I have a software that reads serial data (in coming bytes for sensor reading) from USB port. For simulation purpose I need to write a python script that continuous writes bytes to the USB port simulating a USB device. I require that the /dev/serial/by_id to be created as the software reads the data from that file itself. I cannot edit the software. How can I make this work. I read through the pyserial documentation but I could not figure it out
Requirements:
the serial port is accessible at /dev/serial/file
it is listed by serial.tools.list_ports.
Related
I am trying to automate the below process:
Operator executes operation on field device and generates local data that is stored on the field device. (NOT a PC)
Operator inserts USB into field device and executes a local export function.
Operator takes USB to network machine and transfer files to secure file location.
The USB connection is the ONLY method of data transfer.
I would like to have a direct USB to USB connection, which I believe can be done if you can trick the field device into thinking a USB connection to the network machine (over VLAN/IP USB Hub/some sort of networked hardware) is a flash drive. The field device is commercial off the shelf so it cannot be modified, which drives the need for an emulated flash drive. The new process would look like:
Operator executes operation on field device and generates local data that is stored on the field device.
Operator executes a local export function.
File is transferred over USB connection to emulated flash drive on virtual network machine.
So in summary, the question is how do I configure a virtual machine to have an emulated flash drive that can be hooked into a physical USB port?
I'm working on a USB MIDI device that will function as the receiver for a wireless system. This device will communicate bi-directionally though a radio module with the transmitter, a separate piece of hardware that runs in USB host mode.
The receiver will be plugged into a PC. MIDI devices plugged into the transmitter need to show up on the PC as MIDI ports. Since the transmitter supports a USB hub, there can be multiple devices plugged in.
There are two requirements that I'm not 100% how to meet:
1.) The MIDI port names on the PC end need to reflect the name supplied by the USB device plugged into the transmitter so that it's clear which device the port is for.
2.) The set of MIDI ports on the PC needs to update when devices are plugged/unplugged from the transmitter. This is the crux of the question: is there a way to update the available USB interfaces/MIDI jacks initiated by the device?
The brute force way of doing this would be to completely reset the receiver any time it receives a message from the transmitter that there's been a change (on reset,the receiver would then poll the transmitter for current devices and supply the updated info when the host PC re-enumerates).
The transmitter/receiver hardware are both based on PIC32MZ MCUs (no RTOS). I'm good with writing the USB code to get the host/receiver end to do whatever. The question is about how, at the level of the USB protocol, to do this.
Also, just to be clear: The transmitter/receiver communication will be an ad-hoc protocol and the receiver will set up all its USB configuration data itself; the idea isn't to attempt to seamlessly enumerate devices over the wireless link.
To show the port names on the PC, just copy the USB descriptor strings over to the transmitter.
The only way for a USB device to change its configuration is to reset itself, as if it had been unplugged, and to let the host re-enumerate it. So the only way to prevent multiple devices from interfering with each other is to have multiple (virtual) USB devices on the receiver. If your hardware does not support this, then you cannot avoid the reset.
Hopefully I will have more luck today. I have no prior USB integration and about 8 months of learning embedded systems on Atmel devices. I am trying to use an Atmel SAM L series to connect over USB to a computer. The use case is for data transfer. Specifically, the MCU will be gathering data from it's sensors and packaging it for USB transfer.
I have searched through and read up on all of Atmel's included USB examples. I have also started reading through usb.org's class specifications for CDC.
I have running now something that lets me send data along one com port, into the target usb and then out the debugger usb to another com port. However, I don't think this is real USB.
My problem is two fold.
1.) I do not fully understand what differentiates USB from serial communication on a com port.
2.) Even if I were doing it correctly, I'm not sure how to test and verify that I have indeed created a legitimate USB device that can be accepted by a host computer.
Links to documentation(Atmel or generic) or example code would be appreciated.
1) USB is defined in the USB specifications from http://www.usb.org. Serial ports were an older and simpler interface that involved sending data back and forth asynchonously on pins with names like TX and RX. The USB CDC class and its ACM subclass allow you to make a USB device that emulates a serial port. If you make your device be a USB CDC ACM device, then you don't need to supply any drivers for Windows 10, Linux, or Mac OS X.
2) You can read the USB specification and the CDC ACM specification. You can run the USB command verifier. You can test your device with a variety of different USB hosts to make sure it works.
I'm trying to implement UART over a USB interface on the STM324x9I-EVAL development board. The purpose is to send commands to a servo controller (or other hardware, for that matter) serially. I've successfully implemented the USB_Device_CDC example on the development board but am unsure exactly how this works without a PC with drivers on the other end. As far as other hardware is concerned, will the USB port now simply look like a serial port? Or is there still a need for a driver or some sort of interface on the other end?
I do want to point out that I'm aware of the following post:
Emulating UART over USB
but I don't believe my question is fully answered within the context of that answer.
A USB connection is not a peer-to-peer connection like a UART. It requires a host and a device in a master/slave relationship. The device cannot initiate data transfer; it must be continuously polled by the by the host.
A CDC/ACM class device presents a virtual COM port on a PC host, but that does not allow the device to communicate with a UART interface. It looks like a serial port at the software level, but does not implement a UART physical layer. There is an awful lot going on under the hood to make it look like a PC serial port, but none of it resembles UART communications at the physical level.
