I have a query I need some help with, have been checking out a fair few tutorials but nohting I found covers this issue.
I have three joined tables, Products,ProductImagesLookUp and Images.
A product can have any number of Images and the Order of the Images for a Product are stored in ProductImagesLookUp.
I need to return a list of products with their primary Image (the one with the lowest order value).
The list looks like this
Product
Images
LookUpId FileID Order ProductTitle Price ProductId
65 2 1 Amari Summer Party Dress 29.99 7
66 1 2 Amari Summer Party Dress 29.99 7
67 3 3 Amari Summer Party Dress 29.99 7
74 4 5 Beach Cover Up 18.00 14
75 5 4 Beach Cover Up 18.00 14
76 7 6 Beach Cover Up 18.00 14
77 8 7 Beach Cover Up 18.00 14
78 9 8 Beach Cover Up 18.00 14
79 10 9 Amari Classic Party Dress 29.95 15
80 11 11 Amari Classic Party Dress 29.95 15
81 12 10 Amari Classic Party Dress 29.95 15
I want my query to pull back a list of distinct products which have the lowst Order value.
I.e. it shoudl pull back the rows with the ProductImagesLookUpId of 65 (Product 7),74 ( Product 14) and 79 (Product 15).
Thanks in advance for your help. this one has really had me pulling my hair out!
SELECT
l.LookupId,
i.FileId,
l.[Order],
p.ProductTitle,
p.Price,
p.ProductId
FROM
Products p
INNER JOIN ProductImagesLookUp l ON l.ProductId = p.ProductId
INNER JOIN Images i ON i.FileId = l.FileId
WHERE
i.[Order] = (
SELECT MIN([Order])
FROM ProductImagesLookUp
WHERE ProductId = p.ProductId
)
There is no need to group by or aggregate anything since the sub-query ensures that there is not more than a single result row for any given ProductId — the one with the lowest Order.
Related
I am having difficulty figuring out this dang problem. From the data and queries I have given below I am trying to see the email address that has rented the most movies during the month of September.
There are only 4 relevant tables in my database and they have been anonymized and shortened:
Table "cust":
cust_id
f_name
l_name
email
1
Jack
Daniels
jack.daniels#google.com
2
Jose
Quervo
jose.quervo#yahoo.com
5
Jim
Beam
jim.beam#protonmail.com
Table "rent"
inv_id
cust_id
rent_date
10
1
9/1/2022 10:29
11
1
9/2/2022 18:16
12
1
9/2/2022 18:17
13
1
9/17/2022 17:34
14
1
9/19/2022 6:32
15
1
9/19/2022 6:33
16
3
9/1/2022 18:45
17
3
9/1/2022 18:46
18
3
9/2/2022 18:45
19
3
9/2/2022 18:46
20
3
9/17/2022 18:32
21
3
9/19/2022 22:12
10
2
9/19/2022 11:43
11
2
9/19/2022 11:42
Table "inv"
mov_id
inv_id
22
10
23
11
24
12
25
13
26
14
27
15
28
16
29
17
30
18
31
19
31
20
32
21
Table "mov":
mov_id
titl
rate
22
Anaconda
3.99
23
Exorcist
1.99
24
Philadelphia
3.99
25
Quest
1.99
26
Sweden
1.99
27
Speed
1.99
28
Nemo
1.99
29
Zoolander
5.99
30
Truman
5.99
31
Patient
1.99
32
Racer
3.99
and here is my current query progress:
SELECT cust.email,
COUNT(DISTINCT inv.mov_id) AS "Rented_Count"
FROM cust
JOIN rent ON rent.cust_id = cust.cust_id
JOIN inv ON inv.inv_id = rent.inv_id
JOIN mov ON mov.mov_id = inv.mov_id
WHERE rent.rent_date BETWEEN '2022-09-01' AND '2022-09-31'
GROUP BY cust.email
ORDER BY "Rented_Count" DESC;
and here is what it outputs:
email
Rented_Count
jack.daniels#google.com
6
jim.beam#protonmail.com
6
jose.quervo#yahoo.com
2
and what I want it to be outputting:
email
jack.daniels#google.com
jim.beam#protonmail.com
From the results I am actually getting I have a tie for first place (Jim and Jack) and that is fine but I would like it to list both tieing email addresses not just Jack's so you cant do anything with rows or max I don't think.
