Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
I have learned quite a bit browsing through Hidden Features
of C# and was surprised when I couldn't find something
similar for VB.NET.
So what are some of its hidden or lesser known features?
The Exception When clause is largely unknown.
Consider this:
Public Sub Login(host as string, user as String, password as string, _
Optional bRetry as Boolean = False)
Try
ssh.Connect(host, user, password)
Catch ex as TimeoutException When Not bRetry
''//Try again, but only once.
Login(host, user, password, True)
Catch ex as TimeoutException
''//Log exception
End Try
End Sub
Custom Enums
One of the real hidden features of VB is the completionlist XML documentation tag that can be used to create own Enum-like types with extended functionality. This feature doesn't work in C#, though.
One example from a recent code of mine:
'
''' <completionlist cref="RuleTemplates"/>
Public Class Rule
Private ReadOnly m_Expression As String
Private ReadOnly m_Options As RegexOptions
Public Sub New(ByVal expression As String)
Me.New(expression, RegexOptions.None)
End Sub
Public Sub New(ByVal expression As String, ByVal options As RegexOptions)
m_Expression = expression
m_options = options
End Sub
Public ReadOnly Property Expression() As String
Get
Return m_Expression
End Get
End Property
Public ReadOnly Property Options() As RegexOptions
Get
Return m_Options
End Get
End Property
End Class
Public NotInheritable Class RuleTemplates
Public Shared ReadOnly Whitespace As New Rule("\s+")
Public Shared ReadOnly Identifier As New Rule("\w+")
Public Shared ReadOnly [String] As New Rule("""([^""]|"""")*""")
End Class
Now, when assigning a value to a variable declared as Rule, the IDE offers an IntelliSense list of possible values from RuleTemplates.
/EDIT:
Since this is a feature that relies on the IDE, it's hard to show how this looks when you use it but I'll just use a screenshot:
Completion list in action http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/krudolph/stuff/completionlist.png
In fact, the IntelliSense is 100% identical to what you get when using an Enum.
Have you noticed the Like comparison operator?
Dim b As Boolean = "file.txt" Like "*.txt"
More from MSDN
Dim testCheck As Boolean
' The following statement returns True (does "F" satisfy "F"?)'
testCheck = "F" Like "F"
' The following statement returns False for Option Compare Binary'
' and True for Option Compare Text (does "F" satisfy "f"?)'
testCheck = "F" Like "f"
' The following statement returns False (does "F" satisfy "FFF"?)'
testCheck = "F" Like "FFF"
' The following statement returns True (does "aBBBa" have an "a" at the'
' beginning, an "a" at the end, and any number of characters in '
' between?)'
testCheck = "aBBBa" Like "a*a"
' The following statement returns True (does "F" occur in the set of'
' characters from "A" through "Z"?)'
testCheck = "F" Like "[A-Z]"
' The following statement returns False (does "F" NOT occur in the '
' set of characters from "A" through "Z"?)'
testCheck = "F" Like "[!A-Z]"
' The following statement returns True (does "a2a" begin and end with'
' an "a" and have any single-digit number in between?)'
testCheck = "a2a" Like "a#a"
' The following statement returns True (does "aM5b" begin with an "a",'
' followed by any character from the set "L" through "P", followed'
' by any single-digit number, and end with any character NOT in'
' the character set "c" through "e"?)'
testCheck = "aM5b" Like "a[L-P]#[!c-e]"
' The following statement returns True (does "BAT123khg" begin with a'
' "B", followed by any single character, followed by a "T", and end'
' with zero or more characters of any type?)'
testCheck = "BAT123khg" Like "B?T*"
' The following statement returns False (does "CAT123khg" begin with'
' a "B", followed by any single character, followed by a "T", and'
' end with zero or more characters of any type?)'
testCheck = "CAT123khg" Like "B?T*"
Typedefs
VB knows a primitive kind of typedef via Import aliases:
Imports S = System.String
Dim x As S = "Hello"
This is more useful when used in conjunction with generic types:
Imports StringPair = System.Collections.Generic.KeyValuePair(Of String, String)
Oh! and don't forget XML Literals.
Dim contact2 = _
<contact>
<name>Patrick Hines</name>
<%= From p In phoneNumbers2 _
Select <phone type=<%= p.Type %>><%= p.Number %></phone> _
%>
</contact>
Object initialization is in there too!
Dim x as New MyClass With {.Prop1 = foo, .Prop2 = bar}
DirectCast
DirectCast is a marvel. On the surface, it works similar to the CType operator in that it converts an object from one type into another. However, it works by a much stricter set of rules. CType's actual behaviour is therefore often opaque and it's not at all evident which kind of conversion is executed.
DirectCast only supports two distinct operations:
Unboxing of a value type, and
upcasting in the class hierarchy.
Any other cast will not work (e.g. trying to unbox an Integer to a Double) and will result in a compile time/runtime error (depending on the situation and what can be detected by static type checking). I therefore use DirectCast whenever possible, as this captures my intent best: depending on the situation, I either want to unbox a value of known type or perform an upcast. End of story.
