I am writing a C++ library (header-only) and am using CMake to generate my (Visual Studio) project and solution files. I'm also writing a test suite, which is part of the same CMake project.
My problem occurs when I call target_include_directories() on the target that represents my header-only library, so that consumers of my library may find its header files. I get the following error message (even though generation is NOT aborted).
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Target "Fonts" INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES property contains path:
"D:/Projects/GPC/fonts/include"
which is prefixed in the source directory.
(D:/Projects/GPC/Fonts being the top-level directory of my library project. Btw the problem remains if I move my header files to the top directory.)
The offending line in my CMakeLists.txt is this (adapted for simplicity):
target_include_directories(Fonts INTERFACE "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/include")
I do not understand what I'm doing wrong. Without target_include_directories(), code of consumer projects simply can't include my header files (unless in installed form, but I haven't gotten to that yet, and in any case I want to be able to use my library from its build tree, without installation.)
I feel like I'm missing something basic here; yet I've searched for hours without finding a solution or explanation.
The origin of the problem is not the target_include_directories command itself, but the attempt to install a target that has a public or interface include directory prefixed in the source path (i.e. the include directory is a subdirectory of your ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}.)
While it is perfectly fine and desirable to use absolute paths when building the library from scratch, a third party library that pulls in a prebuilt version of that library will probably want to use a different include path. After all, you do not want all of your users to mirror the directory structure of your build machine, just to end up in the right include path.
CMake's packaging mechanism provides support for both of these use cases: You may pull in a library directly from the build tree (that is, check out the source, build it, and point find_package() to the directory), or from an install directory (run make INSTALL to copy built stuff to the install directory and point find_package() to that directory). The latter approach needs to be relocatable (that is, I build and install on my machine, send you the resulting directory and you will be able to use it on your machine from a different directory structure), while the former is not.
This is a very neat feature, but you have to account for it when setting up the include directories. Quoting the manual for target_include_directories:
Include directories usage requirements commonly differ between the
build-tree and the install-tree. The BUILD_INTERFACE and
INSTALL_INTERFACE generator expressions can be used to describe
separate usage requirements based on the usage location. Relative
paths are allowed within the INSTALL_INTERFACE expression and are
interpreted relative to the installation prefix. For example:
target_include_directories(mylib PUBLIC
$<BUILD_INTERFACE:${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/include/mylib>
$<INSTALL_INTERFACE:include/mylib> # <prefix>/include/mylib
)
The BUILD_INTERFACE and INSTALL_INTERFACE generator expressions do all the magic:
$<INSTALL_INTERFACE:...>
Content of ... when the property is exported using install(EXPORT), and empty otherwise.
$<BUILD_INTERFACE:...>
Content of ... when the property is exported using export(), or when the target is used by another target in the same buildsystem.
Expands to the empty string otherwise.
Related
I am trying to figure out how CMake is supposed to work for shared libraries. I create a shared library like so:
(in /mdp_opt/CMakeLists.txt:)
add_library (mdp_opt SHARED librarycomponent.cpp)
Now, a test executable uses this library:
(/test/CMakeLists.txt:)
add_executable (test test.cpp)
target_link_libraries(test PRIVATE mdp_opt)
If the library is marked STATIC (instead of SHARED as above), I can cmake -> built (under Visual Studio) and successfully run the executable. When it is marked SHARED (as in above), I need to do two things. First thing, is adding:
set(CMAKE_WINDOWS_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS ON)
That is fine. However, now it still only works if I copy the file mdp_opt.dll from build/x64-debug/mdp_opt to build/x64-debug/test. But I don’t understand why this is needed?
In the book “professional CMake”, I read:
LINK_LIBRARIES
This target property holds a list of all libraries the target should
link to directly. It is initially empty when the target is created and
it supports generator expressions. An associated interface property
INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES is supported. Each library listed can be one
of the following (emphasis mine):
• A path to a library, usually specified as an absolute path.
• Just the library name without a path, usually also without any
platform-specific file name prefix (e.g. lib) or suffix (e.g. .a, .so,
.dll).
• The name of a CMake library target. CMake will convert this to a
path to the built library when generating the linker command,
including supplying any prefix or suffix to the file name as
appropriate for the platform. Because CMake handles all the various
platform differences and paths on the project’s behalf, using a CMake
target name is generally the preferred method.
I was under the impression that
target_link_libraries(test PRIVATE mdp_opt)
expresses that I intend to link the output associated with the target mdp_opt with the test executable? Also, in my reading of the above book excerpt, my understanding is that the location of the .dll will convert to a path? If the purpose of this conversion is not to somehow tell the executable where to find the shared library, then what is that conversion for?
Basically, can anybody tell me how CMake is supposed to work for shared libraries, and why is works like that? Is a manual post-copy (possibly via CMake instructions) really needed, and the best for this scenario (of intermediate builds while developing)?