I think it must have something to do with dense_rank but I don't know how to use that specifically in this scenario with the count and Group By?
Your creativity and help would be appreciated.
You're missing the FETCH FIRST ROWS WITH TIES clause. It will work together with the ORDER BY clause to get you the highest values (FIRST ROWS), including ties (WITH TIES).
SELECT cust.email
FROM cust
INNER JOIN rent
ON rent.cust_id = cust.cust_id
INNER JOIN inv
ON inv.inv_id = rent.inv_id
INNER JOIN mov
ON mov.mov_id = inv.mov_id
WHERE rent.rent_date BETWEEN '2022-09-01' AND '2022-09-31'
GROUP BY cust.email
ORDER BY COUNT(DISTINCT inv.mov_id) DESC
FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS WITH TIES
I have a table named orders in a Postgres database that looks like this:
customer_id order_id order_date price product
1 2 2021-03-05 15 books
1 13 2022-03-07 3 music
1 14 2022-06-15 900 travel
1 11 2021-11-17 25 books
1 16 2022-08-03 32 books
2 4 2021-04-12 4 music
2 7 2021-06-29 9 music
2 20 2022-11-03 8 music
2 22 2022-11-07 575 travel
2 24 2022-11-20 95 food
3 3 2021-03-17 25 books
3 5 2021-06-01 650 travel
3 17 2022-08-17 1200 travel
3 19 2022-10-02 6 music
3 23 2022-11-08 70 food
4 9 2021-08-20 3200 travel
4 10 2021-10-29 2750 travel
4 15 2022-07-15 1820 travel
4 21 2022-11-05 8000 travel
4 25 2022-11-29 27 books
5 1 2021-01-04 3 music
5 6 2021-06-09 820 travel
5 8 2021-07-30 19 books
5 12 2021-12-10 22 music
5 18 2022-09-19 20 books
Here's a SQL Fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!17/262fc/1
I'd like to return the average money spent by customers per product, but only consider orders within the first 12 months of a given customer's first purchase within the given product group. (yes, this is challenging!)
For example, for customer 1, order ID 2 and order ID 11 would be factored into the average for books(because order ID 11 took place less than 12 months after customer 1's first order for books, which was order ID 2), but order ID 16 would not be factored into the average (because 8/3/22 is more than 12 months from customer 1's first purchase for books, which took place on 3/5/21).
Here is a matrix showing which orders would be included within a given product (denoted by "yes"):
The desired output would look as follows:
average_spent
books 22.20
music 7.83
travel 1530.71
food 82.50
How would I do this?
Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give!
You can use a subquery to check whether or not to include a product's price in the summation:
select o.product, sum(o.price)/count(*) val from orders o
where o.order_date < (select min(o1.order_date) from orders o1 where
o1.product = o.product and o.user_id = o1.user_id) + interval '12 months'
group by o.product
See fiddle
My SQL is not really good, but I am improving.
I try to extract records from a table with sales data. I want to know how much profit was made by a retailer and its subsidiaries per month.
The retailer_id is build from the root of 5 digits and (if subsidiaries exist) an adjacent _ with two digits. Like so:
without subsidiaries: 30000
with subsidiaries: 30000_01, 30000_02
Code:
SELECT
retailer_id,
MONTH(Date(created_at)) AS month,
SUM(grand_total) AS Totals
FROM
sales_table
GROUP BY
retailer_id, month
As you can imagine, the retailer with subsidiaries are still separated line items.
As requested, I will give an example:
raw data
retailer_id
month
grand total
10006
12
10
10006
9
20
10006
9
40
10006_10
12
40
10015
9
10
10015
11
10
10015
12
5
10015
11
20
expected result:
retailer_id
month
Totals
10006
12
50
10006
9
60
10015
9
10
10015
11
30
10015
12
5
10015
11
20
Thank you for your help!
