I have a Where clause that is needed to properly filter my report. It's not working. 000 works but WAR does not. Please take a look and let me know if you have any suggestions.
AND ((#Wharehouse ='000' AND wd.Whse in('000','REP') AND wh.ParentWhse <> 'STR')
OR (#Wharehouse = 'WAR' AND wd.Whse in ('001','008','RMA') )
OR (#Wharehouse <> '000' AND wd.Whse = #Wharehouse))
Edit:
We have several warehouses (ya, I misspelled the parameter) in our facility. For the report, when '000' is passed in, the resulting report will contain data from both the '000' and 'REP' warehouses. When 'WAR' is passed in, warehouses '001','008' and 'RMA' will be included in the results.
Related
I have the following select statement in ABAP:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN EVER AS EV on
MUNIC~POD = EV~VREFER(9).
"where EV~BSTATUS = '14' or EV~BSTATUS = '32'.
My problem with the above statement is that does not recognize the substring/offset operation on the 'ON' clause. If i remove the '(9) then
it recognizes the field, otherwise it gives error:
Field ev~refer is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables
nor defined by a "DATA" statement. I have also tried doing something similar in the 'Where' clause, receiving a similar error:
LOOP AT gt_instmunic.
clear wa_gt_instmunic_f.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-mandt = gt_instmunic-mandt.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-bis = gt_instmunic-bis.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ab = gt_instmunic-ab.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-zzelecdate = gt_instmunic-zzelecdate.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZCERTDATE = gt_instmunic-ZZCERTDATE.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-CONSYEAR = gt_instmunic-CONSYEAR.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZDIMO = gt_instmunic-ZDIMO.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_M = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_T = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_T.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_M = gt_instmunic-USAGE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_T = gt_instmunic-USAGE_T.
temp_pod = gt_instmunic-pod.
SELECT vrefer
FROM ever
INTO wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer
WHERE ( vrefer(9) LIKE temp_pod ). " PROBLEM WITH SUBSTRING
"AND ( BSTATUS = '14' OR BSTATUS = '32' ).
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / sy-dbcnt.
WRITE: / 'wa is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / 'wa-ever is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
APPEND wa_gt_instmunic_f TO gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
ENDLOOP.
itab_size = lines( gt_instmunic_f ).
WRITE: / 'Internal table populated with', itab_size, ' lines'.
The basic task i want to implement is to modify a specific field on one table,
pulling values from another. They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) ). Thanks in advance for your time.
If you are on a late enough NetWeaver version, it works on 7.51, you can use the OpenSQL function LEFT or SUBSTRING. Your query would look something like:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN ever AS ev
ON MUNIC~POD EQ LEFT( EV~VREFER, 9 )
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F.
Note that the INTO clause needs to move to the end of the command as well.
field(9) is a subset operation that is processed by the ABAP environment and can not be translated into a database-level SQL statement (at least not at the moment, but I'd be surprised if it ever will be). Your best bet is either to select the datasets separately and merge them manually (if both are approximately equally large) or pre-select one and use a FAE/IN clause.
They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) )
This is a wrong assumption, because they both are not fields, but a field an other thing.
If you really need to do that task through SQL, I'll suggest you to check native SQL sentences like SUBSTRING and check if you can manage to use them within an EXEC_SQL or (better) the CL_SQL* classes.
i have this query
insert into changes (id_registro)
select d2.id_registro
from daily2 d2
where exists (
select 1
from daily d1
where
d1.id_registro = d2.id_registro
and (d2.origen, d2.sector, d2.entidad_um, d2.sexo, d2.entidad_nac, d2.entidad_res,
d2.municipio_res, d2.tipo_paciente,d2.fecha_ingreso, d2.fecha_sintomas,
d2.fecha_def, d2.intubado, d2.neumonia, d2.edad, d2.nacionalidad, d2.embarazo,
d2.habla_lengua_indig, d2.diabetes, d2.epoc, d2.asma, d2.inmusupr, d2.hipertension,
d2.otra_com, d2.cardiovascular, d2.obesidad,
d2.renal_cronica, d2.tabaquismo, d2.otro_caso, d2.resultado, d2.migrante,
d2.pais_nacionalidad, d2.pais_origen, d2.uci )
<>
(d1.origen, d1.sector, d1.entidad_um, d1.sexo, d1.entidad_nac, d1.entidad_res,
d1.municipio_res, d1.tipo_paciente, d1.fecha_ingreso, d1.fecha_sintomas,
d1.fecha_def, d1.intubado, d1.neumonia, d1.edad, d1.nacionalidad, d1.embarazo,
d1.habla_lengua_indig, d1.diabetes, d1.epoc, d1.asma, d1.inmusupr, d1.hipertension,
d1.otra_com, d1.cardiovascular, d1.obesidad,
d1.renal_cronica, d1.tabaquismo, d1.otro_caso, d1.resultado, d1.migrante,
d1.pais_nacionalidad, d1.pais_origen, d1.uci ))
it results in an insersion data that doesn't exist in another table, that's fine. but i want know exactly which field has changed to store it in a log table
You don't mention precisely what you expect to see in your output but basically to accomplish what you're after you'll need a long sequence of CASE clauses, one for each column
e.g. one approach might be to create a comma-separated list of the column names that have changed:
INSERT INTO changes (id_registro, column_diffs)
SELECT d2.id_registro,
CONCAT(
CASE WHEN d1.origen <> d2.origen THEN 'Origen,' ELSE '' END,
CASE WHEN d1.sector <> d2.sector THEN 'Sector,' ELSE '' END,
etc.
