I need to create a new firebird-db user which has only access to 4 specific tables. Is there a way to do that?
http://www.destructor.de/firebird/gsec.htm isn't really helpful in that regard.
The - third-party - gsec documentation you link does not provide information about granting rights on tables, because gsec is only for managing users in the security database. In Firebird, rights of users are managed in the individual databases using the GRANT (and REVOKE) statements (it is even possible to grant rights to users that do not exist (yet)). Be aware, Firebird 3 deprecated gsec, and since Firebird 2.5, it is recommended to use the SQL user management statements instead of gsec.
You need to create the user, and then give the user privileges to the tables you want. See the Security chapter in the Firebird 2.5 Language Reference.
A regular, authenticated user has no privileges on any database object
until they are explicitly granted, either to that individual user or
to all users bundled as the user PUBLIC.
Specifically:
Create a user:
create user <username> password '<password>';
See also CREATE USER; to create a user, you need to be either SYSDBA, or you need to have and the admin role in the security database, and the RDB$ADMIN role in the current database, and be logged in specifying the RDB$ADMIN role on connect.
Grant the necessary privileges to the user. For example to give SELECT privileges:
grant select on table <tablename> to user <username>;
To allow select, insert, update and delete:
grant select, insert, update, delete on table <tablename> to user <username>;
See also GRANT; to grant permission to an object, you must be either SYSDBA, the owner of the object, be RDB$ADMIN in the current database, or have been granted the privilege(s) with the WITH GRANT OPTION.
When you need to grant the same set of rights to multiple users, it is better to grant rights to a role, and then grant that role to the users. However in Firebird 3 and earlier, to get the rights granted to a role, the user needs to explicitly specify that role on connect (Firebird 4 will introduce roles that are automatically applied).
Related
If I'm creating the role 'VIPGUEST' and giving them object privileges to these environments:
BedroomDEV
KitchenINT
GarageTEST
LivingroomTRN
DiningroomPROD
Create role VIPGUEST not identified
Grant connect to VIPGUEST
Grant create session TO VIPGUEST
Grant delete, execute to VIPGUEST
Grant insert, load, view to VIPGUEST
Grant refresh, references, select to VIPGUEST
Grant update, resource, index, alter to VIPGUEST
How do I combine these to get the results that I want?
I know my statements are incomplete, but I don’t know how.
There are different categories of privileges, such as system, table or procedure ones. Depending on that, GRANT differs.
You can GRANT CREATE SESSION TO VIPGUEST, but can't GRANT DELETE TO VIPGUEST. Delete what? GRANT DELETE ON EMP TO VIPGUEST would make sense.
The same goes for, for example, EXECUTE: you have to say what you'd want to allow VIPGUEST to execute, e.g. GRANT EXECUTE ON p_insert_employee TO VIPGUEST.
Have a look at the Security Guide (of your database version) for some more info.
P.S. Don't grant CONNECT nor RESOURCE. Those were "popular" roles some time ago but will be deprecated in future Oracle database releases. Correct way is what you're trying to do: create your own role with minimum set of privileges which will enable users (who will be granted that role) to work.
I am connecting to my SQL studio manager using Power BI (a report writing software). I only want tables appearing listed under a certain schema, and deny permission to access all others, instead of displaying all tables which it currently does.
Usually, when preventing individual users from accessing a schema, I would use the following code:
revoke select on schema::UnwantedSchema to User
grant select on schema::WantedSchema To User
However, now I want it so ALL users and Logins have these permission settings. Not just the individual user. Is there a way I can do this without having to set the permissions for every individual user?
If you wanted to set the privileges to multiple user logins, You need to create a role and assign the role to the ers to that role. The give required permission to the role created.
Following are the sample steps.
--Create a new role
EXEC sp_addrole 'yourRole'
GO
--Assiging role to the user
EXEC sp_addrolemember 'yourRole', 'yourUser';
GO
--Assigning permissions to the Role
GRANT ALTER, DELETE, EXECUTE, INSERT, REFERENCES, SELECT,
UPDATE, VIEW DEFINITION ON SCHEMA::YourSchema TO yourRole;
GO
GRANT CREATE TABLE, CREATE PROCEDURE, CREATE FUNCTION, CREATE VIEW TO yourRole;
GO
I'm moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL and have hit a wall with user privileges. I am used to assigning a user all privileges to all tables of a database with the following command:
# MySQL
grant all privileges on mydatabase.* to 'myuser'#'localhost' identified by 'mypassword';
It appears to me that the PostgreSQL 9.x solution involves assigning privileges to a "schema", but the effort required of me to figure out exactly what SQL to issue is proving excessive. I know that a few more hours of research will yield an answer, but I think everyone moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL could benefit from having at least one page on the web that provides a simple and complete recipe. This is the only command I have ever needed to issue for users. I'd rather not have to issue a command for every new table.
