{
"data":{
"type":"flight-order",
"id":"eJzTd9cPijL1Cg8FAAuUAn0%3D",
"associatedRecords":[
{
"reference":"RZ5JWU",
"creationDate":"2022-01-13T05:40:00.000",
"originSystemCode":"GDS",
"flightOfferId":"1"
}
],
"flightOffers":[
{
"type":"flight-offer",
"id":"1",
"source":"GDS",
"nonHomogeneous":false,
"lastTicketingDate":"2022-03-31",
"itineraries":[
{
"segments":[
{
"departure":{
"iataCode":"ISB",
"at":"2022-03-30T01:40:00"
},
"arrival":{
"iataCode":"DXB",
"terminal":"1",
"at":"2022-03-31T03:55:00"
},
"carrierCode":"PK",
"number":"233",
"aircraft":{
"code":"320"
},
"operating":{
},
"id":"1",
"numberOfStops":0,
"co2Emissions":[
{
"weight":141,
"weightUnit":"KG",
"cabin":"ECONOMY"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"price":{
"currency":"PKR",
"total":"25235.00",
"base":"15190.00",
"fees":[
{
"amount":"0.00",
"type":"TICKETING"
},
{
"amount":"0.00",
"type":"SUPPLIER"
},
{
"amount":"0.00",
"type":"FORM_OF_PAYMENT"
}
],
"grandTotal":"25234.00",
"billingCurrency":"PKR"
},
"pricingOptions":{
"fareType":[
"PUBLISHED"
],
"includedCheckedBagsOnly":true
},
"validatingAirlineCodes":[
"PK"
],
"travelerPricings":[
{
"travelerId":"1",
"fareOption":"STANDARD",
"travelerType":"ADULT",
"price":{
"currency":"PKR",
"total":"25234.00",
"base":"15190.00",
"taxes":[
{
"amount":"5000.00",
"code":"RG"
},
{
"amount":"2000.00",
"code":"SP"
},
{
"amount":"2800.00",
"code":"YD"
},
{
"amount":"244.00",
"code":"ZR"
}
],
"refundableTaxes":"10044.00"
},
"fareDetailsBySegment":[
{
"segmentId":"1",
"cabin":"ECONOMY",
"fareBasis":"VLOWPK",
"class":"V",
"includedCheckedBags":{
"weight":30,
"weightUnit":"KG"
}
}
]
}
]
}
],
"travelers":[
{
"id":"1",
"dateOfBirth":"2003-01-03",
"gender":"FEMALE",
"name":{
"firstName":"Fakhar",
"lastName":"Khan"
},
"documents":[
{
"number":"AG324234234",
"issuanceDate":"2015-01-17",
"expiryDate":"2025-01-17",
"issuanceCountry":"PK",
"issuanceLocation":"Pakistan",
"nationality":"PK",
"documentType":"PASSPORT",
"holder":true
}
],
"contact":{
"purpose":"STANDARD",
"phones":[
{
"deviceType":"MOBILE",
"countryCallingCode":"92",
"number":"3452345678"
}
],
"emailAddress":"hamidafridi.droidor#gmail.com"
}
}
],
"remarks":{
"general":[
{
"subType":"GENERAL_MISCELLANEOUS",
"text":"ONLINE BOOKING FROM INCREIBLE VIAJES"
}
]
},
"ticketingAgreement":{
"option":"DELAY_TO_CANCEL",
"delay":"6D"
},
"contacts":[
{
"addresseeName":{
"firstName":"PABLO RODRIGUEZ"
},
"address":{
"lines":[
"Calle Prado, 16"
],
"postalCode":"28014",
"countryCode":"ES",
"cityName":"Madrid"
},
"purpose":"STANDARD",
"phones":[
{
"deviceType":"LANDLINE",
"countryCallingCode":"34",
"number":"480080071"
},
{
"deviceType":"MOBILE",
"countryCallingCode":"33",
"number":"480080072"
}
],
"companyName":"INCREIBLE VIAJES",
"emailAddress":"support#increibleviajes.es"
}
]
},
"dictionaries":{
"locations":{
"ISB":{
"cityCode":"ISB",
"countryCode":"PK"
},
"DXB":{
"cityCode":"DXB",
"countryCode":"AE"
}
}
}
}
I request for create-order then returned #PNR and now want to issue ticket. #Amadeus
As of now, this Flight Create Orders API allows you to book a flight and generate a PNR, but it does not allow for ticketing. Therefore, one of the requirements in order to use the API in production is to sign a contract with an airline consolidator to issue tickets.
