Given a number of tables like the following, representing state-changes at time t of an entity identified by id:
| A | | B |
| t | id | a | | t | id | b |
| - | -- | - | | - | -- | - |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | | 3 | 1 | 1 |
where t is in reality a DateTime field with millisecond precision (making discretisation infeasible), how would I go about creating the following output?
| output |
| t | id | a | b |
| - | -- | - | - |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
The idea is that for any given input timestamp, the entire state of a selected entity can be extracted by selecting one row from the resulting table. So the latest state of each variable corresponding to any time needs to be present in each row.
I've tried various JOIN statements, but I seem to be getting nowhere.
Note that in my use case:
rows also need to be joined by entity id
there may be more than two source tables to be merged
I'm running PostgreSQL, but I will eventually translate the query to SQLAlchemy, so a pure SQLAlchemy solution would be even better
I've created a db<>fiddle with the example data.
I think you want a full join and some other manipulations. The ideal would be:
select t, id,
last_value(a.a ignore nulls) over (partition by id order by t) as a,
last_value(b.b ignore nulls) over (partition by id order by t) as b
from a full join
b
using (t, id);
But . . . Postgres doesn't support ignore nulls. So an alternative method is:
select t, id,
max(a) over (partition by id, grp_a) as a,
max(b) over (partition by id, grp_b) as b
from (select *,
count(a.a) over (partition by id order by t) as grp_a,
count(b.b) over (partition by id order by t) as grp_b
from a full join
b
using (t, id)
) ab;
Related
I have a table where each row consists of an ID, date, variable values (eg. var1).
When there is a null value for var1 in a row, I want like to replace the null value with the most recent non-null value before that date for that ID. How can I do this quickly for a very large table?
So presume I start with this table:
+----+------------|-------+
| id |date | var1 |
+----+------------+-------+
| 1 |'01-01-2022'|55 |
| 2 |'01-01-2022'|12 |
| 3 |'01-01-2022'|45 |
| 1 |'01-02-2022'|Null |
| 2 |'01-02-2022'|Null |
| 3 |'01-02-2022'|20 |
| 1 |'01-03-2022'|15 |
| 2 |'01-03-2022'|Null |
| 3 |'01-03-2022'|Null |
| 1 |'01-04-2022'|Null |
| 2 |'01-04-2022'|77 |
+----+------------+-------+
Then I want this
+----+------------|-------+
| id |date | var1 |
+----+------------+-------+
| 1 |'01-01-2022'|55 |
| 2 |'01-01-2022'|12 |
| 3 |'01-01-2022'|45 |
| 1 |'01-02-2022'|55 |
| 2 |'01-02-2022'|12 |
| 3 |'01-02-2022'|20 |
| 1 |'01-03-2022'|15 |
| 2 |'01-03-2022'|12 |
| 3 |'01-03-2022'|20 |
| 1 |'01-04-2022'|15 |
| 2 |'01-04-2022'|77 |
+----+------------+-------+
cte suits perfect here
this snippets returns the rows with values, just an update query and thats all (will update my response).
WITH selectcte AS
(
SELECT * FROM testnulls where var1 is NOT NULL
)
SELECT t1A.id, t1A.date, ISNULL(t1A.var1,t1B.var1) varvalue
FROM selectcte t1A
OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM selectcte
WHERE id = t1A.id AND date < t1A.date
AND var1 IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY id, date DESC) t1B
Here you can dig further about CTEs :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/with-common-table-expression-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver16
Suppose I have the following table:
+----+-------------+-------------+
| id | step_number | employee_id |
+----+-------------+-------------+
| 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 2 | 4 | 5 |
+----+-------------+-------------+
My desired results are:
+----+-------------+-------------+
| id | step_number | employee_id |
+----+-------------+-------------+
| 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 3 |
+----+-------------+-------------+
My current solution is:
SELECT
*
FROM
(SELECT
id,
step_number,
MIN(step_number) OVER (PARTITION BY id) AS min_step_number,
employee_id
FROM
table_name) AS t
WHERE
t.step_number = t.min_step_number
Is there a more efficient way I could be doing this?
I'm currently using postgresql, version 12.
In Postgres, I would recommend using distinct on to adress this greatest-n-per-group problem:
select distinct on (id) t.*
from mytbale t
order by id, step_number
This Postgres extension to the SQL standard has usually better performance than the standard approach using window functions (and, as a bonus, the syntax is neater).