Using CType, on the other hand, leaves the reader of the code wondering what the programmer really intended because it resolves to all kinds of different operations, including calling user-defined code.
Why is this a hidden feature? The VB team has published a guideline1 that discourages the use of DirectCast (even though it's actually faster!) in order to make the code more uniform. I argue that this is a bad guideline that should be reversed: Whenever possible, favour DirectCast over the more general CType operator. It makes the code much clearer. CType, on the other hand, should only be called if this is indeed intended, i.e. when a narrowing CType operator (cf. operator overloading) should be called.
1) I'm unable to come up with a link to the guideline but I've found Paul Vick's take on it (chief developer of the VB team):
In the real world, you're hardly ever going to notice the difference, so you might as well go with the more flexible conversion operators like CType, CInt, etc.
(EDIT by Zack: Learn more here: How should I cast in VB.NET?)
If conditional and coalesce operator
I don't know how hidden you'd call it, but the Iif([expression],[value if true],[value if false]) As Object function could count.
It's not so much hidden as deprecated! VB 9 has the If operator which is much better and works exactly as C#'s conditional and coalesce operator (depending on what you want):
Dim x = If(a = b, c, d)
Dim hello As String = Nothing
Dim y = If(hello, "World")
Edited to show another example:
This will work with If(), but cause an exception with IIf()
Dim x = If(b<>0,a/b,0)
This is a nice one. The Select Case statement within VB.Net is very powerful.
Sure there is the standard
Select Case Role
Case "Admin"
''//Do X
Case "Tester"
''//Do Y
Case "Developer"
''//Do Z
Case Else
''//Exception case
End Select
But there is more...
You can do ranges:
Select Case Amount
Case Is < 0
''//What!!
Case 0 To 15
Shipping = 2.0
Case 16 To 59
Shipping = 5.87
Case Is > 59
Shipping = 12.50
Case Else
Shipping = 9.99
End Select
And even more...
You can (although may not be a good idea) do boolean checks on multiple variables:
Select Case True
Case a = b
''//Do X
Case a = c
''//Do Y
Case b = c
''//Do Z
Case Else
''//Exception case
End Select
One major time saver I use all the time is the With keyword:
With ReallyLongClassName
.Property1 = Value1
.Property2 = Value2
...
End With
I just don't like typing more than I have to!
The best and easy CSV parser:
Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.TextFieldParser
By adding a reference to Microsoft.VisualBasic, this can be used in any other .Net language, e.g. C#
AndAlso/OrElse logical operators
(EDIT: Learn more here: Should I always use the AndAlso and OrElse operators?)
Static members in methods.
For example:
Function CleanString(byval input As String) As String
Static pattern As New RegEx("...")
return pattern.Replace(input, "")
End Function
In the above function, the pattern regular expression will only ever be created once no matter how many times the function is called.
Another use is to keep an instance of "random" around:
Function GetNextRandom() As Integer
Static r As New Random(getSeed())
Return r.Next()
End Function
Also, this isn't the same as simply declaring it as a Shared member of the class; items declared this way are guaranteed to be thread-safe as well. It doesn't matter in this scenario since the expression will never change, but there are others where it might.
In vb there is a different between these operators:
/ is Double
\ is Integer ignoring the remainder
Sub Main()
Dim x = 9 / 5
Dim y = 9 \ 5
Console.WriteLine("item x of '{0}' equals to {1}", x.GetType.FullName, x)
Console.WriteLine("item y of '{0}' equals to {1}", y.GetType.FullName, y)
'Results:
'item x of 'System.Double' equals to 1.8
'item y of 'System.Int32' equals to 1
End Sub
I really like the "My" Namespace which was introduced in Visual Basic 2005. My is a shortcut to several groups of information and functionality. It provides quick and intuitive access to the following types of information:
My.Computer: Access to information related to the computer such as file system, network, devices, system information, etc. It provides access to a number of very important resources including My.Computer.Network, My.Computer.FileSystem, and My.Computer.Printers.
My.Application: Access to information related to the particular application such as name, version, current directory, etc.
My.User: Access to information related to the current authenticated user.
My.Resources: Access to resources used by the application residing in resource files in a strongly typed manner.
My.Settings: Access to configuration settings of the application in a strongly typed manner.
Custom Events
Though seldom useful, event handling can be heavily customized:
Public Class ApplePie
Private ReadOnly m_BakedEvent As New List(Of EventHandler)()
Custom Event Baked As EventHandler
AddHandler(ByVal value As EventHandler)
Console.WriteLine("Adding a new subscriber: {0}", value.Method)
m_BakedEvent.Add(value)
End AddHandler
RemoveHandler(ByVal value As EventHandler)
Console.WriteLine("Removing subscriber: {0}", value.Method)
m_BakedEvent.Remove(value)
End RemoveHandler
RaiseEvent(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Console.WriteLine("{0} is raising an event.", sender)
For Each ev In m_BakedEvent
ev.Invoke(sender, e)
Next
End RaiseEvent
End Event
Public Sub Bake()
''// 1. Add ingredients
''// 2. Stir
''// 3. Put into oven (heated, not pre-heated!)
