I have a problem that I would like have solved via a SQL query. This is going to
be used as a PoC (proof of concept).
The problem:
Product offerings are made up of one or many product instances, a product
instance can belong to many product offerings.
This can be realised like this in a table:
PO | PI
-----
A | 10
A | 11
A | 12
B | 10
B | 11
C | 13
Now I would like to get back the product offer from a set of product instances.
E.g. if we send in 10,11,13 the expected result back is B & C, and if we send in
only 10 then the result should be NULL since no product offering is made up of
only 10. Sending in 10,11,12 would result in A (not A & B since 12 is not a valid product offer in it self).
Prerequisites:
The combination of product instances sent in can only result in one specific
combination of product offerings, so there is only one solution to each query.
Okay, I think I have it. This meets the constraints you provided. There might be a way to simplify this further, but it ate my brain a little:
select distinct PO
from POPI x
where
PO not in (
select PO
from POPI
where PI not in (10,11,12)
)
and PI not in (
select PI
from POPI
where PO != x.PO
and PO not in (
select PO
from POPI
where PI not in (10,11,12)
)
);
This yields only results who fill the given set which are disjoint with all other results, which I think is what you were asking for. For the test examples given:
Providing 10,11,12 yields A
Providing 10,11,13 yields B,C
Edit: Whilst I think mine works fine, Adam's answer is without a doubt more elegant and more efficient - I'll just leave mine here for posterity!
Apologies since I know this has been tagged as an Oracle issue since I started playing. This is some SQL2008 code which I think works for all the stated cases....
declare #test table
(
[PI] int
)
insert #test values (10), (11), (13)
declare #testCount int
select #testCount = COUNT(*) from #test
;with PO_WITH_COUNTS as
(
select PO_FULL.PO, COUNT(PO_FULL.[PI]) PI_Count
from ProductOffering PO_FULL
left
join (
select PO_QUALIFYING.PO, PO_QUALIFYING.[PI]
from ProductOffering PO_QUALIFYING
where PO_QUALIFYING.[PI] in (select [PI] from #test)
) AS QUALIFYING
on QUALIFYING.PO = PO_FULL.PO
and QUALIFYING.[PI] = PO_FULL.[PI]
group by
PO_FULL.PO
having COUNT(PO_FULL.[PI]) = COUNT(QUALIFYING.[PI])
)
select PO_OUTER.PO
from PO_WITH_COUNTS PO_OUTER
cross
join PO_WITH_COUNTS PO_INNER
where PO_OUTER.PI_Count = #testCount
or PO_OUTER.PO <> PO_INNER.PO
group by
PO_OUTER.PO, PO_OUTER.PI_Count
having PO_OUTER.PI_Count = #testCount
or PO_OUTER.PI_Count + SUM(PO_INNER.PI_Count) = #testCount
Not sure if Oracle has CTEs but could just state the inner query as two derived tables. The cross join in the outer query lets us find combinations of offerings that have all the valid items. I know that this will only work based on the statement in the question that the data is such that there is only 1 valid combination for each requested set, Without that it's even more complicated as counts are not enough to remove combinations that have duplicate products in them.
I don't have a db in front of me, but off the top of my head you want the list of POs that don't have any PIs not in your input list, ie
select distinct po
from tbl
where po not in ( select po from tbl where pi not in (10,11,13) )
Edit: Here are the example other cases:
When input PI = 10,11,13 the inner select returns A so the outer select returns B, C
When input PI = 10 the inner select returns A,B,C so the outer select returns no rows
When input PI = 10,11,12 the inner select returns C so the outer select returns A,B
Edit: Adam has pointed out that this last case doesn't meet the requirement of only returning A (that'll teach me for rushing), so this isn't yet working code.
Select Distinct PO
From Table T
-- Next eliminates POs that contain other PIs
Where Not Exists
(Select * From Table
Where PO = T.PO
And PI Not In (10, 11, 12))
-- And this eliminates POs that do not contain all the PIs
And Not Exists
(Select Distinct PI From Table
Where PI In (10, 11, 12)
Except
Select Distinct PI From Table
Where PO = T.PO
or, if your database does not implement EXCEPT...
