My top package.json:
{
"name": "foo",
"version": "0.0.0",
"private": true,
"workspaces": [
"apps/*",
"packages/*"
],
"devDependencies": {
"#foo/eslint-config": "*"
},
"engines": {
"npm": ">=7.0.0",
"node": ">=14.0.0"
},
"dependencies": {},
"packageManager": "npm#8.18.0"
}
and I have a package in packages/#foo/eslint-config.
However, when I do npm install, I get an error saying that #foo/eslint-config is not in the registry.
I am assuming that I have either wrong directory structure.
Figured it out.
The package should have gone directly to packages/eslint-config directory.
The package name still needs to have the scope, i.e. #foo/eslint-config.
It appears that workspaces do not use the same convention of nesting scoped packages under a sub-directory as node_modules do.
It also appears that the folder name has no significance, as long as it is directly in the directory defined in workspaces configuration and has the correct package name.
Alternatively, you can also just update your workspaces configuration to read from packages/#foo/*.
In my application's package.json:
"dependencies": {
"axios": "0.21.2",
....
},
"resolutions": {
"axios": "0.24.0"
},
"scripts": {
"preinstall": "npx npm-force-resolutions",
...
}
However, the 'axios' version that is installed is 0.21.2. I would expect to be 0.24.0. What am I missing? When doing that for nested dependencies, they are forced to use the version defined in resolutions rather than this defined in their package.json. Why it is not the case with the app's package.json?
In package.json add something like this to resolve any grapahql package (replace with your package of issue) to the specified version.
"resolutions": {
"graphql": "^15.8.0",
"**/graphql": "^15.8.0"
},
I would like to use the grunt-contrib-jasmine NPM package. It has various dependencies. Part of the dependency graph looks like this:
─┬ grunt-contrib-jasmine#0.4.1
│ ├─┬ grunt-lib-phantomjs#0.2.0
│ │ ├─┬ phantomjs#1.8.2-2
Unfortunately, there's a bug in this version phantomjs which prevents it from installing correctly on Mac OS X. This is fixed in the latest version.
How can I get grunt-lib-phantomjs to use a newer version of phantomjs?
Some additional context:
grunt-contrib-jasmine explicitly requires version "~0.2.0" of grunt-lib-phantomjs, which explicitly requires version "~1.8.1" of phantomjs.
Adding phantomjs to my package's dependencies first has no effect; both versions are installed and grunt-contrib-jasmine still uses the older versions (see: When installing a package with NPM, can you tell it to use a different version of one of its dependencies?).
You can use npm shrinkwrap functionality, in order to override any dependency or sub-dependency.
I've just done this in a grunt project of ours. We needed a newer version of connect, since 2.7.3. was causing trouble for us. So I created a file named npm-shrinkwrap.json:
{
"dependencies": {
"grunt-contrib-connect": {
"version": "0.3.0",
"from": "grunt-contrib-connect#0.3.0",
"dependencies": {
"connect": {
"version": "2.8.1",
"from": "connect#~2.7.3"
}
}
}
}
}
npm should automatically pick it up while doing the install for the project.
(See: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/npm/managing-node-js-dependencies-with-shrinkwrap/)
As of npm cli v8.3.0 (2021-12-09) this can be solved using the overrides field of package.json. As described in StriplingWarrior's answer
For example, the project has typescript version 4.6.2 as direct development dependency and awesome-typescript-loader that uses old version 2.7 of typescript. Here is how you can tell npm to use version 4.6.2 of typescript for awesome-typescript-loader:
{
"name": "myproject",
"version": "0.0.0",
"scripts": ...
"dependencies": ...
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "~4.6.2",
"awesome-typescript-loader": "^5.2.1",
...
},
"overrides": {
"awesome-typescript-loader": {
"typescript": "$typescript"
}
}
}
If you don't use typescript as direct development dependency, then you have to write 4.6.2 instead of $typescript in overrides section:
{
"name": "myproject",
"version": "0.0.0",
"scripts": ...
"dependencies": ...
"devDependencies": {
"awesome-typescript-loader": "^5.2.1",
...
},
"overrides": {
"awesome-typescript-loader": {
"typescript": "~4.6.2"
}
}
}
For using the latest version of dependency:
{
"name": "myproject",
"version": "0.0.0",
"scripts": ...
