I have 3 tables in PostgreSQL database:
person (id, first_name, last_name, age)
interest (id, title, person_id REFERENCES person)
location (id, city, state text NOT NULL, country, person_id REFERENCES person)
city can be null, but state and country cannot.
A person can have many interests but only one location. My challenge is to return a table of people who share the same interest and location.
All ID's are serialized and thus created automatically.
Let's say I have 4 people living in "TX", they each have two interests a piece, BUT only person 1 and 3 share a similar interest, lets say "Guns" (cause its Texas after all). I need to select all people from person table where the person's interest title (because the id is auto generated, two Guns interest would result in two different ID keys) equals that of another persons interest title AND the city or state is also equal.
I was looking at the answer to this question here Select Rows with matching columns from SQL Server and I feel like the logic is sort of similar to my question, the difference is he has two tables, to join together where I have three.
return a table of people who share the same interest and location.
I'll interpret this as "all rows from table person where another rows exists that shares at least one matching row in interest and a matching row in location. No particular order."
A simple solution with a window function in a subquery:
SELECT p.*
FROM (
SELECT person_id AS id, i.title, l.city, l.state, l.country
, count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY i.title, l.city, l.state, l.country) AS ct
FROM interest i
JOIN location l USING (person_id)
) x
JOIN person p USING (id)
WHERE x.ct > 1;
This treats NULL values as "equal". (You did not specify clearly.)
Depending on undisclosed cardinalities, there may be faster query styles. (Like reducing to duplicative interests and / or locations first.)
Asides 1:
It's almost always better to have a column birthday (or year_of_birth) than age, which starts to bit-rot immediately.
Asides 2:
A person can have [...] only one location.
You might at least add a UNIQUE constraint on location.person_id to enforce that. (If you cannot make it the PK or just append location columns to the person table.)
Related
I'm working on my SQL project using the Oracle database for class, and I'm asked a question that I see far too often.
You have three tables:
STUDENT: SNO, SNAME
CLASS: CNO, CNAME
ATTENDANCE: SNO, CNO, Grade
The question I keep finding is of a similar type: Find the names of the students that attend in all of the classes that "John" (or anyone else) attends.
John attends three classes, so I have to find the students that also attend those three classes (could be more, but those three must be there). However, I won't always know how many classes John (or whoever) attends, so it can't be hardcoded like that.
SELECT jclass.CNO
FROM attendance jclass
INNER JOIN student on jclass.SNO = student.SNO
WHERE student.SNAME = 'John';
This gets me the classes that John attends. I tried to add the identifier for the other students:
SELECT student.SNAME
FROM student
INNER JOIN attendance on student.SNO = attendance.SNO
INNER JOIN class on attendance.CNO = class.CNO
WHERE student.SNAME <> 'John'
AND class.CNO IN (SELECT jclass.CNO
FROM attendance jclass
INNER JOIN student on jclass.SNO = student.SNO
WHERE student.SNAME = 'John');
However, this only gets me the students that appear in at least one of John's classes, rather than all of them. I can see why it's doing this, but I'm not sure how to fix it. It's the one big struggle I'm having with SQL.
Here is one way - assuming SNO is primary key in the first table, CNO is primary key in the second table, and (SNO, CNO) is (composite) primary key in the third table, and that the input student is given by a unique identifier (first name is distinctly NOT a unique identifier, so the problem stated in terms of giving "John" as the input makes no sense). Here I assume the "special" student is identified by SNO = 1001; you can make 1001 into a variable, or change it to a subquery that selects a (unique!!) SNO based on some other inputs.
I didn't try to make the query as efficient as possible, or use features you most likely haven't seen in your class. Rather, I tried to make it as elementary and as readable as possible.
select sno
from attendance
where cno in (select cno from attendance where sno = 1001)
group by sno
having count(*) = (select count(*) from attendance where sno = 1001)
;
The strategy is simple: the subquery in the in condition finds the classes attended by the "special" student, then from the attendance table we select only rows for those classes. Group by student, and count. Keep only the students for whom the count is equal to the total count for the "special" student. Note the last condition is about groups, not about input rows, so it belongs in the having clause.
I have multiple (8-10) different datasets, all of which have a primary key (Name), some common columns and then some individual columns each. For example, table 1 might consist of Name, Date, Age, Username, LoginTime; table 2 Name, Date, MothersName,LoginTime, Age; table3 Name, Username, School, University, Age and so on and so forth.
Ideally I would like this all merged into a single table with unique columns: Name, Date, Age, Username, LoginTime, MothersName, School, University.
I know Access doesn't allow the use of covalesce - how can I go about creating this master table? I know what order I would like SQL to look in i.e. if Age is not in table 3, only then look in table 2 (even if table 2 has a value), and only then look in table 1 for that given Name. However I cannot work out how best to do the join so I don't get table1.Age, table2.Age, and table3.Age across all of my common fields...
Say I have a student table with the following fields - student id, student name, age, gender, marks, class.Assume that due to some error, there are multiple entries corresponding to each student. My requirement is to identify the duplicate rows in the table and the filter criterion is the student name and the class.But in the query result, in addition to identifying the duplicate records, I also need to find the original student detail which got duplicated. Is there any method to do this. I went through this answer: SQL: How to find duplicates based on two fields?. But here it only specifies how to find the duplicate rows and not a means to identify the actual row that was duplicated. Kindly throw some light on the possible solution. Thanks.
First of all: if the columns you've listed are all in the same table, it looks like your database structure could use some normalization.