There are devices that act as UART/USB bridges (from FTDI and Prolific for example), and you could (somewhat expensively) build your own from a microcontroller that has a USB device controller and a UART, but the bridge is a USB device and must still connect to a USB host; these are normally used to connect a PC to a microcontroller that lacks a USB controller or where the software/CPU overhead of using a USB controller is too great.
In theory you could connect a microcontroller that has a USB host controller to one that has a USB device controller, but you need host and device software stacks on each respectively, and once you have the USB connection, implementing CDC/ACM is a somewhat inefficient use of the available bandwidth. The purpose of the CDC/ACM class is primarily to allow "legacy" software to work on a PC.
If you need to connect to a "real" serial port, you should use a real UART - which are far more ubiquitous than USB controllers on microcontrollers in any case.
You should learn a little bit about USB device classes. CDC is a USB device class, and ACM is a subclass that I assume you are using. The device you made could be called a "CDC ACM device" because it uses the CDC class and the ACM subclass.
These classes and subclasses are defined by the USB Implementers Forum in documents that you can find here:
http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/devclass_docs/
These documents specify things like what USB descriptors a CDC ACM device should have in order to describe itself to the host, and what kinds of interfaces and endpoints it should have, and how serial data will be represented in terms of USB transactions and transfers.
Note that CDC ACM only specifies some USB commands for transferring data between the host and the device. It does not specify what the device will actually do with that data. You can use CDC ACM to implement a USB-to-serial adapter, or you can just use it as a general purpose communication interface for whatever data you want to send.
Yes, you do need a driver on the PC side. The driver needs to be designed to run on your specific operating system. It needs to create some kind of virtual serial port device in your operating system that other software (which only knows about serial ports) can find and connect to. It needs to translate serial port operations performed by other software on the serial port (e.g. writing some bytes to the serial port) into low-level USB commands according to the CDC ACM specifications (e.g. sending some bytes out to the device on a particular endpoint in the form of USB packets). It needs to somehow know which USB devices it should operate on, since not every USB device is a CDC ACM device.
For Windows, you will probably use the usbser.sys driver which comes with Windows. For versions of Windows older than Windows 10, you will need to write an INF file to associate your device to usbser.sys and sign it. For Windows 10 and later, there is a new INF file called usbser.inf already included with Windows which will automatically match any valid CDC ACM device. This means you don't have to write or distribute a driver for CDC ACM devices if you only intend to support using the device on Windows 10 or later. The partnership between Microsoft and Arduino which began in 2015 gives me hope that Microsoft will continue supporting and improving usbser.sys in the future. In fact, they claim that in Windows 10 "the driver has been rewritten by using the Kernel-Mode Driver Framework that improves the overall stability of the driver", so that is good news.
For Linux, there is the cdc_acm kernel module, which has been a standard part of the kernel for a long time and should work automatically with any CDC ACM device you plug in.
For Mac OS X, there is the AppleUSBCDCACM driver, which should work automatically with any CDC ACM device you plug in.
Note that for any of these drivers to recognize your device and work with it, your device has to have certain values in its USB descriptors, and the requirements can vary depending on what exact driver version you are talking about.
Will the USB port now simply look like a serial port?
No, that's the wrong way to think about it. The USB port will still look like a USB port, but the various USB drivers provided by your operating system will recognize that a CDC ACM device is plugged into that port and create a new entry in your operating system's list of serial ports. Then if you run some software that only knows about serial ports, it can connect to that port.
In fact, if you make a composite device, you can have a single USB device plugged into a single USB port that actually has two or more virtual serial ports.
I have a text file containing NMEA (GPS) data that I' like to replay to a COM port so the application I'm building can read it.
I considered writing a quick C# console app to loop over the file but I don't have any COM ports. This appraoch would require a virtual COM port and I'm not sure what challenges that would entail.
I also looked at GPSGate. Nice product but it doesn't seem to replay NMEA files over one of its virtual com ports.
How can I stream an existing text file to simulate GPS over a serial connection? I prefer a serial port, rather than mocking, to avoid reworking the application I'm developing and to facilitate use with other applications that use GPS over serial ports for which we don't have source code.
Update 1 - I downloaded a trial version of Virtual Serial Port Driver by Eltima and within a few minutes had some C# code writing to a serial port and appearing in Termite. Yes, it works but $100 seems excessive for what I'm trying to accomplish. Open source or free commercial would be preferred.
gpsfake is part of the gpsd project
gpsfake is a test harness for gpsd and its clients. It opens a pty (pseudo-TTY), launches a gpsd instance that thinks the slave side of the pty is its GPS device, and repeatedly feeds the contents of one or more test logfiles through the master side to the GPS. If there are multiple logfiles, sentences from them are interleaved in the order the files are specified.
You can port the output to a virtual serial via /usr/bin/gpspipe -r | socat - PTY,link=/tmp/gpsd.pty,raw using gpspipe, also from the gpsd project, to be picked up however you choose.
It is POSIX compliant.
You need a virtual serial port such as:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/com0com/
and a hyper terminal replacement.. in XP and earlier it was very easy with the shipped copy of hyperterminal as mentioned bellow..
You set up a virtual null modem connection
Null modem has a COM4 to COM5 Connection established as Null modem std gps is 4800Baud
Hyperterminal to COM5
Application to COM4
Copy paste your NMEA Values into Hyperterminal this isn't 1Hz like GPS though.. to enable 1Hz(or 1 line per second) you will need to find a different application than hyperterminal to send the messages at 1 second increments.