"dependencies": ...
"devDependencies": {
"awesome-typescript-loader": "^5.2.1",
...
},
"overrides": {
"awesome-typescript-loader": {
"typescript": "latest"
}
}
}
Same overrides can be used for both dependencies and devDependencies.
If you're using npm version >5 but <8.3.0: edit your package-lock.json: remove the library from "requires" section and add it under "dependencies".
For example, you want deglob package to use glob package version 3.2.11 instead of its current one. You open package-lock.json and see:
"deglob": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/deglob/-/deglob-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-TUSr4W7zLHebSXK9FBqAMlApoUo=",
"requires": {
"find-root": "1.1.0",
"glob": "7.1.2",
"ignore": "3.3.5",
"pkg-config": "1.1.1",
"run-parallel": "1.1.6",
"uniq": "1.0.1"
}
},
Remove "glob": "7.1.2", from "requires", add "dependencies" with proper version:
"deglob": {
"version": "2.1.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/deglob/-/deglob-2.1.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-TUSr4W7zLHebSXK9FBqAMlApoUo=",
"requires": {
"find-root": "1.1.0",
"ignore": "3.3.5",
"pkg-config": "1.1.1",
"run-parallel": "1.1.6",
"uniq": "1.0.1"
},
"dependencies": {
"glob": {
"version": "3.2.11"
}
}
},
Now remove your node_modules folder, run npm ci (or npm install for old version of node/npm) and it will add missing parts to the "dependencies" section.
As of NPM v8.3, the correct way to deal with this is via the overrides section of your package.json file.
If you need to make specific changes to dependencies of your
dependencies, for example replacing the version of a dependency with a
known security issue, replacing an existing dependency with a fork, or
making sure that the same version of a package is used everywhere,
then you may add an override.
Overrides provide a way to replace a package in your dependency tree
with another version, or another package entirely. These changes can
be scoped as specific or as vague as desired.
To make sure the package foo is always installed as version 1.0.0 no
matter what version your dependencies rely on:
{
"overrides": {
"foo": "1.0.0"
}
}
There are a variety of other, more nuanced configurations allowing you to only override a package when it's a dependency of a particular package hierarchy. For more details, check out https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/configuring-npm/package-json#overrides
The only solution that worked for me (node 12.x, npm 6.x) was using npm-force-resolutions developed by #Rogerio Chaves.
First, install it by:
npm install npm-force-resolutions --save-dev
You can add --ignore-scripts if some broken transitive dependency scripts are blocking you from installing anything.
Then in package.json define what dependency should be overridden (you must set exact version number):
"resolutions": {
"your-dependency-name": "1.23.4"
}
and in "scripts" section add new preinstall entry:
"preinstall": "npm-force-resolutions",
Now, npm install will apply changes and force your-dependency-name to be at version 1.23.4 for all dependencies.
For those using yarn.
I tried using npm shrinkwrap until I discovered the yarn cli ignored my npm-shrinkwrap.json file.
Yarn has https://yarnpkg.com/lang/en/docs/selective-version-resolutions/ for this. Neat.
Check out this answer too: https://stackoverflow.com/a/41082766/3051080
Nested replacement with an entirely different package
Most of the strategies outlined in the other answers here work well if you are just interested in overriding the package's version number, but in our case, we needed to find a way to override a nested npm sub-dependency with a different package altogether. For details on why you would ever want to do this, please refer to the following question:
How to override a nested npm sub-dependency with a different package altogether (not just different package version number)?
Specify the tarball directly
For nested replacement of a package with an entirely different package using the npm-force-resolutions strategy that others have mentioned, you just need to provide a link to the tarball where you would normally specify the overriding version number.
As an example, for the case of replacing the vulnerable package, ansi-html, with the fixed fork of this package, ansi-html-community, your resolutions section of package.json should look like this:
"resolutions": {
"ansi-html": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-html-community/-/ansi-html-community-0.0.8.tgz"
}
To find the link to the tarball, use the following command, modifying your registry as necessary:
npm view ansi-html-community dist.tarball --registry=https://registry.npmjs.org/
Also, note that for npm-force-resolutions to work when you run npm install, you will need a preinstall entry under the scripts section of package.json:
"scripts": {
"preinstall": "npx npm-force-resolutions"
}
#user11153 's answer worked for me locally, but when trying to do a clean install (aka deleting node_modules), I would get:
npm-force-resolutions: command not found
I had to update the preinstall script to be:
"preinstall": "npm i npm-force-resolutions && npm-force-resolutions"
Which ensures that npm-force-resolutions package is installed before attempting to run it.