Please check the requirements on the API page. If you want help to find a consolidator get in touch with us via the support channel and we can recommend you one.
Related
Customer appointments with top level locationId sample data set:
[
{
"locationId": 9999,
"customerAppointments": [
{
"customerId": "1",
"appointments": [
{
"appointmentId": "cbbce566-da59-42c2-8845-53976ba63d56",
"locationName": "Sullivan St"
},
{
"appointmentId": "5f09e2af-ddae-47aa-9f7c-fd1001a9c5e6",
"locationName": "Oak St"
}
]
},
{
"customerId": "2",
"appointments": [
{
"appointmentId": "964a3c1c-ccec-4082-99e2-65795352ba79",
"locationName": "Kellet St"
}
]
},
{
"customerId": "3",
"appointments": []
}
]
},
{
...
},
{
...
}
]
I need to pull out appointment by locationId and customerId and only get the appointment for that customerId e.g
Sample response:
[
{
"appointmentId": "964a3c1c-ccec-4082-99e2-65795352ba79",
"locationName": "Kellet St"
}
]
Tried below query, but it just returns all records for all customers ids (which is kind of expected):
db.getCollection("appointments").find(
{
"locationId" : NumberInt(9999),
"customerAppointments" : {
"$elemMatch" : {
"customerId" : "2"
}
}
}
);
But how can I get just the appointment record for a specific customerId?
When asking this question I was unaware of the older version of MongoDB driver (< v5) so we cannot use the $getField operator.
However, this query seems to work well:
db.getCollection("appointments").aggregate([
{
$match: {
"locationId": NumberInt(9999)
}
},
{
$unwind: "$customerAppointments"
},
{
$match: {
"customerAppointments.customerId": "2"
}
},
{
$project: {
appointments: "$customerAppointments.appointments"
}
}
]);
Yields:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("63eebe95c7a0da54804c1db2"),
"appointments" : [
{
"appointmentId" : "964a3c1c-ccec-4082-99e2-65795352ba79",
"locationName" : "Kellet St"
}
]
}
Usually, tronGrid returns blocks with transactions, but as I found today, it's not behaving as needed.
How it works right now:
{
"blockID": "0000000001b16eb8b97ab73b7dc8f161c5f2f786f0937bfed7886baa33926c84",
"block_header": {
"raw_data": {
"number": 28405432,
"txTrieRoot": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"witness_address": "41f16412b9a17ee9408646e2a21e16478f72ed1e95",
"parentHash": "0000000001b16eb7a6f39a1523f35db8b4089d5a03f591958beafd139e0949d5",
"version": 24,
"timestamp": 1666102851000
},
"witness_signature": "60c7b8b964f103072b7e0fd33b5df636ef4e06d95bb113184ef3266b691b2cf517091960aba72dcd8d5a1ee40374f2124256ddad445429897b066332964ef8d500"
}
}
And how it works before:
{
"blockID": "0000000001b15f18976aee56ff9490303ec64c2007d6034ca03a7a2caefdab73",
"block_header": {
"raw_data": {
"number": 28401432,
"txTrieRoot": "167b9b1620d76e9855d426453ea726a709582f4ed711701ee22fe730bae3f8d8",
"witness_address": "41cd8d8ad1b4a5bd7afe46949421d2b411a3601717",
"parentHash": "0000000001b15f175dc2a20b8c3b29bbbb50860dc57d54d44eff4b02edf849e6",
"version": 24,
"timestamp": 1666089210000
},
"witness_signature": "b9239d12b2044b1bdfa631115f3c7b9b1c1fc5d37c482809d2c7846d05ab84d61778910a55501f4702fe653b943b22b9270b33151ec15e35aa500388dac0abda01"
},
"transactions": [
{
"ret": [
{
"contractRet": "SUCCESS"
}
],
"signature": [
"56a427e32fc0267a2e469ef85530c3145c7de423c8f20d7e11d85dbff98701bdd599d5a45b58ab4f7fa7f212c2ee3cbb5daa50541a83f67dbff533b7e185331501"
],
"txID": "5fd2335105f68de47b82fe3f8065cb3d1cc8ab437aaee55a5d4e61624113730b",
"raw_data": {
...