''// 4. Bake
RaiseEvent Baked(Me, EventArgs.Empty)
''// 5. Digest
End Sub
End Class
This can then be tested in the following fashion:
Module Module1
Public Sub Foo(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Console.WriteLine("Hmm, freshly baked apple pie.")
End Sub
Sub Main()
Dim pie As New ApplePie()
AddHandler pie.Baked, AddressOf Foo
pie.Bake()
RemoveHandler pie.Baked, AddressOf Foo
End Sub
End Module
I just found an article talking about the "!" operator, also know as the "dictionary lookup operator". Here's an excerpt from the article at: http://panopticoncentral.net/articles/902.aspx
The technical name for the ! operator
is the "dictionary lookup operator." A
dictionary is any collection type that
is indexed by a key rather than a
number, just like the way that the
entries in an English dictionary are
indexed by the word you want the
definition of. The most common example
of a dictionary type is the
System.Collections.Hashtable, which
allows you to add (key, value) pairs
into the hashtable and then retrieve
values using the keys. For example,
the following code adds three entries
to a hashtable, and looks one of them
up using the key "Pork".
Dim Table As Hashtable = New Hashtable
Table("Orange") = "A fruit"
Table("Broccoli") = "A vegetable"
Table("Pork") = "A meat"
Console.WriteLine(Table("Pork"))
The ! operator can be used to look up
values from any dictionary type that
indexes its values using strings. The
identifier after the ! is used as the
key in the lookup operation. So the
above code could instead have been
written:
Dim Table As Hashtable = New Hashtable
Table!Orange = "A fruit"
Table!Broccoli = "A vegetable"
Table!Pork = "A meat"
Console.WriteLine(Table!Pork)
The second example is completely
equivalent to the first, but just
looks a lot nicer, at least to my
eyes. I find that there are a lot of
places where ! can be used, especially
when it comes to XML and the web,
where there are just tons of
collections that are indexed by
string. One unfortunate limitation is
that the thing following the ! still
has to be a valid identifier, so if
the string you want to use as a key
has some invalid identifier character
in it, you can't use the ! operator.
(You can't, for example, say
"Table!AB$CD = 5" because $ isn't
legal in identifiers.) In VB6 and
before, you could use brackets to
escape invalid identifiers (i.e.
"Table![AB$CD]"), but when we started
using brackets to escape keywords, we
lost the ability to do that. In most
cases, however, this isn't too much of
a limitation.
To get really technical, x!y works if
x has a default property that takes a
String or Object as a parameter. In
that case, x!y is changed into
x.DefaultProperty("y"). An interesting
side note is that there is a special
rule in the lexical grammar of the
language to make this all work. The !
character is also used as a type
character in the language, and type
characters are eaten before operators.
So without a special rule, x!y would
be scanned as "x! y" instead of "x !
y". Fortunately, since there is no
place in the language where two
identifiers in a row are valid, we
just introduced the rule that if the
next character after the ! is the
start of an identifier, we consider
the ! to be an operator and not a type
character.
This is built-in, and a definite advantage over C#. The ability to implement an interface Method without having to use the same name.
Such as:
Public Sub GetISCSIAdmInfo(ByRef xDoc As System.Xml.XmlDocument) Implements IUnix.GetISCSIInfo
End Sub
Forcing ByVal
In VB, if you wrap your arguments in an extra set of parentheses you can override the ByRef declaration of the method and turn it into a ByVal. For instance, the following code produces 4, 5, 5 instead of 4,5,6
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim R = 4
Trace.WriteLine(R)
Test(R)
Trace.WriteLine(R)
Test((R))
Trace.WriteLine(R)
End Sub
Private Sub Test(ByRef i As Integer)
i += 1
End Sub
See Argument Not Being Modified by Procedure Call - Underlying Variable
Passing parameters by name and, so reordering them
Sub MyFunc(Optional msg as String= "", Optional displayOrder As integer = 0)
'Do stuff
End function
Usage:
Module Module1
Sub Main()
MyFunc() 'No params specified
End Sub
End Module
Can also be called using the ":=" parameter specification in any order:
MyFunc(displayOrder:=10, msg:="mystring")
The Using statement is new as of VB 8, C# had it from the start. It calls dispose automagically for you.
E.g.
Using lockThis as New MyLocker(objToLock)
End Using
Import aliases are also largely unknown:
Import winf = System.Windows.Forms
''Later
Dim x as winf.Form
Consider the following event declaration
Public Event SomethingHappened As EventHandler
In C#, you can check for event subscribers by using the following syntax:
if(SomethingHappened != null)
{
...
}
However, the VB.NET compiler does not support this. It actually creates a hidden private member field which is not visible in IntelliSense:
If Not SomethingHappenedEvent Is Nothing OrElse SomethingHappenedEvent.GetInvocationList.Length = 0 Then
...
