I have a csv file with in which I want to compare each row with all other rows. I want to do a linear regression and get the r^2 value for the linear regression line and put it into a new matrix. I'm having trouble finding a way to iterate over all the other rows (it's fine to compare the primary row to itself).
I've tried using .iterrows but I can't think of a way to define the other rows once I have my primary row using this function.
UPDATE: Here is a solution I came up with. Please let me know if there is a more efficient way of doing this.
def bad_pairs(df, limit):
list_fluor = list(combinations(df.index.values, 2))
final = {}
for fluor in list_fluor:
final[fluor] = (r2_score(df.xs(fluor[0]),
df.xs(fluor[1])))
bad_final = {}
for i in final:
if final[i] > limit:
bad_final[i] = final[i]
return(bad_final)
My data is a pandas DataFrame where the index is the name of the color and there is a number between 0-1 for each detector (220 columns).
I'm still working on a way to make a new pandas Dataframe from a dictionary with all the values (final in the code above), not just those over the limit.
Related
I have two Dataframes, one containing my data read in from a CSV file and another that has the data grouped by all of the columns but the last and reindexed to contain a column for the count of the size of the groups.
df_k1 = pd.read_csv(filename, sep=';')
columns_for_groups = list(df_k1.columns)[:-1]
k1_grouped = df_k1.groupby(columns_for_groups).size().reset_index(name="Count")
I need to create a series such that every row(i) in the series corresponds to row(i) in my original Dataframe but the contents of the series need to be the size of the group that the row belongs to in the grouped Dataframe. I currently have this, and it works for my purposes, but I was wondering if anyone knew of a faster or more elegant solution.
size_by_row = []
for row in df_k1.itertuples():
for group in k1_grouped.itertuples():
if row[1:-1] == group[1:-1]:
size_by_row.append(group[-1])
break
group_size = pd.Series(size_by_row)
I have a big dataframe its about 200k of rows and 3 columns (x, y, z). Some rows doesn't have y,z values and just have x value. I want to make a new column that first set of data with z value be 1,second one be 2,then 3, etc. Or make a multiIndex same format.
Following image shows what I mean
Like this image
I made a new column called "NO." and put zero as initial value. Then
I tried to record the index of where I want the new column get a new value. with following code
df = pd.read_fwf(path, header=None, names=['x','y','z'])
df['NO.']=0
index_NO_changed = df.index[df['z'].isnull()]
Then I loop through it and change the number:
for i in range(len(index_NO_changed)-1):
df['NO.'].iloc[index_NO_changed[i]:index_NO_changed[i+1]]=i+1
df['NO.'].iloc[index_NO_changed[-1]:]=len(index_NO_changed)
But the problem is I get a warning that "
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame
I was wondering
Is there any better way? Is creating multiIndex instead of adding another column easier considering size of dataframe?
I initially had 100k rows in my dataset. I read the csv using pandas into a dataframe called data. I tried to do a subset selection of 51 rows using .loc. My index labels are numeric values 0, 1, 2, 3 etc. I tried using this command -
data = data.loc['0':'50']
But the results were weird, it took all the rows from 0 to 49999, looks like it is taking rows till the index value starts with 50.
Similarly, I tried with this command - new_data = data.loc['0':'19']
and the result was all the rows, starting from 0 till 18999.
Could this be a bug in pandas?
You want to use .iloc in place of .loc, since you are selecting data from the dataframe via numeric indices.
For example:
data.iloc[:50,:]
Keep in mind that your indices are of numeric-type, not string-type, so querying with a string (as you have done in your OP) attempts to match string-wise comparisons.
I am working with pandas / python /numpy / datalab/bigQuery to generate an input table for machine learning processing. The data is genomic - and right now, I am working with small subset of
174 rows
12430 columns
The column names are extracted from bigQuery (df_pik3ca_features = bq.Query(std_sql_features).to_dataframe(dialect='standard',use_cache=True))
at the same way, the row names are extracted: samples_rows = bq.Query('SELECT sample_id FROMspeedy-emissary-167213.pgp_orielresearch.pgp_PIK3CA_all_features_values_step_3GROUP BY sample_id')
what would be the easiest way to create a dataframe / matrix with named rows and columns that were extracted.
I explored the dataframes in pandas and could not find the way to pass the names as parameter.
for empty array, I was able to find the following (numpy) with no names:
a = np.full([num_of_rows, num_of_columns], np.nan)
a.columns
I know R very well (if there is no other way - I hope that I can use it with datalab)
any idea?
Many thanks!
If you have your column names and row names stored in lists then you can just use .loc to select the exact rows and columns you desire. Just make sure that the row names are in the index. You might need to do df.set_index('sample_id') to put the correct row name in the index.
Assuming the rows and columns are in variables row_names and col_names, do this.
df.loc[row_names, col_names]
I am trying to preset the dimensions of my data frame in pandas so that I can have 500 rows by 300 columns. I want to set it before I enter data into the dataframe.
I am working on a project where I need to take a column of data, copy it, shift it one to the right and shift it down by one row.
I am having trouble with the last row being cut off when I shift it down by one row (eg: I started with 23 rows and it remains at 23 rows despite the fact that I shifted down by one and should have 24 rows).
Here is what I have done so far:
bolusCI = pd.DataFrame()
##set index to very high number to accommodate shifting row down by 1
bolusCI = bolus_raw[["Activity (mCi)"]].copy()
activity_copy = bolusCI.shift(1)
activity_copy
pd.concat([bolusCI, activity_copy], axis =1)
Thanks!
There might be a more efficient way to achieve what you are looking to do, but to directly answer your question you could do something like this to init the DataFrame with certain dimensions
pd.DataFrame(columns=range(300),index=range(500))
You just need to define the index and columns in the constructor. The simplest way is to use pandas.RangeIndex. It mimics np.arange and range in syntax. You can also pass a name parameter to name it.
pd.DataFrame
pd.Index
df = pd.DataFrame(
index=pd.RangeIndex(500),
columns=pd.RangeIndex(300)
)
print(df.shape)
(500, 300)