Select Distinct PO
From Table T
-- Next predicate eliminates POs that contain other PIs
Where Not Exists
(Select * From Table
Where PO = T.PO
And PI Not In (10, 11, 12))
-- And this eliminates POs that do not contain ALL the PIs
And Not Exists
(Select Distinct PI From Table A
Where PI In (10, 11, 12)
And Not Exists
(Select Distinct PI From Table
Where PO = T.PO
And PdI = A.PI))
Is it possible that a customers asks for a product more than once?
For example: he/she asks an offering for 10,10,11,11,12?
If this is possible than solutions like
select ...
from ...
where pi in (10,10,11,11,12)
will not work.
Because 'pi in (10,10,11,11,12)' is the same as 'pi in (10,11,12)'.
A solution for 10,10,11,11,12 is A&B.
well some pseudo code from the top of my head here:
select from table where PI = 10 or pi =11, etc
store the result in a temp table
select distinct PO and count(PI) from temp table.
now for each PO you can get the total available PI offerings. if the number of PIs available matches the count in the temp table, it means that you have all the PIs for that PO. add all the POs and you ave your result set.
You will need a count of the items in your list, i.e. #list_count. Figure out which Offerings have Instances that aren't in the list. Select all Offerings that aren't in that list and do have Instances in the list:
select P0,count(*) c from table where P0 not in (
select P0 from table where P1 not in (#list)
) and P1 in (#list) group by P0
I would store that in a temp table and select * records where c = #list_count
If we redefine a bit a problem:
Lets have a customer table with product instances:
crete table cust_pi (
pi varchar(5),
customer varchar(5));
And a "product_catalogue" table:
CREATE TABLE PI_PO_TEST
("PO" VARCHAR2(5 CHAR),
"PI" VARCHAR2(5 CHAR)
);
Lets fill it with some sample data:
insert into CUST_PI (PI, CUSTOMER)
values ('11', '1');
insert into CUST_PI (PI, CUSTOMER)
values ('10', '1');
insert into CUST_PI (PI, CUSTOMER)
values ('12', '1');
insert into CUST_PI (PI, CUSTOMER)
values ('13', '1');
insert into CUST_PI (PI, CUSTOMER)
values ('14', '1');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('A', '10');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('A', '11');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('A', '12');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('A', '13');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('B', '14');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('C', '11');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('C', '12');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('D', '15');
insert into PI_PO_TEST (PO, PI)
values ('D', '14');
Then my first shoot solution is like this:
select po1 po /* select all product offerings that match the product definition
(i.e. have the same number of product instances per offering as
in product catalogue */
from (select po po1, count(c.pi) k1
from cust_pi c, pi_po_test t
where c.pi = t.pi
and customer = 1
group by po) t1,
(select po po2, count(*) k2 from pi_po_test group by po) t2
where k1 = k2
and po1 = po2
minus /* add those, that are contained within others */
select slave
from (select po2 master, po1 slave
/* this query returns, that if you have po "master" slave should be removed from result,
as it is contained within*/
from (select t1.po po1, t2.po po2, count(t1.po) k1
from pi_po_test t1, pi_po_test t2
where t1.pi = t2.pi
group by t1.po, t2.po) t1,
(select po, count(po) k2 from pi_po_test group by po) t2
where t1.po2 = t2.po
and k1 < k2)
where master in
/* repeated query from begining. This could be done better :-) */
(select po1 po
from (select po po1, count(c.pi) k1
from cust_pi c, pi_po_test t
where c.pi = t.pi
and customer = 1
group by po) t1,
(select po po2, count(*) k2 from pi_po_test group by po) t2
where k1 = k2
and po1 = po2)
All of that was done on Oracle, so your mileage may vary
I tested this under 4 sets of values and they all returned a correct result. This uses a function that I use in SQL to generate a table from a string of parameters separated by semicolons.
