When I save a session with redis,
I'd like to add custom data.
RedisSessionRepository.class
....
#Override
public void save(CustomRedisSessionRepository.RedisSession session) {
if (!session.isNew) {
String key = getSessionKey(session.hasChangedSessionId() ? session.originalSessionId : session.getId());
Boolean sessionExists = this.sessionRedisOperations.hasKey(key);
if (sessionExists == null || !sessionExists) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Session was invalidated");
}
}
session.save();
//I want add code..... (custom data..)
}
So I decided to expand.
public class MyRedisSessionRepository extends RedisSessionRepository {
public MyRedisSessionRepository(RedisOperations<String, Object> sessionRedisOperations) {
super(sessionRedisOperations);
}
#Override
public void save(RedisSessionRepository.RedisSession session) {
super.save(session);
//add custom data...
}
}
But I can't.
The access modifier for RedisSession is 'default'.
public class RedisSessionRepository implements SessionRepository<RedisSessionRepository.RedisSession> {
...
final class RedisSession implements Session {
....
}
..
}
So I can't extend the save method of RedisSessionRepository.
Is there any other way Or is there an expandable class?
Related
I have implemented an IAsyncAuthorizationFilter/IActionFilter filter and implemented TypeFilterAttribute for the filter. When I add the attribute to both the controller and action, the action filter does not appear to override the controller level filter.
public class MyAuthorizeAttribute : TypeFilterAttribute
{
public MyAuthorizeAttribute (bool redirectOnFailure = true)
: base(typeof(MyFilter))
{
Arguments = new object[]
{
redirectOnFailure
};
}
}
public class MyFilter: IAsyncAuthorizationFilter, IActionFilter
{
public bool RedirectOnFailure { get; set; }
public MyFilter(bool redirectOnFailure)
{
RedirectOnFailure = redirectOnFailure;
}
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (context.Controller is Controller controller)
{
// Do some work
if (true)
{
if (!RedirectOnFailure)
{
context.Result = new JsonResult("Your session has expired.");
}
else
{
context.Result = new RedirectResult("LoginUrl");
}
return;
}
}
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
// Do nothing
}
public virtual async Task OnAuthorizationAsync(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
// Do work
}
}
The redirectOnFailure will be true for the Index action even though the filter specified false. In ASP.NET MVC, the action filter would override the controller filter. You could have a default for all actions but override specific actions with different properties/parameters. Can you not do this in Core?
[MyAuthorize]
public class HomeController : Controller
{
[MyAuthorize(redirectOnFailure: false)]
public IActionResult Index()
{
// Do work
}
}
As per the Microsoft website, filters do not override each other. They simply run one after the other in the order described in the cited document.
Just because the same attribute is put in both the controller and the action doesn't mean that ASP.net will say "ah, you probably want to override the class-level attribute". That's just not how it works.
If you want override logic, you need to write override logic.
Here's a sample made for .Net 6. The magic is done by the FindEffectivePolicy() method. This sample shows how to compare the current object against the effective one and only run the logic if the comparison matches.
public class MyFilter : IAsyncAuthorizationFilter
{
#region Properties
public string Name { get; }
#endregion
#region Constructors
public MyFilter(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
#endregion
#region IAsyncAuthorizationFilter
public Task OnAuthorizationAsync(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
var effectiveAtt = context.FindEffectivePolicy<MyFilter>();
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print($"Effective filter's name: {effectiveAtt?.Name}");
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print($"Am I the effective attribute? {this == effectiveAtt}");
if (this == effectiveAtt)
{
// Do stuff since this is the effective attribute (policy).
}
else
{
// ELSE part probably not needed. We just want the IF to make sure the code runs only once.
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
#endregion
}
I am attempting to add a mixin to the Jackson's ObjectMapper in a Quarkus project. I have some code that looks likes this:
#Provider
public class ObjectMapperContextResolver implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
private final ObjectMapper mapper;
public ObjectMapperContextResolver() {
this.mapper = createObjectMapper();
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> type) {
return mapper;
}
private ObjectMapper createObjectMapper() {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.addMixIn(MyModel.class, MyMixin.class);
return mapper;
}
}
This code worked perfectly in a Thorntail project I had. For some reason, Quarkus isn't picking this up, and the object mapper is not affected. Is there something different I have to do with the Quarkus CDI?
Updates
Apparently I was a little confused about the implementation. I should be using the Json-B api. I figured out how to change the configuration for Json-B and posted it below.
Instead of providing an ObjectMapper, you can provide a JsonbConfig so that you can customize serialization/deserialization.