On windows you need to export symbols of a shared library or add a linker option that results in symbols being exported; otherwise the .lib file for linking the dll simply isn't generated. This is why you need
set(CMAKE_WINDOWS_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS ON)
, use __declspec( dllexport ) or similar.
The other issue is the way windows locates dlls: It basically first searches the directory containing the executable and then continues the search via the PATH environment variable. This can result in issues locating the dll at runtime.
You can avoid this issue by setting the directory to place the runtime artefacts before generating the first one of the targets involved:
set(CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin)
...
add_library(mdp_opt ...)
...
add_executable(test ...)
Alternatively you could simply change the environment variable visible to the vs debugger:
set_target_properties(test PROPERTIES VS_DEBUGGER_ENVIRONMENT "PATH=$<TARGET_FILE_DIR:mdp_opt>;$ENV{PATH}")
If you're working with CTest, there's also a similar property for tests: ENVIRONMENT
If the purpose of [target_link_libraryes] is not to somehow tell the executable where to find the shared library, then what is that conversion for?
You still need to link a dll, or more precisely the corresponding import library; this is what target_link_libraries does, in addition to adding build system dependencies, transferring some properties (e.g. include directories with PUBLIC visibility), ect.
I am trying to build an example project that requires dozens of packages contained in different subdirectories, for example
/home/Olumide/src/project/Release/modules/module1/CMakeFiles/Export/lib/cmake/module1
/home/Olumide/src/project/Release/modules/module2/CMakeFiles/Export/lib/cmake/module2
/home/Olumide/src/project/Release/modules/module3/CMakeFiles/Export/lib/cmake/module3
...
Given that the application that I'm trying to build is in the location /home/Olumide/src/project/applications/tutorial, is it possible to build the application without explicitly specifying the paths to all each package that the project requires, or modifying the CMakeLists.txt file, for example by specify a common root path to be searched for all the packages, for example:
cmake -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH=/home/Olumide/src/project/Release/modules .
Unfortunately this does not work and cmake complains that it cannot find package configuration files with the names Modul1eConfig.cmake or module1-config.cmake etc.
If all of the modules adhere tho this exact pattern you should be able to provide the "root path" via cache variable and pass a the info where to look for the libs to find_package via PATHS parameter:
# maybe a more reasonable default here?
set(MYPROJECT_MODULE_PATH "/home/Olumide/src/project/Release/modules" CACHE PATH "the path to the modules we're looking for")
set(MYPROJECT_MODULE_NAMES
module1
module2
...
)
foreach(_MODULE IN LISTS MYPROJECT_MODULE_NAMES)
find_package(${_MODULE} REQUIRED CONFIG
PATHS "${MYPROJECT_MODULE_PATH}/${_MODULE}/CMakeFiles/Export"
)
endforeach()
In general if these packages logically belong to the same software package, you should provide a way of finding those modules by passing them as components for find_package but since this seems to be code not under your own control you may not have that luxury. (E.g. boost provides this functionality: find_package(boost COMPONENTS test mpl ...).) However it may be worth some investigation if there is a configuration script somewhere that's supposed to automatically include the modules, if listed as components, e.g. somewhere in Release or Release/modules.
I have a scenario that I think is very similar to this one: CMake add_custom_command/_target in different directories for cross-compilation, however the solution for that issue isn't working for me.
In subdir/CMakeLists.txt I have:
add_custom_command(OUTPUT foo.h foo.cpp COMMAND ... DEPENDS foo.xml)
add_custom_target(generate_foo DEPENDS foo.h foo.cpp)
and then CMakeLists.txt:
add_executable(MyTarget
subdir/foo.h
subdir/foo.cpp
${OTHER_SOURCES})
add_dependencies(MyTarget generate_foo)
add_subdirectory(subdir)
This fails with "Cannot find source file: subdir/foo.h". The documentation for add_dependencies suggests that it will ensure that generate_foo builds before MyTarget, but if that's the case it looks like it's at least trying to access all source files before either target builds. Am I doing something wrong here? How can I compile source files that are generated by a custom target/command in a subdirectory?
The problem is that the GENERATED file property (that CMake uses to determine if it needs to check that a file exists at configure time) is not visible outside the directory in which the file is generated. The problem goes away in CMake 3.20. This is explained here.
I usually solve this problem by compiling generated source files into a static or object library in the subdirectory, then linking to that, since targets are globally visible. You can also explicitly set the GENERATED property on the generated files in the scope you wish to use them, but this hack breaks the encapsulation gained by using a subdirectory.
It's also worth noting that you can do away with the custom target and the call to add_dependencies because the generated files are already dependencies of the executable (this has always has been the case AFAIK).