DECLARE #tbl TABLE (
po varchar(10),
pii int)
INSERT INTO #tbl
SELECT 'A', 10
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A', 11
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A', 12
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 10
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 11
UNION ALL
SELECT 'C', 13
DECLARE #value varchar(100)
SET #value = '10;11;12;'
--SET #value = '11;10;'
--SET #value = '13;'
--SET #value = '10;'
SELECT DISTINCT po
FROM #tbl a
INNER JOIN fMultiValParam (#value) p ON
a.pii = p.paramid
WHERE a.po NOT IN (
SELECT t.po
FROM #tbl t
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT *
FROM #tbl tt
INNER JOIN fMultiValParam (#value) p ON
tt.pii = p.paramid) tt ON
t.pii = tt.pii
AND t.po = tt.po
WHERE tt.po IS NULL)
here's the function
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[fMultiValParam]
(#Param varchar(5000))
RETURNS #tblParam TABLE (ParamID varchar(40))
AS
BEGIN
IF (#Param IS NULL OR LEN(#Param) < 2)
BEGIN
RETURN
END
DECLARE #len INT
DECLARE #index INT
DECLARE #nextindex INT
SET #len = DATALENGTH(#Param)
SET #index = 0
SET #nextindex = 0
WHILE (#index < #len)
BEGIN
SET #Nextindex = CHARINDEX(';', #Param, #index)
INSERT INTO #tblParam
SELECT SUBSTRING(#Param, #index, #nextindex - #index)
SET #index = #nextindex + 1
END
RETURN
END
Try this:
SELECT DISTINCT COALESCE ( offer, NULL )
FROM products
WHERE instance IN ( #instancelist )
IMHO impossible via pure SQL without some stored-procedure code. But... i'm not sure.
Added: On the other hand, I'm getting an idea about a recursive query (in MSSQL 2005 there is such a thing, which allows you to join a query with it's own results until there are no more rows returned) which might "gather" the correct answers by cross-joining the results of previous step with all products and then filtering out invalid combinations. You would however get all permutations of valid combinations and it would hardly be efficient. And the idea is pretty vague, so I can't guarantee that it can actually be implemented.
Related
I am trying to select values from a table that are not duplicates - for example, with the following input set, I would like to select only the values in Column 1 that don't have a duplicated value in Column 2
Column 1 Column 2
A X
B X
C Y
D Y
E Z
Resulting in
Column 1 Column 2
E Z
This is made harder by my having a character limit for my SQL statement, and my having to join a couple of tables in the same query.
My existing statement is here, and this is where I am stuck.
SELECT d.o_docguid, d.o_itemdesc
FROM dms_doc d
INNER JOIN
(SELECT s.o_itemno as si, s.o_projectno as sp, t.o_itemno as ti, t.o_projectno as tp
FROM env_bs1192_1 s, env_bs1192_2 t
WHERE s.TB_FILE_ID = t.TB_FILE_ID) as r
ON (si = d.o_itemno AND sp = d.o_projectno)
OR (ti = d.o_itemno AND tp = d.o_projectno)
Results look like
o_docguid o_itemdesc
aguid adescription
bguid adescription
cguid bdescription
I want to filter this list out such that all that remains are the unique descriptions and their associated guid (i.e. only the rows that have specifically a single unique entry in the description, or put another way, if there is a duplicate, throw both away - in this instance, cguid and bdescription should be the only results).
The last challenge, which I still haven't solved, is that this SQL statement needs to fit into a character limit of 242 characters.
Taking the first part as a question, the answer might be:
declare #Table table (Column1 char(1), Column2 char(1));
insert into #Table values
('A', 'X'),
('B', 'X'),
('C', 'Y'),
('D', 'Y'),
('E', 'Z');
select
Column1 = max(Column1),
Column2
from
#Table
group by
Column2
having
count(*) = 1;
How to do it with generic data.
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS #MyTable
CREATE TABLE #MyTable(Column1 VARCHAR(50),Column2 VARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO #MyTable(Column1,Column2)
VALUES
('A','X'),
('B','X'),
('C','Y'),
('D','Y'),
('E','Z')
;WITH UniqueCol2 AS
(
SELECT Column2
FROM #MyTable
GROUP BY Column2
HAVING COUNT(*) = 1
)
SELECT
mt.*
FROM UniqueCol2
JOIN #MyTable mt ON mt.Column2 = UniqueCol2.Column2
I have T-SQL Table below.