That being said, if you're able to use yarn instead, I would do that and then use #Gus 's answer.
I had an issue where one of the nested dependency had an npm audit vulnerability, but I still wanted to maintain the parent dependency version. the npm shrinkwrap solution didn't work for me, so what I did to override the nested dependency version:
Remove the nested dependency under the 'requires' section in package-lock.json
Add the updated dependency under DevDependencies in package.json, so that modules that require it will still be able to access it.
npm i
I was about to go down the npm-force-resolutions route but it seems that simply including the dependency in my own package.json fixed the problem for me.
I believe this worked in my case because the original dependency allows for patch versions of the dependency in question that I wanted to update. Thus by manually including a newer version it still fulfilled the dependency of the original dependency and will use the one I've manually added.
Example
Problem
I need to update plyr to version 3.6.9 from 3.6.8
Mine
package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"react-plyr": "^3.2.0"
}
}
React Plyr
package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"plyr": "^3.6.8"
}
}
Notice for the plyr dependency it starts with ^ this means it can accept any minor patches. You can learn more about that here:
https://docs.npmjs.com/about-semantic-versioning#using-semantic-versioning-to-specify-update-types-your-package-can-accept
Updating Mine
This updates the plyr dependency from my package.json.
package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"plyr": "^3.6.9",
"react-plyr": "^3.2.0"
}
}
Based on the rest of the answers, I provide the same solution, but I display the package.json, as I struggled a little bit on where to place the override and how.
{
"name": "my-app",
"version": "snapshot",
"scripts": {
"ng": "ng",
"build-dev": "ng build --configuration development",
},
"private": true,
"dependencies": {
"#angular/animations": "~14.2.9",
"#angular/common": "~14.2.9"
...
},
"devDependencies": {
"#angular-devkit/build-angular": "^14.2.8",
....
},
"overrides": {
"loader-utils#>2.0.0 <3": "2.0.4",
"loader-utils#>3.0.0 <4": "3.2.1"
}
}
For November 2022 "loader-utils" security vulnerability, it was requested to
use the version 2.0.4, if you are in the 2.X
use the version 3.2.1, if you are in the 3.X
And to verify
add the package.json the override tag
delete the package-lock.json
run "npm install"
run "npm audit"
Run this first
npm i -D #types/eslint#8.4.3
it will solve the issue
I have installed waypoints with using bower. I can see that there is a folder for shortcuts inside of its /lib folder, containing the shortcuts for infinite.js inview.js and sticky.js. My question is how I can actually access them in my project using bower.
I am using gulp to package all of my JavaScript for this project, so I am using "main-bower-files" to compile all of the library javascript files into a single file.
I have modified the bower.json so that waypoints will use the jquery version by doing the following
"dependencies": {
"jquery": "^3.3.1",
"waypoints": "^4.0.1"
},
"overrides" : {
"waypoints" : {
"main": "lib/jquery.waypoints.js"
}
}
But I do not know how I can include the /shortcuts/inview.js using this method. Is it possible to use npm or bower to get access to these files?
Should be able to just add it to "main" I would think:
"dependencies": {
"jquery": "^3.3.1",
"waypoints": "^4.0.1"
},
"overrides" : {
"waypoints" : {
"main": [
"lib/jquery.waypoints.js",
"lib/shortcuts/sticky.js"
]
}
}
I'm getting below Yarn error.
error moduleB#0.1.2: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "~0.10.22".
Below is my package.json
"engines": {
"node": ">4.0.0"
}
"dependencies": {
"moduleA": "^x.x.x"
}
moduleA has dependency
"dependencies": {
"moduleB": "^3.3.3"
}
I tried for that moduleB.
npm show moduleB engines
{ node: '>=4.0.0 < 7.0.0' }
Any clue. much appreciated !
Most likely it's because of moduleB package, I had the exact same issue with svgutils, looking at their source code on GitHub I found in the package.json the following:
"engines": {
"node": "~0.10.22"
}
You can create an issue for them or might as well fork the repo and make the necessary changes.