I don't know what scenarios have to be handled differently in PostgreSQL, so I'll list some of the scenarios that I have typically had to handle in the past. Assume that we only mean to modify privileges to a single database that has already been created.
(1a) Not all of the tables have been created yet, or (1b) the tables have already been created.
(2a) The user has not yet been created, or (2b) the user has already been created.
(3a) Privileges have not yet been assigned to the user, or (3b) privileges were previously assigned to the user.
(4a) The user only needs to insert, update, select, and delete rows, or (4b) the user also needs to be able to create and delete tables.
I have seen answers that grant all privileges to all databases, but that's not what I want here. Please, I am looking for a simple recipe, although I wouldn't mind an explanation as well.
I don't want to grant rights to all users and all databases, as seems to be the conventional shortcut, because that approach compromises all databases when any one user is compromised. I host multiple database clients and assign each client a different login.
It looks like I also need the USAGE privilege to get the increasing values of a serial column, but I have to grant it on some sort of sequence. My problem got more complex.
Basic concept in Postgres
Roles are global objects that can access all databases in a db cluster - given the required privileges.
A cluster holds many databases, which hold many schemas. Schemas (even with the same name) in different DBs are unrelated. Granting privileges for a schema only applies to this particular schema in the current DB (the current DB at the time of granting).
Every database starts with a schema public by default. That's a convention, and many settings start with it. Other than that, the schema public is just a schema like any other.
Coming from MySQL, you may want to start with a single schema public, effectively ignoring the schema layer completely. I am using dozens of schema per database regularly.
Schemas are a bit (but not completely) like directories in the file system.
Once you make use of multiple schemas, be sure to understand search_path setting:
How does the search_path influence identifier resolution and the "current schema"
Default privileges
Per documentation on GRANT:
PostgreSQL grants default privileges on some types of objects to
PUBLIC. No privileges are granted to PUBLIC by default on tables,
columns, schemas or tablespaces. For other types, the default
privileges granted to PUBLIC are as follows: CONNECT and CREATE TEMP TABLE
for databases; EXECUTE privilege for functions; and USAGE privilege for languages.
All of these defaults can be changed with ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES:
Grant all on a specific schema in the db to a group role in PostgreSQL
Group role
Like #Craig commented, it's best to GRANT privileges to a group role and then make a specific user member of that role (GRANT the group role to the user role). This way it is simpler to deal out and revoke bundles of privileges needed for certain tasks.
A group role is just another role without login. Add a login to transform it into a user role. More:
Why did PostgreSQL merge users and groups into roles?
Predefined roles
Update: Postgres 14 or later adds the new predefined roles (formally "default roles") pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data to simplify some of the below. See:
Grant access to all tables of a database
Recipe
Say, we have a new database mydb, a group mygrp, and a user myusr ...
While connected to the database in question as superuser (postgres for instance):
REVOKE ALL ON DATABASE mydb FROM public; -- shut out the general public
GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE mydb TO mygrp; -- since we revoked from public
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO mygrp;
To assign "a user all privileges to all tables" like you wrote (I might be more restrictive):
GRANT ALL ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO mygrp;
GRANT ALL ON ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA public TO mygrp; -- don't forget those
To set default privileges for future objects, run for every role that creates objects in this schema:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE myusr IN SCHEMA public
GRANT ALL ON TABLES TO mygrp;
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE myusr IN SCHEMA public
GRANT ALL ON SEQUENCES TO mygrp;
-- more roles?
Now, grant the group to the user:
GRANT mygrp TO myusr;
Related answer:
PostgreSQL - DB user should only be allowed to call functions
Alternative (non-standard) setting
Coming from MySQL, and since you want to keep privileges on databases separated, you might like this non-standard setting db_user_namespace. Per documentation:
This parameter enables per-database user names. It is off by default.
Read the manual carefully. I don't use this setting. It does not void the above.
Maybe you could give me an example that grants a specific user
select/insert/update/delete on all tables -- those existing and not
yet created -- of a specific database?
What you call a database in MySQL more closely resembles a PostgreSQL schema than a PostgreSQL database.
Connect to database "test" as a superuser. Here that's
$ psql -U postgres test
Change the default privileges for the existing user "tester".
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA public
GRANT INSERT, SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE ON TABLES
TO tester;
Changing default privileges has no effect on existing tables. That's by design. For existing tables, use standard GRANT and REVOKE syntax.
You can't assign privileges for a user that doesn't exist.
You can forget about the schema if you only use PUBLIC.
Then you do something like this: (see doc here)
GRANT { { SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | TRUNCATE | REFERENCES | TRIGGER }
[, ...] | ALL [ PRIVILEGES ] }
ON { [ TABLE ] table_name [, ...]
| ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA schema_name [, ...] }
TO { [ GROUP ] role_name | PUBLIC } [, ...] [ WITH GRANT OPTION ]
I don't want to grant rights to all users and all databases, as seems to be the conventional shortcut, because that approach compromises all databases when any one user is compromised. I host multiple database clients and assign each client a different login.
