I have a table where the most important information is that it is auto-incremented, the rest of the fields in the database are not relevant. Before inserting the data into the table, I created a "helper" table to store the newly created IDs in this table.
I have a second table like this - also the most important information is that the ID is auto-incremented, and the other data is not relevant to this example. In this case, I have also created an auxiliary table that stores the newly created ID values from this table.
Now I would like to take the values from auxiliary table 1 and 2 and insert them into a third table that will take the smallest ID from auxiliary table 1 and the smallest ID from auxiliary table 2 and insert them as a record into this third table, for example:
Record ID of third table | Smallest ID from first table | Smallest ID from third table.
I have no idea how to build the query constructs in my case - could someone give me some advice, or ready-made (different) code to follow?
My code:
DECLARE #inserted1 TABLE (contact_id udt_id)
INSERT INTO t_usr_contact (contact_firstname, contact_lastname)
OUTPUT INSERTED.contact_id INTO #inserted1(contact_id)
SELECT
'Firma',
'Temporary_value'
FROM t_sup_supplier AS sup
WHERE sup.sup_id IN (175,176) AND sup.grp_id IS null
DECLARE #inserted2 TABLE (grp_id udt_id)
INSERT INTO t_usr_group (grp_label_en)
OUTPUT INSERTED.grp_id INTO #inserted2(grp_id)
SELECT
'Supplier contact'
FROM t_sup_supplier AS sup2
WHERE sup2.sup_id IN (175,176) AND sup2.grp_id IS null
INSERT INTO t_usr_contact_group (grp_id, contact_id)
I would like to go the easiest way, which is as below, but it doesnt work :/.
VALUES (#inserted2.grp_id, #inserted2.contact_id)
As for the data example, after the insert in the first table I will get the following records and in the auxiliary table number 1 I will get the following records:
**Table t_usr_contact:**
175 - Firma - Temporary_value
176 - Firma - Temporary_value
**Table #inserted1:**
175
176
**Table t_usr_group:**
201 - Supplier_contact
202 - Supplier_contact
**Table #inserted2:**
201
202
**Table t_usr_contact_group:**
201 - 175
202 - 176
I've got no idea what you're ultimately trying to do, but if you want two tables each with N rows to become one table made from the columns of the two input tables, like you've got in your example (where your table of 175,176 and your table of 201,202 shall become a table of 175|201,176|202) then you need to join them. To join them you need a key. You haven't got a key so you'll have to fake one:
INSERT INTO thirdtable
SELECT contact_id,grp_id
FROM
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY contact_id) as FakeKey FROM #inserted1) x
INNER JOIN
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY grp_id) as FakeKey FROM #inserted2) x
ON x.FakeKey = y.FakeKey
This, of course, joins the data in a very arbitrary fashion based on the order of the assigned IDs. If you want some specific order, like contact 175 exists first and has to get group 202, then you can make the query that inserts the group (eg 202) based on the input 175 output the 175 and the 202 together into a (temp) common table then split it into the detail and middleman tables after
Related
I'm creating a new table using PostgreSQL, but I need to get a parameter from another table as an input.
This is the table I have (I called table_1):
id column_1
1 100
2 100
3 100
4 100
5 100
I want to create a new table, but only using ids that are higher than the highest id from the table above (table_1). Something like this:
insert into table_new
select id, column_1 from table_old
where id > (max(id) from table_1)
How can I do this? I tried searching, but I got to several posts like https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/M-Query-Create-a-table-using-input-from-another-table/td-p/209923, Take one table as input and output using another table BigQuery and sql query needs input from another table, which are not exactly what I need.
Just use where id > (select max(id) from table_1).
I would like to create a product table. This product has unique part numbers. However, each part number has various number of previous part numbers, and various number of machines where the part can be used.
For example the description for part no: AA1007
Previous part no's: AA1001, AA1002, AA1004, AA1005,...
Machine brand: Bosch, Indesit, Samsun, HotPoint, Sharp,...
Machine Brand Models: Bosch A1, Bosch A2, Bosch A3, Indesit A1, Indesit A2,....
I would like to create a table for this, but I am not sure how to proceed. What I have been able to think is to create a table for Previous Part no, Machine Brand, Machine Brand Models individually.
Question: what is the proper way to design these tables?
There are of course various ways to design the tables. A very basic way would be:
You could create tables like below. I added the columns ValidFrom and ValidTill, to identify at which time a part was active/in use.
