32 Bit dll in 64 bBit application - vb.net

I need to run the vb6 32 Bit dll in .net application. When I run the application in X86 it works fine. But when I run the application in "Any Cpu" Configuration it gives Following Error:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {AAA4DA7D-FC03-4BF7-B240-FA6F323D41EE} failed due to the following error: 800700c1 is not a valid Win32 application. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800700C1).
For the Code line
CommonUniqueObj = New Uniquekey.Class1
How to solve this error. I want to run the .net application in "Any cpu" configuration?

AX (COM) DLLs run in-process, and as the comments say, you can't mix x86 and x64 code directly.
One possible workaround is to compile the VB6 DLL as an AX EXE instead. 64-bit programs can instance AX EXEs and data can be marshalled between them, since they run in separate processes.

You can mix 32 bit and 64 bit. By calling into an exe bitness doesn't matter. Data is marshalled as with any out of process call.
DLLs can be run in an exe by setting registry values.
See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/com/dllsurrogate
PS when using an exe it is a good idea to always set everytime just before you use it in case the user has terminated the dllhost.exe that hosts the DLLs.

Related

Class not registered Error

Running an application from Visual Studio 2012 on 64-bit computers, displays the following error message:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {F2D4F4E5-EEA1-46FF-A83B-A270C92DAE4B} failed due to the following error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG))
I am using Inventor packandgo dll library in visualstudio.
Anyone know what is the error?
My problem and the solution
I have a 32 bit third party dll which I have installed in 2008 R2 machine which is 64 bit.
I have a wcf service created in .net 4.5 framework which calls the 32 bit third party dll for process. Now I have build property set to target 'any' cpu and deployed it to the 64 bit machine.
When Ii tried to invoke the wcf service got error "80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG"
Now Ii used ProcMon.exe to trace the com registry issue and identified that the process is looking for the registry entry at HKLM\CLSID and HKCR\CLSID where there is no entry.
Came to know that Microsoft will not register the 32 bit com components to the paths HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID in 64 bit machine rather it places the entry in HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID paths.
Now the conflict is 64 bit process trying to invoke 32 bit process in 64 bit machine which will look for the registry entry in HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID. The solution is we have to force the 64 bit process to look at the registry entry at HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID.
This can be achieved by configuring the wcf service project properties to target to 'X86' machine instead of 'Any'.
After deploying the 'X86' version to the 2008 R2 server got the issue "System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assembly"
Solution to this badimageformatexception is setting the 'Enable32bitApplications' to 'True' in IIS Apppool properties for the right apppool.
The problem is that the DLL is registered on the 32 bit version of the windows registry, and the application is using the 64 bit version.
Solution: Go into the Project Properties, Compile tab and click "Advanced Compile Options...". Change "Target CPU" to x86, click OK, save and try again.
Source:
http://www.theogray.com/blog/2009/10/comexception-regdbeclassnotreg-on-64-bit-windows
Has worked for me with an VB 6 COM DLL invoked from a .Net 4 Winforms application
Somewhere in the code you are using, there is a call to the Win32 API, CoCreateInstance, to dynamically load a DLL and instantiate an object from it.
The mapping between the component ID and the DLL that is capable of instantiating that object is usually found in HEKY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID in the registry. To discuss this further would be to explain a lot about COM in Windows. But the error indicates that the COM guid is not present in the registry.
I don't much about what the PackAndGo DLL is (an Autodesk component), but I suspect you simply need to "install" that component or the software package it came with through the designated installer to have that DLL and appropriate COM registry keys on your computer you are trying to run your code on. (i.e. go run setup.exe for this product).
In other words, I think you need to install "Pack and Go" on this computer instead of just copying the DLL to the target machine.
Also, make sure you decide to build your code appropriate as 32-bit vs. 64-bit depending on the which build flavor (32 or 64 bit) of Pack And Go you install.
I had the same problem. I tried lot of ways but at last solution was simple.
Solution:
Open IIS, In Application Pools, right click on the .net framework that is being used.
Go to settings and change 'Enable 32-Bit Applications' to 'True'.
In 64 bit windows machines the COM components need to register itself in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID (64 bit component) OR HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Wow6432Node\CLSID (32 bit component) . If your application is a 32 bit application running on 64-bit machine the COM library would typically look for the GUID under Wow64 node and if your application is a 64 bit application, the COM library would try to load from HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID. Make sure you are targeting the correct platform and ensure you have installed the correct version of library(32/64 bit).
Long solved I'm sure but this might help some other poor soul.
This error can ocurre if the DLL you are deploying in the install package is not the same as the DLL you are referencing (these will have different IDs)
Sounds obvious but can easily happen if you make a small change to the dll and have previously installed the app on your own machine which reregisters the dll.
I had run into the same problem. I added reference of Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel COM component's dll but Office was not installed on my system it wont give compile time error. I moved my application to another system and ran it..it worked successfully.
So, I can say in my case it was the system environment which was causing this issue.
I had this problem and I solved it when I understood that it was looking for the Windows Registry specified in the brackets.
Since the error was happening only in one computer, what I had to do was export the registry from the computer that it was working and install it on the computer that was missing it.
I was getting the below error in my 32 bit application.
Error: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID
{4911BB26-11EE-4182-B66C-64DF2FA6502D} failed due to the following
error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT:
0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)).
And on setting the "Enable32bitApplications" to true in defaultapplicationpool in IIS worked for me.
For me, I had to install Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable and restart my computer.
This happened to me when I startup eclipse for a workspace and not other workspaces. In that workspace I had a *.ts file opened with "JS editor". Error occurred in spite of having correct file association in Preferences. Other *.ts file opened without error. To get around this, in "Open Resource" (ctrl-shift-r), I used the "Open With" button and selected "JS Editor", and the file opened without problem. After that eclipse knows the editor to use for that file. I solved the problem for one particular file type, but solution probably applies to all file types. Hope this helps someone. Thanks for reading
Check if the MS Office and MS Excel is installed on that server.