OK. When you assign tables to the correct role, the privileges granted will be role-specific and not to all users! Then you can decide who to give roles to.
Create a role for each database. A role can hold many users.
Then assign a client-username to the correct role.
Also assign your-username to each role if needed.
(1a) Not all of the tables have been created yet, or (1b) the tables have already been created.
OK. You can create tables later.
When you are ready, assign tables to the correct client role.
CREATE TABLE tablename();
CREATE ROLE rolename;
ALTER TABLE tablename OWNER TO rolename;
(2a) The user has not yet been created, or (2b) the user has already been created.
OK. Create usernames when you are ready. If your client needs more than one username simply create a second client-username.
CREATE USER username1;
CREATE USER username2;
(3a) Privileges have not yet been assigned to the user, or (3b) privileges were previously assigned to the user.
OK. When you are ready to give privileges, create the user and assign the correct role to her.
Use GRANT-TO command to assign roles to users.
GRANT rolename TO username1;
GRANT rolename TO username2;
(4a) The user only needs to insert, update, select, and delete rows, or (4b) the user also needs to be able to create and delete tables.
OK. You run these commands to add permissions to your users.
GRANT SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE ON dbname TO role-or-user-name;
ALTER USER username1 CREATEDB;
I am trying to setup a new role for making the access rights granting easier. I was wondering if there is an easier way to give select on all tables (newly created tables should be accessible automatically) under a schema to selected users. I ran following queries for the same. But still my user is not able to access the specific table.
CREATE ROLE myrole;
GRANT SELECT ON myschema.mytable TO myrole;
GRANT usage ON schema myschema TO myrole;
CREATE USER mytest1 identified BY '***';
GRANT myrole TO mytest1;
After this, when I login with mytest1 user and trying to run select on myschema.mytable it is asking me to grant usage on schema to user. After I grant usage on schema to user directly it is failing with permission denied for that table.
Please help with the same. I am running on vertica 5.0
Update:
I find that u also have to make that role default or explicitely set that role as default for user session for making the role's effect take place.
ALTER USER mytest1 DEFAULT ROLE myrole;
But still, my another question of how to make all tables under a schema accessible to specific users remains.
As per the Vertica SQL Reference Manual.pdf (page 725) (doc version 5.0 - for page numbers)
GRANT (Schema)
...
USAGE
Allows the user access to the objects contained within the
schema. This allows the user to look up objects within the
schema. Note that the user must also be granted access to the
individual objects. See the GRANT TABLE (page 727) ... .
The the user must also be granted access to the individual objects means that you need to also GRANT table.
The two I use is GRANT SELECT and GRANT REFERENCES which allows the user to run queries and join (reference) tables in the query.
Example:
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE [schema].[Table1] TO myUser;
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE [schema].[Table2] TO myUser;
GRANT REFERENCES ON TABLE [schema].[Table1] TO myUser;
GRANT REFERENCES ON TABLE [schema].[Table2] TO myUser;
...
6.0 doc reference GRANT SCHEMA (page 808) and GRANT TABLE (page 813).
How do you grant read/select access on all functions and views to an arbitrary user?
I use psql --user=postgres -d mydb -f myview.sql to create several functions and views, and then I run:
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON DATABASE mydb TO myuser;
Having been granted all privileges, I would expect myuser to now have access to the functions and views created by the postgres user. However, when I try and access them with myuser, I get a "permission denied for relation..." error. Why is this?
The reason is that you need additional privileges to access a view or table. Privileges on the database do not cover access to all objects in it.
It is different with functions: EXECUTE privilege is granted to public by default. But the function is executed with the privileges of the current user. You may be interested in the SECURITY DEFINER modifier for CREATE FUNCTION. But normally it is enough to grant SELECT on involved tables.
Per documentation about default privileges:
Depending on the type of object, the initial default privileges might
include granting some privileges to PUBLIC. The default is no public
access for tables, columns, schemas, and tablespaces; CONNECT
privilege and TEMP table creation privilege for databases; EXECUTE
privilege for functions; and USAGE privilege for languages.
You may be interested in this DDL command (requires Postgres 9.0 or later):
GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO myuser;
While connected to the database in question, of course (see #marcel's comment below), and as a user with sufficient privileges. You may also be interested in the setting DEFAULT PRIVILEGES:
Grant all on a specific schema in the db to a group role in PostgreSQL
More detailed answer how to manage privileges:
How to manage DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for USERs on a DATABASE vs SCHEMA?
pgAdmin has a feature for more sophisticated bulk operations:
Or you can query the system catalogs to create DDL statements for bulk granting / revoking ...