Dynamic robots.txt - seo

Let's say I have a web site for hosting community generated content that targets a very specific set of users. Now, let's say in the interest of fostering a better community I have an off-topic area where community members can post or talk about anything they want, regardless of the site's main theme.
Now, I want most of the content to get indexed by Google. The notable exception is the off-topic content. Each thread has it's own page, but all the threads are listed in the same folder so I can't just exclude search engines from a folder somewhere. It has to be per-page. A traditional robots.txt file would get huge, so how else could I accomplish this?

This will work for all well-behaving search engines, just add it to the <head>:
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" />

If using Apache I'd use mod-rewrite to alias robots.txt to a script that could dynamically generate the necessary content.
Edit: If using IIS you could use ISAPIrewrite to do the same.

You can implement it by substituting robots.txt with dynamic script generating the output.
With Apache You could make simple .htaccess rule to acheive that.
RewriteRule ^robots\.txt$ /robots.php [NC,L]

Simlarly to #James Marshall's suggestion - in ASP.NET you could use an HttpHandler to redirect calls to robots.txt to a script which generated the content.

Just for that thread , make sure your head contains a noindex meta tag. Thats one more way to tell search engines not to crawl your page other than blocking in robots.txt

Just keep in mind that a robots.txt disallow will NOT prevent Google from indexing pages that have links from external sites, all it does is prevent crawling internally. See http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4490125.htm or http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts.shtml.

You can disallow search engines to read or index your content by restricting robot meta tags. In this way, spider will consider your instructions and will index only such pages that you want.

block dynamic webpage by robots.txt use this code
User-agent: *
Disallow: /setnewsprefs?
Disallow: /index.html?
Disallow: /?
Allow: /?hl=
Disallow: /?hl=*&

Related

Prevent search engines from indexing my api

I have my api at api.website.com which requires no authentication.
I am looking for a way to disallow google from indexing my api.
Is there a way to do so?
I already have the disallow in my robots at api.website.com/robots.txt
but that just prevents google from crawling it.
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
The usual way would be to remove the Disallow and add a noindex meta tag but it's an API hence no meta tags or anything.
Is there any other way to do that?
It seems like there is a way to add a noindex on api calls.
See here https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/24569/why-do-google-search-results-include-pages-disallowed-in-robots-txt/24571#24571
The solution recommended on both of those pages is to add a noindex meta tag to the pages you don't want indexed. (The X-Robots-Tag HTTP header should also work for non-HTML pages. I'm not sure if it works on redirects, though.) Paradoxically, this means that you have to allow Googlebot to crawl those pages (either by removing them from robots.txt entirely, or by adding a separate, more permissive set of rules for Googlebot), since otherwise it can't see the meta tag in the first place.
It is strange Google is ignoring your /robots.txt file. Try dropping an index.html file in the root web directory and adding the following between the <head>...</head> tags of the web page.
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">

Any way to both NoIndex and Prevent Crawling?

I created a new website and I do not want it to be crawled by search engines as well as not appear in search results.
I already created a robots.txt
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
I have a html page. I wanted to use
<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
but Google page says it should be used when a page is not blocked by robots.txt as robots.txt will not see noindex tag at all.
Is there any way I can use both noindex as well as robots.txt?
There are two solutions, neither of which are elegant.
You are correct that even if you Disallow: / that your URLs might still appear in the search results, just likely without a meta description and a Google generated title.
Assuming you are only doing this temporarily, the recommended approach is to be basic http auth in front of your site. This isn't great since users will have to put in a basic username and password, but this will prevent your site from getting crawled and indexed.
If you can't or don't want to put basic auth in front of your site, the alternative is to still Disallow: / in your Robots.txt file, and use Google Search Console to regularly purge the Google index by requesting the site be removed from the index.
This is inelegant in multiple ways.
You'll have to monitor the search results to see if URLs get indexed
You'll have to manually request the removal in the Google Search Console
Google really didn't intend for the removal feature to be used in this fashion, and who knows if they'll start ignoring your requests over time. But I'd imagine it would actually continue to work even though they'd prefer you didn't use it that way.

robots.txt which folders to disallow - SEO?