End If
More Information:
http://jelle.druyts.net/2003/05/09/BehindTheScenesOfEventsInVBNET.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/vbteam/archive/2009/09/25/testing-events-for-nothing-null-doug-rothaus.aspx
If you need a variable name to match that of a keyword, enclose it with brackets. Not nec. the best practice though - but it can be used wisely.
e.g.
Class CodeException
Public [Error] as String
''...
End Class
''later
Dim e as new CodeException
e.Error = "Invalid Syntax"
e.g. Example from comments(#Pondidum):
Class Timer
Public Sub Start()
''...
End Sub
Public Sub [Stop]()
''...
End Sub
There are a couple of answers about XML Literals, but not about this specific case:
You can use XML Literals to enclose string literals that would otherwise need to be escaped. String literals that contain double-quotes, for instance.
Instead of this:
Dim myString = _
"This string contains ""quotes"" and they're ugly."
You can do this:
Dim myString = _
<string>This string contains "quotes" and they're nice.</string>.Value
This is especially useful if you're testing a literal for CSV parsing:
Dim csvTestYuck = _
"""Smith"", ""Bob"", ""123 Anywhere St"", ""Los Angeles"", ""CA"""
Dim csvTestMuchBetter = _
<string>"Smith", "Bob", "123 Anywhere St", "Los Angeles", "CA"</string>.Value
(You don't have to use the <string> tag, of course; you can use any tag you like.)
DateTime can be initialized by surrounding your date with #
Dim independanceDay As DateTime = #7/4/1776#
You can also use type inference along with this syntax
Dim independanceDay = #7/4/1776#
That's a lot nicer than using the constructor
Dim independanceDay as DateTime = New DateTime(1776, 7, 4)
You can have 2 lines of code in just one line. hence:
Dim x As New Something : x.CallAMethod
Optional Parameters
Optionals are so much easier than creating a new overloads, such as :
Function CloseTheSystem(Optional ByVal msg AS String = "Shutting down the system...")
Console.Writeline(msg)
''//do stuff
End Function
Title Case in VB.Net can be achieved by an old VB6 fxn:
StrConv(stringToTitleCase, VbStrConv.ProperCase,0) ''0 is localeID
Properties with parameters
I have been doing some C# programming, and discovered a feature that was missing that VB.Net had, but was not mentioned here.
An example of how to do this (as well as the c# limitation) can be seen at: Using the typical get set properties in C#... with parameters
I have excerpted the code from that answer:
Private Shared m_Dictionary As IDictionary(Of String, Object) = _
New Dictionary(Of String, Object)
Public Shared Property DictionaryElement(ByVal Key As String) As Object
Get
If m_Dictionary.ContainsKey(Key) Then
Return m_Dictionary(Key)
Else
Return [String].Empty
End If
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Object)
If m_Dictionary.ContainsKey(Key) Then
m_Dictionary(Key) = value
Else
m_Dictionary.Add(Key, value)
End If
End Set
End Property
Related
Not too long ago C# added a nice "pattern matching" feature where you can check an object's type and cast it to that type all in one statement:
object o = GetSomeObjectFromTheDatabase();
if (o is Person p)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{p.Name} is {p.Age} years old.");
}
Does VB.NET have anything like this, or will I have to do the type check and cast in two separate operations as I have in the past?
As I had previously noted in my own comment (and Codexer noted in the previous answer), this feature is not in VB.
Based on recent comments from Microsoft (https://devblogs.microsoft.com/vbteam/visual-basic-support-planned-for-net-5-0/) it doesn't seem likely that this feature will be added to the language in the near future. That having been said, the language still has a very full set of features that is missing very little for day-to-day development. If you're considering whether to do further development in VB, you would consider availability of development resources (internally and externally), suitability of VB for your project, and your current code base.
The .TryCast might be what you are looking for. If it succeeds, it will make the assignment, otherwise it returns Nothing. To test I just commented out one of the 2 Return statements. Note that the underlying type is Coffee if c is returned.
Private Function GetSomeObjectFromTheDatabase() As Object
Dim dt = LoadCoffeeTable() 'Returns a DataTable
Dim c = New Coffee(CInt(dt(0)(0)), dt(0)(1).ToString, dt(0)(2).ToString)
'Return c
Return "I am not a Coffee"
End Function
Private Sub Button1_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim o As Object = GetSomeObjectFromTheDatabase()
Dim p As Coffee = TryCast(o, Coffee)
If p Is Nothing Then
MessageBox.Show("Object is not a Coffee " & o.ToString)
Else
MessageBox.Show(p.Name)
End If
End Sub
Unfortunately VB doesn't have pattern matching as mentioned already in the comments. One option is to create a module so we can create an extension to use on anything we would need to type match.
