Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 days ago.
Improve this question
On the light house report I get this error thrown.
Error: Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio.
Aspect Ratio (Actual)
300 x 400 (0.75)
Aspect Ratio (Displayed)300 x 184 (1.63)
solid-epoxy-floor
…mobile/metallic-floor-mobile.webp(logicmovingcompany.com)
300 x 400 (0.75)
300 x 184 (1.63)
My images are set to the correct height and width yet it throws this error?
anyone know what I can do to fix this?
The propertys for the image I'm using is:
Height: 184pixels
Width: 300pixels
Dimensions 300x 184
I have the dimentions set properly on the height and width to the exact dimensions of the impage propertys yet the light house report keeps throwing that error above? I have no idea why it is throwing this report and the deadline for the website I'm making for a client already over due so I would appreciate any feedback thanks.
Picture Propertys:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789000027988819989/1074249734606295100/image.png
Lighthouse Report
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/789000027988819989/1074249970032574534/image.png
What the report says
How the Lighthouse image aspect ratio audit fails
Lighthouse flags any image with a rendered dimension of more than a few pixels difference to the expected dimension when rendered at its natural ratio:
Yet my pixels for height and width are both the exact same as the images origin?
Tried using the exact dimensions yet it still throws this error.
Related
The x axis values (expected them to be the step value) aren't shown in my tensorboard for some unknown reason. Although, when I put my cursor over the graph the step value seems correct.
Added print screen below.
Anyone got any idea why does is happening?
This issue is discussed here: https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorboard/issues/905
Some people said that using a different browser caused tick marks to show up, another suggested decreasing label font size - however labels also appear to be missing in your case.
I have the same issue on my machine. I guess it is related to a new tensorboard release. However, if you change the horizontal axis type from Step to Wall, you get a label for the horizontal axis.
I have searched extensively online and I have the PDF specification in which I have looked, yet I still can't figure out how to draw a simple black line on a PDF page from the content object's instructions (stream).
Let's say I just want to draw a 1-pixel thickness (assuming 72 dpi) black line at x 400, y 100-300.
This should in theory be a very simple operation, but the PDF spec goes on and on about all kinds of fancy things and appears to forget to explain how I would go about performing this simple operation.
Please can someone point me in the right direction?
In the PDF specification, have a look at chapter 8 (Graphics) and in there section 8.5, Path Construction and Painting.
To draw a simple straight path, you need a "move to" operation followed by a "line to" operation:
400 100 m
400 300 l
You can then stroke the path using the S operator so your code becomes
400 100 m
400 300 l
S
By default the color is black so you've already gotten a black line :-) But if you want to make sure you have to set some parameters in the graphics state.
0 G
1 w
400 100 m
400 300 l
S
The first line now sets the color space to "gray" and puts the shade of grey to 0 (black). The following line sets the line width of your stroked line to 1 user unit (what this comes out as is dependent on your current transformation matrix.
You can apply a neat trick if you really want 1 pixel (please don't for production files though!) and that is to set the width to zero:
0 w
This gives you "the thinnest line that can be rendered at device resolution: 1 device pixel wide".
Very simply I have a script that calls imagemagick on my photos.
The original image is 320 x 444, and I want to create a few scaled down versions but keeping the same aspect ratio
I call imagemagick using
convert oldfile.png -resize 290x newfile.png
I want to scale it to my set widths but the heights scale accordingly.
I do 80x, 160x and 290x in 3 separate commands.
The smallest 2 produce images with the same original aspect ratio, the 290x does not.
The size of the image it produces is 290 x 402
I have no idea why that one fails to keep the aspect ratio but the other 2 sizes maintaine it.
Any ideas?
I think that the problem in the third command is the requested size itself:
in the first command both dimensions are divided by 4: 320/4=80 and 444/4=111
in the second command both dimensions are divided by 2: 320/2=160 and 444/2=222
444 and 320 have only two common divisors: 2 and 4. You already used these divisors in your first two commands, so any other (width, height) couple will give you a slightly different aspect ratio: it is impossible to obtain the same exact aspect ratio fixing 290.
In fact while your original image has an aspect ratio of 1.3875, with a 290x403 image you would obtain an aspect ratio of 1,389655172 and with a 290x402 image you would get a 1,386206897 ratio: fixing 290 there is no other dimension's value that can give you the desired aspect ratio.
In general however Imagemagick always tries to preserve the aspect ratio of the image, as you can read in Imagemagick documentation:
The argument to the resize operator is the area into which the image
should be fitted. This area is not the final size of the image but the
maximum sizes for the image. that is because IM tries to preserve the
aspect ratio of the image more than the final (unless a '!' flag is
given), but at least one (if not both) of the final dimensions should
match the argument given image. So let me be clear... Resize will fit
the image into the requested size. It does NOT fill, the requested box
size.
For further reference see here
I searched and tried the troubleshooting faqs but can't see a reference to the problem I'm having.
I have the following presets in the resizer section my web.config:
name="kbp600w" defaults="w=600;h=600;mode=max;anchor=MiddleCenter;watermark=kbp600"
name="kbp600" defaults="w=600;h=600;anchor=MiddleCenter;bgcolor=FEF2E1;watermark=kbp600"
name="kbp300" defaults="w=300;h=300;anchor=MiddleCenter;bgcolor=FEF2E1;watermark=kbp300"
I generate my images with the following urls (I generate three different images using the same file):
picture.jpg?preset=kbp600w
picture.jpg?preset=kbp300
picture.jpg?preset=kbp600
So, here's the thing:
The first URL works fine and does everything defined in the preset.
The second URL also works fine and does everything defined in the preset.
The third URL works fine when the image width is larger than the height (landscape), but when the height is the largest dimension (portrait) it resizes the height correctly but the width dimension does not get padded to fill the 600px width but instead becomes whatever size is calculated to maintain the aspect ratio. I need it to always have dimensions of 600 x 600 with padding either on the top and bottom or sides with the appropriate background color for the padding.
Am I doing something wrong?
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5672886
Use mode=pad and scale=canvas (or scale=both) to always get exactly the requested dimensions.
Without scale=both or scale=canvas, an image < 600x600 in either dimension won't be upscaled or padded.
P.S. Anchor=MiddleCenter is the default, so you don't need to specify that.
I want to get the PlotArea width and height in order to calculate the proportion.
I used ActiveChart.PlotArea.Width to get the width, and then tested the width using Photoshop.
I discovered that the width returned by ActiveChart.PlotArea.Width is wrong.
Image shows what I am talking about:
I have no Idea why...
Please help me to understand why it happens and how to fix it...
Thanks!
PlotArea.Width is returning the width in points not pixels.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff198324.aspx
Points are a unit of length. Pixels are variable on a number of factors like monitor, fonts, truefont settings, ect. Here is a SO post about converting pixels to points: Convert Pixels to Points