I think I did some stupid thing by creating random data using some command dd if=/dev/urandom of=20GB.bin bs=1GB count=16 iflag=fullblock
in huge size. Actually I was testing the behaviors of something when disk is full.
However Now I wish to delete this. I deleted the dev/urandom folder hoping it will do something, but it seems nothing was deleted without making any difference.
I see some commands online like wipe and shred, However now my dev/urandom folder is deleted, so what exactly should I do now ?
Any kind of help will be great.
you saved the random numbers to 20GB.bin thus you can do rm 20GB.bin to remove it. /dev/urandom is a special file bound to a tool and does not save random files, but just creates them on the fly. Some other tools might depend on /dev/urandom so deleting this device file might let them crash.
Related
Recently, I've been trying to write to a .PAK file while it is being used by another process in ring 0. This has been a problem for quite a while and i haven't had much success. I am able to use any programming language necessary to accomplish this, but C#/VB.net is preferred. I originally wanted to use a find and replace system when editing, but I will just choose and offset to write to and such instead.
No, I can't just terminate the process then edit; the process must be running. Yes, I obviously know the process with the file handle attached.
No, I can't just run as admin because the process is established in ring 0/the kernel.
I've tried multiple methods including setting the process speed temporarily to 0 to edit then revert, and changing the FileShare and other parameters, none with any success.
One approach which I have been told a lot and which I have no experience in is creating a "Kernel Driver". I'm not sure how to go about this and I cant find much info online so if you think that's is the best method please inform me on how to get started. Any help is appreciated!
Always create a temporary file (a copy of your original file). If you need to process a file within your codes, create a temp file, use the temp file and process that file. So if you need another process, there will be no problem.
IntelliJ has a "safe write" option (quotes theirs, for some reason) which, on save, instead of simply updating the file, writes to a temporary file, then deletes the original, then renames the temporary file to the original's name. I hear that vim also does this.
I know this causes problems with programs that are watching the file. Sometimes such programs see the delete, but never see the update, for example.
But what advantages are there? IntelliJ's docs say that there are advantages that would be lost if you turned it off. There must be some reason this option is the default.
It took me a looong time to figure out this was how intellij operated and that it was causing some chronic issues I was facing, and took me even longer to figure out it was an option I could turn off. Now that I have that option, I'd like to know if the cure is worse than the disease, so to speak.
The safe write prevents you from data loss in case something goes wrong during the update. Just think of your computer or Intellij crashing while you are saving the file. You might lose the file completely then. But with safe write you would lose your recent changes only. After the updated version of your file is written to disk without errors, the old version can be replaced. This way you have a valid file version at any point of time during the update process, so no crash or whatever could make you lose all your work on that file. The worst thing which could happen is the loss of your recent changes.
When using the magic function %edit from QtConsole with IPython, the call does not block, and does not execute the saved code. It does however save a temporary file...
I think this is intended behavior due to GUI editors and uncertainty, and whatever that reason is for not being able to communicate with subprocess (pyZMQ?).
What do you suggest as the best way to mix %edit/%run magics?
I would not mind calling two different commands (one to edit, and one after I have saved and execution is safe). But those commands need a way to synchronize this target file location, or someone to persist storage, and probably need some crude form of predicatably generating filenames such that you can edit more than one file at a time, and execute in arbitrarily. Session persistence is not a must.
Would writing my own magic do any good? Hope we can %edit macros soon, that would do well enough to make it work.
you shoudl be able to do %edit filename.py and %run filename.py. The non blocking behavior is expected, and IIRC due to technical reason. Not unsurmountable but difficult.
You could define your own magic if you wish, improvement are welcomed.
Hope we can %edit macros soon, that would do well enough to make it work.
For that too, PR are welcomed. I guess as a workaround/option you can %load macro which would put macro on input n+1 , edit it and redefine it, that might be a good extension for a cell magic %%macro macroname
If you have some executable code on your input (from QtConsole), you can type
%edit 1-5
This fires the editor, creates a temporarily file (automatically managed), and loads your input lines. This is nearly enough, now how to retrieve the name of that temp file pragmatically?
