Is there anyway that everything except main part body can be deleted, like bodies, Geo-sets etc. for example:
there is a part with bodies, geo-sets, working supports as seen in the below picture.
I have code which can delete bodies and geo-sets but not the working supports.
now I have no idea what else will be there in the part maybe draft analysis etc.
so I want to delete anything and everything except the main part body.
if anyone can do this please help me achieve this thing.
Thanks.
Related
Wrote a plugin to handle some custom format stuff in yaml files that I've written for a huge project. It's a chat bot that can respond in a huge number of ways. There is a lot of slang and non-standard words in the yaml.
I don't want to disable spellchecking as I want to fix legitimate speeling errors. But the annotations under the "misspelled" slang words are conflicting with the annotations in my plugin, and causing issue.
One yaml file has 349 "typos". 10% or so are legit. The rest are slang and custom words.
I need to do one of two things. Either add those words to the dictionary (I've found the method to do that - SpellCheckManager.getInstance(project).acceptWordAsCorrect()) OR get a list of the words and create a custom dictionary from them. Both approaches require me to grab a list of all typos in the document/editor/project.
That's the part I can't find. Looked everywhere. (List of current Annotations? List of current Problems?) Googled my fingers off. Anyone able to point me in the right direction?
This is not the IDEAL solution, but it worked for my means, and I'm leaving the answer in case this is googled.
In DaemonCodeAnalyzerImpl, there is a method:
DaemonCodeAnalyzerImpl.getHighlights(Document document, HighlightSeverity minSeverity, Project project);
This returns a list of all highlights in the document. The method is Annotated with #TestOnly, and docs state that it should only be used in Test code because it breaks/shortcuts the normal way to access that. It still works in non-test code however.
Since the only thing I wanted was the strings of the typos, I pulled the list, then looped through the HighlightInfo's in the list, and pulled the .getText()s.
No danger of screwing anything up.
Then pushed all those strings into:
SpellCheckerManager.getInstance(project).acceptWordAsCorrect(word, project);
Viola! All current highlighted typos are now added to the dictionary.
Proper solution? No. Good enough for what I needed to accomplish? Yup.
I have exactly the problem described here:
From what I can see on the web, this is a fairly common complaint, but answers seem to be rarer. The problem is this:
We have a number of Excel VBA apps which work perfectly on a number of users' machines. However on one machine they stop on certain lines of code. It is always the same lines, but those lines seem to have nothing in common with one another.
If you press F5 (run) after the halt, the app continues, so it's almost like a break point has been added. We've tried selecting 'remove all breaks' from the menu and even adding a break and removing it again.
We've had this issue with single apps before and we've 'bodged' it by cutting code out of modules, compiling and then pasting it back in etc.
The problem now seems to relate to Excel itself rather than a single .xls, so we're a little unsure how to manage this.
I have managed to resolve it with the accepted answer, but now, when I send the VBA file to my colleagues, they have the same problem.
My question and my problem is - any ideas what to do, as far as it is really not a good idea to go to everyone and to debug every time. And I somehow do not want to add Application.EnableCancelKey = xlDisabled to my macros.
Sounds like a ghost break. File saved one time with a break in there. What has worked for me in the past was to remove any breaks you see and manually step through the code (F8) through completion and then save file. Prob now necessay to step all the way through but I like to know I went all the way and didn't miss any.
we're currently customizing iNotes for a customer (platform currently is Domino 9). We almost reached our goals, but one thing that's on our todo list I can't really figure out: they want us to also customize any possible error pages; see the following example screenshot:
This and other similar pages seem to come from the central Forms9.nsf which I'd love to leave as it is. We so far tried domcfg.nsf mappings, but as this is an iNotes internal error it obviously can't work; I also tried to figure out a way to put seomething into our customized Forms9_x.nsf but without any hint this is too abstract for me.
So my questions are:
has anyone ever done this?
what options do we have (apart from "hacking" Forms9.nsf)?
Many thanks in advance...
Update:
After continuing to play with domcfg mappings I suddenly saw a first result; not sure what's the difference to the first attempts, though; maybe moving the error form to Forms9_x.nsf did the trick? I'll keep investigating and post an answer if I can find one...
Alright, this has been an afternoon of wild guessing and hacking along, but finally I think I found it:
first of all, my playing around with domcfg mappings didn't have to do with solving the problem; instead, I just by chance had put my error page form into my Forms9_x.nsf and named it $$ReturnGeneralError (that's simply the name used in Forms9.nsf...; I completely had forgotton about those 4 pre-defined form names back from Domino 5 times).
What did not work was the old method of simply including a text file named MessageString to display the exact error message returned from the server; obviously iNotes is handling those error strings differently.
After a few hours of testing, and comparing codes between the standard iNotes error page and mine I finally found it: include some iNotes specific computed text into the page, in my case that is
#{{MessageString}; html}
See this document for some details (last row in the table)
Hopefully this can help someone else as well...
So, I'm working on a SharePoint 2010 site that I developed, and I am trying to implement content type change propogation. During this process I seem to have found a strange bug. It seems my combination of calling methods in the SharePoint object model causes an infinite loop. You can see the code here (a little too large to post directly here I think): http://pastebin.com/U0qbLxpS. The key line there is on line 13. Leaving that line commented out results in an infinite loop of sub sites (starting at the first one). If I uncomment that line though, things seem to work fine. Does anyone have any experience with this bug or have any advice? Can anyone duplicate this issue for me? I was trying to use SPWeb.GetList("blah") instead of using SPWeb.List["blah"] directly as GetList is the recommended way to get access to a list (according to everything I have read). But this bug is a bit odd and is going to force me to leave a completely unrelated line of code in there (which leaves me feeling a bit strange).
My test site structure is this: http://localhost (main site) and http://localhost/ASubSite. The infinite loop happens on http://localhost/ASubSite and just keeps appending /ASubSite to the end and continuing the loop.
Thanks for any hope you can offer. If anyone can duplicate this, it would be great. Then maybe I can submit a bug to Microsoft about this. Otherwise, maybe this is just some strange combination of things I am doing combined with my site.
ok so this is somewhat of an awkward question, but lets put it like this...
I have a website with about 15 pages... Thanks to HTML5, I have a distinct and for the site. The content in these sections is fairly complex (with navigation menus and what not).
Now here's the problem, on Monday, (when I completed the site) everything was fine. On Wednesday, I realized that I need to add another item to the navigation menu in the , and change the parameters of some elements in the ...
Any simplistic way of doing this, other than editing one file, and then copy/pasting into each and every other file manually one by one?
Is there a good IDE out there that will allow me to just add a as a snippet in many places, and if I edit the master snippet, it auto-changes everywhere else?
Hope I'm being clear here...
Well… first thought: is server side scripting out of question? If so, maybe server side includes can be utilized? Whichever IDE you'd use, it'd solve only part
of the problem, leaving real architectural problem untouched.