So I'm making a Pokémon ROM hack using advanced map, XSE, and some other tools for the process. I'm having trouble finding the script where you actually receive the parcel in Pokémon Fire Red, and its well possible because its been done before.
I've looked all over online and cant seem to find where the script for it is, does anybody possibly know where I could find this? I understand the location number for the script may be different, I would just like to know how I could find it.
Related
i made a basic playermodel for Valve Source Engine games like Garry's Mod.
I aldready did flexes though Shapekeys and the .qc file to make the eyes blink.
I also know how to make skins and bodygroups.
Now i want to make the eyes be able to move. Unfortunately, I cant find a proper manual on how moving eyes in source engine work. Can anybody help me with that?
SUMMARY:
I need the most efficient workflow to individually edit over 200 files, and have them automatically disappear from the search results as they are updated.
DETAILS:
I am in the process of adding logging throughout a legacy system, and need to update over 200 files, each with their own custom code. I need to edit them one by one, and would like for the updated files to automatically disappear from my working search results after I have completed each one. The idea is to know how many and which ones still need to be updated as I slowly work through them all.
I already had to do something similar a few months ago, but on a much smaller scale, and I used an old-school HACK to do it. I did a search and replace for my keyword, and intentionally misspelled it. I then used the misspelled keyword for my search, and corrected it when editing each file, hence automatically removing it from the list. It "works", but is obviously a TOTAL HACK.
I recently started using IntelliJ IDEA, and am not yet familiar with the more advanced features like Find in File Scopes, Search Structurally, Search Templates, etc., but I am sure there HAS to be a "correct" way to do this in IntelliJ, and I just don't know how.
I am currently using "Find in Files" to work through the list, and recently found "All Changed Files" in the Scope list, which is actually the EXACT OPPOSITE of what I need. Is there a way to show "All UNCHANGED Files"??? That would work PERFECTLY in a pinch! But really, I would rather learn the CORRECT way to do this in IntelliJ.
Thanks!
What do I need to do that my saved run -configurations get numbers so that I can call them directly. I dont want to mess-around with cursor up and down.
In the following screenshot there is a "1" for run configuration (blue background) but I do not know how it came there and what do I have to search for in IntellijDoc to add numbers like 2 to other configurations. :-)
I don't think it is possible yet, what I do, is rename the configurations with a number at the beginning, i.e. 2. Test All so I can take advantage of the search feature of the run dialog for achieving almost what you want to do. In this way you are going to type a bit more, but you are not going to need to use the mouse :)
I honestly can't even find anything like this anywhere on the internet, seems kind of like an obvious feature that is missing.
Basically, I'd like the compiler to check the names of every local variable and cause a build to fail if certain variable names are used. Just as an example, I'd like the build to fail if someone tries to use "x" as a variable for anything.
I get that determined folks would find a ways around it, but I'd like to see if it could be done.
I'm interested more in hearing if this can be done in Visual Studio since that's just what I use the most, but I'd be interesting in hearing about any kind of feature like this for any language / compiler if you know of one.
I was wondering if there were a way to compute the size of a reg in Verilog. I researched it quite a bit, and found $size(a), but it's only in SystemVerilog, and it won't work in my verilog program.
Does anyone know an alternative for this??
I also wanted to ask as a side note; I'm having some trouble with my test bench in the sense that when I update a value in the file, that change is not taken in consideration when I simulate. I've been told I might have been using an old test bench but the one I am continuously simulating is the only one available in this project.
EDIT:
To give you an idea of what's the problem: in my code there is a "start" signal and when it is set to 1, the operation starts. Otherwise, it stays idle. I began writing the test bench with start=0, tested it and simulated it, then edited the test bench by setting start to 1. But when I simulate it, the start signal remains 0 in the waveform. I tried to check whether I was using another test bench, but it is the only test bench I am using in this project.
Given that I was on a deadline, I worked on the code so that it would adapt to the "frozen" test bench. I am getting now all the results I want, but I wanted to test some other features of my code, so I created a new project and copy pasted the code in new files (including the same test bench). But when I ran a simulation, the waveform displayed wrong results (even though I was using the exact same code in all modules and test bench). Any idea why?
Any help would be appreciated :)
There is a standardised way to do this, but it requires you to use the VPI, which I don't think you get on Modelsim's student edition. In short, you have to write C code, and dynamically link it to the simulator. In the C code, you can get object properties using routines such as vpi_get. Useful properites might be vpiSize, which is what you want, vpiLeftRange, vpiRightRange, and so on.
Having said all that, Verilog is essentially a static language, and objects have to be declared with a static width using constant expressions. Having a run-time method to determine an object's size is therefore of pretty limited value (since you should already know it), and may not solve whatever problem you actually have. Your question would make more sense for VHDL (and SystemVerilog?), which are much more dynamic.
Note on Icarus: the developers have pushed lots of SystemVerilog stuff back into the main language. If you take advantge of this you may find that your code is not portable.
Second part of your question: you need to be specific on what your problem actually is.