Within the THEN part of the CASE you can build whatever detail you want to show
e.g. a string showing before and after values of the columns CONCAT('Origen: Was==> ', d1.origen, ' Now==>', d2.origen). Presumably though you'll also need to record the times of these changes if there can be multiple updates to the same record throughout the day.
Essentially you'll need to decide what information you want to show in your logfile, but based on your example query you should have all the information you need.
I have following sql query in my hbm file. The SCHEMA, A and B are schema and two tables.
select
*
from SCHEMA.A os
inner join SCHEMA.B o
on o.ORGANIZATION_ID = os.ORGANIZATION_ID
where
case
when (:pass = 'N' and os.ORG_ID in (:orgIdList)) then 1
when (:pass = 'Y') then 1
end = 1
and (os.ORG_SYNONYM like :orgSynonym or :orgSynonym is null)
This is a pretty simple query. I had to use the case - when to handle the null value of "orgIdList" parameter(when null is passed to sql IN it gives error). Below is the relevant java code which sets the parameter.
if (_orgSynonym.getOrgIdList().isEmpty()) {
query.setString("orgIdList", "pass");
query.setString("pass", "Y");
} else {
query.setString("pass", "N");
query.setParameterList("orgIdList", _orgSynonym.getOrgIdList());
}
This works and give me the expected output. But I would like to know if there is a better way to handle this situation(orgIdList sometimes become null).
There must be at least one element in the comma separated list that defines the set of values for the IN expression.
In other words, regardless of Hibernate's ability to parse the query and to pass an IN(), regardless of the support of this syntax by particular databases (PosgreSQL doesn't according to the Jira issue), Best practice is use a dynamic query here if you want your code to be portable (and I usually prefer to use the Criteria API for dynamic queries).
If not need some other work around like what you have done.
or wrap the list from custom list et.
Apologies for posting a new question but I just can't think how to search for this question.
I'm creating a Crystal Report with multiple parameters and at the moment each one is connected by an ‘AND’ in the Report > Selection Formulas part of the report (not the SQL command part).
I haven’t fully authored the report and it contains lots of arrays to deal with multiple text values and wildcard searches but I think my question should be more around logic than the technical functions.
So…
Parameters are for things like product code, date range, country, batch number etc.
Currently the parameters I’m concerned with are Faults and keyword searches for complaints against products.
(Query 1) If all other parameters are set to default I can enter Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ and that gives me 17 records.
(Query 2) Entering keyword = ‘%unit%’ gives me 55 records.
The 2 parameters are connected by an AND so if I use Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ and Keyword = ‘%unit%’ then I get 12 records. If the connect the 2 queries with OR then I get 12 records.
If I compare the unique records, in excel, between query 1 & 2 then there are 60 records with Fault Combination = ‘Assembly – Code’ OR keyword = ‘%unit%.
How can write the parameter formula to get the 60 unique records with one query?
Many thanks!
Gareth
Edit - Code Added
This is the segment i'm concerned with. The arrays are defined earlier in the statement and the '*' & '%' parts of the query below are just to deal with the different wildcard operators between SQL and Crystal. There are a lot of other parameters but these 3 are the only ones that need the OR kind or connection.
Hope that helps!
(IF "%" LIKE array_fn2
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.FaultNoun})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultNoun} LIKE '*'))
ELSE IF {Command.RecordType} = 'Complaint'
THEN ({Command.FaultNoun} like array_fn2)
ELSE ((ISNULL({Command.FaultNoun})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultNoun} LIKE '*'))) AND
(IF "%" LIKE array_fa2
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.FaultAdjective})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultAdjective} LIKE '*'))
ELSE IF {Command.RecordType} = 'Complaint'
THEN ({Command.FaultAdjective} like array_fa2)
ELSE ((ISNULL({Command.FaultAdjective})=TRUE) OR ({Command.FaultAdjective} LIKE '*'))) AND
(IF ("%" LIKE array_k2) OR ({Command.RecordType} = 'Sale')
THEN ((ISNULL({Command.ActualStatements})=TRUE) OR ({Command.ActualStatements} LIKE '*')
OR (ISNULL({Command.ResultsAnalysis})=TRUE) OR ({Command.ResultsAnalysis} LIKE '*')
OR (ISNULL({Command.Observation})= TRUE) OR ({Command.Observation} LIKE '*'))
ELSE
({Command.ActualStatements} like array_k2) OR
({Command.ResultsAnalysis} like array_k2) OR
({Command.Observation} like array_k2))
i'm having an issue comparing a date in an access database. basically i'm parsing out a date from a text field, then trying to compare that date to another to only pull newer/older records.
so far i have everything working, but when i try to add the expression to the where clause, it's acting like it's not a date value.