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module Extensions
<Extension()>
Public Function IsPatternMatch(Of T)(MyObj As Object, ByRef outObj As T) As Boolean
Dim isMatch As Boolean = TypeOf MyObj Is T
outObj = If(isMatch, CType(MyObj, T), outObj)
Return isMatch
End Function
End Module
Example Usage:
Dim o As Object = Nothing
Dim p As Person = Nothing
o = GetSomeObjectFromTheDatabase()
If o.IsPatternMatch(p) Then
' Do something with p now...
End If
I'm trying to remove a specific string out of a label. The label is suppose to print an error message while the input is invalid, as soon as the user changes the textbox input to a number, the error message should disappear for that specific input.
Here is what I tried so far but the "-=" did not work as I expected.
Sub errorOutput(toggleError As Boolean, courseNumber As Integer)
Dim err(6) As String
err(courseNumber) = "please ensure that what you input in Course " + courseNumber.ToString + " is a number between 0 and 100"
If toggleError = True Then
lblError.Text += err(courseNumber)
Else
lblError.Text -= err(courseNumber)
End If
End Sub
When applied to two Strings, the + operator does concatenation. It appends the string on the right-hand side of the operator to the string on the left-hand side of the operator.
(Technically, it creates a new String object that represents the concatenation of the left-hand and right-hand strings, since strings are immutable in .NET, but that's a technical detail you probably don't care about.)
The += operator is referred to as a compound assignment operator. It merges together an operator that modifies the value (in this case, the +) with the assignment operator (=), so that you can get both at once.
Okay, so you know how this works already. You're using +=, and you can append two strings, and everything is good.
So, by way of analogy, you try -=. Wait…what should happen? What does it mean to subtract two strings? Subtracting two numbers, well, that makes perfect sense. But how do you subtract a string?
It's not obvious what operation would be performed, so the subtraction operator doesn't do anything for String objects. It hasn't been defined, because its semantics are not clear. Only concatenation is defined, using the + operator (and also the & operator).
If you need to "remove" a portion of a string, you will have to write a bit more code, using one or more of the methods provided by the String class to spell out exactly what operation you want to happen. For example, you could use the String.Replace method to replace all occurrences of one string with another string (or even an empty string):
Dim message As String = "My favorite color is yellow."
message = message.Replace("yellow", "blue")
But in this case, you probably just want to clear the Label control first, and then only add in the error messages. This is essentially what Ry- suggested in a comment; e.g.:
Sub errorOutput(toggleError As Boolean, courseNumber As Integer)
lblError.Text = String.Empty
Dim err(6) As String
err(courseNumber) = "please ensure that what you input in Course " + courseNumber.ToString + " is a number between 0 and 100"
If toggleError = True Then
lblError.Text += err(courseNumber)
End If
End Sub
There is some built in things that can be used for validating user input. This is just some info I saved on the subject. Easy to use.
Validation
ErrorProvider
Private err As New ErrorProvider()
Or add to your form from Toolbox -> Components in Design View
.SetError(Control, “Error Message”)
Control.Validating
Private Sub TextBox1_Validating(sender As Object, e As System.ComponentModel.CancelEventArgs) Handles TextBox1.Validating
If TextBox1.Text = "" Then
e.Cancel = True
err.SetError(TextBox1, "This text box cannot be blank.")
Else
err.Clear()
End If
End Sub
So I am trying to make a code where the user inputs an ID number and receives the line of text that the ID corresponds to. I am having trouble with the code as I am unable to display the result (or correct result) in a label box.
For example:
If I type in ID 1, it displays the data that corresponds to ID 2, ID 2 corresponds to ID 3 and ID 3 ends the loop (there are only 3 records in the data currently).
I have included my code below
Private Sub btnSearch_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles btnSearch.Click
Filename = "NamesAndAges.txt"
FileOpen(1, Filename, OpenMode.Input,,,)
Dim ID As Integer
ID = txtSearch.Text
Dim Found As Boolean
Found = False
Do While Not EOF(1) And Found = False
If LineInput(1).Contains(ID) Then
lblDisplaySearch.Text = LineInput(1)
Found = True
Else MsgBox("Not Found")
End If
Loop
FileClose(1)
End Sub
Thanks in advance, would also really appreciate if anyone could explain the code they use as I am still a visual basic beginner.
Every time you call LineInput(1), it reads a line, so you're reading a line and checking if it contains ID then reading another line and setting lblDisplaySearch.Text to that value.
Try something like this:
Dim line As String
Do While Not EOF(1) And Found = False
line = LineInput(1)
If line.Contains(ID) Then
lblDisplaySearch.Text = line
Found = True
Else MsgBox("Not Found")
End If
Loop
I would strongly suggest simplifying this code, by using File.ReadLines:
Private Sub btnSearch_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles btnSearch.Click
Filename = "NamesAndAges.txt"
Dim line = File.ReadLines(Filename).FirstOrDefault(Function(x) x.Contains(txtSearch.Text))
If line Is Nothing Then
MsgBox("Not Found")
Exit Sub
End If
lblDisplaySearch.Text = line
End Sub
The primary advantage is that you don't need to manage the Do While loop. Instead, you are passing the match condition (Function(x) x.Contains(txtSearch.Text)) to the FirstOrDefault method, which internally will find the first line matching the condition and return it, or return Nothing if it's not found.
