(
SELECT ST2.PRIMARY_KEY
FROM
SOURCE_TABLE ST2
,DESTINATION_TABLE DT2
WHERE ST2.PRIMARY_KEY = DT2.PRIMARY_KEY
);
--second, insert any non-matches
INSERT INTO DESTINATION_TABLE(
MY_FIELD1
,MY_FIELD2
)
SELECT
ST.MY_FIELD1
,NULL AS MY_FIELD2 --insert NULL into this field
FROM
SOURCE_TABLE ST
WHERE NOT EXISTS(
SELECT DT2.PRIMARY_KEY
FROM DESTINATION_TABLE DT2
WHERE DT2.PRIMARY_KEY = ST.PRIMARY_KEY
);
Expanding on Aristotle’s answer you can SELECT from a dummy 'singleton' table (a table of your own creation with a single row). This avoids some duplication.
I've also kept the example portable across MySQL and SQLite and used a 'date_added' column as an example of how you could set a column only the first time.
REPLACE INTO page (
id,
name,
title,
content,
author,
date_added)
SELECT
old.id,
"about",
"About this site",
old.content,
42,
IFNULL(old.date_added,"21/05/2013")
FROM singleton
LEFT JOIN page AS old ON old.name = "about";
If someone wants to read my solution for SQLite in Cordova, I got this generic js method thanks to #david answer above.
function addOrUpdateRecords(tableName, values, callback) {
get_columnNames(tableName, function (data) {
var columnNames = data;
myDb.transaction(function (transaction) {
var query_update = "";
var query_insert = "";
var update_string = "UPDATE " + tableName + " SET ";
var insert_string = "INSERT INTO " + tableName + " SELECT ";
myDb.transaction(function (transaction) {
// Data from the array [[data1, ... datan],[()],[()]...]:
$.each(values, function (index1, value1) {
var sel_str = "";
var upd_str = "";
var remoteid = "";
$.each(value1, function (index2, value2) {
if (index2 == 0) remoteid = value2;
upd_str = upd_str + columnNames[index2] + "='" + value2 + "', ";
sel_str = sel_str + "'" + value2 + "', ";
});
sel_str = sel_str.substr(0, sel_str.length - 2);
sel_str = sel_str + " WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT changes() AS change FROM "+tableName+" WHERE change <> 0);";
upd_str = upd_str.substr(0, upd_str.length - 2);
upd_str = upd_str + " WHERE remoteid = '" + remoteid + "';";
query_update = update_string + upd_str;
query_insert = insert_string + sel_str;
// Start transaction:
transaction.executeSql(query_update);
transaction.executeSql(query_insert);
});
}, function (error) {
callback("Error: " + error);
}, function () {
callback("Success");
});
});
});
}
So, first pick up the column names with this function:
function get_columnNames(tableName, callback) {
myDb.transaction(function (transaction) {
var query_exec = "SELECT name, sql FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='table' AND name ='" + tableName + "'";
transaction.executeSql(query_exec, [], function (tx, results) {
var columnParts = results.rows.item(0).sql.replace(/^[^\(]+\(([^\)]+)\)/g, '$1').split(','); ///// RegEx
var columnNames = [];
for (i in columnParts) {
if (typeof columnParts[i] === 'string')
columnNames.push(columnParts[i].split(" ")[0]);
};
callback(columnNames);
});
});
}
Then build the transactions programmatically.
"Values" is an array you should build before and it represents the rows you want to insert or update into the table.
"remoteid" is the id I used as a reference, since I'm syncing with my remote server.
For the use of the SQLite Cordova plugin, please refer to the official link
I think this may be what you are looking for: ON CONFLICT clause.
If you define your table like this:
CREATE TABLE table1(
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ON CONFLICT REPLACE,
field1 TEXT
);
Now, if you do an INSERT with an id that already exists, SQLite automagically does UPDATE instead of INSERT.
Hth...
This method remixes a few of the other methods from answer in for this question and incorporates the use of CTE (Common Table Expressions). I will introduce the query then explain why I did what I did.
I would like to change the last name for employee 300 to DAVIS if there is an employee 300. Otherwise, I will add a new employee.