The answer is 'left'. As in this one:
select
left(retailer_id, 5),
Month(Date(created_at)) AS month,
sum(grand_total) AS Umsatz
FROM sales_order
WHERE store_id = '2' AND NOT status = 'canceled' AND created_at between '2021-09-01' AND '2022-01-27'
GROUP BY left(retailer_id, 5), month
ORDER BY left(retailer_id,5);
I have a table that looks like this:
customer_id item price cost
1 Shoe 120 36
1 Bag 180 50
1 Shirt 30 9
2 Shoe 150 40
3 Shirt 30 9
4 Shoe 120 36
5 Shorts 65 14
I am trying to find the most expensive item each customer bought along with the cost of item and the item name.
I'm able to do the first part:
SELECT customer_id, max(price)
FROM sales
GROUP BY customer_id;
Which gives me:
customer_id price
1 180
2 150
3 30
4 120
5 65
How do I get this output to also show me the item and it's cost in the output? So output should look like this...
customer_id price item cost
1 180 Bag 50
2 150 Shoe 40
3 30 Shirt 9
4 120 Shoe 36
5 65 Shorts 14
I'm assuming its a Select statement within a Select? I would appreciate the help as I'm fairly new to SQL.
One method that usually has good performance is a correlated subquery:
select s.*
from sales s
where s.price = (select max(s2.price)
from sales s2
where s2.customer_id = s.customer_id
);
I have a table product, pick_qty, shortfall, location, loc_qty
Product Picked Qty Shortfall Location Location Qty
1742 4 58 1 15
1742 4 58 2 20
1742 4 58 3 15
1742 4 58 4 20
1742 4 58 5 20
1742 4 58 6 20
1742 4 58 7 15
1742 4 58 8 15
1742 4 58 9 15
1742 4 58 10 20
I want a report to loop around and show the number of locations and the quantity I need to drop to fulfil the shortfall for replenishment. So the report would look like this.
Product Picked Qty Shortfall Location Location Qty
1742 4 58 1 15
1742 4 58 2 20
1742 4 58 3 15
1742 4 58 4 20
Note that it is best not to think about SQL "looping through a table" and instead to think about it as operating on some subset of the rows in a table.
What it sounds like you need to do is create a running total that tells how many of the item you would have if you were to take all of them from a location and all of the locations that came before the current location and then check to see if that would give you enough of the item to fulfill the shortfall.
Based on your example data, the following query would work, though if Locations aren't actually numerics then you would need to add a row number column and tweak the query a bit to use the row number instead of the Location Number; It would still be very similar to the query below.
SELECT
Totals.Product, Totals.PickedQty, Totals.ShortFall, Totals.Location, Totals.LocationQty
FROM (
SELECT
TheTable.Product, TheTable.PickedQty, TheTable.ShortFall,
TheTable.Location, TheTable.LocationQty, SUM(ForRunningTotal.LocationQty) AS RunningTotal
FROM TheTable
JOIN TheTable ForRunningTotal ON TheTable.Product = ForRunningTotal.Product
AND TheTable.Location >= ForRunningTotal.Location
GROUP BY TheTable.Product, TheTable.PickedQty, TheTable.ShortFall, TheTable.Location, TheTable.LocationQty
) Totals
-- Note you could also change the join above so the running total is actually the count of only the rows above,
-- not including the current row; Then the WHERE clause below could be "Totals.RunningTotal < Totals.ShortFall".
-- I liked RunningTotal as the sum of this row and all prior, it seems more appropriate to me.
WHERE Totals.RunningTotal - Totals.LocationQty <= Totals.ShortFall
AND Totals.LocationQty > 0
Also - as long as you are reading my answer, an unrelated side-note: Based on the data you showed above, your database schema isn't normalized as far as it could be. It seems like the Picked Quantity and the ShortFall actually depend only on the Product, so that would be a table of its own, and then the Location Quantity depends on the Product and Location, so that would be a table of its own. I'm pointing it out because if your data contained different Picked Quantities/ShortFall for a single product, then the above query would break; This situation would be impossible with the normalized tables I mentioned.