I'm trying to implement a wopi on our site (our domain is already added to wopi). I can view and edit in first load. But upon clicking the back button and view again or edit I got this error.
Any idea what causes the issue.
Github: https://github.com/apulliam/WOPIFramework
I remember having the same error when implementing WOPI. Unfortunately don't recall the exact reason for it, but as far as I remember, this may be a permission issue (the IIS process can't read the certificate used for the app. Just adjust the permission for the certificates using the Certificates snap-in in the MMC console). To verify that is the problem, you could tell the app to consume the certificate from a PFX (physical) file rather than from the store.
Back button problems are frequently caused by a lack of (or incorrect) wd* parameter implementation.
Office Online will sometimes pass additional query string parameters to your host page. These query string parameters are of the form wd*. When you receive these query string parameters on your host page URLs, you must pass them, unchanged, to the Office Online iframe.
In addition, if the replaceState method from the HTML5 History API is available in the user’s browser, you should remove the following parameters from your host page URL after passing them to the Office Online iframe:
wdPreviousSession
wdPreviousCorrelation
Other wd* parameters must not be removed from the host page URL.
The key here is that you may not be using the HTML 5 API to do replaceState.
Related
We have a CMS that powers over 2000 school websites. The admin sites for each of those websites are all under the same root domain, e.g. *.myadmin.com. We are working on integrating OneDrive File Picker on multiple pages in all of those admin sites.
We have an issue with the Redirect URLs in the API Settings. We tried to set the Root domain field to myadmin.com by setting Redirect URLs: to https://myadmin.com. In JavaScript, we initialize the File Picker like this:
WL.init({
client_id: window.OneDrive.clientId,
redirect_uri: ''
});
WL.fileDialog({
mode: "open",
select: "single"
});
That results in a popup window saying:
We're unable to complete your request. Microsoft account is experiencing technical problems. Please try again later.
In the address bar of the popup window, there's a further error description(url decoded):
error_description=The provided value for the input parameter 'redirect_uri' is not valid. The expected value is 'https://login.live.com/oauth20_desktop.srf' or a URL which matches the redirect URI registered for this client application.
Putting a specific url, like https://subdomain.myadmin.com/homepage, in the API Setting would make the Picker work on that specific page, but not on other pages. Looks like it's looking for an exact match. Obviously it's not practical for us to create a separate app for each page that uses OneDrive.
The problem can be solved by disabling Enhanced redirection security on the API Settings page. That option existed a few weeks ago when we created an app for development, but was marked as deprecated. Today when we created a new app for production, it wasn't there anymore, which I think is now enabled for all new apps.
We had a similar issue with Dropbox Drop-ins Chooser, but we were able to solve the problem by setting myadmin.com as the domain of the app.
Is there any work around for this problem?
Thanks for your help and suggestions.
The only way I could get this to work was
Make sure the exact single web page on a single domain is configured and working for one drive (the url running OneDrive needs to be correctly configured in Microsoft account Developer Center
Then use this page inside an iframe (even if it is a completely different domain)
then use postMessage to pass the data back to the parent iframe to utilise
a working copy (link may be removed at any time )
Testing OneDrive in an iframe
Other pertinent urls
browser support for postMessage
Browser support for postMessage on stackoverflow
postMessage documentation
Some example usage of postMessage
example usage of postMessage
another example of use of postMessage
You can add multiple Redirect URLs as long as all of them are in the same subdomain. Each redirection URL needs to be specified explicitly:
The bug with the Microsoft developer console mention is resolved if you put the root domain you want first, then the 2 sub domains.
Add 3 entires:
1. domain.com
2. sub1.domain.com
3. sub2.domain.com
I had error when access SharePoint sites out of the server , as when I
try to add new document or did any action this error displayed although
it worked well in SharePoint server
I think Yevgeniy made a good suggestion.
I assume you mean by 'outside' the server, users are trying to view the page on a different URL? If so, it might be the URLs to access the site 'outside SharePoint' are not configured correctly.
I would suggest a few things to start with:
When you say it works 'in SharePoint server' does this mean that the whole site is accessible, with no problems? But using a different URL (i.e. host header?), fails - for just this one page with the list or the whole site?