Table Name: employees
Columns: id, first_name, last_name
The query is:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO employees (employee_id, first_name, last_name)
WITH registered_employees AS ( --CTE for checking if the row exists or not
SELECT --this is needed to ensure that the null row comes second
*
FROM (
SELECT --an existing row
*
FROM
employees
WHERE
employee_id = '300'
UNION
SELECT --a dummy row if the original cannot be found
NULL AS employee_id,
NULL AS first_name,
NULL AS last_name
)
ORDER BY
employee_id IS NULL --we want nulls to be last
LIMIT 1 --we only want one row from this statement
)
SELECT --this is where you provide defaults for what you would like to insert
registered_employees.employee_id, --if this is null the SQLite default will be used
COALESCE(registered_employees.first_name, 'SALLY'),
'DAVIS'
FROM
registered_employees
;
Basically, I used the CTE to reduce the number of times the select statement has to be used to determine default values. Since this is a CTE, we just select the columns we want from the table and the INSERT statement uses this.
Now you can decide what defaults you want to use by replacing the nulls, in the COALESCE function with what the values should be.
Following Aristotle Pagaltzis and the idea of COALESCE from Eric B’s answer, here it is an upsert option to update only few columns or insert full row if it does not exist.
In this case, imagine that title and content should be updated, keeping the other old values when existing and inserting supplied ones when name not found:
NOTE id is forced to be NULL when INSERT as it is supposed to be autoincrement. If it is just a generated primary key then COALESCE can also be used (see Aristotle Pagaltzis comment).
WITH new (id, name, title, content, author)
AS ( VALUES(100, 'about', 'About this site', 'Whatever new content here', 42) )
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO page (id, name, title, content, author)
SELECT
old.id, COALESCE(old.name, new.name),
new.title, new.content,
COALESCE(old.author, new.author)
FROM new LEFT JOIN page AS old ON new.name = old.name;
So the general rule would be, if you want to keep old values, use COALESCE, when you want to update values, use new.fieldname
If you don't mind doing this in two operations.
Steps:
1) Add new items with "INSERT OR IGNORE"
2) Update existing items with "UPDATE"
The input to both steps is the same collection of new or update-able items. Works fine with existing items that need no changes. They will be updated, but with the same data and therefore net result is no changes.
Sure, slower, etc. Inefficient. Yep.
Easy to write the sql and maintain and understand it? Definitely.
It's a trade-off to consider.
Works great for small upserts. Works great for those that don't mind sacrificing efficiency for code maintainability.
Complete example of upserting using WHERE to select the newer dated record.
-- https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/7jyj4n76MZHLLk2yszB6XD/22
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS db;
CREATE TABLE db
(
id PRIMARY KEY,
updated_at,
other
);
-- initial INSERT
INSERT INTO db (id,updated_at,other) VALUES(1,1,1);
SELECT * FROM db;
-- INSERT without WHERE
INSERT INTO db (id,updated_at,other) VALUES(1,2,2)
ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET updated_at=excluded.updated_at;
SELECT * FROM db;
-- WHERE is FALSE
INSERT INTO db (id,updated_at,other) VALUES(1,2,3)
ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET updated_at=excluded.updated_at, other=excluded.other
WHERE excluded.updated_at > updated_at;
SELECT * FROM db;
-- ok to SET a PRIMARY KEY. WHERE is TRUE
INSERT INTO db (id,updated_at,other) VALUES(1,3,4)
ON CONFLICT(id) DO UPDATE SET id=excluded.id, updated_at=excluded.updated_at, other=excluded.other
WHERE excluded.updated_at > updated_at;
SELECT * FROM db;
Having just read this thread and been disappointed that it wasn't easy to just to this "UPSERT"ing, I investigated further...
You can actually do this directly and easily in SQLITE.
Instead of using: INSERT INTO
Use: INSERT OR REPLACE INTO
This does exactly what you want it to do!
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table1 WHERE id = 1;
if COUNT(*) = 0
INSERT INTO table1(col1, col2, cole) VALUES(var1,var2,var3);
else if COUNT(*) > 0
UPDATE table1 SET col1 = var4, col2 = var5, col3 = var6 WHERE id = 1;
From my code (Java) I want to ensure that a row exists in the database (DB2) after my code is executed.
My code now does a select and if no result is returned it does an insert. I really don't like this code since it exposes me to concurrency issues when running in a multi-threaded environment.