For Each and IEnumerable
VB.NET allows you to loop over a set of items without knowing or caring about the index within the set. For example:
For Each x As String In File.ReadLines(Filename)
'do something with the line, which is now in x
Next
In order to use For Each with an object, that object has to implement a specific interface — the IEnumerable interface.
Interfaces
Interfaces guarantee that a given object has, or implements, specific members. In this case, if an object implements the IEnumerable interface, that means it has a GetEnumerator method, which the For Each uses under the hood.
IEnumerable(Of T)
The object returned from File.ReadLines implements another more advanced generic interface called IEnumerable(Of T). With this interface, the compiler can figure out automatically that each step of the For Each will be parsing a string, and we don't need to specify it as a string:
For Each x In File.ReadLines(Filename)
'x is known to be a String here
Next
Lambda expressions
The condition "the line which contains the search text" is written as a lambda expression, which (in this case) is made into a method without an explicit name or definition. This is convenient, because we don't have to write this:
Function ContainsCondition(line As String, toFind As String) As Boolean
Return line.Contains(toFind)
End Function`
every time we want to express a condition this way.
Type of x in the condition
Because File.ReadLines returns an IEnumerable(Of T), in this case an IEnumerable(Of String), the compiler can figure out that the condition is working on strings, so we don't have to specify that x is a string within the condition.
I'm currently working in .NET 2.0 Visual Basic. The current project is an Active Directory Wrapper class library within which I have a Searcher(Of T) generic class that I wish to use to search the underlying directory for objects.
In this Searcher(Of T) class I have the following methods:
Private Function GetResults() As CustomSet(Of T)
Public Function ToList() As CustomSet(Of T)
Public Function Find(ByVal ParamArray filter() As Object) As CustomSet(Of T)
// And some other functions here...
The one that interests me the most is the Find() method to which I can pass property and values and would like to parse my LDAP query from this filter() ParamArray parameter. Actually, all I can figure out is this:
Public Sub SomeSub()
Dim groupSearcher As Searcher(Of Group) = New Searcher(Of Group)()
Dim groupsSet as CustomSet(Of Group) = groupSearcher.Find("Name=someName", "Description=someDescription")
// Working with the result here...
End Sub
But what I want to be able to offer to my users is this:
Public Sub SomeSub()
Dim groupSearcher As Searcher(Of Group) = New Searcher(Of Group)()
Dim groupsSet As CustomSet(Of Groupe) = groupSearcher.Find(Name = "someName", Guid = someGuid, Description = "someDescription")
// And work with the result here...
End Sub
In short, I want to offer some kind of Expression feature to my users, unless it is too much work, as this project is not the most important one and I don't have like 2 years to develop it. I think that the better thing I should do is to write something like CustomExpression that could be passed in parameters to some functions or subs.
Thanks for any suggestions that might bring me to my goal!
Interesting question. This is a language dependent feature, so I don't see this happening without some clever trickery of the IDE/compiler.
You could however have optional overloads on your Find method (vb.net is good for this), then make the search string manually to obtain the result.
Finally you could make use of lambda functions, but only in .net 3.5 and above. Even still, it would require your searcher to expose a preliminary set of data so you can recover the expression tree and build up the find string.
UPDATE
I've just been playing around with Reflection to see if I can retrieve the parameters passed, and build up a string dynamically depending on if they exist. This doesn't appear to be possible, due to the fact that compiled code doesn't reference the names.
This code just used was:
'-- Get all the "parameters"
Dim m As MethodInfo = GetType(Finder).GetMethod("Find")
Dim params() As ParameterInfo = m.GetParameters()
'-- We now have a reference to the parameter names, like Name and Description
Hmm. http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259443-Using-SystemReflection-to-obtain-parameter-values-dynamically/
Annoyingly it's not (easily) possible to recover the values sent, so we'll have to stick with building up the string in a non-dynamic fashion.
A simple optional method would look like:
Public Sub Find( _
Optional ByVal Name As String = "", _
Optional ByVal Description As String = "")
Dim query As String = String.Empty
If Not String.IsNullOrEmpty(Name) Then
query &= "Name=" & Name
'-- ..... more go here with your string seperater.
End If
End Sub
Locked. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
Which features of the VBA language are either poorly documented, or simply not often used?
This trick only works in Access VBA, Excel and others won't allow it. But you can make a Standard Module hidden from the object browser by prefixing the Module name with an underscore. The module will then only be visible if you change the object browser to show hidden objects.