Check you have Alternate Access Mappings configured correctly as suggested above - check that the URL is setup correctly in any AAM zones defined, and that the authentication (e.g. Anonymous, Forms whatever required) is also setup too. This is all done in Central Administration.
If AAM setup correctly, check if you have any firewall or other network security that may block access to the site (again, assuming users are routed externally?)
Does the problem page or list (or the subsite it is within) have any unique security permissions?
You can check for the site via Site Actions | Site Permissions - if it does not have unique permissions, you will see a 'This Web site inherits permissions from its parent.' message.
If the List has unique permissions, you can check by going to the list page, and clicking 'Library Permissions' on the Library grouping on the Library Tools section of the ribbon.
This problem is driving me nuts. Our web app uses HTTP POST to login users and now IE 10 is aborting the connection and saying:
SCRIPT7002: XMLHttpRequest: Network Error 0x2f7d, Could not complete the operation due to error 00002f7d.
Here are all the details I have
IE version 10.0.9.16618, update version 10.0.6. I've also reproduced this on IE version 10.0.9200.16635, update version 10.0.7.
The domain is using HTTPS. The problem doesn't occur on HTTP connections
I've read that for some reason IE needs to get a certificate before it can do an HTTP POST, so I have HTTP GETs running before my POST request, but now the GET is erroring out. See network flow screen shot. The GET is super simple, just a PING page that returns "I'm up."
Asyn is turned off $.ajax({type: 'POST',url: url,async: false...}); I've read in other posts that this matters.
The certificate is good, see screen shot.
The problem goes away if the site is added as a "trusted site" but that's not really the user experience we're shooting for.
This just started about a month ago. Did Microsoft push some new updates recently?
I've already read: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsapps/en-US/dd5d2762-7643-420e-880a-9bf75554e383/intermittent-xmlhttprequest-network-error-0x2f7d-could-not-complete-the-operation-due-to-error. It doesn't help.
Screen shots:
Network flow:
Cert is good:
Any help is greatly appreciated. I've spent a lot of hours on this with no luck. As you would expect this works fine in Chrome and Firefox. If you need any more detail about what's happening please let me know.
Thanks,
Certificate revocation checks may block the initial JSON POST, but allow subsequent requests after the GET callback
We recently determined that URLMon's code (Win8, Win7, and probably earlier) to ignore certificate revocation check failures is not applied for content uploads (e.g. HTTP POST). Hence, if a Certificate Revocation check fails, that is fatal to the upload (e.g. IE will show a Page Cannot Be Displayed error message; other clients would show a different error). However, this rarely matters in the real world because in most cases, the user first performs a download (HTTP GET) from the target HTTPS site, and as a result the server's certificate is cached with the "ignore revocation check failures" exemption for the lifetime of the process and thus a subsequent POST inherits that flag and succeeds. The upload fails if the very first request to the HTTPS site in the current process was for an upload (e.g. as in a cross-origin POST request).
Here is how it works:
A little background: When a web browser initiates a HTTPS handshake with a web server, the server immediately sends down a digital certificate. The hostname of the server is listed inside the digital certificate, and the browser compares it to the hostname it was attempting to reach. If these hostnames do not match, the browser raises an error.
The matching-hostnames requirement causes a problem if a single-IP is configured to host multiple sites (sometimes known as “virtual-hosting”). Ordinarily, a virtual-hosting server examines the HTTP Host request header to determine what HTTP content to return. However, in the HTTPS case, the server must provide a digital certificate before it receives the HTTP headers from the browser. SNI resolves this problem by listing the target server’s hostname in the SNI extension field of the initial client handshake with the secure server. A virtual-hosting server may examine the SNI extension to determine which digital certificate to send back to the client.
The GET may be victim of the operation aborted scenario:
The HTML file is being parsed, and encounters a script block. The script block contains inline script which creates a new element and attempts to add it to the BODY element before the closing BODY tag has been encountered by the parser.
<body>
<div>
<script>document.body.appendChild(newElem)</script>
</div>
</body>
Note that if I removed the <div> element, then this problem would not occur because the script block's immediate parent would be BODY, and the script block's immediate parent is immune to this problem.