here's the full SQL:
SELECT
Switch(Isdate(TRIM(LEFT(bc_testingtickets.notes, Instr(bc_testingtickets.notes, ' ')))) = false, 'NOT ASSIGNED!!!') AS [Assigned Status],
TRIM(LEFT(bc_testingtickets.notes, Instr(bc_testingtickets.notes, ' '))) AS [Last Updated Date],
bc_testingtickets.notes AS [Work Diary],
bc_testingtickets.ticket_id,
clients.client_code,
bc_profilemain.SYSTEM,
list_picklists.TEXT,
list_picklists_1.TEXT,
list_picklists_2.TEXT,
list_picklists_3.TEXT,
bc_testingtickets.createdate,
bc_testingtickets.completedate,
Datevalue(TRIM(LEFT([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], Instr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], ' ')))) AS datetest
FROM list_picklists AS list_picklists_3
RIGHT JOIN (list_picklists AS list_picklists_2
RIGHT JOIN (list_picklists AS list_picklists_1
RIGHT JOIN (bc_profilemain
RIGHT JOIN (((bc_testingtickets
LEFT JOIN clients
ON
bc_testingtickets.broker = clients.client_id)
LEFT JOIN list_picklists
ON
bc_testingtickets.status = list_picklists.id)
LEFT JOIN bc_profile2ticketmapping
ON bc_testingtickets.ticket_id =
bc_profile2ticketmapping.ticket_id)
ON bc_profilemain.id =
bc_profile2ticketmapping.profile_id)
ON list_picklists_1.id = bc_testingtickets.purpose)
ON list_picklists_2.id = bc_profilemain.destination)
ON list_picklists_3.id = bc_profilemain.security_type
WHERE ( ( ( list_picklists.TEXT ) <> 'Passed'
AND ( list_picklists.TEXT ) <> 'Failed'
AND ( list_picklists.TEXT ) <> 'Rejected' )
AND ( ( bc_testingtickets.ticket_id ) <> 4386 ) )
GROUP BY bc_testingtickets.notes,
bc_testingtickets.ticket_id,
clients.client_code,
bc_profilemain.SYSTEM,
list_picklists.TEXT,
list_picklists_1.TEXT,
list_picklists_2.TEXT,
list_picklists_3.TEXT,
bc_testingtickets.createdate,
bc_testingtickets.completedate,
DateValue(TRIM(LEFT([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], Instr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], ' '))))
ORDER BY Datevalue(TRIM(LEFT([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], Instr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes], ' '))));
the value i'm trying to compare against a various date is this:
DateValue(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' '))))
if i add a section to the where clause like below, i get the Data Type Mismatch error:
WHERE DateValue(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' ')))) > #4/1/2012#
i've even tried using the DateValue function around the manual date i'm testing with but i still get the mismatch error:
WHERE DateValue(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' ')))) > DateValue("4/1/2012")
any tips on how i can compare a date in this method? i can't change any fields in the database, ect, that's why i'm parsing the date in SQL and trying to manipulate it so i can run reports against it.
i've tried googling but nothing specifically talks about parsing a date from text and converting it to a date object. i think it may be a bug or the way the date is being returned from the left/trim functions. you can see i've added a column to the end of the SELECT statement called DateTest and it's obvious access is treating it like a date (when the query is run, it asks to sort by oldest to newest/newest to oldest instead of A-Z or Z-A), unlike the second column in the select.
thanks in advance for any tips/clues on how i can query based on the date.
edit:
i just tried the following statements in my where clause and still getting a mismatch:
CDate(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' ')))) > #4/1/2012#
CDate(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' ')))) >
CDate("4/1/2012") CDate(DateValue(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' '))))) > #4/1/2012#
i tried with all the various combinations i could think of regarding putting CDate inside of DateValue, outside, ect. the CDate function does look like what i should be using though. not sure why it's still throwing the error.
here's a link to a screenshot showing the results of the query http://ramonecung.com/access.jpg. there's two screenshots in one image.
You reported you get Data Type Mismatch error with this WHERE clause.
WHERE DateValue(Trim(Left([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],
InStr([bc_TestingTickets].[notes],' ')))) > #4/1/2012#
That makes me wonder whether [bc_TestingTickets].[notes] can ever be Null, either because the table design allows Null for that field, or Nulls are prohibited by the design but are present in the query's set of candidate rows as the result of a LEFT or RIGHT JOIN.
If Nulls are present, your situation may be similar to this simple query which also triggers the data type mismatch error:
SELECT DateValue(Trim(Left(Null,InStr(Null,' '))));
If that proves to be the cause of your problem, you will have to design around it somehow. I can't offer a suggestion about how you should do that. Trying to analyze your query scared me away. :-(
It seems like you are having a problem with the type conversion. In this case, I believe that you are looking for the CDate function.
A problem might be the order of the date parts. A test in the Immediate window shows this
?cdate(#4/1/2012#)
01.04.2012
?cdate(#2012/1/4#)
04.01.2012
Write the dates backwards in the format yyyy/MM/dd and thus avoiding inadverted swapping of days and months!
DateValue("2012/1/4")
and
CDate(#2012/1/4#)