What I would like to do is to put this logic in DB2 instead of in my Java code.
Does DB2 have an insert-or-update statement? Or anything like it that I can use?
For example:
insertupdate into mytable values ('myid')
Another way of doing it would probably be to always do the insert and catch "SQL-code -803 primary key already exists", but I would like to avoid that if possible.
Yes, DB2 has the MERGE statement, which will do an UPSERT (update or insert).
MERGE INTO target_table USING source_table ON match-condition
{WHEN [NOT] MATCHED
THEN [UPDATE SET ...|DELETE|INSERT VALUES ....|SIGNAL ...]}
[ELSE IGNORE]
See:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v9/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.db2.udb.admin.doc/doc/r0010873.htm
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SS6NHC/com.ibm.swg.im.dashdb.sql.ref.doc/doc/r0010873.html
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/SQLTips4DB2LUW/entry/merge?lang=en
I found this thread because I really needed a one-liner for DB2 INSERT OR UPDATE.
The following syntax seems to work, without requiring a separate temp table.
It works by using VALUES() to create a table structure . The SELECT * seems surplus IMHO but without it I get syntax errors.
MERGE INTO mytable AS mt USING (
SELECT * FROM TABLE (
VALUES
(123, 'text')
)
) AS vt(id, val) ON (mt.id = vt.id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = vt.val
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val) VALUES (vt.id, vt.val)
;
if you have to insert more than one row, the VALUES part can be repeated without having to duplicate the rest.
VALUES
(123, 'text'),
(456, 'more')
The result is a single statement that can INSERT OR UPDATE one or many rows presumably as an atomic operation.
This response is to hopefully fully answer the query MrSimpleMind had in use-update-and-insert-in-same-query and to provide a working simple example of the DB2 MERGE statement with a scenario of inserting AND updating in one go (record with ID 2 is updated and record ID 3 inserted).
CREATE TABLE STAGE.TEST_TAB ( ID INTEGER, DATE DATE, STATUS VARCHAR(10) );
COMMIT;
INSERT INTO TEST_TAB VALUES (1, '2013-04-14', NULL), (2, '2013-04-15', NULL); COMMIT;
MERGE INTO TEST_TAB T USING (
SELECT
3 NEW_ID,
CURRENT_DATE NEW_DATE,
'NEW' NEW_STATUS
FROM
SYSIBM.DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT
2 NEW_ID,
NULL NEW_DATE,
'OLD' NEW_STATUS
FROM
SYSIBM.DUAL
) AS S
ON
S.NEW_ID = T.ID
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET
(T.STATUS) = (S.NEW_STATUS)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT
(T.ID, T.DATE, T.STATUS) VALUES (S.NEW_ID, S.NEW_DATE, S.NEW_STATUS);
COMMIT;
Another way is to execute this 2 queries. It's simpler than create a MERGE statement:
update TABLE_NAME set FIELD_NAME=xxxxx where MyID=XXX;
INSERT INTO TABLE_NAME (MyField1,MyField2) values (xxx,xxxxx)
WHERE NOT EXISTS(select 1 from TABLE_NAME where MyId=xxxx);
The first query just updateS the field you need, if the MyId exists.
The second insertS the row into db if MyId does not exist.
The result is that only one of the queries is executed in your db.
I started with hibernate project where hibernate allows you to saveOrUpdate().
I converted that project into JDBC project the problem was with save and update.
I wanted to save and update at the same time using JDBC.
So, I did some research and I came accross ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE :
String sql="Insert into tblstudent (firstName,lastName,gender) values (?,?,?)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
firstName= VALUES(firstName),
lastName= VALUES(lastName),
gender= VALUES(gender)";
The issue with the above code was that it updated primary key twice which is true as
per mysql documentation:
The affected rows is just a return code. 1 row means you inserted, 2 means you updated, 0 means nothing happend.
I introduced id and increment it to 1. Now I was incrementing the value of id and not mysql.
String sql="Insert into tblstudent (id,firstName,lastName,gender) values (?,?,?)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
id=id+1,
firstName= VALUES(firstName),
lastName= VALUES(lastName),
gender= VALUES(gender)";
The above code worked for me for both insert and update.
Hope it works for you as well.