I see the print statement on Stdout, but its not visible to QtConsole AFAIK. Could maybe redirect stdout to catch that line, but that may not be an option anyway if your doing something else with stdout.
If I could retrieve the full pathname that was just created, this would be cake. Store it where some magics will know how to find it. Then issue a followup command when ready,pops the name off the stack, loads it into a macro, and run. All this with 2 input commands and no names to remember (unless you want to find and use that macro again, but for 1 shot stuff...)
How do I catch or retrieve the path of that temporary file?
is there any way to use html anchor tag in a gml file..I want to create a hyperlink to location/point in a gml file.
how can i do so???
thanks in advance..
This is a little known GML technique that GREATLY increases the power of Game Maker, and is well worth learning, but as a note, it does NOT work in Studio, because of the countless new restrictions on commands. Go back to GM8.1 (I only ever use that now), and you should have no problem making use of this technique.
The technique is to write a program in another language through GML (batch, vbs, etc, or in this case, HTLM), execute it through GML, then delete the program.
Quite simply, use the file_text commands to create a file with the correct content and extension, execute it with execute_program, and then delete it with file_delete.
Specifically for this script:
argument0 is the link, including the protocol.
argument1 is the anchor, minus the # (that's handled for you).
argument2 is the full browser path.
argument3 is important. This is the time in milliseconds the program will wait before deleting the temporary link file.
(The execute_program command, even when told to wait for the program to complete, continues as soon as the temp file is loaded. If external, the redirect takes some time depending on your connection, so deleting the temporary file halfway through will cause it to fail. 10 milliseconds worked fine for me. The program will hang for this time in this setup, but if you would like to set up an alarm based system to stop it from hanging, that wouldn't be too hard.)
In other uses of this technique without the use of the internet (I use small batch and vbs files a lot), the "hang time" (pun not intended) is usually not necessary.
In addition, the browser location will need to be changed for each different computer
file=file_text_open_write(temp_directory+"\tempLink.html")
file_text_write_string(file,'<!DOCTYPE html>')
file_text_writeln(file)
file_text_write_string(file,'<html>')
file_text_writeln(file)
file_text_write_string(file,'<body onload="')
file_text_write_string(file,"location.href='")
file_text_write_string(file,argument0+"#"+argument1+"';")
file_text_write_string(file,'">')
file_text_writeln(file)
file_text_write_string(file,'</body>')
file_text_writeln(file)
file_text_write_string(file,'</html>')
file_text_close(file)
execute_program(argument2,temp_directory+"\tempLink.html",true)
sleep(argument3)
file_delete(temp_directory+"\tempLink.html")
Sorry I wish It was possible but it's not unless you want to spend a lot of time with dll's. BUT you can create a Script and reuse it everywhere in your code...
script0(argument0,argument1...)
reputedly, it is possible to make a "malicious" Word document. Maybe using embedded VB script? Anyway, not sure. My question is, is it possible to make an app that safely scrubs all such insertions from a .doc file? Of course, preferably this app should work without actually opening that file in Word application since presumably that may be sufficient for the machine to get damaged.
Is there something like that out there already? Is this even a problem worthy of discussion or in reality there is nothing really malicious that can be done using the Word documents distributed online?
ADDED LATER: johnnyArt, yes, and when you get dirt on your clothes, make sure to go to mommy and tell her about it. Mommy knows best! As a computer programmer, I am interested in learning more about how the world works, including how the world of .doc files and their embedded malicious scripts works. As for using the antivirus and anti-spyware, I will handle these issues without your precious advice. As will, probably, most other users of this forum.
You should scan the file with your antivirus/spyware of choice.
My advice is, if it has malware in it, it's not worth "cleaning" it for use.
Get yourself a clean copy somewhere else.