I'm creating a custom model binder for a view model, implementing IModelBinder
I have a lot of properties in my view model, the majority of which do not need any custom binding. Rather than explicitly set all of the property values on my model individually from the ModelBindingContext, I would to be able to get the framework to bind the model for me, then I would carry out any custom binding:
public class ApplicationViewModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(bindingContext));
}
// get .net core to bind values on model
// Cary out any customization of the models properties
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(bindingContext.Model);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
Basically I want to carry out the default model binding, then apply custom binding, similar to the approach taken in this SO post but for .NET Core, not framework.
I assumed applying the default binding would be straight forward, but haven't been able to find out how to do so. I believe the solution would involve ComplexTypeModelBinder and ComplexTypeModelBinderProvider classes, but can't seem to find out how to go about it.
I know I could just make any changes when the POST request hits my controller method, but this seem the wrong place and wrong time to do so.
For custom ComplexTypeModelBinder, you could inherit from ComplexTypeModelBinder.
Model
public class BinderModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string BinderValue { get; set; }
}
Controller Action
[HttpPost]
public void Post([FromForm]BinderModel value)
{
}
CustomBinder
public class CustomBinder : ComplexTypeModelBinder
{
private readonly IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> _propertyBinders;
public CustomBinder(IDictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder> propertyBinders)
: base(propertyBinders)
{
_propertyBinders = propertyBinders;
}
protected override Task BindProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
if (bindingContext.FieldName == "BinderValue")
{
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success("BinderValueTest");
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
else
{
return base.BindProperty(bindingContext);
}
}
protected override void SetProperty(ModelBindingContext bindingContext, string modelName, ModelMetadata propertyMetadata, ModelBindingResult result)
{
base.SetProperty(bindingContext, modelName, propertyMetadata, result);
}
}
CustomBinderProvider
public class CustomBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (context.Metadata.IsComplexType && !context.Metadata.IsCollectionType)
{
var propertyBinders = new Dictionary<ModelMetadata, IModelBinder>();
for (var i = 0; i < context.Metadata.Properties.Count; i++)
{
var property = context.Metadata.Properties[i];
propertyBinders.Add(property, context.CreateBinder(property));
}
//var loggerFactory = context.Services.GetRequiredService<ILoggerFactory>();
//return new ComplexTypeModelBinder(propertyBinders, loggerFactory);
return new CustomBinder(propertyBinders);
}
return null;
}
}
Inject provider
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvc(options => {
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, new CustomBinderProvider());
});
}
ComplexTypeModelBinder has unfortunately been deprecated in .Net 5.0, and it's counterpart, ComplexObjectModelBinder, is sealed, so you can't extend from it.
But, you can work around that. ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider is public, and you can use that to create a ComplexObjectModelBinder. Thus, if you make your own custom IModelBinderProvider, you can have the constructor accept a ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider argument, and make use of that to make a ComplexObjectModelBinder. Then, you can pass that to your custom IModelBinder, where it'll happily do its custom work before falling back to the ComplexObjectModelBinder you supplied.
Here's an example. First, your IModelBinder. This example shows that you can use DI if you want to. (In this example, say we needed a DbContext.)
