I set up a new test target for my app useing Xcode Test Plans to specify an .xcappdata file to use for each target. We run the tests in iPad & iOS Simulators, which get recreated from scratch prior to each test run.
However, Xcode never actually copies over the app data (such as com.ourCompany.ourApp.plist, and other files) from the .xcappdata file into the appropriate directories of the simulator container in ~/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/SIMULATED_DEVICE_GUID/data/Containers/Data/Applications/OUR_APP'S_CONTAINER_GUID/.
So our tests fail because, for example, a fresh app .plist gets generated instead of using the one from our .xcappdata, resulting in UserDefaults settings values not matching expectations.
Am I doing something wrong? How can we get this to actually work...?
I have found multiple other threads, such as this one on Apple Dev Forums from four years ago, and several on Stack Overflow such as this post, that indicate that this feature has been broken since at least Xcode 6.
But... didn't they just add the per-target .xcappdata feature as part of Test Plans in Xcode 11? How could it already be broken again in Xcode 12.3? Does Apple not to have tests around their own Test Plans feature?
I hope someone can enlighten me... is it a permissions issue? A regression due to Big Sur? Do I need to add some cryptic executable (buried within the uncountable subfolders in /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Some/Deeply/Nested/Toolchain/usr/bin) into Security & Privacy > Privacy > Full Disk Access?
Any help would be much appreciated... thanks!
I did find the following workarounds, but neither seems very scalable:
set the HOME and CFFIXED_USER_HOME environment variables to $(SRC_ROOT)/path/to/myData.xcappdata/AppData/ in the test scheme (this causes that folder to now become the simulated app's container directory, resulting in these files getting modified as a result of the tests running with this as their actual home instead of the usual container location!)
use a script to copy over the files from the subfolders nested inside .xcappdata into the same subfolders that are nested inside of ~/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/SOME-GUID/data/Containers/Data/Applications/ANOTHER-GUID/ (of course since these GUIDs are random and determined at test time, how to write such a script and get it to work reliably on both CI machines [that execute tests using Fastlane scripts] and local developer machines [that execute tests from within Xcode], would be pretty annoying)
Related
I'm experimenting with Dart/Angular/WebStorm for the first time. One thing which I've found a little jarring has been the build->error cycle. In Visual Studio, I am used to this work flow:
Write some code
Running a build
Having a fresh list of errors being created
Fixing a subset of them (some or all)
Go to 1.
I'm wondering what is the workflow with Dart?
I have the following issues:
I can't figure out a way to just run pub/transformer/whatever-it-is-that-roughly-equates-to-a-build. The only way I can do this is by attempting to run a configuration
When the transformer is run, it just dumps a gigantic error output to the Pub Serve window. It does not clear the existing output, so I end up with duplicate error or errors I've already fixed. So I'm left manually scrolling through the list but taking care not to So I must manually right-click and clear the output window and rerun it.
The transformer only runs when it detects a file change. This makes sense, but when coupled with 1 and 2, I've often cleared the output and I am running the transformer just to see a fresh list of errors. Which I don't get.
So my workflow becomes:
Write some code.
Run
Close dartium browser window (I'm not actually interested in running it, just seeing my errors)
See a bunch of errors. Realise that I didn't clear the errors from the previous run.
Right click and clear the pub serve output window.
Run again
Close dartium browser window again
Realise that the transformer has not run because it already ran in steps 1-3 and I haven't changed a file.
Change a file
Run again
Close dartium browser window again
Scroll through error list to find errors to fix
I find this a little cumbersome. Perhaps there is a philosophical point here on relying too much on my tooling to identify and fix errors (although I thought that was the entire point) but I'm just wondering what other people do to simplify this - I'm faintly surprised I appear to be alone in this.
You may run 'Pub Build' (available in the right-click menu of pubspec.yaml file and also right in the editor when pubspec is open). It is not incremental, so it runs longer (i.e. runs from scratch each time) but it gives you the list of errors just as if you've cleared Pub Serve output, edited each file in the project, started run configuration and closed a browser.
Sometimes errors are only shown when pub serve generates output the first time. For reloads some errors aren't shown anymore.
I'm not sure if this is a limitation of pub serve or a bug in the transformers.
pub serve is going to be replaced a new build system that builds to disk instead of in-memory only.
DDC isn't perfect yet either, but it's the future and I'd suggest to try this instead. There are known performance problems with Angular, but they are working on it.
See also
- https://webdev.dartlang.org/tools/dartdevc
- https://github.com/dart-lang/build
I have a solution written in VB with some C# components. The solution uses some libraries from 2 outside sources. I have been working on this project for several months without issue. I cannot identify anything specific that I did to change my system or configuration. I was just working through the code, transitioning from an old set of library calls to the new library calls. The new library calls require complete rewrite so I change sections of the code and test to that point. Visual Studio 2013 debugger as of Friday morning will no longer recognize or show my local variables in this solution. The only things that appear in the Locals window are under Me. The code does work and I have it writing out to a text log file to confirm the values of variables at certain points, but the debugger has gone blind. When I add any of these local variables to Watch the response is " is not declared. It may be inaccessible due to its protection level."
