I have two tables that share IDs on a postgresql .
I would like to select certain rows from table A, based on condition Y (in table A) AND based on Condition Z in a different table (B) ).
For example:
Table A Table B
ID | type ID | date
0 E 1 01.01.2022
1 F 2 01.01.2022
2 E 3 01.01.2010
3 F
IDs MUST by unique - the same ID can appear only once in each table, and if the same ID is in both tables it means that both are referring to the same object.
Using an SQL query, I would like to find all cases where:
1 - the same ID exists in both tables
2 - type is F
3 - date is after 31.12.2021
And again, only rows from table A will be returned.
So the only returned row should be:1 F
It is a bit hard t understand what problem you are actually facing, as this is very basic SQL.
Use EXISTS:
select *
from a
where type = 'F'
and exists (select null from b where b.id = a.id and dt >= date '2022-01-01');
Or IN:
select *
from a
where type = 'F'
and id in (select id from b where dt >= date '2022-01-01');
Or, as the IDs are unique in both tables, join:
select a.*
from a
join b on b.id = a.id
where a.type = 'F'
and b.dt >= date '2022-01-01';
My favorite here is the IN clause, because you want to select data from table A where conditions are met. So no join needed, just a where clause, and IN is easier to read than EXISTS.
SELECT *
FROM A
WHERE type='F'
AND id IN (
SELECT id
FROM B
WHERE DATE>='2022-01-01'; -- '2022' imo should be enough, need to check
);
I don't think joining is necessary.
Related
I want to compare data of a table with its other records. The count of rows with a specific condition has to match the count of rows without the where clause but on the same grouping.
Below is the table
-------------
id name time status
1 John 10 C
2 Alex 10 R
3 Dan 10 C
4 Tim 11 C
5 Tom 11 C
Output should be time = 11 as the count for grouping on time column is different when a where clause is added on status = 'C'
SELECT q1.time
FROM (SELECT time,
Count(id)
FROM table
GROUP BY time) AS q1
INNER JOIN (SELECT time,
Count(id)
FROM table
WHERE status = 'C'
GROUP BY time) AS q2
ON q1.time = q2.time
WHERE q1.count = q2.count
This is giving the desired output but is there a better and efficient way to get the desired result?
Are you looking for this :
select t.*
from table t
where not exists (select 1 from table t1 where t1.time = t.time and t1.status <> 'C');
However you can do :
select time
from table t
group by time
having sum (case when status <> 'c' then 1 else 0 end ) = 0;
If you want the times where the rows all satisfy the where clause, then in Postgres, you can express this as:
select time
from t
group by time
having count(*) = count(*) filter (where status = 'C');
I have table and I want to find repeating rows for specific time interval (DATE is input parameter for SQL query) where it will list all rows with the same PERSON and TYPE value.
ID DATE PERSON TYPE
1 01.01.2017 PERSON1 TYPE1
2 02.02.2017 PERSON1 TYPE1
3 03.03.2017 PERSON2 TYPE1
4 04.04.2017 PERSON2 TYPE2
5 05.05.2017 PERSON2 TYPE1
6 06.06.2017 PERSON1 TYPE2
So for example if DATE is between 01.01 and 04.04 it should list me rows with ID 1 and 2.
If DATE is between 01.01 and 06.06 it should list me rows with ID 1, 2, 3 and 5 because 1 and 2 have the same person and type in that interval and 3 and 5 have the same person and type in that interval.
SELECT ID FROM TABLE
WHERE DATE>='01.01.2017' AND DATE<='06.06.2017'
but I am not sure even how to start to define this repeating clause based on PERSON and TYPE columns.
Maybe can INNER JOIN help with this if referencing the same table and matching those two columns and third column ID is different?: TABLE.PERSON=TABLE.PERSON and TABLE.TYPE=TABLE.TYPE and TABLE.ID!=TABLE.ID of course table is the same but different alias can be used for this?
Please try...
SELECT ID AS ID
FROM tableName
JOIN
(
SELECT person AS person,
type AS type,
COUNT( person ) AS countOfPair
FROM tableName
WHERE date BETWEEN startDate AND endDate
GROUP BY person,
type
) tempTable ON tableName.person = tempTable.person AND
tableName.type = tempTable.type
WHERE countOfPair >= 2
The inner SELECT gathers each combination of person and type in between your start and end dates (please replace startDate and endDate with however you are referencing those) and performs a count of them.
The outer SELECT statement's JOIN then has the effect of appending the count of each combination to the end of each row containing that combination. The outer SELECT then retrieves the ID from each row that has a repeated combination.
If you have any questions or comments, then please feel free to post a Comment accordingly.
You can try this (I don't know if your version has window analytic function):
(X is the name of your table)
SELECT Y.ID, Y.DATE, Y.PERSON, Y.TYPE
FROM (
SELECT *, COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY PERSON, TYPE) AS RC
FROM X
WHERE DATE >='01.01.2017' AND DATE <='04.04.2017'
) Y
WHERE RC>1
Or this if it doesn't support them:
SELECT X.ID, X.DATE, X.PERSON, X.TYPE
FROM X
INNER JOIN (
SELECT PERSON, TYPE, COUNT(*) AS RC
FROM X
WHERE DATE >='01.01.2017' AND DATE <='04.04.2017'
GROUP BY PERSON, TYPE
) Y ON X.PERSON = Y.PERSON AND X.TYPE = Y.TYPE
WHERE RC>1
I suggest to use always appropriate conversion for date datatypes.