},
"raw_data_hex": "0a025f0522084cf822e1795ff17f40a7e6a2d5be305a67080112630a2d747970652e676f6f676c65617069732e636f6d2f70726f746f636f6c2e5472616e73666572436f6e747261637412320a1541989cc89d2df684c69bed3563c0cd8817be0a11e1121541bc0777bd8f50e5e148ef59bdce2b895b754c452e1888890a70c7919fd5be30"
}
]
}
Is there a new feature, or it's a bug?
I created an envelope using Docusign API with status as sent and I had two signers in it. But when I actually checked in the account - there is one extra signer with the same name added along with the other signers in the envelope.Envelope Screen
I also checked the same while calling the recipients API and here also it had 3 signers and the extra one had status as created. Recipient API response But I referred doc it said created recipients are only for Envelope who is in Draft state. so how can the signer of status sent and created be added together?
Not sure how this extra signer got added. Any inputs will be appreciated.
my json request to generate envelope Id
{
"status":"Sent",
"emailSubject":"Your Amboy Documents",
"emailBlurb":"Please sign the Disclosures",
"compositeTemplates":[
{
"serverTemplates":[
{
"templateId":"1b890a65-ce07-40a7-9086-3be315de6f4f",
"sequence":"1"
}
],
"inlineTemplates":[
{
"sequence":"1",
"recipients":{
"signers":[
{
"tabs":{
"textTabs":[
{
"value":"laptop services",
"tabLabel":"Party_Business_ENTName"
}
],
"checkboxTabs":[
{
"value":"X",
"tabLabel":"App_1_BT_CORP",
"selected":"true"
}
]
},
"roleName":"Signer 1",
"recipientId":"2",
"partyId":"a0uR00000043CfMIAU",
"name":"rafeeq khan",
"emailNotification":null,
"email":"kshama.vaidya#terafinainc.com",
"clientUserId":"2"
},
{
"tabs":{
"textTabs":[
{
"value":"laptop services",
"tabLabel":"Party_Business_ENTName"
}
],
"checkboxTabs":[
{
"value":"X",
"tabLabel":"App_1_BT_CORP",
"selected":"true"
}
]
},
"roleName":"Signer 2",
"recipientId":"3",
"partyId":"a0uR00000043CiRIAU",
"name":"Imam khan",
"emailNotification":null,
"email":"kshama.vaidya#terafinainc.com",
"clientUserId":"3"
}
],
"carbonCopies":[
]
}
}
]
},
{
"serverTemplates":[
{
"templateId":"0b69b96b-6746-470c-9032-06bff16d98e2",
"sequence":"2"
}
],
"inlineTemplates":[
{
"sequence":"2",
"recipients":{
"signers":[
{
"tabs":{
"textTabs":[
{
"value":"rafeeq khan",
"tabLabel":"Party_1_Name"
}
],
"checkboxTabs":[
]
},
"roleName":"Signer 600",
"recipientId":"2",
"partyId":"a0uR00000043CfMIAU",
"name":"rafeeq khan",
"emailNotification":null,
"email":"kshama.vaidya#terafinainc.com",
"clientUserId":"2"
}
],
"carbonCopies":[
]
}
}
]
},
{
"serverTemplates":[
{
"templateId":"0e3fc453-a721-46bb-837d-7b5408e4384b",
"sequence":"3"
}
],
"inlineTemplates":[
{
"sequence":"3",
"recipients":{
"signers":[
{
"tabs":{
"textTabs":[
{
"value":"rafeeq khan",
"tabLabel":"Party_1_Name"
}
],
"checkboxTabs":[
]
},
"roleName":"Signer 1",
"recipientId":"2",
"partyId":"a0uR00000043CfMIAU",
"name":"rafeeq khan",
"emailNotification":null,
"email":"kshama.vaidya#terafinainc.com",
"clientUserId":"2"
},
{
"tabs":{
"textTabs":[
{
"value":"rafeeq khan",
"tabLabel":"Party_1_Name"
}
],
"checkboxTabs":[
]
},
"roleName":"Signer 2",
"recipientId":"3",
"partyId":"a0uR00000043CiRIAU",
"name":"Imam khan",
"emailNotification":null,
"email":"kshama.vaidya#terafinainc.com",
"clientUserId":"3"
}
],
"carbonCopies":[
]
}
}
]
}
],