Here is what I ended up using:
#Provider
public class JsonConfig implements ContextResolver<Jsonb> {
#Override
public Jsonb getContext(Class type) {
JsonbConfig config = new JsonbConfig();
config.withPropertyVisibilityStrategy(new IgnoreMethods());
return JsonbBuilder.create(config);
}
}
class IgnoreMethods implements PropertyVisibilityStrategy {
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Field field) {
return true;
}
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Method method) {
return false;
}
}
This allows you to customize your JsonbConfig. Here, mine specifically prevents access of methods for serialization/deserialization. On Quarkus with Panache, this prevents isPersistent from appearing in your JSON output.
In addition to the correct answer of #jsolum, here is a working provider which uses the fasterxml-annotations to check visibility of fields and methods:
#Provider
public class JsonConfig implements ContextResolver<Jsonb> {
#Override
public Jsonb getContext(Class aClass) {
JsonbConfig config = new JsonbConfig();
config.withPropertyVisibilityStrategy(new PropertyVisibilityStrategy() {
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Field field) {
JsonIgnore annotation = field.getAnnotation(JsonIgnore.class);
return annotation == null || !annotation.value();
}
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Method method) {
JsonIgnore annotation = method.getAnnotation(JsonIgnore.class);
return annotation == null || !annotation.value();
}
});
return JsonbBuilder.create(config);
}
}
JsonbConfig in Quarkus can be customized providing an ApplicationScoped instance of JsonbConfigCustomizer (taking #jsolum's answer into account):
#ApplicationScoped
public class JsonbFormattingConfig implements JsonbConfigCustomizer {
#Override
public void customize(JsonbConfig jsonbConfig) {
jsonbConfig.withPropertyVisibilityStrategy(new IgnoreMethods());
}
}
class IgnoreMethods implements PropertyVisibilityStrategy {
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Field field) {
return true;
}
#Override
public boolean isVisible(Method method) {
return false;
}
}
Source: https://quarkus.io/guides/rest-json#json-b
I'm creating a custom model binder for a view model, implementing IModelBinder
I have a lot of properties in my view model, the majority of which do not need any custom binding. Rather than explicitly set all of the property values on my model individually from the ModelBindingContext, I would to be able to get the framework to bind the model for me, then I would carry out any custom binding:
public class ApplicationViewModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext));
}
// get .net core to bind values on model
// Cary out any customization of the models properties
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(bindingContext.Model);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
Basically I want to carry out the default model binding, then apply custom binding, similar to the approach taken in this SO post but for .NET Core, not framework.
I assumed applying the default binding would be straight forward, but haven't been able to find out how to do so. I believe the solution would involve ComplexTypeModelBinder and ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider classes, but can't seem to find out how to go about it.
I know I could just make any changes when the POST request hits my controller method, but this seem the wrong place and wrong time to do so.
For custom ComplexTypeModelBinder, you could inherit from ComplexTypeModelBinder.
Model
public class BinderModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string BinderValue { get; set; }
}
Controller Action
[HttpPost]
public void Post([FromForm]BinderModel value)
{
}
CustomBinder
public class CustomBinder : ComplexTypeModelBinder
{
private readonly IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> _propertyBinders;
public CustomBinder(IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> propertyBinders)
: base(propertyBinders)
{
_propertyBinders = propertyBinders;
}
protected override Task BindProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext.FieldName == "BinderValue")
{
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success("BinderValueTest");
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
else
{
return base.BindProperty(bindingContext);
}
}
protected override void SetProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext, string modelName, ModelMetadata propertyMetadata, ModelBindingResult result)
{
base.SetProperty(bindingContext, modelName, propertyMetadata, result);
}
}
CustomBinderProvider
public class CustomBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (context.Metadata.IsComplexType && !context.Metadata.IsCollectionType)
{
var propertyBinders = new Dictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder>();
for (var i = 0; i < context.Metadata.Properties.Count; i++)
{
var property = context.Metadata.Properties[i];
propertyBinders.Add(property, context.CreateBinder(property));
}
//var loggerFactory = context.Services.GetRequiredService<ILoggerFactory>();
//return new ComplexTypeModelBinder(propertyBinders, loggerFactory);
return new CustomBinder(propertyBinders);
}
return null;
}
}
Inject provider
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvc(options => {
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, new CustomBinderProvider());
});
}
ComplexTypeModelBinder has unfortunately been deprecated in .Net 5.0, and it's counterpart, ComplexObjectModelBinder, is sealed, so you can't extend from it.
But, you can work around that. ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider is public, and you can use that to create a ComplexObjectModelBinder. Thus, if you make your own custom IModelBinderProvider, you can have the constructor accept a ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider argument, and make use of that to make a ComplexObjectModelBinder. Then, you can pass that to your custom IModelBinder, where it'll happily do its custom work before falling back to the ComplexObjectModelBinder you supplied.