Another method would be:
SELECT a.id
FROM tablename a NATURAL JOIN
(SELECT person,type FROM tablename
WHERE date>='01.01.2017' AND date<='06.06.2017'
GROUP BY person, type HAVING COUNT(*)>1) b ;
The NATURAL JOIN would automatically use columns person and type.
Add "DISTINCT" clause to avoid redundancy
SELECT DISTINCT ID FROM TABLE
WHERE DATE>='01.01.2017' AND DATE<='06.06.2017'
Fair warning: I'm new to using SQL. I do so on an Oracle server either via AQT or with SQL Developer.
As I haven't been able to think or search my way to an answer, I put myself in your able hands...
I'd like to combine data from table A (high quality data) with data from table B (fresh data) such that the entries from B are only included when the date stamp are later than those available from table A.
Both tables include entries from multiple entities, and the latest date stamp varies with those entities.
On the 4th of january, the tables may look something like:
A____________________________ B_____________________________
entity date type value entity date type value
X 1.jan 1 1 X 1.jan 1 2
X 1.jan 0 1 X 1.jan 0 2
X 2.jan 1 1 X 2.jan 1 2
Y 1.jan 1 1 (new entry)X 3.jan 1 1
Y 3.jan 1 1 Y 1.jan 1 2
Y 3.jan 1 2
(new entry)Y 4.jan 1 1
I have made an attempt at some code that I hope clarify my need:
WITH
AA AS
(SELECT entity, date, SUM(value)
FROM table_A
GROUP BY
entity,
date),
BB AS
(SELECT entity, date, SUM(value)
FROM table_B
WHERE date > ALL (SELECT date FROM AA)
GROUP BY
entity,
date
)
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM AA UNION ALL SELECT * FROM BB)
Now, if the WHERE date > ALL (SELECT date FROM AA)would work seperately for each entity, I think have what I need.
That is, for each entity I want all entries from A, and only newer entries from B.
As the data in table A often differ from that of B (values are often corrected) I dont think I can use something like: table A UNION ALL (table B MINUS table A)?
Thanks
Essentially you are looking for entries in BB which do not exist in AA. When you are doing date > ALL (SELECT date FROM AA) this will not take into consideration the entity in question and you will not get the correct records.
Alternative is to use the JOIN and filter out all matching entries with AA.
Something like below.
WITH
AA AS
(SELECT entity, date, SUM(value)
FROM table_A
GROUP BY
entity,
date),
BB AS
(SELECT entity, date, SUM(value)
FROM table_B
LEFT OUTER JOIN AA
ON AA.entity = BB.entity
AND AA.DATE = BB.date
WHERE AA.date == null
GROUP BY
entity,
date
)
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM AA UNION ALL SELECT * FROM BB)
I find your question confusing, because I don't know where the aggregation is coming from.
The basic idea on getting newer rows from table_b uses conditions in the where clause, something like this:
select . . .
from table_a a
union all
select . . .
from table_b b
where b.date > (select max(a.date) from a where a.entity = b.entity);
You can, of course, run this on your CTEs, if those are what you really want to combine.
Use UNION instead of UNION ALL , it will remove the duplicate records
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT *
FROM AA
UNION
SELECT *
FROM BB )
It is possible in SQL (ORACLE) to select all entry from a table where an atribute equals an parameter and if not select all the others entries?
like in this example:
COD | Name
1 | Monday
2 | Thursday
3 | Saturday
parameter=3
when cod equals parameter(cod=3) return entry of cod parameter(cod=3) (including cod and name)
else
return all others entries different from parameter(cod=3) (including cod and name) (like 1 Monday and 2 Thursday)
Is it possible with SQL (oracle), or i need something like PLSQL?
I'd use a correlated query and a non-correlated query:
SELECT COD, NAME
FROM TABLE a
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM TABLE b WHERE b.COD = a.COD AND b.COD = 3)
OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM TABLE c WHERE c.COD = 3)
I'm not sure if I'm following your logic, entirely, however.
And, actually, in cases where it's all from one table it can be simplified to just:
SELECT COD, NAME
FROM TABLE a
WHERE a.COD = 3
OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM TABLE c WHERE c.COD = 3)
IF EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM TABLE WHERE COD=3)
THEN
SELECT COD, NAME FROM TABLE WHERE COD=3
ELSE
SELECT COD, NAME FROM TABLE
END IF
In Oracle SQL Developer, how do I compare three tables where A + B = C table? I have to validate if all the data of A and B is converted into C. Also table A is in a different database from B and C, which are in the same database.
Let me assume that the different databases have one column, an id. You could use full outer join for this, assuming it is never NULL. However, this is probably easier using union all and aggregation.
You can get a list of ids that differ using the following query:
select id, sum(inab) as inab, sum(inc) as inc
from ((select id, 1 as inab, 0 as inc
from a
) union all
(select id, 1 as inab, 0 as inc
from b
) union all
(select id, 0 as inab, 1 as inc
from c
)
) c
group by id
having sum(inab) <> 1 or sum(inc) <> 1;
In practice, you would probably have multiple columns. Note: if there are duplicates in A+B or C, this just guarantees that the duplicate appears in both (rather than in both with the same count).