I am currently writing my robots.txt file and have some trouble deciding whether I should allow or disallow some folders for SEO purposes.
Here are the folders I have:
/css/ (css)
/js/ (javascript)
/img/ (images i use for the website)
/php/ (PHP which will return a blank page such as for example checkemail.php which checks an email address or register.php which puts data into a SQL database and sends an email)
/error/ (my error 401,403,404,406,500 html pages)
/include/ (header.html and footer.html I include)
I was thinking about disallowing only the PHP pages and let the rest.
What do you think?
Thanks a lot
Laurent
/css and /js -- CSS and Javascript files will probably be crawled by googlebot whether or not you have them in robots.txt. Google uses them to render your pages for site preview. Google has asked nicely that you not put them in robots.txt.
/img -- Googlebot may crawl this even when in robots.txt the same way as CSS and Javascript. Putting your images in robots.txt generally prevents them from being indexed in Google image search. Google image search may be a source of visitors to your site so you may wish to be indexed there.
/php -- sounds like you don't want spiders hitting the urls that perform actions. Good call to use robots.txt
/error -- If your site is set up correctly the spiders will probably never know what directory your error pages are served from. They generally get served at the url that has the error and the spider never sees their actual url. This isn't the case if you redirect to them, which isn't recommended practice anyway. As such, I would say there is no need to put them in robots.txt

Can a relative sitemap url be used in a robots.txt?

In robots.txt can I write the following relative URL for the sitemap file?
sitemap: /sitemap.ashx
Or do I have to use the complete (absolute) URL for the sitemap file, like:
sitemap: http://subdomain.domain.com/sitemap.ashx
Why I wonder:
I own a new blog service, www.domain.com, that allow users to blog on accountname.domain.com.
I use wildcards, so all subdomains (accounts) point to: "blog.domain.com".
In blog.domain.com I put the robots.txt to let search engines find the sitemap.
But, due to the wildcards, all user account share the same robots.txt file.Thats why I can't use the second alternative. And for now I can't use url rewrite for txt files. (I guess that later versions of IIS can handle this?)
According to the official documentation on sitemaps.org it needs to be a full URL:
You can specify the location of the Sitemap using a robots.txt file. To do this, simply add the following line including the full URL to the sitemap:
Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml
Google crawlers are not smart enough, they can't crawl relative URLs, that's why it's always recommended to use absolute URL's for better crawlability and indexability.
Therefore, you can not use this variation
> sitemap: /sitemap.xml
Recommended syntax is
Sitemap: https://www.yourdomain.com/sitemap.xml
Note:
Don't forgot to capitalise the first letter in "sitemap"
Don't forgot to put space after "Sitemap:"
Good technical & logical question my dear friend.
No in robots.txt file you can't go with relative URL of the sitemap; you need to go with the complete URL of the sitemap.
It's better to go with "sitemap: https://www.example.com/sitemap_index.xml"
In the above URL after the colon gives space.
I also like to support Deepak.

robots.txt - exclude any URL that contains "/node/"

How do I tell crawlers / bots not to index any URL that has /node/ pattern?
Following is since day one but I noticed that Google has still indexed a lot of URLs that has
/node/ in it, e.g. www.mywebsite.com/node/123/32
Disallow: /node/
Is there anything that states that do not index any URL that has /node/
Should I write something like following:
Disallow: /node/*
Update:
The real problem is despite:
Disallow: /node/
in robots.txt, Google has indexed pages under this URL e.g. www.mywebsite.com/node/123/32
/node/ is not a physical directory, this is how drupal 6 shows it's content, I guess this is my problem that node is not a directory, merely part of URLs being generated by drupal for the content, how do I handle this? will this work?
Disallow: /*node
Thanks
Disallow: /node/ will disallow any url that starts with /node/ (after the host). The asterisk is not required.
So it will block www.mysite.com/node/bar.html, but will not block www.mysite.com/foo/node/bar.html.
If you want to block anything that contains /node/, you have to write Disallow: */node/
Note also that Googlebot can cache robots.txt for up to 7 days. So if you make a change to your robots.txt today, it might be a week before Googlebot updates its copy of your robots.txt. During that time, it will be using its cached copy.
Disallow: /node/* is exactly what you want to do. Search engines support wildcards in their robots.txt notation and the * characters means "any characters". See Google's notes on robots.txt for more.
update
An alternative way to make sure search engines stay out of a directory, and all directories below it, is to block them with the robots HTTP header. This can be done by placing the following in an htaccess file in your node directory:
Header set x-robots-tag: noindex
Your original Disallow was fine. Jim Mischel's comment seemed spot on and would cause me to wonder if it was just taking time for Googlebot to fetch the updated robots.txt and then unindex relevant pages.
A couple additional thoughts:
Your page URLs may appear in Google search results even if you've included it in robots.txt. See: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156449 ("...While Google won't crawl or index the content of pages blocked by robots.txt, we may still index the URLs if we find them on other pages on the web."). To many people, this is counter-intuitive.
Second, I'd highly recommend verifying ownership of your site in Google Webmaster Tools (https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en), then using tools such as Health->"Fetch as Google" to see real time diagnostics related to retrieving your page. (Does that result indicate that robots.txt is preventing crawling?)
I haven't used it, but Bing has a similar tool: http://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/fetch-as-bingbot-fe18fa0d . It seems well worthwhile to use diagnostic tools provided by Google, Bing, etc. to perform real-time diagnostics on the site.
This question is a bit old, so I hope you've solved the original problem.