public class MyCustomModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
private readonly IModelBinder _defaultBinder;
private readonly DbContext _dbContext;
public MyCustomModelBinder(IModelBinder defaultBinder, DbContext dbContext)
{
_defaultBinder = defaultBinder;
_dbContext = dbContext;
}
public override Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
// -do custom work here-
return _defaultBinder.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
}
}
However, in order to use DI on your custom model binder, you'll need a helper class. The problem is, when IModelBinderProvider is called, it won't have access to all the services in a typical request, like your DbContext for example. But this class will help:
internal class DIModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
private readonly IModelBinder _rootBinder;
private readonly ObjectFactory _factory;
public DIModelBinder(Type binderType, IModelBinder rootBinder)
{
if (!typeof(IModelBinder).IsAssignableFrom(binderType))
{
throw new ArgumentException($"Your binderType must derive from IModelBinder.");
}
_factory = ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory(binderType, new[] { typeof(IModelBinder) });
_rootBinder = rootBinder;
}
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var requestServices = bindingContext.HttpContext.RequestServices;
var binder = (IModelBinder)_factory(requestServices, new[] { _rootBinder });
return binder.BindModelAsync(bindingContext);
}
}
Now you're ready to write the custom IModelBinderProvider:
public class MyCustomModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider
{
private readonly IModelBinderProvider _rootProvider;
public MyCustomModelBinderProvider(IModelBinderProvider rootProvider)
{
_rootProvider = rootProvider;
}
public IModelBinder? GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context)
{
if (context.Metadata.ModelType == typeof(MyModel))
{
var rootBinder = _rootProvider.GetBinder(context)
?? throw new InvalidOperationException($"Root {_rootProvider.GetType()} did not provide an IModelBinder for MyModel.");
return new DIModelBinder(typeof(MyCustomModelBinder), rootBinder);
}
return null;
}
}
Finally, in your startup file where you configure services, you can grab the ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider instance, use that to create a new instance of your MyCustomModelBinderProvider, and insert that into the ModelBinderProviders.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
var fallbackProvider = options.ModelBinderProviders
.First(p => p is ComplexObjectModelBinderProvider);
var myProvider = new MyCustomModelBinderProvider(fallbackProvider);
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, myProvider);
})
Related
I have implemented an IAsyncAuthorizationFilter/IActionFilter filter and implemented TypeFilterAttribute for the filter. When I add the attribute to both the controller and action, the action filter does not appear to override the controller level filter.
public class MyAuthorizeAttribute : TypeFilterAttribute
{
public MyAuthorizeAttribute (bool redirectOnFailure = true)
: base(typeof(MyFilter))
{
Arguments = new object[]
{
redirectOnFailure
};
}
}
public class MyFilter: IAsyncAuthorizationFilter, IActionFilter
{
public bool RedirectOnFailure { get; set; }
public MyFilter(bool redirectOnFailure)
{
RedirectOnFailure = redirectOnFailure;
}
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (context.Controller is Controller controller)
{
// Do some work
if (true)
{
if (!RedirectOnFailure)
{
context.Result = new JsonResult("Your session has expired.");
}
else
{
context.Result = new RedirectResult("LoginUrl");
}
return;
}
}
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
// Do nothing
}
public virtual async Task OnAuthorizationAsync(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
// Do work
}
}
The redirectOnFailure will be true for the Index action even though the filter specified false. In ASP.NET MVC, the action filter would override the controller filter. You could have a default for all actions but override specific actions with different properties/parameters. Can you not do this in Core?
[MyAuthorize]
public class HomeController : Controller
{
[MyAuthorize(redirectOnFailure: false)]
public IActionResult Index()
{
// Do work
}
}
As per the Microsoft website, filters do not override each other. They simply run one after the other in the order described in the cited document.
Just because the same attribute is put in both the controller and the action doesn't mean that ASP.net will say "ah, you probably want to override the class-level attribute". That's just not how it works.
If you want override logic, you need to write override logic.
Here's a sample made for .Net 6. The magic is done by the FindEffectivePolicy() method. This sample shows how to compare the current object against the effective one and only run the logic if the comparison matches.
public class MyFilter : IAsyncAuthorizationFilter
{
#region Properties
public string Name { get; }
#endregion
#region Constructors
public MyFilter(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
#endregion
#region IAsyncAuthorizationFilter
public Task OnAuthorizationAsync(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
var effectiveAtt = context.FindEffectivePolicy<MyFilter>();
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print($"Effective filter's name: {effectiveAtt?.Name}");
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print($"Am I the effective attribute? {this == effectiveAtt}");
if (this == effectiveAtt)
{
// Do stuff since this is the effective attribute (policy).
}
else
{
// ELSE part probably not needed. We just want the IF to make sure the code runs only once.
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
#endregion
}
I am developing an OData API for my Asp.net core application and i want to implement caching on this.