References
Understanding Certificate Revocation Checks
Client Certificates vs Server Certificates
Understanding and Managing the Certificate Stores
Preventing Operation Aborted Scenarios
HTTPS Improvements in IE
Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP
[SOLVED]
I only observed this error today. for me the Error code was different though.
SCRIPT7002: XMLHttpRequest: Network Error 0x2efd, Could not complete
the operation due to error 00002efd.
I was occuring randomly and not all time. but what it noticed is, if it comes it comes for subsequent ajax calls.. so i put some delay of 5 seconds between the ajax calls and it resolved.
Also the CORS must be configured on your web server.
I had the same exact issue and I just finally resolved it. For some reason I got the same error that you were receiving on IE when connecting to the API using OWIN middleware that was used to receive login credentials. It seemed to work fine while connecting to any other sort of API though. For some reason it didnt like cross domain request even though I had CORS enabled server side on the API.
Anyways I was able to resolve the issue using the xdomain library. Make sure you load this script before loading any other javascript.
First create a proxy.html page on the root of your API server and add this code. Replace placeholder URL.
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<script src="//cdn.rawgit.com/jpillora/xdomain/0.7.3/dist/xdomain.min.js" master="http://insert_client_url_here.com"></script>
Now simply add this to your client replacing the placeholder URL pointing to the proxy.html page on your API server.
<script src="//cdn.rawgit.com/jpillora/xdomain/0.7.3/dist/xdomain.min.js" slave="http://Insert_Api_Url_Here.com/proxy.html"></script>
Adding a delay is not a proper solution.
This can be because the IE will treat it as an network error when the empty body request is made.
Try adding a empty class as the parameter in the server and IE should start working.
I'm working on a web application that uses the google earth plugin. Recently, a new requirement to have non-public users logon was added, which meant that some users were now using the site over https. Among the things that broke in testing were the custom placemark icons (They were working using http).
The icons are hosted on the same server which servers the page.
Here are the urls for each of the protocols.
http - http://localhost/Images/yellow.png
https - https://localhost/Images/yellow.png
I can follow that link and the image will appear as you would expect.
The images hrefs are declared as icon styles in dynamically generated kml.
I want to avoid loading the images over http because I think that will cause internet explorer to present the user with a mixed content warning.
How do I get the images to load properly while using https?
I have been wrestling with this myself -- the short answer is that this won't work. If the content is served off of an HTTPS site that generates any kind of error/prompt (authentication, invalid certificate, etc.) the plugin will simply not load the content.
Interestingly, the desktop client works fine and prompts the user for credentials if necessary. However, neither client will allow content to be served off of site with an untrusted certificate.
The only workaround that I have found is:
Use a trusted HTTPS certificate on the server hosting the content (either trust the certificate on the client systems or just use a real certificate.)
Do not use HTTPS basic auth as that will always generate 401/Challenge responses which the web browser client will simply ignore
If authentication is a requirement, use NTLM authentication and common (e.g., domain) logins. If you load the plugin in Interent Explorer (or in a .NET WebBrowserControl) the authentication will be handled properly and the images will show up.
I was at a Google Earth administrator's training last week and the trainer confirmed this "bug". It is supposed to be fixed in the next version of the plugin (it may actually be fixed already -- what version of the plugin are you using?)
I have a newsletter tool that, well, shows newsletters. Well, the site was on non-SSL hosting and now is on an SSL host. When a user receives the newsletter in Gmail or Outlook the images have a blue question mark on it and the image doesn't show. They can click the 'view in browser' option and everything shows up fine.
This is also with images displayed option turned on in both Outlook and Gmail.
Here's where I think I see the problem - the site does not have it's own SSL cert. It's using a server one so there is a name mismatch.
Would that be the reason why the images are not showing up in Outlook/Gmail? If so, would the solution be to get an SSL cert that matches the domain name?
Here's where I think I see the problem - the site does not have it's own SSL cert. It's using a server one so there is a name mismatch.
The certificate you're using must be valid for the host name you're using (see RFC 2818, Section 3.1). If this is not the case, your HTTPS server isn't set up properly, so you shouldn't be surprised clients don't like it.
They can click the 'view in browser' option and everything shows up
fine.
Presumably, this works because your users are willing to ignore an error message, which they shouldn't do.