As part API Automation using karate framework, I am trying to send 'form-data' as body in karate feature file.
Please provide your solution with following example attached.
I tried to call the get method with body as form-data using karate framework feature file.
Feature: Get API
Background:
def data =
"""
{
"name":"tom",
"email":"tom110#gmail.com",
"gender":"male",
"status":"active"
}
"""
Scenario: get Auth details
Given url 'https://demo.domain.com/ea80952e/oauth2/token'
And request data
When method GET
Then status 200
You can use form-data like this:
And multipart field client_id = 76t775e676
Related
enter image description hereNot getting appropriate response like I get on the postman application
I tried a few online APIs which give me response, but I need an option to be able to add a payload in my program. I am using tc3 iotbase library from the twincat library repo.
The HTTP POST request payload is builded by the FB_IotHttpRequest function block, when you call one of the send methods
You can use 2 option here:
FB_IotHttpRequest.SendRequest(...) in this case you need to create the payload JSON manually
FB_IotHttpRequest.SendJsonDomRequest(...) in this case you need just pass the reference of the FB_JsonDomParser, which contains the json document.
I am trying to use two api call (Post & put call) in one scenario in karate framework. But I am not able to validate 2nd Api call response. when i tried to do like response.id , it passing 1 st api call response.
Is there any solution for it?
In your feature file, you wrote your print response in When instead of writing it after Then. Which means it is showing the previous response only. As per documentation response gets overridden after making a new http request.
Following,
...
When method put
And print 'jokerresult-->',response.joker_result
Then status 201
Should be like,
...
When method put
Then status 201
And print 'jokerresult-->',response.joker_result
let me know if it worked for you or not.
This question already has an answer here:
Karate API : How to hit an endpoint url with post method which does not have request body
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
How to provide request body for GET method using Karate API.
When trying to provide Request body for Get method in Karate API, it doesnt take the request and throws 500 status code.
As stated in HTTP GET with request body
using the request body within a GET request to change the semantics of the request is highly discouraged.
It's debatable that Karate ignores the message body when using method GET and if you think there is a use case for that feature your free to file an issue.
Furthermore, the 500 status code you observe is returned by your system under test because of the missing message body and has nothing to do with karate.
EDIT: confirmed that Karate 1.0 will support a body along with a GET
This question already has an answer here:
Karate API : How to hit an endpoint url with post method which does not have request body
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
How to provide request body for GET method using Karate API.
When trying to provide Request body for Get method in Karate API, it doesnt take the request and throws 500 status code.
As stated in HTTP GET with request body
using the request body within a GET request to change the semantics of the request is highly discouraged.
It's debatable that Karate ignores the message body when using method GET and if you think there is a use case for that feature your free to file an issue.
Furthermore, the 500 status code you observe is returned by your system under test because of the missing message body and has nothing to do with karate.
EDIT: confirmed that Karate 1.0 will support a body along with a GET
I am writing some tests for my application that is expected to return Json response and i wish to ensure it by using Behat.
Scenario: Response is json
Given I am on the domain "api.mydomain.net"
When I call the webservice "api" with GET
Then the webservice response content type is "application/json"
I researched at documentation of Behat but couldn't find any useful resource to assert response type.
Does anyone experienced the same situation and came up with a solution?