I'm looking to use Netdata to monitor multiple nodes. I realize I can have one node gather data from multiple nodes, and to use a customized dashboard display. And I found that netdata cloud itself has a nice uncluttered display of multiple on a single page. See the link to the image below. Can I create the same display on a local netdata installation, without using the cloud? Thanks. - Mark
Netdata single display
You can sort-of create a dashboard like that, using the custom dashboard functionality. In essence, you will create an html file that has charts from different nodes.
Since you are creating the HTML, you could layer it in a way that is analogous to the screenshot.
You can read more about custom dashboard on our documentation
That being said, I think Netdata Cloud is the best solution there. Mind that we don't store any data. When you access the dashboard, the data is streamed directly from the node to your browser via the Netdata Cloud-Agent link.
Related
I use cytoscape to visually map network infrastructures. Using the thick client, I embed node information using node table columns and embed link information as well. I also create an "External Link" for each node so that I can click on the node (selecting external link) and get much more detailed information for each node.
Is there any way I can create an external link with the Full Web Application? This is an enormously useful tool?
I have a middle size asp.net core application (online store). One of the functions is uploading pictures for products. Also, I want to host my application in Kubernetes in a cloud.
I know that a common solution to this problem is to use some S3-like file storage. But my store quite little and I don't want to complicate it very much.
So I want to use some folder in mySite/wwwroot like mySite/wwwroot/storage to storage all pictures:
It's simple to work with
I can create a simple URL for my pictures like mysite.com/storage/picture.png
Is it somehow possible to map mySite/wwwroot/storage to some persistent volume?
What hostname should I use? It is easy to mount images like Postgres because Postgres use some hardcoded folder to store data (/var/lib/postgresql/data).
I understand that it restricts all replicas of my site only by one node.
I would like to have two separate Parse servers (configured with a different app ID) connect to the same mongodb, so they can see the same set of users, so that I can create 2 different apps that share the same userbase.
Is this something Parse would support? Are there any expected conflicts or config caveats? I was unable to find info about this on Parse's github..
thanks
There's nothing to do, besides setting the database URL option to the same value on both servers, and that your database is accessible from both servers.
I'm not sure why you would need two different applicationId's as you want the same data and likely, logic running on both apps.
No, Parse Server does not support sharing classes between applications.
What you could do is have one of the instances or maybe a third one handle authentication and store your user information. I am pretty sure this would mean you will have to manually set user info on your requests and objects to save on the other two instances.
Another option is for each of the instances have an afterSave hook on the user class that saves and updates the info at the other instance. This seems easier to do and maintain.
I would choose the second option.
My company decided to migrate to the Oracle Fusion Middleware, and we are starting to use the Oracle Webcenter components, especially the WCC (v11.1).
We can access our documents via 2 different entry points :
http://server:port_1/wcc
http://server:port_2/cs (and this URL is also accessed via RIDC)
The GUI are very different from one app to the other, but the main functionalities seem to be the same on both of them : I can browse, view, download stored documents, I have access to the metadata, I can do an advanced search or upload a file...
Why does Oracle provide 2 webapps to manage the content ? Why are these URLs on 2 different Weblogic servers (or domains) ? Should we use one address rather than the other ?
Thank you.
They are simply two different GUIs. Some functionality is available in one that may not be available in the other.
Use whatever interface best fits your needs (including what user's may prefer).
/cs/ is for the native (original) UI.
/wcc/ is for the new(ish) ADF WebUI. Also see this blog post.
I was wanting to use a file sharing server to keep certain files up-to-date and constant across multiple instances of my application across multiple computers - like (for example) writing a multiplayer game, which stores all the player's positions in a text file, and uses something like Dropbox to keep the text file constant across all the applications, and each application instance can change the file with that application's player's position, and then the rest of the applications can update accordingly. This is only an example, and is not what I intend to do using this technology. What I want to do does not rely on fast sharing of data very quickly - but only periodically downloading and updating the text file.
I was wondering how I might be able to do this using the Dropbox API for Objective-C without prompting the user for any Dropbox username/password - just store a single Dropbox account's login information, log into it automatically and update/download the file stored on it?
From what I have found out from experimenting, Dropbox prompts users for their passwords via a web-broswer, and is designed to accommodate multiple accounts, whereas I only need to accommodate the 'Server' account.
So, is there anyway to do this sort of thing using the Dropbox API, or should I use something else. Or do I need to find out how to write my own server. Using some sort of file sharing API seems a lot easier to me than writing an actual server.
Thanks for any help,
Ben
You might think about using Google App Engine (GAE). I had a similar requirement recently and I'm thinking this is a good option when you want centralized data. Plus you can do the no-browser account login by using your own custom authentication, or I think it's even possible via OAuth? Depends on how sensitive the data is I guess. I just rolled my own.
From my research I found that using Dropbox as a server has some issues with scalability, since you'll be limited to maybe 5,000 calls per day. source It's built on Amazon S3, so you could also look at using that directly.
GAE lifts that limit up to 675,000, but can be increased up to 91 million for free.
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas
I did find an open-source project for doing this with Java, alternative you could look at Python example
I've written a daemon that continuously checks for updated files and syncs them. I wrote it for my own file manager iOS app. You can find the implementation here:
https://github.com/H2CO3/MyFile/tree/master/DropboxDaemon
I'm personally not an iOS developer but I came across this question while looking for something else and thought I would offer up another potential solution to the OP's question.
Microsoft just released something called Azure Mobile Services which supports iOS development (among other platforms). It's basically a convenient way to set up a back end system complete with push notifications, authentication, etc. without rolling your own. You don't need to know anything about Azure or servers as the setup process walks you through most of it. It is new so keep that in mind, but it looks promising for situations like this.
Here's a 10 minute video explaining how to use it with an iOS developed app along with links to more documentation:
http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/iOS-Support-in-Windows-Azure-Mobile-Services/
Hope this helps.