Here's an example. First, your IModelBinder. This example shows that you can use DI if you want to. (In this example, say we needed a DbContext.)
public class MyCustomModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
private readonly IModelBinder _defaultBinder;
private readonly DbContext _dbContext;
public MyCustomModelBinder(IModelBinder defaultBinder, DbContext dbContext)
{
_defaultBinder = defaultBinder;
_dbContext = dbContext;
}
public override Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
// -do custom work here-
return _defaultBinder.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
}
}
However, in order to use DI on your custom model binder, you'll need a helper class. The problem is, when IModelBinderProvider is called, it won't have access to all the services in a typical request, like your DbContext for example. But this class will help:
internal class DIModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
private readonly IModelBinder _rootBinder;
private readonly ObjectFactory _factory;
public DIModelBinder(Type binderType, IModelBinder rootBinder)
{
if (!typeof(IModelBinder).IsAssignableFrom(binderType))
{
throw new ArgumentException($"Your binderType must derive from IModelBinder.");
}
_factory = ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory(binderType, new[] { typeof(IModelBinder) });
_rootBinder = rootBinder;
}
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var requestServices = bindingContext.HttpContext.RequestServices;
var binder = (IModelBinder)_factory(requestServices, new[] { _rootBinder });
return binder.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
}
}
Now you're ready to write the custom IModelBinderProvider:
public class MyCustomModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
private readonly IModelBinderProvider _rootProvider;
public MyCustomModelBinderProvider(IModelBinderProvider rootProvider)
{
_rootProvider = rootProvider;
}
public IModelBinder? GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context.Metadata.ModelType == typeof(MyModel))
{
var rootBinder = _rootProvider.GetBinder(context)
?? throw new InvalidOperationException($"Root {_rootProvider.GetType()} did not provide an IModelBinder for MyModel.");
return new DIModelBinder(typeof(MyCustomModelBinder), rootBinder);
}
return null;
}
}
Finally, in your startup file where you configure services, you can grab the ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider instance, use that to create a new instance of your MyCustomModelBinderProvider, and insert that into the ModelBinderProviders.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
var fallbackProvider = options.ModelBinderProviders
.First(p => p is ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider);
var myProvider = new MyCustomModelBinderProvider(fallbackProvider);
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, myProvider);
})
like the title says I want to give through the user information to my viewmodel, but the problem is that the viewmodel is registered as a dependency and I am binding its content to the xaml page itself. How do I send the user information to the viewmodel itself?
Thank you!
Xaml.cs part:
[XamlCompilation(XamlCompilationOptions.Compile)]
public partial class Calendar : ContentPage
{
public Calendar(User user)
{
InitializeComponent();
FileImageSource image = new FileImageSource
{
File = "calendar.png"
};
Icon = image;// push user information to the ICalendarViewModel
BindingContext = AppContainer.Container.Resolve<ICalendarViewModel>();
}
}
Interface:
public interface ICalendarViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
}
Bootstrap part registering dependencies:
public class Bootstrap
{
public IContainer CreateContainer()
{
var containerBuilder = new ContainerBuilder();
RegisterDependencies(containerBuilder);
return containerBuilder.Build();
}
protected virtual void RegisterDependencies(ContainerBuilder builder)
{
builder.RegisterType<CalendarViewModel>()
.As<ICalendarViewModel>()
.SingleInstance();
}
}
CalendarViewModel: I do not know if this will help
public class CalendarViewModel : ViewModelBase, ICalendarViewModel
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public string ErrorMessage { get; set; }
private CourseInformation _information;
private ICourseInformationRepository _repository;
public CalendarViewModel()
{
_repository = new CourseInformationRepository();
LoadData();
}
private ObservableCollection<CourseInformation> _courses;
public ObservableCollection<CourseInformation> Courses
{
get
{
return _courses;
}
set
{
_courses = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(nameof(Courses));
}
}
private void LoadData()
{
try
{
ObservableCollection<CourseInformation> CourseList = new ObservableCollection<CourseInformation>(_repository.GetAllCourseInformation());
Courses = new ObservableCollection<CourseInformation>();
DateTime date;
foreach (var course in CourseList)
{
string [] cour = course.Date.Split('/');
cour[2] = "20" + cour[2];
date = new DateTime(Convert.ToInt32(cour[2]), Convert.ToInt32(cour[1]), Convert.ToInt32(cour[0]));
if (date == DateTime.Now)//TESTING WITH TEST DATE, datetime.now
{
if (course.FromTime.Length < 4)
{
course.FromTime = "0" + course.FromTime;
}
if (course.UntilTime.Length < 4)
{
course.UntilTime = "0" + course.UntilTime;
}
course.FromTime = course.FromTime.Insert(2, ":");
course.UntilTime = course.UntilTime.Insert(2, ":");
Courses.Add(course);
}
}
}
catch (ServerUnavailableException e)
{
ErrorMessage = "Server is niet beschikbaar, ophalen van kalender is niet mogelijk.";
}
}
private void RaisePropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
Bootstrap binding in app.xaml.cs:
public partial class App : Application
{
public App()
{
InitializeComponent();
AppContainer.Container = new Bootstrap().CreateContainer();
MainPage = new LoginView();
}
protected override void OnStart()
{
// Handle when your app starts
}
protected override void OnSleep()
{
// Handle when your app sleeps
}
protected override void OnResume()
{
// Handle when your app resumes
}
}
I wanted to comment (not enough reputation) on #LeRoy, use a framework. I would recommend FreshMVVM and you can pass objects into the ViewModel and even pass in Services. It makes it all nice and clean, and it just works.
