I trained the network without batching, hence the input dimension of graph is (H,W,C) (not even [1,H,W,C]).
But during inference, I need predictions for multiple images (batched inference).
How can we achieve this
Related
I want to work with Keras models pre-trained on ImageNet. The models and information about their performance are here.
I downloaded ILSVRC 2012 (ImageNet) dataset and evaluated ResNet50 on the validation dataset. The top-1 accuracy should be 0.749 but I get 0.68. The top-5 accuracy should be 0.921, mine is 0.884. I also tried VGG16 and MobileNet with similar discrepancies.
I preprocess the images using built-in preprocess_input function (e.g. tensorflow.keras.applications.resnet50.preprocess_input()).
My guess is that the dataset is different. How can I make sure that the validation dataset that I use for evaluation is the same as the one that was used by the authors? Could there be any other reason why I get different results?
A layer (....) which is an input to the Conv operator producing the output array model/re_lu_1/Relu, is lacking min/max data, which is necessary for quantization. If accuracy matters, either target a non-quantized output format, or run quantized training with your model from a floating point checkpoint to change the input graph to contain min/max information. If you don't care about accuracy, you can pass --default_ranges_min= and --default_ranges_max= for easy experimentation.
For tensorflow 1.x, if you want to quantize, you have to place it with fake quantization nodes to activate the quantization of the model.
There are 3 phases of quantization:
Training part: load your model to graph => create training graph by contrib => train and store weights ckpt
Eval part: load your model to graph without weights => create eval graph => restore graph => export to frozen model
Toco/tflite convert frozen model to quantized model
However, the most important factor is the configuration of batch_normalization in the model. After trying multiple configuration, the best one is using batch_normalization without fused option from tensorflow.keras.layers.
The reason is because Tensorflow want to avoid the folding result to be quantized. Therefore, activation behind batchnorm wont work. Details in [here][1]
In short, this layer should be attached only under tensorflow.keras.layers.Conv2D with parsed activation param, which is Relu/Relu6/Identity
If you conduct the above process: Conv2d=>Activation=>BatchNorm
the layer will not yield errors does not have MinMax information
I will describe my intention here. I want to import BERT pretrained model via tf-hub function hub.module(bert_url, trainable = True) and utilize it for text classification task. I plan to use a large corpus to fine-tune weights of BERT as well as a few dense layers whose inputs are the BERT outputs. I would then like to freeze layers of BERT and train only the dense layers following BERT. How can I do this efficiently?
You mention Hub's TF1 API hub.Module, so I suppose you are writing TF1 code and using the TF1-compatible Hub assets google/bert/..., such as https://tfhub.dev/google/bert_cased_L-12_H-768_A-12/1
Are you going to have separate run of your program for the two phases of training? If so, maybe you can just drop trainable=True from the hub.Module call in the second run. This doesn't affect variable names, so you can restore the training result from the first run, including BERT's adjusted weights. (To be clear: the pre-trained weights shipped with the hub.Module are only used for initialization at the very start of training; restoring a checkpoint overrides them.)
I have trained a seq2seq model with 1M samples and saved the latest checkpoint. Now, I have some additional training data of 50K sentence pairs which has not been seen in previous training data. How can I adapt the current model to this new data without starting the training from scratch?
You do not have to re-run the whole network initialization. You may run an incremental training.
Training from pre-trained parameters
Another use case it to use a base model and train it further with new training options (in particular the optimization method and the learning rate). Using -train_from without -continue will start a new training with parameters initialized from a pre-trained model.
Remember to tokenize your 50K corpus the same way you tokenized the previous one.
Also, you do not have to use the same vocabulary beginning with OpenNMT 0.9. See the Updating the vocabularies section and use the appropriate value with -update_vocab option.
I want to build a conditional GAN with tensorflow and use input pipline for loading my dataset. The problem is that in each iteration I want to the use same data batch for training both generative and discriminative models, but because their training operators are fetched in different runs they will receive different batches of data. Is there any solution for that or should I use a feed_dict?
One way to use the same data is to use a tf.group on the generator and discriminator train ops so they are trained jointly, and set use_locking=True on your optimizers to prevent pathological race conditions. Note that there still will be some stochasticity due to the fact that TensorFlow runtime won't guarantee that either the generator or the discriminator will consistently be trained first.
This idea is already implemented in TensorFlow's TFGAN library in get_joint_train_hooks, although it uses hooks instead of grouping the training ops (the "joint" refers to the fact that the discriminator and generator are trained jointly, rather than sequentially).