"accountId":"11931216"
}
I have an incoming CSV file that looks like this (notice that the first field is common - this is the order number)
36319602,100,12458,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319602,101,12459,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319602,102,12457,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319601,110,12458,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319601,111,12459,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319601,112,12457,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319603,110,12458,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319603,121,12459,HARVEY NORMAN,
36319603,132,12457,HARVEY NORMAN,
This is my current Dataweave code
list_of_orders: {
order: payload map ((payload01 , indexOfPayload01) -> {
order_dtl:
[{
seq_nbr: payload01[1],
route_nbr: payload01[2]
}],
order_hdr: {
ord_nbr: payload01[0],
company: payload01[3],
city: payload01[4],
}
})
}
An example of the desired output would be something like this ... (this is just mocked up). Notice how I would like a single header grouped by the first column which is the order number - but with multiple detail lines
"list_of_orders": {
"order": [
{
"order_dtl": [
{
seq_nbr: 100,
route_nbr: 12458
},
{
seq_nbr: 101,
route_nbr: 12459
},
{
seq_nbr: 102,
route_nbr: 12457
}
],
"order_hdr":
{
ord_nbr: 36319602,
company: HARVEY NORMAN
}
}
]
}
It works fine except that it is repeating the order_hdr key.
What they would like is a single header key with multiple details beneath.
The grouping is to be based on "ord_nbr: payload01[0]"
Any help appreciated
Thanks
I think you're using Dataweave 1. In dw1, this groupBy gets the desired output(Note you can change the field pointers [0],1 etc to field name mappings if you have them set up as metadata etc):
%dw 1.0
%output application/json
---
list_of_orders: {
order: (payload groupBy ($[0])) map {
order_dtl: $ map {
seq_nbr: $[1],
route_nbr: $[2]
},
order_hdr:
{
ord_nbr: $[0][0],
company: $[0][3]
}
}}
UPDATE
Here is the output for the new input sample with multiple orders:
{
"list_of_orders": {
"order": [
{
"order_dtl": [
{
"seq_nbr": "110",
"route_nbr": "12458"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "121",
"route_nbr": "12459"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "132",
"route_nbr": "12457"
}
],
"order_hdr": {
"ord_nbr": "36319603",
"company": "HARVEY NORMAN"
}
},
{
"order_dtl": [
{
"seq_nbr": "100",
"route_nbr": "12458"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "101",
"route_nbr": "12459"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "102",
"route_nbr": "12457"
}
],
"order_hdr": {
"ord_nbr": "36319602",
"company": "HARVEY NORMAN"
}
},
{
"order_dtl": [
{
"seq_nbr": "110",
"route_nbr": "12458"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "111",
"route_nbr": "12459"
},
{
"seq_nbr": "112",
"route_nbr": "12457"
}
],
"order_hdr": {
"ord_nbr": "36319601",
"company": "HARVEY NORMAN"
}
}
]
}
}
ODL version: Carbon
I'm having a problem with getting BGP-LS into the Network Topology. As you can see from below REST output, I set up "bgp-example" and homed to an external eBGP linkstate peer. "effective-rib-in", "adj-rib-in", and "adj-rib-out" all populate - but "loc-rib" does not. For some reason, it is not inheriting the linkstate afi/safi.