This trick works with Enums in all vb6 based version of VBA. You can create a hidden member of an Enum by encasing it's name in brackets, then prefixing it with an underscore. Example:
Public Enum MyEnum
meDefault = 0
meThing1 = 1
meThing2 = 2
meThing3 = 3
[_Min] = meDefault
[_Max] = meThing3
End Enum
Public Function IsValidOption(ByVal myOption As MyEnum) As Boolean
If myOption >= MyEnum.[_Min] Then IsValidOption myOption <= MyEnum.[_Max]
End Function
In Excel-VBA you can reference cells by enclosing them in brackets, the brackets also function as an evaluate command allowing you to evaluate formula syntax:
Public Sub Example()
[A1] = "Foo"
MsgBox [VLOOKUP(A1,A1,1,0)]
End Sub
Also you can pass around raw data without using MemCopy (RtlMoveMemory) by combining LSet with User Defined Types of the same size:
Public Sub Example()
Dim b() As Byte
b = LongToByteArray(8675309)
MsgBox b(1)
End Sub
Private Function LongToByteArray(ByVal value As Long) As Byte()
Dim tl As TypedLong
Dim bl As ByteLong
tl.value = value
LSet bl = tl
LongToByteArray = bl.value
End Function
Octal & Hex Literals are actually unsigned types, these will both output -32768:
Public Sub Example()
Debug.Print &H8000
Debug.Print &O100000
End Sub
As mentioned, passing a variable inside parenthesis causes it to be passed ByVal:
Sub PredictTheOutput()
Dim i&, j&, k&
i = 10: j = i: k = i
MySub (i)
MySub j
MySub k + 20
MsgBox Join(Array(i, j, k), vbNewLine), vbQuestion, "Did You Get It Right?"
End Sub
Public Sub MySub(ByRef foo As Long)
foo = 5
End Sub
You can assign a string directly into a byte array and vice-versa:
Public Sub Example()
Dim myString As String
Dim myBytArr() As Byte
myBytArr = "I am a string."
myString = myBytArr
MsgBox myString
End Sub
"Mid" is also an operator. Using it you overwrite specific portions of strings without VBA's notoriously slow string concatenation:
Public Sub Example1()
''// This takes about 47% of time Example2 does:
Dim myString As String
myString = "I liek pie."
Mid(myString, 5, 2) = "ke"
Mid(myString, 11, 1) = "!"
MsgBox myString
End Sub
Public Sub Example2()
Dim myString As String
myString = "I liek pie."
myString = "I li" & "ke" & " pie" & "!"
MsgBox myString
End Sub
There is an important but almost always missed feature of the Mid() statement. That is where Mid() appears on the left hand side of an assignment as opposed to the Mid() function that appears in the right hand side or in an expression.
The rule is that if the if the target string is not a string literal, and this is the only reference to the target string, and the length of segment being inserted matches the length of the segment being replaced, then the string will be treated as mutable for the operation.
What does that mean? It means that if your building up a large report or a huge list of strings into a single string value, then exploiting this will make your string processing much faster.
Here is a simple class that benefits from this. It gives your VBA the same StringBuilder capability that .Net has.
' Class: StringBuilder
Option Explicit
Private Const initialLength As Long = 32
Private totalLength As Long ' Length of the buffer
Private curLength As Long ' Length of the string value within the buffer
Private buffer As String ' The buffer
Private Sub Class_Initialize()
' We set the buffer up to it's initial size and the string value ""
totalLength = initialLength
buffer = Space(totalLength)
curLength = 0
End Sub
Public Sub Append(Text As String)
Dim incLen As Long ' The length that the value will be increased by
Dim newLen As Long ' The length of the value after being appended
incLen = Len(Text)
newLen = curLength + incLen
' Will the new value fit in the remaining free space within the current buffer
If newLen <= totalLength Then
' Buffer has room so just insert the new value
Mid(buffer, curLength + 1, incLen) = Text
Else
' Buffer does not have enough room so
' first calculate the new buffer size by doubling until its big enough
' then build the new buffer
While totalLength < newLen
totalLength = totalLength + totalLength
Wend
buffer = Left(buffer, curLength) & Text & Space(totalLength - newLen)
End If
curLength = newLen
End Sub
Public Property Get Length() As Integer
Length = curLength
End Property
Public Property Get Text() As String
Text = Left(buffer, curLength)
End Property
Public Sub Clear()
totalLength = initialLength
buffer = Space(totalLength)
curLength = 0
End Sub
And here is an example on how to use it:
Dim i As Long
Dim sb As StringBuilder
Dim result As String
Set sb = New StringBuilder
For i = 1 to 100000
sb.Append CStr( i)
Next i
result = sb.Text
VBA itself seems to be a hidden feature. Folks I know who've used Office products for years have no idea it's even a part of the suite.
I've posted this on multiple questions here, but the Object Browser is my secret weapon. If I need to ninja code something real quick, but am not familiar with the dll's, Object Browser saves my life. It makes it much easier to learn the class structures than MSDN.
The Locals Window is great for debugging as well. Put a pause in your code and it will show you all the variables, their names, and their current values and types within the current namespace.
And who could forget our good friend Immediate Window? Not only is it great for Debug.Print standard output, but you can enter in commands into it as well. Need to know what VariableX is?
?VariableX
Need to know what color that cell is?