It depends on your data, if datatype date is enough, or you need datetime to make it more exactly.
CREATE TABLE Parts
(
ID bigint NOT NULL
,PartNo varchar(100)
,PartName varchar(100)
,ValidFrom date
,ValidTill date
)
CREATE TABLE Brands
(
ID bigint NOT NULL
,Brand varchar(100)
)
CREATE TABLE Models
(
ID bigint NOT NULL
,BrandsID bigint NOT NULL
,ModelName varchar(100)
)
CREATE TABLE ModelParts
(
ModelsID bigint NOT NULL
,PartID bigint NOT NULL
)
Fill your data like:
INSERT INTO Parts VALUES
(1,'AA1007', 'Screw HyperFuturistic', '2017-08-09', '9999-12-31'),
(1,'AA1001', 'Screw Iron', '1800-01-01', '1918-06-30'),
(1,'AA1002', 'Screw Steel', '1918-07-01', '1945-05-08'),
(1,'AA1004', 'Screw Titanium', '1945-05-09', '1983-10-05'),
(1,'AA1005', 'Screw Futurium', '1983-10-06', '2017-08-08')
INSERT INTO Brands VALUES
(1,'Bosch'),
(2,'Indesit'),
(3,'Samsung'),
(4,'HotPoint'),
(5,'Sharp')
INSERT INTO Models VALUES
(1,1,'A1'),
(2,1,'A2'),
(3,1,'A3'),
(4,2,'A1'),
(5,2,'A2')
INSERT INTO ModelParts VALUES
(1,1)
To select all parts of a certain date (in this case 2013-03-03) of the "Bosch A1":
DECLARE #ReportingDate date = '2013-03-03'
SELECT B.Brand
,M.ModelName
,P.PartNo
,P.PartName
,P.ValidFrom
,P.ValidTill
FROM Brands B
INNER JOIN Models M
ON M.BrandsID = B.ID
INNER JOIN ModelParts MP
ON MP.ModelsID = M.ID
INNER JOIN Parts P
ON P.ID = MP.PartID
WHERE B.Brand = 'Bosch'
AND M.ModelName = 'A1'
AND P.ValidFrom <= #ReportingDate
AND P.ValidTill >= #ReportingDate
Of course there a several ways to do an historization of data.
ValidFrom and ValidTill (ValidTo) is one of my favourites, as you can easily do historical reports.
Unfortunately you have to handle the historization: When inserting a new row - in example for your screw - you have to "close" the old record by setting the ValidTill column before inserting the new one. Furthermore you have to develop logic to handle deletes...
Well, thats a quite large topic. You will find tons of information in the world wide web.
For the part number table, you can consider the following suggestion:
id | part_no | time_created
1 | AA1007 | 2017-08-08
1 | AA1001 | 2017-07-01
1 | AA1002 | 2017-06-10
1 | AA1004 | 2017-03-15
1 | AA1005 | 2017-01-30
In other words, you can add a datetime column which versions each part number. Note that I added a primary key id column here, which is invariant over time and keeps track of each part, despite that the part number may change.
For time independent queries, you would join this table using the id column. However, the part number might also serve as a foreign key. Off the top of my head, if you were generating an invoice from a previous date, you might lookup the appropriate part number at that time, and then join out to one or more tables using that part number.
For the other tables you mentioned, I do not see a similar requirement.
EDIT: I'm using the PROC SQL functionality in SAS.
I'm trying to overwrite data in a primary table with data in a secondary table if two IDs match. Basically, there is a process modifying certain values associated with various IDs, and after that process is done I want to update the values associated with those IDs in the primary table. For a very simplified example:
Primary table:
PROD_ID PRICE IN_STOCK
1 5.25 17
2 10.24 200 [...additional fields...]
3 6.42 140
...
Secondary table:
PROD_ID PRICE IN_STOCK
2 11.50 175
3 6.42 130
And I'm trying to get the new Primary table to look like this:
PROD_ID PRICE IN_STOCK
1 5.25 17
2 11.50 175 [...additional fields...]
3 6.42 130
...
So it overwrites certain columns in the primary table if the keys match.
