I have a problem where I have a macro which was saved without connecting to any references, can I know how to know which object belongs to which reference.
for example:
but when I try to run the code it shows a compile error as "user type not defined"
there are many such declarations in code, I don't know which declaration belongs to which library.
so can I know which reference is not connected.
Related
The situation is that. I run Labview and from one via ActiveX pallet call my COM object method. And it works, I walk through my code with debugger.
But when I start to use (uncomment) code from side dll I see "class is not registered" error in Labview. My additional dll and its dependencies located in separate directory. So I tried to set PATH environment variable to this directory and after that run Labview. But is still doesn't work.
So the question is how to debug this situation? I looked through event logger but didn't found anything related.
P.S. I created my own synthetic application in C++ which calls the same method as Labview via COM too. And it works.
The problem was in hard defined base dll address. Labview used this address and COM dlls couldn't use that space.
I suppose report is incorrect ("class is not registered") because class is registered, but corresponding dll couldn't be loaded.
I have a VB6 program that calls a VB6 DLL which in turn calls another VB6 DLL. When I execute the calling program there is an application error which I am unable to pinpoint so I researched how if it was possible to "see" the error in the dll.
I read Stackoverflow entry question about debugging VB6 dll
and followed the directions of Booji Boy to create a vbg. I also followed his directions and removed the two DLLs from he Reference list. The calling program takes a .txt file as input. When I executed the exe I received this error:
Error Number: 13Description: Type mismatch
The error isn't being generated by the application.
What does this mean? How can I debug this issue?
You must have all the source code for the EXE and the two DLLs. You add all the projects into single group file i.e. the VBG. You must have a reference in the EXE project to the first DLL. I have no idea why you have been told you have to remove them. You must have a reference in the first DLL project to the second DLL project. VB is clever enough to silently replace the DLL reference with the project reference. It is also clever enough to silently replace the project reference with the DLL reference if you remove a DLL project from the project group.
Make sure you have error handling set to "Break on All Errors" or "Break in Class".
The type mismatch error can occur from simple things like assign a non-numeric string to an numeric variable. It gets more complicated if you are passing object references around. If you see this error occurs on something like:
Set myObject = someOtherObject
... and it looks as if they should be the same type, this might get very complicated. But first, I'll let you do the debug.
You can use an open source project made in Visual Basic 6.0. It is called "Debuggy v2".This project has multiple roles:
-debugger
-disassembler
-Windows resource extractor
-file hex editor
-window sniffer
-API spy
all rolled into one. I may be useful for what you need.
When starting to work in a VBG a type mismatch can arise if the library references are inconsistent. One library may be referencing another IN the VBG; a second may be referencing the compiled version. Passing objects between them can result in this error.
Concrete example:
VBG contains code for: A.DLL, B.DLL, C.DLL
A references B in the VBG
C references B which is compiled
Code in A calls code in C passing an object defined by a class in B.
Type mismatch
C should have referenced B in the VBG.
I am modifying an existing application in VB .NET.
In one routine, I have added a reference to a class in a newly-referenced class library project that is part of my solution, and now I get run-time FileNotFoundException messages when the program attempts to access this routine while debugging. The error tells me that the class can't be found, what's up with that?
To be clear: if I remove the lines of code relating to the new class, I no longer receive the exception messages. If I add them back in, here they come again!
I have referenced the class library in the project containing this routine.
The class library is building properly (other projects reference same library, and use it more extensively), and the project is referencing the class library's .dll file in my "debug" folder.
I get no errors from other routines that use this new class (thus far).
I get no errors in the Error List of the IDE.
What in the world could be happening here?
SH
This is a project reference, not a reference to an assembly (DLL), right?
Are the .NET frameworks the same?
Does the project you are referencing depend on some external assemblies not included in the other project, that might be called, producing the file not found?
I was convinced that there is no way to find COM dependencies of an ActiveX but to my surprise OLEVIEW shows some comments Like:
// TLib : // TLib : OLE Automation : {00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
// TLib : Visual Basic runtime objects and procedures : {EA544A21-C82D-11D1-A3E4-00A0C90AEA82}
importlib("3");
I tried to extract the same information using TypeLibInfoFromFile but based on what I find in MSDN, there is no Api that provides this information. Are you aware of a method to extract this information from OCX or it's Tlb file? Knowing that all my ocxes are compiled with vb6 can I trust this informaion for Imported(Explicitly not in code) interfaces?
Well, I've found the answer to this question. I'll write it here just in case someone would search for the same question. It's possible to find some of dependencies but you can never be sure if you have found them all. Basically you must enumerate every type and interface, and every member of each type to find all types in the module and for every type you find you should check to see if it's in an external TypeLib. in the end you have a List of Typelibs referenced.
The problem with this method lays in the fact you find only the types that are used in the public interface (fields, return values and parameters) and you miss every local object or dynamically created ones. That said you can check this link for an implementation or better yet this one.
I have a VB6 dll that is trying to create a COM object using the following line of code:
Set CreateObj = CreateObject("OPSValuer.OPSValue")
However this fails with the error "Object variable or With block variable not set".
I can see OPSValuer.OPSValue in dcomcnfg and it appears to be registered fine. Does anyone have any ideas about what may be causing the problem?
It's possible that the class you are trying to instantiate is not installed correctly or is missing some dependencies. If you have access to OLE View, you can try instantiating that class outside of VB. If it won't instantiate then you have a bad installation or missing dependency. OLE View ships with Visual Studio, search for OleView.exe on your system.
It was located here on my system: D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\Common7\Tools\Bin
DMKing is right about OleView. Also try looking at the control in Dependency Walker, any missing dependencies should come quickly to the surface.
Since this is a DCom component there also may be something failing in the components constructor, if anything fails in the constructor you will get that error. Is this a local DCom object or something running on another tier?
Instead of CreateObject try instantiating it with a standard New and see if it gives you a different error. Adding the reference itself may help out with determining that error. Is there a reason you are using late binding, rather than early binding?
The error may be thrown within the object initializing routine. That I don't find "OPSValuer.OPSValue" on Google makes me think it is custom code that encounters a bug.
Assuming OPSValuer.OPSValue is a component written in VB, this is probably an error raised in the Class_Initialize event of that component. If you have the source code of the component it should be easy to debug.