The problem is all my endpoints will be IQueryable with a queryable services with no execution at all. so i can't implement any caching on service level
Controller
public class TagsController : ODataController
{
private readonly ITagService _tagService;
private readonly ILogger<TagsController> _logger;
public TagsController(ITagService tagService, ILogger<TagsController> logger)
{
_tagService = tagService;
_logger = logger;
}
[HttpGet("odata/tags")]
[Tags("Odata")]
[AllowAnonymous]
[EnableCachedQuery]
public ActionResult<IQueryable<Tag>> Get()
{
try
{
return Ok(_tagService.GetAll());
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "Some unknown error has occurred.");
return BadRequest();
}
}
}
So I tried to apply an extension on EnableQuery attribute to add the caching implementation on it. so i added the following
public class EnableCachedQuery : EnableQueryAttribute
{
private IMemoryCache _memoryCache;
public EnableCachedQuery()
{
_memoryCache = new MemoryCache(new MemoryCacheOptions());
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext actionContext)
{
//var url = GetAbsoluteUri(actionContext.HttpContext);
var path = actionContext.HttpContext.Request.Path + actionContext.HttpContext.Request.QueryString;
//check cache
if (_memoryCache.TryGetValue(path, out ObjectResult value))
{
actionContext.Result = value;
}
else
{
base.OnActionExecuting(actionContext);
}
}
public override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
if (context.Exception != null)
return;
var path = context.HttpContext.Request.Path + context.HttpContext.Request.QueryString;
var cacheEntryOpts = new MemoryCacheEntryOptions().SetAbsoluteExpiration(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(15));
base.OnActionExecuted(context);
_memoryCache.Set(path, context.Result, cacheEntryOpts);
}
}
the first request completed successfully and retrieved the data correctly with filters and queries applied. then when tried to add the data to cache the context.Result holds the ObjectResult and then in the second request which should be cached the value was there but with an error in executing which means that the cached value is not the final output value that should be passed to the Result
Cannot access a disposed context instance. A common cause of this error is disposing a context instance that was resolved from dependency injection and then later trying to use the same context instance elsewhere in your application. This may occur if you are calling 'Dispose' on the context instance, or wrapping it in a using statement. If you are using dependency injection, you should let the dependency injection container take care of disposing context instances.
Object name: 'ApplicationDbContext'.
============================
Update:
public class ApplicationDbContext : IdentityDbContext<User, Account, Session>, IApplicationDbContext
{
public ApplicationDbContext(
DbContextOptions options,
IApplicationUserService currentUserService,
IDomainEventService domainEventService,
IBackgroundJobService backgroundJob,
IDomainEventService eventService,
IDateTime dateTime) : base(options, currentUserService, domainEventService, backgroundJob, dateTime) { }
public DbSet<Tag> Tags => Set<Tag>();
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
var entityTypes = builder.Model.GetEntityTypes()
.Where(c => typeof(AuditableEntity).IsAssignableFrom(c.ClrType))
.ToList();
foreach (var type in entityTypes)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type.ClrType);
var deletedCheck = Expression.Lambda
(Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(parameter, nameof(AuditableEntity.Deleted)), Expression.Constant(false)), parameter);
type.SetQueryFilter(deletedCheck);
}
builder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(ApplicationDbContext).Assembly);
builder.ApplySeedsFromAssembly(typeof(ApplicationDbContext).Assembly);
}
}
I can't find IHttpControllerActivator in asp.net core api
public class WindsorHttpControllerActivator:IHttpControllerActivator
{
public IHttpController Create(HttpRequestMessage request, HttpControllerDescriptor controllerDescriptor, Type controllerType)
{
var instance = DependencyContainer.Resolve(controllerType);
if (instance == null)
{
throw new HttpException((int)HttpStatusCode.NotFound, string.Format("{0} cannot be resolved.", controllerType.Name));
}
return (IHttpController) instance;
}
}
Let me know if this rewrite works.
There were changes to the API for third-party DI
using Castle.Windsor;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Controllers;
public class WindsorControllerActivator : IControllerActivator
{
private readonly IWindsorContainer _container;
public WindsorControllerActivator(IWindsorContainer container)
{
_container = container;
}
public object Create(ControllerContext context)
{
var controllerType = context.ActionDescriptor.ControllerTypeInfo.AsType();
var instance = _container.Resolve(controllerType);
if (instance == null)
{
//throw whatever
}
return (ControllerBase)instance;
}
public void Release(ControllerContext context, object controller)
{
_container.Release(controller);
}
}
these articles were helpful to me # least:
https://kristian.hellang.com/third-party-dependency-injection-in-asp-net-core/
https://medium.com/#nevsnirG/manual-controller-activation-and-dependency-injection-in-asp-net-core-web-api-46aba579b0e
EDIT:
in '''Startup.cs''', don't forget the lines
services.AddSingleton<IControllerActivator>(new WindsorControllerActivator (_container));
I have WebAPI (.NET Core) and use FluentValidator to validate model, including updating.