?Application.ActiveCell.Interior.Color
In fact all those windows are great tools to be productive with VBA.
It's not a feature, but a thing I have seen wrong so many times in VBA (and VB6): Parenthesis added on method calls where it will change semantics:
Sub Foo()
Dim str As String
str = "Hello"
Bar (str)
Debug.Print str 'prints "Hello" because str is evaluated and a copy is passed
Bar str 'or Call Bar(str)
Debug.Print str 'prints "Hello World"
End Sub
Sub Bar(ByRef param As String)
param = param + " World"
End Sub
Hidden Features
Although it is "Basic", you can use OOP - classes and objects
You can make API calls
Possibly the least documented features in VBA are those you can only expose by selecting "Show Hidden Members" on the VBA Object Browser. Hidden members are those functions that are in VBA, but are unsupported. You can use them, but microsoft might eliminate them at any time. None of them has any documentation provided, but you can find some on the web. Possibly the most talked about of these hidden features provides access to pointers in VBA. For a decent writeup, check out; Not So Lightweight - Shlwapi.dll
Documented, but perhaps more obscure (in excel anyways) is using ExecuteExcel4Macro to access a hidden global namespace that belongs to the entire Excel application instance as opposed to a specific workbook.
You can implement interfaces with the Implements keyword.
Dictionaries. VBA is practically worthless without them!
Reference the Microsoft Scripting Runtime, use Scripting.Dictionary for any sufficiently complicated task, and live happily ever after.
The Scripting Runtime also gives you the FileSystemObject, which also comes highly recommended.
Start here, then dig around a bit...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa164509%28office.10%29.aspx
Typing VBA. will bring up an intellisense listing of all the built-in functions and constants.
With a little work, you can iterate over custom collections like this:
' Write some text in Word first.'
Sub test()
Dim c As New clsMyCollection
c.AddItems ActiveDocument.Characters(1), _
ActiveDocument.Characters(2), _
ActiveDocument.Characters(3), _
ActiveDocument.Characters(4)
Dim el As Range
For Each el In c
Debug.Print el.Text
Next
Set c = Nothing
End Sub
Your custom collection code (in a class called clsMyCollection):
Option Explicit
Dim m_myCollection As Collection
Public Property Get NewEnum() As IUnknown
' This property allows you to enumerate
' this collection with the For...Each syntax
' Put the following line in the exported module
' file (.cls)!'
'Attribute NewEnum.VB_UserMemId = -4
Set NewEnum = m_myCollection.[_NewEnum]
End Property
Public Sub AddItems(ParamArray items() As Variant)
Dim i As Variant
On Error Resume Next
For Each i In items
m_myCollection.Add i
Next
On Error GoTo 0
End Sub
Private Sub Class_Initialize()
Set m_myCollection = New Collection
End Sub
Save 4 whole keystrokes by typing debug.? xxx instead of debug.print xxx.
Crash it by adding: enum foo: me=0: end enum to the top of a module containing any other code.
Support for localized versions, which (at least in the previous century) supported expressions using localized values. Like Pravda for True and Fałszywy (not too sure, but at least it did have the funny L) for False in Polish... Actually the English version would be able to read macros in any language, and convert on the fly. Other localized versions would not handle that though.
FAIL.
The VBE (Visual Basic Extensibility) object model is a lesser known and/or under-utilized feature. It lets you write VBA code to manipulate VBA code, modules and projects. I once wrote an Excel project that would assemble other Excel projects from a group of module files.
The object model also works from VBScript and HTAs. I wrote an HTA at one time to help me keep track of a large number of Word, Excel and Access projects. Many of the projects would use common code modules, and it was easy for modules to "grow" in one system and then need to be migrated to other systems. My HTA would allow me to export all modules in a project, compare them to versions in a common folder and merge updated routines (using BeyondCompare), then reimport the updated modules.
The VBE object model works slightly differently between Word, Excel and Access, and unfortunately doesn't work with Outlook at all, but still provides a great capability for managing code.
IsDate("13.50") returns True but IsDate("12.25.2010") returns False
This is because IsDate could be more precisely named IsDateTime. And because the period (.) is treated as a time separator and not a date separator. See here for a full explanation.
VBA supports bitwise operators for comparing the binary digits (bits) of two values. For example, the expression 4 And 7 evaluates the bit values of 4 (0100) and 7 (0111) and returns 4 (the bit that is on in both numbers.) Similarly the expression 4 Or 8 evaluates the bit values in 4 (0100) and 8 (1000) and returns 12 (1100), i.e. the bits where either one is true.
Unfortunately, the bitwise operators have the same names at the logical comparison operators: And, Eqv, Imp, Not, Or, and Xor. This can lead to ambiguities, and even contradictory results.
As an example, open the Immediate Window (Ctrl+G) and enter:
? (2 And 4)
This returns zero, since there are no bits in common between 2 (0010) and 4 (0100).
Deftype Statements
This feature exists presumably for backwards-compatibility. Or to write hopelessly obfuscated spaghetti code. Your pick.