Steps I've taken so far with no permanent success:
looked online and tried the few matches I found with no success
deleted the bin and obj folders and had the solution rebuild with no
success
recreated solution from scratch, copied over base files and rebuilt
solution and project (which worked for a few hours), until I did a
rebuild project and problem appeared again
updated to pack 5 and no success
I have opened my older projects and checked them. The debugger runs just fine and shows the variables. It is obviously something that happens during the rebuild process.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Update:
Let me try to explain a little more clearly the situation.
I have an application I have built and am selling to some customers. Version 1 is installed and running at several locations. It is written in VB and uses some older COM libraries for a particular integration process.
The vendor is retiring the COM libraries. Their new libraries are in C#.
I created a new copy of my entire application (solution) and imported the new C# libraries. I have been going through and replacing the old code with the code for the new calls.I recompiled the solution and everything ran fine in debug.
The objects used with the new calls are completely different and there is limited documentation so I update a section of code and test to that point. Each time I "Save all Files", rebuild the project and test the changes. Everything worked fine for a few days. On Friday morning I started working on more changes and got an odd error. The system was not getting a proper value for a certain variable. When I went to check it in the WATCH window, debugger said it could not evaluate it. I figured something was hung up so I shut everything down and rebooted my machine. When I tried it again later, the same problem.
After several hours of no success I exited VS, renamed the folder to "OLD" and recreated the solution from the older version. Immediately everything was looking fine. I started making the changes and testing. Each time I did a rebuild, everything looked fine until the last change. Here I am again.
The code works fine up to the point I have updated. The only issue is that the debugger windows are not working correctly. If a variable is declared at the Class level outside the Sub, they can be seen. The only variables the debugger is blind to are the local variables within the running Sub.
I looked for anyone else with this issue and only found a few items. I tried the suggestions but no joy. I am left with having to temporarily define the variables outside the sub so I can see them while debugging.
I am on VS 2013 Update 5.
Do I need to move to VS 2015 to get around this?
Thanks again for your time and assistance.
I am assuming that you haven't changed versions of visual studio since the last time a rebuild worked for you.
recreated solution from scratch, copied over base files and rebuilt solution and project (which worked for a few hours), until I did a rebuild project and problem appeared again
Based on this, you create it from scratch and everything works until you do the rebuild right? But you are copying the base files still and you have new library calls since the last time a rebuild didn't mess up the locals window. So one of those is almost assuredly the culprit.
Since the library calls seem to be the thing that changed based on your post start there. If you go back to the old code and do a rebuild does it fix it? Assuming so, put the library calls back one at a time until it breaks.
If going back to the old code doesn't fix it, create from scratch with the old code and copy over the base files and rebuild. If that fixes it, add new library calls one at a time and rebuild after each until it breaks.
If that doesn't fix it either, then you will need to dig deeper on what else might have changed.
You are copying base files so eliminate those as the problem if you can:
Are you able to use placeholders instead of the base files or something that won't necessarily work as a finished product but that will allow you to debug, rebuild, debug again to see if the problem is related to one of them? Check the dates on the base files and ensure that they haven't changed since the last time a rebuild worked.
Something you could do concurrently could be to have have a colleague do a rebuild on their machine and see if the same issue comes up for them. It would (almost) completely eliminate the possibility that it is a configuration / program corruption issue on yours. Alternately, there are some free vb.net compilers online that you can upload files and code to. I'm not sure if that would be practical for you (due to the components of your program and/or sensitivity of the data) or not and haven't ever tried any where there is C# code in there but I wouldn't think that would be an issue.
I am at my wits end. I've written a xul app and it runs fine if I open the .xul in firefox directly. But xulrunner doesn't cooperate at all. I can run my xul fine by using the -chrome flag for firefox and giving it an absolute path, but -app doesn't work on firefox either. I have all the files required (application.ini, chrome.manifest both in root and /chrome/ and tried with either missing as well) and their format has been checked and re-checked.
I was prepared to paste all my files here and link the code, but I've tried everything, including a boilerplate project from http://www.mozdev.org/projects/wizard/ (from the application wizard) which reacts the same way as my own project.
xulrunner returns no error message, nothing - it just stays there in the task manager, no cpu load, not loading anything to memory, inert.
I've tried other projects (https://github.com/matthewkastor/XULRunner-Examples - the periodic table works at least) but I can't get a single solid lead on why some projects run properly, while others just have xulrunner waiting and doing nothing. It also seems this is a rare problem because most people can at least run the boilerplate fine, even if their own projects don't initially run.
