I have a database with a couple tables that tracks personnel errors that require rework by another person. Basically, a person on the job could rework up to 10 different work packages by other people throughout their shift. To make it easy, I just have columns in the table for rework_1/original_worker_1/rework_comment_1 (repeated up to 10) and the person who had to rework it. All of my worker's names are in a separate table so I can add people and my forms update dynamically with their names. What I want to do is this:
Pull a person from my worker's name table.
Search for all occurrences of their name in another table in in column original_worker_X (where X is 1 - 10).
Output the values: Workers Name / How Many Times I found it in the original_worker_X columns.
From here I would need to make a bar graph so that each person's name had a bar with how many times someone had to rework something they did originally.
If I could do this with PHP and MySQL I would be in the money because I could brute force something with some PHP variables, queries, and loops but I am an access novice at best! I appreciate any help you wizards can provide.
Table 1:
Table 2:
Expected Output Numbers:
so i will suggest you do the following
Create a new table,lets say table 3 with three fields
A. ID, pkey, auto number
B. original_worker, text field
C. Person_doing_rework, text field
You will need ten insert statements that will insert each of the original worker 1-10, as well as person doing re-work , this is to a normalise table
Currently, the design of your table is a bit crude, and having a select statement with group by columns numbering 10 is not achievable
Below are samples of the insert statements
INSERT INTO Table3 (original_worker,Person_doing_rework)
SELECT original_worker1,Person_doing_rework
FROM table2 where isnotNull(original_worker1)
INSERT INTO Table3 (original_worker,Person_doing_rework)
SELECT original_worker2,Person_doing_rework
FROM table2 where isnotNull(original_worker2)
replicate this for original_worker3 to original_worker10
Third step
You need a delete statement that will delete all from table 3, this is to ensure that the records from table 3 is not duplicated, since we don't have a pkey/fkey relationship between table 2 and 3
Fourth step
Place all the queries into a macro in the following order
A. Delete query to run first
B. Insert queries to run next
Fifth step
Add a msgbox in the macro, that will run last, this is to inform you that all the other macro steps, i.e A and B above has successfully run.
Sixth step
You can now have a select statement from table 3 that can count the number of times an original workers' work is re worked upon, because you now have two main fields in table 3, one for original_work, and two for Person_reworked.
So any time you want to find out how many times some ones work has been re worked upon, you have to just click the macro button, this will run all the queries and put values you need in the table 3, after which you can view the details via the query in step 6.
SELECT original_worker, Count(Person_doing_rework), FROM table3 GROUP BY original_worker;
Related
We have a software solution which is used by +200 customers. We recently switched to pgsql, because our former database was too slow handeling the search queries our customers use.
Our dabatabase looks like this:
TABLE A
1. ID
(+ some other fields which aren't important here)
TABLE B
This table is used to store 'data' on the items in table A. This is different for every customer. For example 'Type' can be 'CLIENTNAME' and value 'AZERTY'. One record on TABLE A can have infinite records in TABLE B. Mostly 1 record in Table A has between 5 - 10 records on Table B.
1. ID TABLE A
2. TYPE
3. VALUE
TABLE C
1. TABLE A ID
2. VERSIONNR
3. DESCRIPTION
This file has the different verions of the records in TABLE A. Each of these versions has an extended description. This can range from 0 characters to infinite.
Our problem: our customers are used on 'google-like' searching. For example: they type 'AZERTY' and we show all the records from TABLE A where the ID of TABLE A:
'AZERTY' is in the description of the most recent version of TABLE C
'AZERTY' is in one of the values of TABLE B
Additional problem: this search is a 'contains'. If they search 'ZER', they should also find the records with 'AZERTY' in it. Multiple arguments are an 'AND', if they search for 'ZER 123', we need to show all records where the description matches 'ZER' and '123' or the values match 'ZER' and '123'.
What we have done so far:
There is an option a user can check in/out whether they want to search the description or not. We mosty advice them to only search for the values and only use the description in case of need.
We make several search threads to the database for one search query, because searching all documents at once would take too much time.
Some time ago, on our former slow database engine, a collegue of mine made 'search tables', basically this is a table which contains all values on a TABLE A ID so there isn't need for any join in the SQL query when searching. It looks like this:
TABLE D
TABLE A ID
VALUES (all values from TABLE B for this TABLE A ID, seperated by a ' ')
DESCRIPTION (the description of the most recent version for this TABLE A ID)
Example record:
- 1
- ZER 123 CLIENT NAME NUMBER 7856 jsdfjklf 4556423
- DESCRIPTION CAN BE VERY LONG.
If a customer searches for 'ZER 123' this becomes:
"select TABLE_A_ID from TABLE_D where values like '%ZER%' and values like '%123%'"
Important:
Some of our customers have alot of records in TABLE A. +5.000.000, which means there are alot of records in TABLE B (+/- 50.000.000). Most of our customers have between 300.000 and 500.000 records in TABLE A.
My questions:
Is there a better / faster way to search through all the values then that search table? Without the search table i would have to make a join for every ' ' in the search argument of the customer, which will work too slow (i think?) if they have alot of records in TABLE A. For example:
select ID from TABLE_A
INNER JOIN TABLE_B Sub1 ON TABLE_A.ID = Sub1.TABLE_A_ID and Sub1.VALUE like '%ZER%'
INNER JOIN TABLE_B Sub2 on FILE_A.ID = Sub2.TABLE_A_ID and Sub2.VALUE like '%123%'
I have taken a look at the full text search in PGSQL. I don't think i can use it since you can't use it as like (= 'contains') ?