ID Cost MaxCost
-------------------------------
2 200 300
3 400 1000
6 20 100
The above table must have 10 rows with IDs 1 to 10. So its missing 7 rows. How do i insert missing rows with proper ID. The cost & maxcost for missing rows will be zero. Do i need to create a temp table that holds 1 to 10 numbers?
No need for temp table, simple tally derived table and LEFT OUTER JOIN are sufficient:
CREATE TABLE #tab(ID INT, Cost INT, MaxCost INT);
INSERT INTO #tab(ID, Cost, MaxCost)
VALUES (2, 200,300),(3, 400, 1000) ,(6, 20, 100);
DECLARE #range_start INT = 1
,#range_end INT = 10;
;WITH tally AS
(
SELECT TOP 1000 r = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY name)
FROM master..spt_values
)
INSERT INTO #tab(id, Cost, MaxCost)
SELECT t.r, 0, 0
FROM tally t
LEFT JOIN #tab c
ON t.r = c.ID
WHERE t.r BETWEEN #range_start AND #range_end
AND c.ID IS NULL;
SELECT *
FROM #tab
ORDER BY ID;
LiveDemo
EDIT:
Tally table is simply number table. There are many ways to achieve it with subquery:
recursive cte
ROW_NUMBER() from system table that holds many values (used here)
UNION ALL and CROSS JOIN
VALUES(...)
using OPENJSON (SQL Server 2016+)
...
The TOP 1000 will generate only 1000 records if you know that you need more you can use:
SELECT TOP 1000000 r = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM master..spt_values c
CROSS JOIN master..spt_values c2;
Since your number of rows is low you could just define the data explicitly...
CREATE TABLE Data(ID INT, Cost INT, MaxCost INT);
INSERT INTO Data(ID, Cost, MaxCost) VALUES(2, 200, 300);
INSERT INTO Data(ID, Cost, MaxCost) VALUES(3, 400, 1000);
INSERT INTO Data(ID, Cost, MaxCost) VALUES(6, 20, 100);
and the query...
select *
from (VALUES(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10)) RowNums (ID)
left outer join Data on RowNums.ID = Data.ID
The first part defines a column ID with rows 1-10, it then left outer joins to your data. The beauty of this is that it is very readable.
I like to google for new and better ways to do things.. so i stumbled over this post and...Well what worked good in SQL7 and works good in SQL2016 is to just use a outer join and look for NULL values(null is missing data) ....
insert into DestTable (keyCol1,col1,col2,col3...)
select keyCol1,col1,col2,col3,...)
from SouceTable as s
left outer join DestTable as d on d.KeyCol1=s.KeyCol1
where d.KeyCol1 is null
and ...
feel free to test it
wrap your statement in a transaction, delete a few rows and see them come back in the select statement that would normally insert the rows in the destination table...
BEGIN TRAN
--> delete a subset of the data, in this case 5 rows
set rowcount 5;
-->delete and show what is deleted
delete from DestTable;
OUTPUT deleted.*,'DELETD' as [Action]
--> Perform the select to see if the selected rows that are retured match the deleted rows
--insert into DestTable (keyCol1,col1,col2,col3...)
Select keyCol1,col1,col2,col3,...)
from SouceTable as s
left outer join DestTable as d on d.KeyCol1=s.KeyCol1
where d.KeyCol1 is null
and ...
ROLLBACK
another way would be a TSQL merge, google that if you need to also update and optionally delete...
I need to calculate Dividend Factors in the DB and the basic calculation needed in a general way is row2 field2 = (row2's field1) * (row1's field2) where the field2 is the value I need to both update and query at the same time i.e. when I calculate it for one row, I need the calculated value of the previous row for this row.
Now I have a temp table with has all the values and now I need to calculate the final values, but when I tried this:
UPDATE
#temp
SET
field2 = IsNull(
(SELECT d2.field2 * d.field1 FROM #temp AS d2 WHERE d2.rowNr = d.rowNr - 1)
,d.field1
)
FROM
#temp as d
;
It always saw that the field2 was always NULL and went with the default action, with it should do only for the first row.
Now currently there are only two methods I know for doing this:
Loop through the #temp with a cursor
Use a while statement and loop through the table that way (I opted for this one, because I thought there is no point in using a cursor for a small table of 10-20 rows max)
But I still would like to get this into a single statement, but I have no idea how to do this. I am using MS SQL 2008 R2.