In non-working SQL code, what I'm trying to do is something like this:
INSERT INTO PRIMARY_TABLE (PRICE, IN_STOCK)
SELECT PRICE, IN_STOCK
FROM SECONDARY_TABLE
WHERE SECONDARY_TABLE.PROD_ID = PRIMARY_TABLE.PROD_ID
Is this possible to do in one statement like this, or will I have to figure out some workaround using temporary tables (which is something I'm trying to avoid)?
EDIT: None of the current answers seem to be working, although it's probably my fault - I'm using PROC SQL in SAS and didn't specify, so is it possible some of the functionality is missing? For example, the "FROM" keyword doesn't turn blue when using UPDATE, and throws errors when trying to run it, but the UPDATE and SET seem fine...
Do you really want to insert new data? Or update existing rows? If updating, join the tables:
UPDATE PT
SET
PT.PRICE = ST.PRICE,
PT.IN_STOCK = ST.IN_STOCK
FROM
PRIMARY_TABLE PT JOIN SECONDARY_TABLE ST ON PT.PROD_ID = ST.PROD_ID
One answer in SAS PROC SQL is simply to do it as a left join and use COALESCE, which picks the first nonmissing value:
data class;
set sashelp.class;
run;
data class_updates;
input name $ height weight;
datalines;
Alfred 70 150
Alice 59 92
Henry 65 115
Judy 66 95
;;;;
run;
proc sql;
create table class as select C.name, coalesce(U.height,C.height) as height, coalesce(U.weight,C.weight) as weight
from class C
left join class_updates U
on C.name=U.name;
quit;
In this case though the SAS solution outside of SQL is superior in terms of simplicity of coding.
data class;
update class class_updates(in=u);
by name;
run;
This does require both tables to be sorted. There are a host of different ways of doing this (hash table, format lookup, etc.) if you have performance needs.
Try this:
INSERT INTO PRIMARY_TABLE (PRICE, IN_STOCK) VALUES
(SELECT PRICE, IN_STOCK
FROM SECONDARY_TABLE
JOIN PRIMARY_TABLE ON SECONDARY_TABLE.PROD_ID = PRIMARY_TABLE.PROD_ID)
The only reason you would have to use an INSERT statement is if there are IDs present in the secondary table and not present in the primary table. If this is not the case then use a regular UPDATE statement. If it is the case then use the following:
INSERT INTO PRIMARY_TABLE (ID, PRICE, IN_STOCK)
SELECT ID, PRICE, IN_STOCK
FROM SECONDARY_TABLE s
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE PRICE = s.PRICE, IN_STOCK = s.IN_STOCK
I have 2 sql tables
first table called processed
relatedorders (type in nvarchar)
132,112,144,155
116,113
11,44,15,16
and second table called orders and looks like
orderid (type int)
132
112
155
116
I want to select orderid from orders table where the orderid exists in relatedorders in processed table
I tried somthing like
SELECT *
FROM orders
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT relatedorders
from processed
where orders.orderid like %relatedorders %)
but it doesn't seem to work as it should, what am I doing wrong?
The proper way to model this is with a one-to-many relationship through a join table. Add another table, perhaps called ProcessedRelatedOrders containing the id of an order and the id of a related order, one row per relationship. You will likely want. Use both columns as the primary key. The index on the primary key should allow fast look up for a join with the processed order.
The outline of the tables in question are as follows:
I have a table, lets call it join, that has two columns, both foreign keys to other tables. Let's call the two columns userid and buildingid so join looks like
+--------------+
| join |
|--------------|
|userid |
|buildingid |
+--------------+
I basically need to insert a bunch of rows into this table. Each user will be assigned to multiple buildings by having multiple entries in this table. So user 13 might be assigned to buildings 1, 2, and 3 by the following
13 1
13 2
13 3
I'm trying to figure out how to do this in a query if the building numbers are constant, that is, I'm assigning a group of people to the same buildings. Basically, (this is wrong) I want to do
insert into join (userid, buildingid) values ((select userid from users), 1)
Does that make sense? I've also tried using
select 1
The error I'm running into is that the subquery returns more than one result. I also attempted to create a join, basically with a static select query that was also unsuccessful.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Chris
Almost! When you want to insert to values of a query, don't try to put them in the values clause. insert can take a select as an argument for the values!
insert into join (userid, buildingid)
select userid, 1 from users
Also, in the spirit of learning more, you can create a table that doesn't exist by using the following syntax:
select userid, 1 as buildingid
into join
from users
That only works if the table doesn't exist, though, but it's a quick and dirty way to create table copies!