I tried debugs for bgp & karaf but saw nothing out of the ordinary (that I could see) - any help would be much appreciated.
thanks
Erik
*bgp configuration
http://192.168.3.42:8181/restconf/config/openconfig-network-instance:network-instances/network-instance/global-bgp/protocols/protocol/openconfig-policy-types:BGP/bgp-example
{
"protocol": [
{
"name": "bgp-example",
"identifier": "openconfig-policy-types:BGP",
"bgp-openconfig-extensions:bgp": {
"global": {
"config": {
"router-id": "192.168.3.42",
"as": 65000
}
},
"neighbors": {
"neighbor": [
{
"neighbor-address": "192.168.3.41",
"config": {
"peer-type": "EXTERNAL",
"peer-as": 65111
},
"afi-safis": {
"afi-safi": [
{
"afi-safi-name": "bgp-openconfig-extensions:LINKSTATE"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
*loc-rib empty
http://192.168.3.42:8181/restconf/operational/bgp-rib:bgp-rib/rib/bgp-example/loc-rib
{
"loc-rib": {
"tables": [
{
"afi": "bgp-types:ipv4-address-family",
"safi": "bgp-types:unicast-subsequent-address-family",
"bgp-inet:ipv4-routes": {}
}
]
}
}
as you can see, linkstate is making it into every rib, except loc-rib
http://192.168.3.42:8181/restconf/operational/bgp-rib:bgp-rib/rib/bgp-example
{
"rib": [
{
"id": "bgp-example",
"peer": [
{
"peer-id": "bgp://x.x.x.x",
"supported-tables": [
{
"afi": "bgp-types:ipv4-address-family",
"safi": "bgp-types:unicast-subsequent-address-family"
},
{
"afi": "bgp-linkstate:linkstate-address-family",
"safi": "bgp-linkstate:linkstate-subsequent-address-family"
}
],
"effective-rib-in": {
"tables": [
{
"afi": "bgp-linkstate:linkstate-address-family",
"safi": "bgp-linkstate:linkstate-subsequent-address-family",
"bgp-linkstate:linkstate-routes": {
"linkstate-route": [
{
"route-key": "AAMAMAIAAAAAAAAFMgEAABoCAAAEAAD+VwIBAAQAAAAAAgMABgEAFQmQAAEJAAUgCv0YAQ==",
"identifier": 1330,
"advertising-node-descriptors": {
"as-number": 65111,
"domain-id": 0,
"isis-node": {
"iso-system-id": "AQAVCZAA"
}
},
"prefix-descriptors": {
"ip-reachability-information": "x.x.x.x/32"
},
"attributes": {
"origin": {
"value": "igp"
},
"ipv4-next-hop": {
"global": "x.x.x.x"
},
"as-path": {
"segments": [
{
"as-sequence": [
65111
]
}
]
}
},
"protocol-id": "isis-level2"
}
}
rest of output truncated for brevity/readability
OK, figured this out.... turns out I had not enabled LINKSTATE afi/safi in the global config for ODL BGP. I had to DELETE my existing global config, then POST, add neighbors, peers, etc. Now I have the linkstate DB in the loc-rib, AND it's made it to the network topology - BUT - no idea how to view this topology via DLUX....