EDIT:
This is the actual data I am working with: (Note, that all field2 values are NULL prior to the calculation and the data type is money)
field1 field2(expected values)
------ ----------------------
1,033 1,033
1,0363 1,0705
1,0558 1,1302
1,0157 1,1479
1,0188 1,1695
1,026 1,1999
1,0286 1,2342
1,0323 1,2741
1,0319 1,3147
Okay if I'm understanding this, you want to find field2 which is based on previous rows of field2 that were just calculated so you need either some form of loop or recursion. Try this recursive solution out:
Setting Up Tables
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#temp') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #temp;
DECLARE #yourTable TABLE (ID INT,field1 INT, field2 INT);
INSERT INTO #yourTable(ID,field1,field2)
VALUES (1111,11,11),(2222,22,22),(3333,33,33);
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ID) rowNr,
ID,
field1,
field2 INTO #temp
FROM #yourTable;
Calculating values
WITH cte_recursion
AS
(
SELECT TOP 1
rowNR,
ID,
field1,
field2,
field1 AS dividend_factor
FROM #temp A
ORDER BY rowNr
UNION ALL
SELECT B.rowNr,
B.ID,
B.field1,
B.field2,
B.field1 * A.dividend_factor
FROM cte_recursion A
INNER JOIN #temp B
ON A.rowNr = B.rowNr - 1
)
Actual Update
UPDATE #yourTable
SET field2 = B.dividend_factor
FROM #yourTable A
INNER JOIN cte_recursion B
ON A.ID = B.ID
OPTION (MAXRECURSION 0)
SELECT *
FROM #yourTable
Results:
ID field1 field2
----------- ----------- -----------
1111 11 11
2222 22 242
3333 33 7986
Personally I wouldn't use the update because you have to constantly make sure the data is update to date. I'd much rather use the CTE I used to calculate the values and put it in a view so that you know the values are ALWAYS up to date and you don't have to worry about running it. Either that or having a dividend_factor column in your actual table that will be NULL unless the value is updated. Just my two cents
UPDATE d1
SET d1.field2 = IsNull(d2.field2 * d1.field1, d1.field1)
FROM #temp AS d1
left outer join #temp AS d2
on d2.rowNr = d1.rowNr - 1
magic
select d1.field1, EXP(SUM(LOG(d2.field1)))
from #temp AS d1
join #temp AS d2
on d2.rowNr <= d1.rowNr
group by d1.field1
op claims wrong answer
test for youself
drop table #temp;
create table #temp (ID int, val money);
insert into #temp (ID, val) values
(1, 1.033)
, (2, 1.0363)
, (3, 1.0558)
, (4, 1.0157)
, (5, 1.0188)
, (6, 1.026)
, (7, 1.0286)
, (8, 1.0323)
, (9, 1.0319);
SELECT TOP 10 [t1].[ID], EXP(SUM(LOG([t2].[val])))
from #temp AS t1
join #temp AS t2
on t2.[ID] <= t1.[ID]
group by t1.[ID]
order by t1.[ID]
I have two tables I want to join.
Table A has one column, named "Week", and contains 52 rows: 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc.
Table 2 has three columns, named "Name", "Week", and "Total", and contains 10 rows:
'Bob', 1, 1
'Bob', 3, 1
'Joe', 4, 1
'Bob', 6, 1
I want to join these together so that my data looks like:
NAME|WEEK|TOTAL
'Bob', 1, 1
'Bob', 2, 0
'Bob', 3, 1
'Bob', 4, 0
'Bob', 5, 0
'Bob', 6, 1
As you can see, a simple outer join. However, when I try to do this, I'm not getting the expected result, no matter what kind of join I use.
My query below:
SELECT a.WEEK, b.Total
FROM Weeks a LEFT JOIN Totals b ON (a.Week = b.Week and b.Name ='Bob')
The result of this query is
NAME|WEEK|TOTAL
'Bob', 1, 1
'Bob', 3, 1
'Bob', 6, 1
Thanks in advance for the help!