I use PATCH verb and have the following method:
public IActionResult Update(int id, [FromBody] JsonPatchDocument<TollUpdateAPI> jsonPatchDocument)
{
also, I have a validator class:
public class TollUpdateFluentValidator : AbstractValidator<TollUpdateAPI>
{
public TollUpdateFluentValidator ()
{
RuleFor(d => d.Date)
.NotNull().WithMessage("Date is required");
RuleFor(d => d.DriverId)
.GreaterThan(0).WithMessage("Invalid DriverId");
RuleFor(d => d.Amount)
.NotNull().WithMessage("Amount is required");
RuleFor(d => d.Amount)
.GreaterThanOrEqualTo(0).WithMessage("Invalid Amount");
}
}
and map this validator in Startup class:
services.AddTransient<IValidator<TollUpdateAPI>, TollUpdateFluentValidator>();
but it does not work. How to write valid FluentValidator for my task?
You will need to trigger the validation manually.
Your action method will be somthing like this:
public IActionResult Update(int id, [FromBody] JsonPatchDocument<TollUpdateAPI> jsonPatchDocument)
{
// Load your db entity
var myDbEntity = myService.LoadEntityFromDb(id);
// Copy/Map data to the entity to patch using AutoMapper for example
var entityToPatch = myMapper.Map<TollUpdateAPI>(myDbEntity);
// Apply the patch to the entity to patch
jsonPatchDocument.ApplyTo(entityToPatch);
// Trigger validation manually
var validationResult = new TollUpdateFluentValidator().Validate(entityToPatch);
if (!validationResult.IsValid)
{
// Add validation errors to ModelState
foreach (var error in validationResult.Errors)
{
ModelState.AddModelError(error.PropertyName, error.ErrorMessage);
}
// Patch failed, return 422 result
return UnprocessableEntity(ModelState);
}
// Map the patch to the dbEntity
myMapper.Map(entityToPatch, myDbEntity);
myService.SaveChangesToDb();
// So far so good, patch done
return NoContent();
}
You can utilize a custom rule builder for this. It might not be the most elegant way of handling it but at least the validation logic is where you expect it to be.
Say you have the following request model:
public class CarRequestModel
{
public string Make { get; set; }
public string Model { get; set; }
public decimal EngineDisplacement { get; set; }
}
Your Validator class can inherit from the AbstractValidator of JsonPatchDocument instead of the concrete request model type.
The fluent validator, on the other hand, provides us with decent extension points such as the Custom rule.
Combining these two ideas you can create something like this:
public class Validator : AbstractValidator<JsonPatchDocument<CarRequestModel>>
{
public Validator()
{
RuleForEach(x => x.Operations)
.Custom(HandleInternalPropertyValidation);
}
private void HandleInternalPropertyValidation(JsonPatchOperation property, CustomContext context)
{
void AddFailureForPropertyIf<T>(
Expression<Func<T, object>> propertySelector,
JsonPatchOperationType operation,
Func<JsonPatchOperation, bool> predicate, string errorMessage)
{
var propertyName = (propertySelector.Body as MemberExpression)?.Member.Name;
if (propertyName is null)
throw new ArgumentException("Property selector must be of type MemberExpression");
if (!property.Path.ToLowerInvariant().Contains(propertyName.ToLowerInvariant()) ||
property.Operation != operation) return;
if (predicate(property)) context.AddFailure(propertyName, errorMessage);
}
AddFailureForPropertyIf<CarRequestModel>(x => x.Make, JsonPatchOperationType.remove,
x => true, "Car Make cannot be removed.");
AddFailureForPropertyIf<CarRequestModel>(x => x.EngineDisplacement, JsonPatchOperationType.replace,
x => (decimal) x.Value < 12m, "Engine displacement must be less than 12l.");
}
}
In some cases, it might be tedious to write down all the actions that are not allowed from the domain perspective but are defined in the JsonPatch RFC.
This problem could be eased by defining none but rules which would define the set of operations that are valid from the perspective of your domain.