Note that this assumes unicity of (id, step_number) tuples: otherwise, the results might be different than those of your query (which allows ties, while distinct on does not).
i need a SQL-Query to delete duplicates from a table. Lets start with my tables
rc_document: (there are more entries, this is just an example)
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
| rc_document_id | document_id | rc_document_group_id |
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 |
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
(document_id can be exists in mulitple rc_document-group´s)
rc_document_group:
+----------------------+----------+
| rc_document_group_id | priority |
+----------------------+----------+
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
+----------------------+----------+
Each rc_document can be joined with the rc_document_group. In the rc_document_group is the priority for each rc_document.
I want to delete the rc_document rows with document_id which have not the highest priority in the rc_document_group. Because the document_id can be exists in multiple rc_document-group´s .. i just want to keep that one, with the highest priority.
here is my expected rc_document table after deleting duplicate document_id´s:
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
| rc_document_id | document_id | rc_document_group_id |
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 |
+----------------+-------------+----------------------+
the rc_document´s with rc_document_id 1 and 3 must be deleted, because there document_id 1 and 3 are in another rc_document_group with higher priority.
Im new in sql and i have no idea how to write these sql query ... thank for your help!!
First, you could join the two tables in order to get the corresponding priority on each row. After that, you could use the analytic function MAX() to get, for each row, the max priority within each group of document_id. At this point, you filter out the rows where the priority is not equal to the max priority in the group.
Try this query:
SELECT t.rc_document_id,
t.document_id,
t.rc_document_group_id
FROM (SELECT d.*,
g.priority,
MAX(g.priority) OVER(PARTITION BY document_id) max_priority
FROM rc_document d
INNER JOIN rc_document_group g
ON d.rc_document_group_id = g.rc_document_group_id) t
WHERE t.priority = t.max_priority
I am trying my hardest to get a list of the most recent rows by date in a DB2 file. The file has no unique id, so I am trying to get the entries by matching a set of columns. I need DESCGA most importantly as that changes often. When it does they keep another row for historical reasons.
SELECT B.COGA, B.COMSUBGA, B.ACCTGA, B.PRFXGA, B.DESCGA
FROM mylib.myfile B
WHERE
(
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
(
SELECT A.COGA,A.COMSUBGA,A.ACCTGA,A.PRFXGA,MAX(A.DATEGA) AS EDATE
FROM mylib.myfile A
GROUP BY A.COGA, A.COMSUBGA, A.ACCTGA, A.PRFXGA
) T
WHERE
(B.ACCTGA = T.ACCTGA AND
B.COGA = T.COGA AND
B.COMSUBGA = T.COMSUBGA AND
B.PRFXGA = T.PRFXGA AND
B.DATEGA = T.EDATE)
) > 1
This is what I am trying and so far I get 0 results.
If I remove
B.ACCTGA = T.ACCTGA AND
It will return results (of course wrong).
I am using ODBC in VS 2013 to structure this query.
I have a table with the following
| a | b | descri | date |
-----------------------------
| 1 | 0 | string | 20140102 |
| 2 | 1 | string | 20140103 |
| 1 | 1 | string | 20140101 |
| 1 | 1 | string | 20150101 |
| 1 | 0 | string | 20150102 |
| 2 | 1 | string | 20150103 |
| 1 | 1 | string | 20150103 |
and i need
| 1 | 0 | string | 20150102 |
| 2 | 1 | string | 20150103 |
| 1 | 1 | string | 20150103 |
You can use row_number():
select t.*
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by a, b order by date desc) as seqnum
from mylib.myfile t
) t
where seqnum = 1;
I have a table, and I'd like to select rows with the highest value. For example:
----------------
| user | index |
----------------
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 |
| 3 | 7 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 |
----------------
Expected result:
----------------
| user | index |
----------------
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 7 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 |
----------------
How may I do so? I assume it can be done by some oracle function I am not aware of?
Thanks in advance :-)
You can use MAX() function for that with grouping user column like this:
SELECT "user"
,MAX("index") AS "index"
FROM Table1
GROUP BY "user"
ORDER BY "user";
Result:
| USER | INDEX |
----------------
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 7 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 |
See this SQLFiddle
if you have more than one column
select user , index
from (
select u.* , row_number() over (partition by user order by index desc) as rnk
from some_table u)
where rnk = 1
user is a reserved word - you should use a different name for the column.
select user,max(index) index from tbl
group by user;
Alternatively, you can use analytic functions:
select user,index, max(index) over (partition by user order by 1 ) highest from YOURTABLE
Note: Try NOT to use words like user, index, date etc.. as your column names, as they are reserved words for Oracle. If you will use, then use them with quotation marks, eg. "index", "date"...