I have a problem building multiple Fortran-90+ executable targets using CMake, when I use Fortran modules that are shared by all executables, and build in parallel using make -j. The issue seems to be that the compiled object files are placed in different subdirectories for each target, CMakeFiles/targetName.dir/src/file.f90.o, while the module files are placed in the same directory for every target (I can change this directory by setting Fortran_MODULE_DIRECTORY, but it will still be the same dir for all module files). The problem is then that all targets start writing these module files in parallel, and I get a
Fatal Error: Can't rename module file 'module.mod0' to 'module.mod': No such file or directory
when using gfortran (which apparently creates a .mod0 file and then renames it to .mod). The problem does not arise when I issue make without the -j option (serial build).
I can see two solutions, but I don't know how to implement them. Firstly, put the object files for all targets in the same directory rather than target-specific directories. This may be the preferred option, since I won't have to compile the shared source files N times for N targets. The make process will then recognise that the object files exist, and not compile the corresponding source files again, hence not touching the .mod(0) files again (I may need to make all following targets depend on the first).
The second solution would be to put the .mod(0) files in the target-specific directories, so that they are not overwritten or removed by the other targets. This would solve my problem, even though it would still involve more compiling than necessary. I have no idea how to accomplish either option, so any hint there or alternative solution is welcome.
The answer I was looking for was provided in the comments to the question by #RaulLaasner:
I would create an additional target in the form of a core library of the relevant source files, which can then be linked to all executables. This should work in parallel. The mod files can still be in put into a single directory.
I used add_library() and target_link_libraries() to achieve this.
Note that e.g. Gentoo ebuild scripts add --as-needed to the linker, which may cause undefined references in your core library when you link it and external libraries to form the executable. To prevent this, make sure you link the external libraries to your core library first. To this end, my CMakeListst.txt contains:
add_library( "Core" STATIC src/functions.f90 src/routines.f90 ) # creates libCore.a
target_link_libraries( Core ${EXTERNAL_LIBRARIES} ) # link external libraries to libCore.a
...
add_executable( myProgram1 src/myProgram1.f90 ) # creates the first executable
target_link_libraries( myProgram1 Core ) # links libCore.a to myProgram1
The last two lines can be repeated to build the other executables (e.g. using foreach()).
I have a specific question which serves as context for a more general question.
There is a scientific package called LAMMPS, and it is usually used as an executable. However, it supports use as a "library". To try to do things right, I put it in /usr/local/lib/lammps. It contains a lammps/src/ directory, which has around 40 source files. Using the instructions provided, I compiled lammps as a .so file in lammps/src/liblammps_serial.so.
I also have separate code in "~/code/ljtube/". This uses cmake to try to find the library. Thus, I wrote a FindLAMMPS.txt so that I could use
FIND_PACKAGE (lammps)
in my CMakeLists. I modified the libtool config file to search in /usr/local/ successfully. I found that it searches in /usr/local/lib/ for a .so file and in /usr/local/include/ for a .h file. So I made a dynamic link to the .so file in /usr/local/lib/, and I copied the .h file from the lammps/src/ to /usr/local/include/.
CMake can now find those two files, but it cannot link to anything else in lammps/src/. It seems absurd to need to make a separate FIND_PACKAGE for each of the .h's I want to include (group.h, fix.h, force.h, pair.h, etc.). It also seems ridiculous to dump the whole package of .h files into the /usr/local/include/ directory. I will be using this code both locally and on a cluster, and possibly distributing it to other group members.
How can I make CMake find what I want to find without hard coding in the location of /usr/local/lib/lammps/src/? Phrased more generically, how should I manage large packages like these to make them easy to link to in the code I write, even if the original developer did not use the best conventions?
(As a side note, I am using a shared library because it seems like the right choice, but I'm not especially married to it. Should I be using a static library? Is there a way for CMake to find an already-compiled library relative to the current source directory, and might that be a better way to implement this? I know that I will be using LAMMPS in multiple projects, so having a local shared copy superficially seems to make the most sense.)
Normally a find_package call yields a variable specifying the path to the "includes" folder of the package. This would then be added in the caller's CMakeLists.txt via include_directories.
For example, to use find_package for boost, you could do:
find_package(Boost) # sets ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS} and ${Boost_LIBRARIES}
if(Boost_FOUND)
include_directories(${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS})
add_executable(foo foo.cc)
target_link_libraries(foo ${Boost_LIBRARIES})
endif()
Regarding your side note, you could use find_library and/or find_path to find the library and its headers given a known location.
Both these commands can be invoked in such a way as to avoid searching in common locations, e.g. by setting PATHS to the known location and using NO_DEFAULT_PATH in the find commands.
Another alternative is for your projects to make use of the ExternalProject_Add function which is described in more detail in this article. From this article:
The ExternalProject_Add function makes it possible to say “download this project from the internet, run its configure step, build it and install it”
A downside to this approach is that each of your projects would end up with its own copy of the third party sources and lib.