I know its access but your join is incorrect. Here we go in sql server..same concept just look at the join condition:
--dont worry about this code im just creating some temp tables
--table to store one column (mainly week number 1,2..52)
CREATE TABLE #Weeks
(
weeknumber int
)
--insert some test data
--week numbers...I'll insert some for you
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(1)
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(2)
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(3)
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(4)
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(5)
INSERT INTO #Weeks(weeknumber) VALUES(6)
--create another table with two columns storing the week # and a total for that week
CREATE TABLE #Table2
(
weeknumber int,
total int
)
--insert some data
INSERT INTO #Table2(weeknumber, total) VALUES(1, 100)
--notice i skipped week 2 on purpose to show you the results
INSERT INTO #Table2(weeknumber, total) VALUES(3, 100)
--here's the magic
SELECT t1.weeknumber as weeknumber, ISNULL(t2.total,0) as total FROM
#Weeks t1 LEFT JOIN #Table2 t2 ON t1.weeknumber=t2.weeknumber
--get rid of the temp tables
DROP TABLE #table2
DROP TABLE #Weeks
Results:
1 100
2 0
3 100
4 0
5 0
6 0
Take your week number table (the table that has one column:
SELECT t1.weeknumber as weeknumber
Add to it a null check to replace the null value with a 0. I think there is something in access like ISNULL:
ISNULL(t2.total, 0) as total
And start your join from your first table and left join to your second table on the weeknumber field. The result is simple:
SELECT t1.weeknumber as weeknumber, ISNULL(t2.total,0) as total FROM
#Weeks t1 LEFT JOIN #Table2 t2 ON t1.weeknumber=t2.weeknumber
Do not pay attention to all the other code I have posted, that is only there to create temp tables and insert values into the tables.
SELECT b.Name, b.Week, b.Total
FROM Totals AS b
WHERE b.Name ='Bob'
UNION
SELECT 'Bob' AS Name, a.Week, 0 AS Total
FROM Weeks AS a
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT *
FROM Totals AS b
WHERE a.Week = b.Week
AND b.Name ='Bob' );
You were on the right track, but just needed to use a left join. Also the NZ function will put a 0 if total is null.
SELECT Totals.Person, Weeks.WeekNo, Nz(Totals.total, 0) as TotalAmount
FROM Weeks LEFT JOIN Totals
ON (Weeks.WeekNo = Totals.weekno and Totals.Person = 'Bob');
EDIT: The query you now have won't even give the results you've shown because you left out the Name field (Which is a bad name for a field because it is a reserved word.). You're still not providing all the information. This query works.
*Another Approach: * Create a separate query on the Totals table having a where clause: Name = 'Bob'
Select Name, WeekNo, Total From Totals Where Name = 'Bob';
and substitute that query for the Totals table in this query.
Select b.Name, w.WeekNo, b.total
from Weeks as w
LEFT JOIN qryJustBob as b
on .WeekNo = b.WeekNo;
OK I have a table like this:
ID Signal Station OwnerID
111 -120 Home 1
111 -130 Car 1
111 -135 Work 2
222 -98 Home 2
222 -95 Work 1
222 -103 Work 2
This is all for the same day. I just need the Query to return the max signal for each ID:
ID Signal Station OwnerID
111 -120 Home 1
222 -95 Work 1
I tried using MAX() and the aggregation messes up with the Station and OwnerID being different for each record. Do I need to do a JOIN?
Something like this? Join your table with itself, and exclude the rows for which a higher signal was found.
select cur.id, cur.signal, cur.station, cur.ownerid
from yourtable cur
where not exists (
select *
from yourtable high
where high.id = cur.id
and high.signal > cur.signal
)
This would list one row for each highest signal, so there might be multiple rows per id.
You are doing a group-wise maximum/minimum operation. This is a common trap: it feels like something that should be easy to do, but in SQL it aggravatingly isn't.
There are a number of approaches (both standard ANSI and vendor-specific) to this problem, most of which are sub-optimal in many situations. Some will give you multiple rows when more than one row shares the same maximum/minimum value; some won't. Some work well on tables with a small number of groups; others are more efficient for a larger number of groups with smaller rows per group.