Calling an x86 dll from a VS 2010/DotNet 4.0 x86 targeted app

I'm getting an 'AccessViolationException' 'Attempted to read or write protected memory' when calling a method in an x86 dll when running on an x64 platform (Windows 7). Everything works great on x86 platforms.
I've read many, many posts about similar problems but haven't been able to get my code to work.
I'm in the process of trying to make our old x86 app work happily on Windows 7 (x64) and Server 2008 R2 (x64). The app is an assortment of VB6 , VB.Net, C#, MicroFocus COBOL and C++. (We couldn't think of any other languages to throw in at the time). The DotNet code was originally written in Visual Studio 2003 for DotNet 1.1. I've ported the code up to Visual Studio 2010 and DotNet 4.0. I've set the target for all the projects to x86. When I call into un-managed 32 bit dll's I get the above error.
Our InstallShield setup routine is installing the x86 dll's into C:\Windows\sysWOW64 instead of C:\Windows\System32. This behavior seems correct. The dll's are some COBOL object code and runtime components linked together into a 'C Style' dll. I don't think the problem has to do with COBOL or the linking process as I also ported up a sample app from Code Project with a VB.Net WinForms app that calls a simple C++ dll, all targeted to x86. I get the same error there. I've also tried building a C++ command line app to call the dll. The Load Library succeeds. GetProcAddress succeeds. Calling the function pointer for the particular method fails. Our VB6 apps can call the dll's just fine when running on Windows 7 x64. I've also tried turning off UAC and setting the requestedExecutionLevel in the manifest to the highestAvailable. I've tried running as administrator.
Seems like this should work, but not sure what to try next. Any ideas?
On x64 .net programs will be run as 64-bit programs and cannot call 32bit-dlls.
Try compiling the application with target x86 instead of "Any Target". You can also force the
target of the built .exe with the .Net CorFlags.exe utility to run in 32bit-mode.
Of course your program will then run in the 32bit environment, especially it will only have a maximum of 2gb of RAM.
Good news,
We investigated DEP as a possible cause of the problem as we saw that even our VB6 code will fail when DEP is turned on. We noticed that the VB.Net code was failing in the same way as VB6 when DEP was on. Apparently our COBOL dll's do something that DEP isn't happy with. Unfortunately the DotNet assemblies don't seem to respect the operating system DEP setting, so you have to turn off DEP with using editbin.exe:
editbin.exe /nxnocompat:no
I still have to test it on our full application, but it looks like we have a solution!

Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location

I have created a COM dll in .Net and build it under Any CPU. I am using that COM dll in Vcpp code but getting Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location error when creating the pointer reference to COM class. The VCPP code works perfectly fine if the Build configuration is Win32 but if i change the configuration to X64 mode then teh application crashes.
Please Help
Since you're using a so-called in process DLL, you have to use the 64 bits version of that DLL in your program.
This question discusses it. It seems that you have to use the 64 bit regasm tool to register your .NET DLL.

Services 32bit dlls on 64bit machine

I've built and installed my service from vs2010 onto a 64bit machine.
My problem comes in when my service references 32 bit dlls (spssio32.dll to be precise) - I get the error in my event viewer : "System.BadImageFormatException: An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007000B)"
Any help on the matter would be appreciated.
Regards,
Byron Cobb.
Is your service code written in a .NET language? If so, you need to mark it as targeting x86 rather than Any CPU (via Project properties / Build / Platform target).
(By default, .NET code targets Any CPU, meaning that on 64-bit machines it will compile into x64 machine code. Because such 64-bit code can't load 32-bit DLLs, that can lead to failures like the one you're seeing. Where code has a dependency on a 32-bit DLL, it needs to always compile to 32-bit machine code even on 64-bit machines, hence setting the target platform to x86.)
You can use a COM surrogate
http://www.dnjonline.com/article.aspx?id=jun07_access3264
The other variant is to spawn an external 32 Bit server-process and add a .NET remoting interface to it and your 64 bit application, so you can use .NET remoting for interprocess communication.

Register COM reference to 64-bit Windows 7 machine

I am writing a C# program that interface with COM object through COM interop.
I have a third-party program that register itself as the COM server when I execute the Application. This works fine in 32-bit Windows Vista and I can interface with the interop just fine. (The reference show up in "COM" tab from Visual Studio when you click "Add Reference")
However, the reference does not show up in "COM" tab on my 64-bit Windows 7 machine after I execute the application. Any thoughts, why would this happen? I actually tried using regsvr32.exe to register the application manually but it didn't work either (error message saying "entry-point DllRegisterServer was not found)
You are not going to be able to use it as long as it doesn't show up in the COM tab. The regsvr32.exe utility is for DLLs, this however sounds like an EXE. If it is a DLL then it needs to be registered with the 32-bit version of regsvr32.exe, the one in c:\windows\syswow64. If it is an EXE then the normal way to get it to register itself is by running it with the /regserver command line option.
Mumble.exe /RegServer
Additionally, if this is a DLL or an EXE for which you don't have a 64-bit proxy/stub then you'll have to force your app to run in 32-bit mode. Project + Properties, Build tab, Platform Target = x86.
If all else fails, you really do need support from the vendor of this program. Surely they'll have an update available that is verified to work properly on 64-bit operating systems. If they are no longer around, running this in a virtual machine is always a possibility.
If it is a managed dll then you might try using RegAsm
REGASM AssemblyName.dll /tlb:AssemblyName.tlb
You may find this helpful as I needed to recompiled and build 64 bit proxy stub for the COM server from C++ myself and it kept failing when trying to register the server using /regserver. Here is and thread from miscrosoft that helped me resolved this issue. Basically you need to use this instead /RegServerPerUser, but go through the thread if you get into this situation after the answers from above.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vcprerelease/thread/11f01ceb-52a4-438f-b7ef-727ce7a3e191