In terms of your question: I'm assuming your StudentID field is a database generated, primary key and so has not been duplicated. (If this is not the case, I think you have bigger problems than just duplicates).
I'm also assuming the duplicate row has a higher value for StudentID than the original row.
I think the following should work (Note: I haven't created a table to verify this so it might not be perfect straight away. If it doesn't it should be fairly close)
select dup.StudentID as DuplicateStudentID
dup.StudentName, dup.Age, dup.Gender, dup.Marks, dup.Class,
orig.StudentID as OriginalStudentId
from StudentTable dup
inner join (
-- Find first student record for each unique combination
select Min(StudentId) as StudentID, StudentName, Age, Gender, Marks, Class
from StudentTable t
group by StudentName, Age, Gender, Marks, Class
) orig on dup.StudentName = orig.StudenName
and dup.Age = orig.Age
and dup.Gender = orig.Gender
and dup.Marks = orig.Marks
and dup.Class = orig.Class
and dup.StudentID > orig.StudentID -- Don't identify the original record as a duplicate
I have multiple tables each connected by PersonID.
PhoneNumber contains columns for phone number type (work, cell, home), phone numbers, a value for whether SMS messaging is enabled, and person IDs.
Person contains names and email addresses and its key is person ID
AttributeValue contains the values for a number of 'custom' attributes (each attribute has a unique 'AttributeId'). The key columns in this table are AttributeId, Value, and EntityId. EntityId matches Person Id
I'm trying to find the corresponding names and email addresses from the PersonTable for the Person ID that meets the following criteria.
FROM [rock].[dbo].[AttributeValue]
WHERE AttributeId='1770';
FROM [rock].[dbo].[PhoneNumber]
WHERE IsMessagingEnabled=0 AND NumberTypeValueId=12
First of all in SQL when you got multiple tables related by one ID you can use joins.
For example I got a table Customer(ID,Name,Firstname) , a table Address(ID, CustomerID, Name, PostalCode, City) and a table Phone(ID,CustomerID,PhoneHome,PhoneMobile)
You can use this kind of query to find addresses and phones corresponding to customers :
SELECT [Address.Name], [Phone.PhoneHome], [Phone.PhoneMobile] FROM Address, Phone
INNER JOIN Address ON [Customer.ID] = [Address.CustomerID]
INNER JOIN Phone ON [Customer.ID] = [Phone.CustomerID]
WHERE [Customer.ID] = "Value"
Hope it will help you, at least you can find good examples of joints on :
http://openclassrooms.com/courses/introduction-aux-jointures-sql (I believe you're french so this is a good french site to learn about it.)
Have a good day
Something like this?
SELECT * FROM Person WHERE PersonID IN (SELECT PersonID FROM ....)
I'm currently working on a personal project and I could use a little help. Here's the scenario:
I'm creating a database (MS Access) for all of the movies myself and some friends have ever watched. We rated all of our movies on IMDb and used the export feature to get all of the movie data and our movie ratings. I plan on doing some summary analysis on Excel. One thing I am interested in is the most common movie genre that each person watched. Below is my current scenario. Note that the column "const" is the movies' unique IDs. I also have individual tables for each person's ratings and the following tables are the summary tables that make up the combination of all the movies we have watched.
Here's the table I had: http://imgur.com/v5x9Dhg
I assigned each genre an ID, like this: http://imgur.com/aXdr9XI
And here is a table where I have separate instances for each movie ID and a unique genre: http://imgur.com/N0wULo8
I want to find a way to count up all of the genres that each person watches. Any advice? I would love to provide any additional information that you need!
Thank you!
You need to have at least one table which has one row per user and const (movie watched). In the 3 example tables you posted nothing shows who watched which movies, which is information you need to solve your problem. You mention having "individual tables for each person's ratings," so I assume you have that information. You will want to combine all of them though, into a table called PERSON_MOVIE or something of the like.
So let's say your second table is called GENRE and its columns are ID, Genre.
Let's say your third table is called GENRE_MOVIE and its columns are Const and ID (ID corresponds to ID on the GENRE table)
Let's say the fourth table, which you did not post, but which is required, is called PERSON_MOVIE and its columns are person, Const, rating.
You could then write a query like this:
select vw1.*, ge.genre
from (select um.person, gm.id as genre_id, count(*) as num_of_genre
from user_movie um
inner join genre_movie gm
on um.const = gm.const
group by um.person, gm.id) vw1
inner join (select person, max(num_of_genre) as high_count
from (select um.person, gm.id, count(*) as num_of_genre
from user_movie um
inner join genre_movie gm
on um.const = gm.const
group by um.person, gm.id) x
group by person) vw2
on vw1.person = vw2.person
and vw1.num_of_genre = vw2.high_count
inner join genre ge
on vw1.genre_id = ge.id
Edit re: your comment:
So right now you have multiple tables reflecting people's ratings of movies. You need to combine those into a table called PERSON_MOVIE or something similar (as in example above).
There will be 3 columns on the table: person, const, rating
I'm not sure if access supports the traditional create table as select query but ordinarily you would be able to construct such a table in the following way:
create table person_movie as
select 'Bob', const, [You rated]
from ratings_by_bob
union all
select 'Sally', const, [You rated]
from ratings_by_sally
union all
select 'Jack', const, [You rated]
from ratings_by_jack
....
If not, just combine the tables manually and add a third column as shown indicating what users are reflected by each row. Then you can run my initial query.