Currently I'm using a viewModelScope to launch a coroutine which in turns retrieves data from a remote server and caches the results in a local ROOM database.
My question is if I should use instead a GlobalScope to launch the coroutine to get such remote data, as the retrieval/caching can be interrupted if the app is sent to the background when using the viewModelScope.
Android discourages to perform continuous running tasks in the background since it uses battery and memory in the main thread. However, if you specifically need code to run in the background, consider using Background Services or Work Manager which is also responsible for starting background tasks.
Related
I'm developing Windows Metro App and in my App I need to download some information(about 60Mb, every time) from server in background. Download should occur regularly, for example every 8 hours. So I tried to use Background Task, but there are some CPU and network quotas(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/xaml/hh977051.aspx), and I can't do this. Could somebody help me with advice in this problem?
Instead of attempting to do the entire transfer in the background task itself, have the background task start a background transfer, which runs independent of the task and independent of the app as well. See the topic, Transferring Data in the Background, https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh452979.aspx. You can run the background task periodically according to the schedule you need, and it will easily stay under CPU and networking quotas because the background transfer doesn't count against that.
I'am planning to have a main OSX application, which the user can launch and a background process, which starts on OSX startup and runs prior to the main application
I need a CoreData database, to keep track of some changes... this database should be the same for the background task and foreground app...
What are the options?
Is it possible, that both access the same sqlite (which will be
located in app bundle?)? By setup with the same .sqlite file?
Should they have two identical databases, which they synchronize?
can this synchronisation be automated?
Should there be one database for the background process and the
main application should communicate with the background process?
Using a background process to update the datastore is fighting the frameworks. Also, your background process (and your main process, for that matter) won't be able to update the .sqlite file that lives in your bundle.
Instead of using a background process, use a background queue (via Grand Central Dispatch, and NSManagedObjectContext -performBlock:. Keeping the logic within one application will make your life easier. Your communication happens within the application, instead of having to use XPC.
Don't forget to handle the case of a partial, interrupted, update. The sequence I suggest is:
Application launches.
Background queue launches, pulls updated info from server, creates updated datastore using a temporary name.
If background update succeeds, main queue of application closes the old version of the datastore, then replaces it with the updated datastore. There is API to do this atomically.
Main thread reopens datastore and refreshes UI as needed.
If background update fails, reschedule an update attempt based on failure reasons (bad credentials, server unreachable, partial download, corrupt .sqlite).
If you're absolutely dead set on using two different processes, then you should still assume that the update might fail. So don't write to the live copy until you know you have a complete, valid, replacement.
Apple achieve this in the Notes app using what they call a "cross process change coordinator". This allows the accountsd daemon and the Notes app to access the same CoreData sqlite database. Their class ICNotesCrossProcessChangeCoordinator in the NotesShared framework works by using NSDistributedNotificationCenter to post the notification of changes between the processes and merge them into each others' context. There are many more implementation details of the technique but this should point you in the right direction.
I was reading about Processes. I wan't to know what really happens. My situation :
"I opened an Application. That creates a process say process1. I have other applications interfaced with this one and all these open up when i click a button inside my running application. I want to know Does my process1 create new processes and IPC happens OR processes for all the linked applications are created at once and then IPC happens?"
Obviously,a running application is a bunch of processes,or maybe a single process which has internally multiple threads acting within these processes.
So,your activity decides the creation and deletion of processes.say,if you are running an application such as media player and you suddenly start searching related info about the album---so here,totally a new process is created which helps interaction through web and after returning the output,it may die,may not,but the process was created on your request.Also,mostly ipc happens within processes,exactly as per your thinking,but shared memory communication is also one of the option,which is complicated and is less common.
One more thing to point out is that there are several 'daemon processes' which are running in the background and don't die before shutdown instruction!So,these processes are also sometimes related to the running application and serves its request.But,mostly,newer processes are created when we switch our task or perform certain action in the application.
I am building a windows 8 metro app using javascript and html5. I want to know following things.
How can I cancel the current instance of any running background task.
What are the possible conditions when system automatically cancels background task.
JavaScript background tasks are executed in web workers, so just use close() within running background task to end it when ever you want. If you want to do this from your app code, check out following MSDN sample: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/jj160500.aspx.
There are many conditions when system may cancel your task, but that depends how you registered it (is it lock screen task etc). In normal conditions each background tasks has 1s CPU quota and 7.5 MB daily data quota. You can read more about it here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh977046.aspx
I use Core Data to maintain a persistent store, and the database can grow quite large. My users with larger databases on iPad 1s don't complete the lightweight migration in time for the process to complete before the app is killed by the iOS for hanging.
What I want to do is every time the server starts up, check to see if the database needs to be migrated (I can't find a method for this on NSPersistentStoreCoordinator), if it does hold the server startup process until the database is upgraded and display a spinner on screen, then move forward with the server startup process once it is. The best way to do this seems to be to add a - (BOOL) upgradeStoreNeedsUpgrade method in the server startup method, but I can't find a way to check. I don't see methods on NSPersistentStoreCoordinator or NSPersistentStore to check the compatibility of a a database at a given URL with a given managed object model.
Is my solution the right way, and if so, how can I check if the managed object model is compatible with the SQLite file at a given URL?
You could try wrapping the core data lightweight migration code in a dispatch block. This should spin it off to a background thread so you can get past the Application Start Watchdog thats probably killing your app. Its either that or you are running the device out of memory.