I have an ActionScript 2.0 file that contains a small library.
This library parses an XML file.
I have assigned an onComplete function on the onLoad function of the XML.
For example:
------------ mysmalllib.as --------------
r_xml = new XML();
r_xml.onLoad = onComplete;
function onComplete(success:Boolean) {
// some stuff
OtherFunction();
}
------------ mainProgram.fla --------------
import mylib.mysmalllib;
var flashCall = new mylib.mysmalllib;
function toBeCalled() {
//
}
------------------------------------------------
The thing that I want is, whenever the OtherFunction is called (that exists in mysmalllib), another function in my main program to be notified (toBeCalled). I suppose it has something to do with dispatch but I'm not any good in AS.
Thx
I did a quick google search and found this:
http://flash-creations.com/notes/asclass_eventdispatcher.php
It seems to cover what you need to know about EventDispatcher in AS2
Related
I'm trying to write a VSTO-Add-In with a System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowser-Control enabling something similar to the Office-JS-Add-In model.
The WebBrowser-control would show some HTML/JS-Page and be able to call C#-functions in the VSTO-Add-In from JavaScript via window.external and the ObjectForScripting-property of the WebBrowser-object.
That is in JS the call would be
window.external.DoFancyStuffToMyDocument(withTheseParams)
while there had to be some
class MyFunctionProxy() {
public void DoFancyStuffToMyDocument(string theParam) {
//code here
}
}
in the C#-Code an this would be attached to the WebBrowser
myWebBrowser.ObjectForScripting = new MyFunctionProxy();
So far so good. Now comes the catch. I want my HTML/JS-Code be able to also utilize the office.js code and functions like
Word.run(function (context) {
var thisDocument = context.document;
var range = thisDocument.getSelection();
range.insertText('"Hitch your wagon to a star."\n', Word.InsertLocation.replace);
//...
}
Does anyone see a way of getting this to work?
My initial guess was that the OfficeJS-taskpane-add-ins in Word on-prem use some some similar methode as above with a class derived from WebBrowser and the appropriate ObjectForScripting. This would then suggest that there must be a (hopefully accessible) class which is assigned to the ObjectForScripting-property handling the function calls from office.js. Then I could proxy this ObjectForScripting-class and add my own functions like 'DoFancyStuffToMyDocument()'.
I am new to Dojo, I am using QueryReadStore as the store for loading my TreeGrid, working fine. But the QueryReadStore appends some paramters to the url, parameters like parentId, count, sort etc., I have looked at this link http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.7/dojox/data/QueryReadStore.html, but not able to understand.
Parameters are getting passed like this servlet/DataHandler?start=0&count=25
How to manipulate the parameters, like I want to set the value for parentId paramters so that I only get that particular row details.
In theory you wold have to create a new class by extending the "dojox.data.QueryReadStore", in the link you posted have an example for doing exactly what you want. See if you get it now(changed a bit):
dojo.require("dojox.data.QueryReadStore");
dojo.declare("custom.MyReadStore", dojox.data.QueryReadStore, {
fetch:function(request){
//append here your custom parameters:
var qs = {p1:"This is parameter 1",
q:request.query.name
}
request.serverQuery = qs;
// Call superclasses' fetch
return this.inherited("fetch", arguments);
}
});
So When come to create the QueryReadStore you actually create a object with the class you defined. something like this:
var queryReadStore = new custom.MyReadStore({args...})
Explore the request parameter passed to the function to see what else you can do.
When javascript is run in the browser there is no need to try and hide function code because it is downloaded and viewable in source.
When run on the server the situation changes. There are use cases such as api where you want to provide users with functions to call without allowing them to view the code that which is run.
On our specific case we want to execute user submitted javascript inside node. We are able to sandbox node.js api however we would like to add our own api to this sandbox without users being able to toString the function to view the code which is run.
Does anyone have a pattern or know of a way of preventing users from outputting a functions code?
Update:
Here is a full solution (i believe) based on the accepted answer below. Please note that although this is demonstrated using client side code. You would not use this client side as someone can see the contents of your hidden function by simply reading the downloaded code (although it may provide some basic slow down to inspect the code if you have used a minify).
This is meant for server side use where you want to allow users to run api code within a sandbox env but not allow them to view what the api's do. The sandbox in this code is only to demonstrate the point. It is not an actual sandbox implementation.
// function which hides another function by returning an anonymous
// function which calls the hidden function (ie. places the hidden
// function in a closure to enable access when the wraped function is passed to the sandbox)
function wrapFunc(funcToHide) {
var shownFunc = function() {
funcToHide();
};
return shownFunc;
}
// function whose contents you want to hide
function secretFunc() {
alert('hello');
}
// api object (will be passed to the sandbox to enable access to
// the hidden function)
var apiFunc = wrapFunc(secretFunc);
var api = {};
api.apiFunc = apiFunc;
// sandbox (not an actual sandbox implementation - just for demo)
(function(api) {
console.log(api);
alert(api.apiFunc.toString());
api.apiFunc();
})(api);
If you wrap a callback in a function, you can use another function in that scope which is actually hidden from the callback scope, thus:
function hideCall(funcToHide) {
var hiddenFunc = funcToHide;
var shownFunc = function() {
hiddenFunc();
};
return shownFunc;
}
Then run thusly
var shtumCallBack = hideCall(secretSquirrelFunc);
userCode.tryUnwindingThis(shtumCallBack);
The userCode scope will not be able to access secretSquirrelFunc except to call it, because the scope it would need is that of the hideCall function which is not available.