Realization bellow allow use IValidator<Model> inside IValidator<JsonPatchDocument<Model>>, but you need create model with valid properties values.
public class ModelValidator : AbstractValidator<JsonPatchDocument<Model>>
{
public override ValidationResult Validate(ValidationContext<JsonPatchDocument<Model>> context)
{
return _validator.Validate(GetRequestToValidate(context));
}
public override Task<ValidationResult> ValidateAsync(ValidationContext<JsonPatchDocument<Model>> context, CancellationToken cancellation = default)
{
return _validator.ValidateAsync(GetRequestToValidate(context), cancellation);
}
private static Model GetRequestToValidate(ValidationContext<JsonPatchDocument<Model>> context)
{
var validModel = new Model()
{
Name = nameof(Model.Name),
Url = nameof(Model.Url)
};
context.InstanceToValidate.ApplyTo(validModel);
return validModel;
}
private class Validator : AbstractValidator<Model>
{
/// <inheritdoc />
public Validator()
{
RuleFor(r => r.Name).NotEmpty();
RuleFor(r => r.Url).NotEmpty();
}
}
private static readonly Validator _validator = new();
}
You may try the below generic validator - it validates only updated properties:
public class JsonPatchDocumentValidator<T> : AbstractValidator<JsonPatchDocument<T>> where T: class, new()
{
private readonly IValidator<T> _validator;
public JsonPatchDocumentValidator(IValidator<T> validator)
{
_validator = validator;
}
private static string NormalizePropertyName(string propertyName)
{
if (propertyName[0] == '/')
{
propertyName = propertyName.Substring(1);
}
return char.ToUpper(propertyName[0]) + propertyName.Substring(1);
}
// apply path to the model
private static T ApplyPath(JsonPatchDocument<T> patchDocument)
{
var model = new T();
patchDocument.ApplyTo(model);
return model;
}
// returns only updated properties
private static string[] CollectUpdatedProperties(JsonPatchDocument<T> patchDocument)
=> patchDocument.Operations.Select(t => NormalizePropertyName(t.path)).Distinct().ToArray();
public override ValidationResult Validate(ValidationContext<JsonPatchDocument<T>> context)
{
return _validator.Validate(ApplyPath(context.InstanceToValidate),
o => o.IncludeProperties(CollectUpdatedProperties(context.InstanceToValidate)));
}
public override async Task<ValidationResult> ValidateAsync(ValidationContext<JsonPatchDocument<T>> context, CancellationToken cancellation = new CancellationToken())
{
return await _validator.ValidateAsync(ApplyPath(context.InstanceToValidate),
o => o.IncludeProperties(CollectUpdatedProperties(context.InstanceToValidate)), cancellation);
}
}
it has to be registered manually:
builder.Services.AddScoped<IValidator<JsonPatchDocument<TollUpdateAPI>>, JsonPatchDocumentValidator<TollUpdateAPI>>();
I was reading this article and found it quite interesting (thanks #Aaronaught). Was what came closest to solve my problem.
The only detail is that in my case I would use the NHibernate interceptor, but an exception is thrown An unhandled exception of type 'System.StackOverflowException' occurred in System.Core.dll
Code
Session factory:
public class SessionFactoryBuilder : IProvider
{
private ISessionFactory _sessionFactory;
private readonly Configuration _configuration;
public SessionFactoryBuilder(AuditInterceptor auditInterceptor)
{
_configuration = Fluently.Configure(new Configuration().Configure())
.Mappings(m => m.AutoMappings.Add(AutoMap.AssemblyOf<IEntidade>(new AutomappingConfiguration())))
.ExposeConfiguration(SetupDatabase)
.BuildConfiguration();
_configuration.SetInterceptor(auditInterceptor);
_sessionFactory = _configuration.BuildSessionFactory();
}
private static void SetupDatabase(Configuration config)
{
var schema = new SchemaExport(config);
//schema.Execute(true, true, false);
}
public object Create(IContext context)
{
return _sessionFactory;
}
public Type Type
{
get { return typeof(ISessionFactory); }
}
}
I have a module that sets up my repositories and ORM (NHibernate)
public class RepositoriosModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<AuditInterceptor>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();
// NHibernate
Bind<ISessionFactory>().ToProvider<SessionFactoryBuilder>().InSingletonScope();