Here's a discussion of some of the common ones (MySQL-biased but generally applicable). Personally, if I know there are no multiple maxima (or don't care about getting them) I often tend towards the null-left-self-join method, which I'll post as no-one else has yet:
SELECT reading.ID, reading.Signal, reading.Station, reading.OwnerID
FROM readings AS reading
LEFT JOIN readings AS highersignal
ON highersignal.ID=reading.ID AND highersignal.Signal>reading.Signal
WHERE highersignal.ID IS NULL;
In classic SQL-92 (not using the OLAP operations used by Quassnoi), then you can use:
SELECT g.ID, g.MaxSignal, t.Station, t.OwnerID
FROM (SELECT id, MAX(Signal) AS MaxSignal
FROM t
GROUP BY id) AS g
JOIN t ON g.id = t.id AND g.MaxSignal = t.Signal;
(Unchecked syntax; assumes your table is 't'.)
The sub-query in the FROM clause identifies the maximum signal value for each id; the join combines that with the corresponding data row from the main table.
NB: if there are several entries for a specific ID that all have the same signal strength and that strength is the MAX(), then you will get several output rows for that ID.
Tested against IBM Informix Dynamic Server 11.50.FC3 running on Solaris 10:
+ CREATE TEMP TABLE signal_info
(
id INTEGER NOT NULL,
signal INTEGER NOT NULL,
station CHAR(5) NOT NULL,
ownerid INTEGER NOT NULL
);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(111, -120, 'Home', 1);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(111, -130, 'Car' , 1);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(111, -135, 'Work', 2);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(222, -98 , 'Home', 2);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(222, -95 , 'Work', 1);
+ INSERT INTO signal_info VALUES(222, -103, 'Work', 2);
+ SELECT g.ID, g.MaxSignal, t.Station, t.OwnerID
FROM (SELECT id, MAX(Signal) AS MaxSignal
FROM signal_info
GROUP BY id) AS g
JOIN signal_info AS t ON g.id = t.id AND g.MaxSignal = t.Signal;
111 -120 Home 1
222 -95 Work 1
I named the table Signal_Info for this test - but it seems to produce the right answer.
This only shows that there is at least one DBMS that supports the notation. However, I am a little surprised that MS SQL Server does not - which version are you using?
It never ceases to surprise me how often SQL questions are submitted without table names.
WITH q AS
(
SELECT c.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY signal DESC) rn
FROM mytable
)
SELECT *
FROM q
WHERE rn = 1
This will return one row even if there are duplicates of MAX(signal) for a given ID.
Having an index on (id, signal) will greatly improve this query.
with tab(id, sig, sta, oid) as
(
select 111 as id, -120 as signal, 'Home' as station, 1 as ownerId union all
select 111, -130, 'Car', 1 union all
select 111, -135, 'Work', 2 union all
select 222, -98, 'Home', 2 union all
select 222, -95, 'Work', 1 union all
select 222, -103, 'Work', 2
) ,
tabG(id, maxS) as
(
select id, max(sig) as sig from tab group by id
)
select g.*, p.* from tabG g
cross apply ( select top(1) * from tab t where t.id=g.id order by t.sig desc ) p
We can do using self join
SELECT T1.ID,T1.Signal,T2.Station,T2.OwnerID
FROM (select ID,max(Signal) as Signal from mytable group by ID) T1
LEFT JOIN mytable T2
ON T1.ID=T2.ID and T1.Signal=T2.Signal;
Or you can also use the following query
SELECT t0.ID,t0.Signal,t0.Station,t0.OwnerID
FROM mytable t0
LEFT JOIN mytable t1 ON t0.ID=t1.ID AND t1.Signal>t0.Signal
WHERE t1.ID IS NULL;
select a.id, b.signal, a.station, a.owner from
mytable a
join
(SELECT ID, MAX(Signal) as Signal FROM mytable GROUP BY ID) b
on a.id = b.id AND a.Signal = b.Signal
SELECT * FROM StatusTable
WHERE Signal IN (
SELECT A.maxSignal FROM
(
SELECT ID, MAX(Signal) AS maxSignal
FROM StatusTable
GROUP BY ID
) AS A
);
select
id,
max_signal,
owner,
ownerId
FROM (
select * , rank() over(partition by id order by signal desc) as max_signal from table
)
where max_signal = 1;