I am using RhinoMocks 3.6 and would like to use the multimock feature to implement both a class and a interface.
var mocks = new MockRepository();
var project = mocks.StrictMultiMock(
typeof(Project),
typeof(INotifyCollectionChanged));
using (mocks.Record())
{
((INotifyCollectionChanged)project).CollectionChanged += null;
LastCall.Constraints(Is.NotNull()).Repeat.Any();
}
The LastCall is working though. I get this message :
System.InvalidOperationException : Invalid call, the last call has been used or no call has been made (make sure that you are calling a virtual (C#) / Overridable (VB) method).
What am I doing wrong here??
Have you actually checked that the Project class has methods you can override as the error message indicates? I'll assume you have. :-)
I'd suggest you switch to using the AAA syntax instead of record/replay as shown here:
I assume you're wanting to know if the class under test reacts the right way when the CollectionChanged event is fired? If that's the case, you can do it something like this:
var project = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Project, INotifyPropertyChanged>();
project.Expect(p => p.SomeMethod())
.Repeat.Any()
.Raise(p => ((INotifyCollectionChanged)p).CollectionChanged += null,p,new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs());
How would I go about extracting the IL code for classes that are generated at runtime by reflection so I can save it to disk? If at all possible. I don't have control of the piece of code that generates these classes.
Eventually, I would like to load this IL code from disk into another assembly.
I know I could serialise/deserialise classes but I wish to use purely IL code. I'm not fussed with the security implications.
Running Mono 2.10.1
Or better yet, use Mono.Cecil.
It will allow you to get at the individual instructions, even manipulating them and disassembling them (with the mono decompiler addition).
Note that the decompiler is a work in progress (last time I checked it did not fully support lambda expressions and Visual Basic exception blocks), but you can have pretty decompiled output in C# pretty easily as far as you don't hit these boundary conditions. Also, work has progressed since.
Mono Cecil in general let's you write the IL to a new assembly, as well, which you can then subsequently load into your appdomain if you like to play with bleeding edge.
Update I came round to trying this. Unfortunately I think I found what problem you run into. It turns out there is seems to be no way to get at the IL bytes for a generated type unless the assembly happened to get written out somewhere you can load it from.
I assumed you could just get the bits via reflection (since the classes support the required methods), however the related methods just raise an exception The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic module. on invocation. You can try this with the code below, but in short I suppose it means that it ain't gonna happen unless you want to f*ck with Marshal::GetFunctionPointerForDelegate(). You'd have to binary dump the instructions and manually disassemble them as IL opcodes. There be dragons.
Code snippet:
using System;
using System.Linq;
using Mono.Cecil;
using Mono.Cecil.Cil;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
using System.Reflection;
namespace REFLECT
{
class Program
{
private static Type EmitType()
{
var dyn = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.DefineDynamicAssembly(new AssemblyName("Emitted"), AssemblyBuilderAccess.RunAndSave);
var mod = dyn.DefineDynamicModule("Emitted", "Emitted.dll");
var typ = mod.DefineType("EmittedNS.EmittedType", System.Reflection.TypeAttributes.Public);
var mth = typ.DefineMethod("SuperSecretEncryption", System.Reflection.MethodAttributes.Public | System.Reflection.MethodAttributes.Static, typeof(String), new [] {typeof(String)});
var il = mth.GetILGenerator();
il.EmitWriteLine("Emit was here");
il.Emit(System.Reflection.Emit.OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
il.Emit(System.Reflection.Emit.OpCodes.Ret);
var result = typ.CreateType();
dyn.Save("Emitted.dll");
return result;
}
private static Type TestEmit()
{
var result = EmitType();
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(result);
var encrypted = instance.GetType().GetMethod("SuperSecretEncryption").Invoke(null, new [] { "Hello world" });
Console.WriteLine(encrypted); // This works happily, print "Emit was here" first
return result;
}
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
Type emitted = TestEmit();
// CRASH HERE: even if the assembly was actually for SaveAndRun _and_ it
// has actually been saved, there seems to be no way to get at the image
// directly:
var ass = AssemblyFactory.GetAssembly(emitted.Assembly.GetFiles(false)[0]);
// the rest was intended as mockup on how to isolate the interesting bits
// but I didn't get much chance to test that :)
var types = ass.Modules.Cast<ModuleDefinition>().SelectMany(m => m.Types.Cast<TypeDefinition>()).ToList();
var typ = types.FirstOrDefault(t => t.Name == emitted.Name);
var operands = typ.Methods.Cast<MethodDefinition>()
.SelectMany(m => m.Body.Instructions.Cast<Instruction>())
.Select(i => i.Operand);
var requiredTypes = operands.OfType<TypeReference>()
.Concat(operands.OfType<MethodReference>().Select(mr => mr.DeclaringType))
.Select(tr => tr.Resolve()).OfType<TypeDefinition>()
.Distinct();
var requiredAssemblies = requiredTypes
.Select(tr => tr.Module).OfType<ModuleDefinition>()
.Select(md => md.Assembly.Name as AssemblyNameReference);
foreach (var t in types.Except(requiredTypes))
ass.MainModule.Types.Remove(t);
foreach (var unused in ass.MainModule
.AssemblyReferences.Cast<AssemblyNameReference>().ToList()
.Except(requiredAssemblies))
ass.MainModule.AssemblyReferences.Remove(unused);
AssemblyFactory.SaveAssembly(ass, "/tmp/TestCecil.dll");
}
}
}
If all you want is the IL for your User class, you already have it. It's in the dll that you compiled it to.
From your other assembly, you can load the dll with the User class dynamically and use it through reflection.
UPDATE:
If what you have is a dynamic class created with Reflection.Emit, you have an AssemblyBuilder that you can use to save it to disk.
If your dynamic type was instead created with Mono.Cecil, you have an AssemblyDefinition that you can save to disk with myAssemblyDefinition.Write("MyAssembly.dll") (in Mono.Cecil 0.9).