Bind<ISession>().ToMethod(CreateSession).InRequestScope();
Bind<NHUnitOfWork>().ToSelf().InRequestScope();
//Model Repositories
Bind<IRepositorio<Usuario>, IUsuariosRepositorio>().To<UsuariosRepositorio>().InRequestScope();
}
private ISession CreateSession(IContext context)
{
return context.Kernel.Get<ISessionFactory>().OpenSession();
}
}
Interceptor to update auditable properties (CriadoEm (create at), CriadoPor (create by), AtualizadoEm and AtualizadoPor)
public class AuditInterceptor : EmptyInterceptor
{
private readonly IUsuario _usuarioLogado;
public AuditInterceptor(IUsuario usuarioLogado)
{
_usuarioLogado = usuarioLogado;
}
public override bool OnFlushDirty(object entity, object id, object[] currentState, object[] previousState, string[] propertyNames, NHibernate.Type.IType[] types)
{
var auditableObject = entity as IAuditavel;
if (auditableObject != null)
{
currentState[Array.IndexOf(propertyNames, "AtualizadoEm")] = DateTime.Now;
return true;
}
return false;
}
public override bool OnSave(object entity, object id, object[] state, string[] propertyNames, NHibernate.Type.IType[] types)
{
var auditableObject = entity as IAuditavel;
if (auditableObject != null)
{
var currentDate = DateTime.Now;
state[Array.IndexOf(propertyNames, "CriadoEm")] = currentDate;
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
A provider to retrieve the logged in user:
public class UsuarioProvider : Provider
{
private Usuario _usuario;
protected override Usuario CreateInstance(IContext context)
{
var usuariosRepositorio = context.Kernel.Get<IUsuariosRepositorio>(); // Stackoverflow on this line!!
if (_usuario == null && WebSecurity.IsAuthenticated)
_usuario = usuariosRepositorio.Get(WebSecurity.CurrentUserId);
return _usuario;
}
}
And the class NinjectWebCommon (web application) define:
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IUsuario>().ToProvider<UsuarioProvider>().InRequestScope(); //.When((req) => WebSecurity.IsAuthenticated)
kernel.Load(new RepositoriosModule(), new MvcSiteMapProviderModule());
}
[Add] Repository class
public class UsuariosRepositorio : Repositorio<Usuario>, IUsuariosRepositorio
{
public UsuariosRepositorio(NHUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
: base(unitOfWork)
{ }
}
public class Repositorio<T> : IRepositorio<T>
where T : class, IEntidade
{
private readonly NHUnitOfWork _unitOfWork;
public IUnitOfWork UnitOfWork { get { return _unitOfWork; } }
private readonly ISession _session;
public Repositorio(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
{
_unitOfWork = (NHUnitOfWork)unitOfWork;
_session = _unitOfWork.Context.SessionFactory.GetCurrentSession();
}
public void Remover(T obj)
{
_session.Delete(obj);
}
public void Armazenar(T obj)
{
_session.SaveOrUpdate(obj);
}
public IQueryable<T> All()
{
return _session.Query<T>();
}
public object Get(Type entity, int id)
{
return _session.Get(entity, id);
}
public T Get(Expression<Func<T, bool>> expression)
{
return Query(expression).SingleOrDefault();
}
public T Get(int id)
{
return _session.Get<T>(id);
}
public IQueryable<T> Query(Expression<Func<T, bool>> expression)
{
return All().Where(expression);
}
}
Problem
The problem occurs in the class UsuarioProvider while trying to retrieve the user repository.
Stackoverflow error:
An unhandled exception of type 'System.StackOverflowException' occurred in System.Core.dll
I see two problems :
The main problem I see is that SessionFactoryBuilder needs an AuditInterceptor which needs an IUsuario, which needs a UsuarioProvider, which needs a SessionFactoryBuilder, thus introducing a cycle, and a stack-overflow.
The second problem I see is that your AuditInterceptor is linked to a request when your SessionFactoryBuilder is singleton like. I must confess I can't see how it work with several logged users.
You should instantiate and attach the AuditInterceptor as part of the CreateSession, instead of trying to create it once and for all as part of the Session builder. Once this is done, your interceptor should not rely on a Session that needs an AuditInterceptor as part of its creation (you may need a separate Session creation mechanism for that. A stateless Session might do the trick)