Should not your CalendarViewModel viewModel contain BindableBase ?
public class CalendarViewModel : BindableBase, ViewModelBase, ICalendarViewModel
what framework are you using? prism, freshmvvm.
Your View and Viewmodel is normally automatically handled by the framework, all you need to do is register your page.
Container.RegisterTypeForNavigation<Views.CalendarPage>();
A bit of history first. I created a EF Code First Library that contains POCO Objects as my Models, a generic DataProvider that inherits from DbContext, generic Repostory that implements the generic DataProvider, and a generic Service that implements the repository. I have used this library successfully in WPF (MVVM), ASP.Net, Window Forms, and ASP MVC applications.
For this discussion I will reference the Company Model
From the top down, I create a Service class called CompanyService that inherits from a base Service Class. The CompanyService class contains all of the business logic for the Company Model. This class uses the Repository class to perform the CRUD operations. The Repository then encapsulates all the DataProvider class operations.
I have done some research on using EF with WCFDataService, but I can't get my head around how to implement my library with it, particulary when it comes to overriding the CreateDataSource() Method.
It may be that I should just use a WCF Service instead, maybe I'm not understanding the purpose of the WCFDataService.
I have listed partial code for the classes involved:
public class CompanyService : ServiceBase<Company> ,ICompanyService
{
public Company GetCompanyByFolderId(string eFolderId)
{
return (Company)GetModelByFolderId(eFolderId);
}
}
public abstract class ServiceBase<TModel> : IService<TModel> where TModel : class, IModel
{
private IDataProvider _dataProvider;
public IDataProvider DataProvider
{
get
{
if (_dataProvider == null)
{
string connectionStringName = Properties.Settings.Default.DataProvider;
bool enableLazyLoading = true;
_dataProvider = new DataProvider(connectionStringName, enableLazyLoading);
}
return _dataProvider;
}
set
{
_dataProvider = value;
}
}
private IRepository<TModel> _repository;
public IRepository<TModel> Repository
{
get
{
if (_repository == null)
{
_repository = new Repository<TModel>(DataProvider);
}
return _repository;
}
set
{
_repository = value;
}
}
public TModel GetModelByFolderId(String folderId)
{
return GetTable().FirstOrDefault(o => o.EFolderid == folderId);
}
public virtual IQueryable<TModel> GetTable()
{
return Repository.GetTable();
}
}
public class Repository<TModel> : IRepository<TModel> where TModel : class, IModel
{
private IDataProvider _dataProvider;
public Repository(IDataProvider dataProvider)
{
_dataProvider = dataProvider;
}
private IDbSet<TModel> DbSet
{
get
{
return _dataProvider.Set<TModel>();
}
}
public IQueryable<TModel> GetTable()
{
return _dataProvider.GetTable<TModel>();
}
}
public class DataProvider : DbContext, IDataProvider
{
public DataProvider()
{
}
public DataProvider(string connectionStringName, bool enableLazyLoading = true)
: base(connectionStringName)
{
Configuration.LazyLoadingEnabled = enableLazyLoading;
//Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
}
public new IDbSet<TModel> Set<TModel>() where TModel : class
{
return base.Set<TModel>();
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new CompanyMapping());
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
public IQueryable<TModel> GetTable<TModel>() where TModel : class
{
return Set<TModel>().AsQueryable();
}
}
Then my Test looks something like this:
[TestClass()]
public class CompanyServiceTest
{
[TestMethod()]
public void GetCompanies()
{
CompanyService target = new CompanyService();
IQueryable<Company> companies = target.GetTable();
Assert.IsNotNull(companies);
}
[TestMethod()]
public void GetCompanyByFolderId()
{
CompanyService target = new CompanyService();
Company company = target.GetCompanyByFolderId("0000000000000000000000000172403");
Assert.IsNotNull(company);
}
}