I don't think it's necessary to post my code at the moment since it behaves the same way as the boilerplate. Can anyone tell me possible reasons why xulrunner won't work with the boilerplate but will with the example project?
I'm running v25 on win xp sp2 and I have been searching and reading all day, so I'm pretty sure I've read everything related - thanks in advance; I hope 5 days of work won't be wasted :(
edit:
SOLUTION: I messed up and didn't notice that prefs.js was missing or empty. Even if you have no preferences in your app, prefs.js is needed to set up the environment and tell firefox or xulrunner where the xul file to start from is. Without this pointer it has no idea. Yes, the MDN article does state this and what it contains is accurate, this was a big mistake on my part, as it seems I subconsciously (or not?) ignored the prefs.js file because I had no need for preferences in my app.
tl;dr if your apps don't work but the example files do, check your prefs.js even if you don't use preferences.
Posting this to close this question, since it doesn't need further answering.
The fault was with me - the app required a valid prefs.js file which I hadn't created because I was under the impression it wasn't required unless you intended to have preferences in your app. The MDN (at least at the time) specified this.
I'm having an issue which I'd have thought others might have come accross, but I can't find any posts.
My (small) WiX projects are taking ages (2-4mins each) to build on our build server, but are much quicker on my desktop (a few seconds).
After some poking around I've narrowed it down to McAfee scanning the temporary files created by light (located in the TEMP user environment variable). I don't know why it's taking so long to scan - disabling the AV has got the build time to well under 2 mins, previously it was over 20!
Now my issue is how to exclude these temp files from the AV. I don't want to exclude the TEMP folder for obvious reasons and there doesn't appear to be a way of excluding by file name without creating a big hole in the AV.
So I guess my question is, is there a way of configuring light.exe to use a different path other than TEMP? I tried some command line switches with no luck. Maybe I could add something to the Light.exe.config?
Cheers.
Can you not just disable real time antivirus scanning on your build machines? My argument for doing this would be that your VM should be full scanned and then disabled and that all files making it's way into the build machine are coming from source control and / or file shares that should have already been scanned at various points upstream in the process.
We ran over 100,000 builds a year at my last job and A/V would have killed us.
Otherwise, if you type light.exe -? you'll see there is an environment variable called WIX_TEMP that overrides the temp directory.
I'm new to VB6 but i'm currently in charge of maintaining a horror of editor like tool with plenty of forms, classes, modules and 3rd party tools all chunk together like the skin faces on that guy in the texas chainsaw massacre...
What i don't understand is why i get different results when i run the app in debugging mode, vs when i compiled it and run it on my devevelopment pc vs when i installed it on a different pc.
Yes i know i'm dumb, so please direct me to where i can find out more about this. I'm hoping to find out something like different linking, registry related etc connection that i'm simply not getting right now, i.e. something like wax on, wax off :P
The main pain in the neck is when i'm trying to debug some errors from my QA and i need to find a spare pc to test this on plus i can't directly debug because i don't know where the code is if i do it that manner.
Thanks.
i run the app in debugging mode vs when i compiled it and run it on my
devevelopment pc
When you compile you have the option of compiling to native code or pcode. The debugger runs using pcode only. Under rare circumstances when you compile to native code there will be a change in behavior. This particular is really rare. I used VB6 since it's release and I may get it once or twice a year. My application is a complex CAD/CAM creating shapes and running metal cutting machine and has two dozen DLLs. Not a typical situation. At home with my hobby software I never ran into this problem.
There are another class of errors that result from event sequencing problems. While VB6 isn't truly multi-tasking it has the ability to jump out of the current code block to process a event. If it re-enters the same block for the new event interesting things (to say the least) can result. I think this is the likely source of your problems as you software is an editor which is a highly interactive type of software.
In general the problem is fixed by reordering the effected areas. You find the effected area by inserting MsgBox or write to a text file to log where you are. I recommend logging to a text file as MsgBox tend to alter behavior that are timing or multi-tasking related.
Remember if a event fire while VB6 in the middle of a code block and there a DoEvents floating around then it will leave the code block process the event and return to the original code block. If it re-enters the same code block and you didn't mean for this to happen then you will have problems. And you will have different problems on different computers as the timing will be different for each.
The easiest way to deal with this type of issues is create some flag variables. In multi-tasking parlance they are known as semaphores or mutexes. WHen you enter a critical section of code, you set it true. When you leave the routine you set it to false. If it is already true when you enter that section of code you don't execute it.
when i installed it on a different pc.
These are usually the result of the wrong DLL installed. Most likely you have an older version while the target has a newer version. I would download the free Virtual PC and create a clean Window XP install to double check this.
If your problem is event timing this too can be different on different computers. This is found by logging (not MsgBox) suspect regions.
If you can display a screen shot or the text of your specific errors then I can help better.
The first thing to check would be the versions of all the dlls that your app depends on - including the service pack version of the VB6 dll.
Have you any more specific details about what's behaving differently?