Is there any index I can use on the values (FILE B or search file) and description (FILE C or search file) to make the searches faster? I've read on it and i don't think there is any, because indexes aren't used when searching with "like '%ZER%'" ?
I hope i've explained this cleary.
Thanks in advance!
Your terminology is confusing, but I assume you mean "tables" when you write "files".
You cannot reasonably search in several tables with a single query, but you can search in several columns of a single table at the same time.
Based on your description, I would say that you need a trigram index on the concatenation of the relevant string columns in the table.
Happy Holidays. I have two dependent tables, [orders] and [reviews], linked by a "one to many relationship". On the [Orders], the PK is [Order#], there is a column for [#_of_reviews_ordered]. On the [reviews] table (the PK is an auto number) the linked field is [order#] and the number of records (records on the table) should equal "[Orders].[#_of_reviews_ordered]".
Is there a simple way to accomplish this without having to do add the records to [reviews] manually?
The only way I can think to do this without VBA is fairly convoluted and would only work if your number of reviews orders fits within a finite (and reasonably small) range. For my explanation I will assume # of review will be between 0 and 3
You would need to create a table called, say, TemplateReviews. This would have at least one field called "KeyNumber", which should not actually be a key. You could also repeat as many fields as desired from Reviews, and use them to store default values for the rows to be inserted.
The important thing about TemplateReviews is that you must set it up in advance to have N rows with KeyNumber=N for each possible value of KeyNumber. For my example, we can have 0 to 3 # of reviews. So TemplateReviews will have:
0 rows with KeyNumber=0
1 row with KeyNumber=1
2 rows with KeyNumber=2
3 rows with KeyNumber=3
Once you have TemplateReviews set up, you need to create an Insert query based on it. The query will insert rows from TemplateReviews into Reviews. But you also have to filter KeyNumber to match the value on the currently selected Order, as in
=Forms!Orders![#_of_reviews]
You then need run Insert query to run using a macro triggered by a button (etc) on the Orders form. This only works the first time you click the button... but you can modify the criteria expression above to subtract the number of existing reviews, as in
=Forms!Orders![#_of_reviews] - DCount("*","Reviews","OrderId=" & Forms!Orders![order#])
Hope this helps. If you got this approach working, you could then replace the button with a single line of VBA code in the Order form AfterUpdate event to trigger the insert query.
I have a table structure
ID [integer]
Name
RecoveryID [integer]
date
I want to search on the RecoveryID with an array and reveal all those in the array without a corresponding record.
so, if my table contains
1,'John',1,20-10-2013
2,'John',4,20-10-2013
3,'John',5,20-10-2013
And I search on the RecoveryID with the array [1,2,3,4,5,6] I would want the result [2,3,6]
I have tried using various IN, NOT IN statements, but I always get what I have, not what I don't have.
To try and explain further, I am trying to Outer Join without a second table. I have a list of users, a list of things that CAN be done (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) and a list of things that NEED to be done by a specific user. {[John],(1,2,7)} For example.
If John completes action 1, my work table now contains ('John',1,20-10-2013) actions 2 & 7 are remaining. I have the list (1,2,7) how can I query the work table so that it returns (2,7) ?
You can use Except set operation as :
SELECT n
FROM (VALUES(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6)) AS Nums(n)
EXCEPT
SELECT RecoveryID from table1
I am putting a table together with the following code:
create table temp
(pnum integer,
pnam varchar(30));
insert into temp(pnum)
select player_number
from players;
insert into temp(pnam)
select player_name
from positions;
It basically works except for the fact that, while both columns are preeent throughout the whole table, they are filled out sequentially. I want all the data from the second select to appear after the data from the first select ON THE SAME LINE. At present, I simply get a bunch of blank lines in the pnam column (while pnum fills out nicely), then get a bunch of blank lines in the pnum column (while pnam fills out nicely). IF anyone knows how to solve this, your prompt reply will be incredibly appreciated!
Yep - the problem is you're doing 2 discrete and seperate inserts, so SQL doesn't know that you want the numbers and the names to match up. You need to rewrite the Select statement into one.
Assuming that both the players and the positions table contains a filed called player_number, you can use this to tie the two tables together (if not, pick a unique field thats in both tables that ties the data together and use that.
insert into temp(pnum,pnam)
select player_number,player_name
from players inner join positions on players.player_number = positions.player_number
Things to note:
Line 1 - see how we are now inserting into both columns at the same time. This will give you the data layout you're looking for
Line 2 - see how we're selecting two bits of data to insert
Line 3 - this is where we join the two tables together (using player_number columnn from both). We need to join them together because in Line 2 we need to select one column from each.
Hope that makes sense. If not, shout. Also, maybe read up on inserting rows using INSERT and SELECT and using inner joins
I have an Access database of information where I need to replace text that may reside in 1 of 10 columns. I have a number of different requests for find and replace that need to be done. I need to do this twice a day.
These are the details. We receive a download of data twice a day that has course information in it. A record can have 10 courses in it. Some of the courses need to be combined. For instance
Course 1 is 12345, there are 2 other courses that are the same and therefore course 2(01234), Course 3(34566) all need to be changed to 12345. I also need to combine other course in a similar fashion, since I need to do this twice a day, ideally I would like to have a table with just columns of find and replace and use it to pick up the changes and reference it in my sql code.
An easy way to do this is the key!
Have you considered a cross reference table of something like
Table1
MCourse Subcourse
12345 2(01234)
12345 3(34566)
Then you can do updates like
Set mainTable.Desiredfield = Table1.Mcourse
where desiredfield = subcourse
Or you can create a query that uses the cross reference table to select the desired value and make a new table from that.