Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location - com

I have created a COM dll in .Net and build it under Any CPU. I am using that COM dll in Vcpp code but getting Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location error when creating the pointer reference to COM class. The VCPP code works perfectly fine if the Build configuration is Win32 but if i change the configuration to X64 mode then teh application crashes.
Please Help

Since you're using a so-called in process DLL, you have to use the 64 bits version of that DLL in your program.
This question discusses it. It seems that you have to use the 64 bit regasm tool to register your .NET DLL.

Related

32 Bit dll in 64 bBit application

I need to run the vb6 32 Bit dll in .net application. When I run the application in X86 it works fine. But when I run the application in "Any Cpu" Configuration it gives Following Error:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {AAA4DA7D-FC03-4BF7-B240-FA6F323D41EE} failed due to the following error: 800700c1 is not a valid Win32 application. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800700C1).
For the Code line
CommonUniqueObj = New Uniquekey.Class1
How to solve this error. I want to run the .net application in "Any cpu" configuration?
AX (COM) DLLs run in-process, and as the comments say, you can't mix x86 and x64 code directly.
One possible workaround is to compile the VB6 DLL as an AX EXE instead. 64-bit programs can instance AX EXEs and data can be marshalled between them, since they run in separate processes.
You can mix 32 bit and 64 bit. By calling into an exe bitness doesn't matter. Data is marshalled as with any out of process call.
DLLs can be run in an exe by setting registry values.
See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/com/dllsurrogate
PS when using an exe it is a good idea to always set everytime just before you use it in case the user has terminated the dllhost.exe that hosts the DLLs.

Class not registered Error

Running an application from Visual Studio 2012 on 64-bit computers, displays the following error message:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {F2D4F4E5-EEA1-46FF-A83B-A270C92DAE4B} failed due to the following error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG))
I am using Inventor packandgo dll library in visualstudio.
Anyone know what is the error?
My problem and the solution
I have a 32 bit third party dll which I have installed in 2008 R2 machine which is 64 bit.
I have a wcf service created in .net 4.5 framework which calls the 32 bit third party dll for process. Now I have build property set to target 'any' cpu and deployed it to the 64 bit machine.
When Ii tried to invoke the wcf service got error "80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG"
Now Ii used ProcMon.exe to trace the com registry issue and identified that the process is looking for the registry entry at HKLM\CLSID and HKCR\CLSID where there is no entry.
Came to know that Microsoft will not register the 32 bit com components to the paths HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID in 64 bit machine rather it places the entry in HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID paths.
Now the conflict is 64 bit process trying to invoke 32 bit process in 64 bit machine which will look for the registry entry in HKLM\CLSID, HKCR\CLSID. The solution is we have to force the 64 bit process to look at the registry entry at HKLM\Wow6432Node\CLSID and HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID.
This can be achieved by configuring the wcf service project properties to target to 'X86' machine instead of 'Any'.
After deploying the 'X86' version to the 2008 R2 server got the issue "System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assembly"
Solution to this badimageformatexception is setting the 'Enable32bitApplications' to 'True' in IIS Apppool properties for the right apppool.
The problem is that the DLL is registered on the 32 bit version of the windows registry, and the application is using the 64 bit version.
Solution: Go into the Project Properties, Compile tab and click "Advanced Compile Options...". Change "Target CPU" to x86, click OK, save and try again.
Source:
http://www.theogray.com/blog/2009/10/comexception-regdbeclassnotreg-on-64-bit-windows
Has worked for me with an VB 6 COM DLL invoked from a .Net 4 Winforms application
Somewhere in the code you are using, there is a call to the Win32 API, CoCreateInstance, to dynamically load a DLL and instantiate an object from it.
The mapping between the component ID and the DLL that is capable of instantiating that object is usually found in HEKY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID in the registry. To discuss this further would be to explain a lot about COM in Windows. But the error indicates that the COM guid is not present in the registry.
I don't much about what the PackAndGo DLL is (an Autodesk component), but I suspect you simply need to "install" that component or the software package it came with through the designated installer to have that DLL and appropriate COM registry keys on your computer you are trying to run your code on. (i.e. go run setup.exe for this product).
In other words, I think you need to install "Pack and Go" on this computer instead of just copying the DLL to the target machine.
Also, make sure you decide to build your code appropriate as 32-bit vs. 64-bit depending on the which build flavor (32 or 64 bit) of Pack And Go you install.
I had the same problem. I tried lot of ways but at last solution was simple.
Solution:
Open IIS, In Application Pools, right click on the .net framework that is being used.
Go to settings and change 'Enable 32-Bit Applications' to 'True'.
In 64 bit windows machines the COM components need to register itself in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID (64 bit component) OR HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Wow6432Node\CLSID (32 bit component) . If your application is a 32 bit application running on 64-bit machine the COM library would typically look for the GUID under Wow64 node and if your application is a 64 bit application, the COM library would try to load from HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID. Make sure you are targeting the correct platform and ensure you have installed the correct version of library(32/64 bit).
Long solved I'm sure but this might help some other poor soul.
This error can ocurre if the DLL you are deploying in the install package is not the same as the DLL you are referencing (these will have different IDs)
Sounds obvious but can easily happen if you make a small change to the dll and have previously installed the app on your own machine which reregisters the dll.
I had run into the same problem. I added reference of Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel COM component's dll but Office was not installed on my system it wont give compile time error. I moved my application to another system and ran it..it worked successfully.
So, I can say in my case it was the system environment which was causing this issue.
I had this problem and I solved it when I understood that it was looking for the Windows Registry specified in the brackets.
Since the error was happening only in one computer, what I had to do was export the registry from the computer that it was working and install it on the computer that was missing it.
I was getting the below error in my 32 bit application.
Error: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID
{4911BB26-11EE-4182-B66C-64DF2FA6502D} failed due to the following
error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT:
0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)).
And on setting the "Enable32bitApplications" to true in defaultapplicationpool in IIS worked for me.
For me, I had to install Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable and restart my computer.
This happened to me when I startup eclipse for a workspace and not other workspaces. In that workspace I had a *.ts file opened with "JS editor". Error occurred in spite of having correct file association in Preferences. Other *.ts file opened without error. To get around this, in "Open Resource" (ctrl-shift-r), I used the "Open With" button and selected "JS Editor", and the file opened without problem. After that eclipse knows the editor to use for that file. I solved the problem for one particular file type, but solution probably applies to all file types. Hope this helps someone. Thanks for reading
Check if the MS Office and MS Excel is installed on that server.

E_NOINTERFACE for MFC GUI not for Win32 console application

Running under Win7 SP1 with VS2010 and Microsoft SDK v7.0a. If I create a VS2010 project for a Win32 console application, a CreateInstance on a regsvr32.exe registered COM DLL succeeds. If I create a VS2010 project for an MFC GUI, the identical CreateInstance fails with E_NOINTERFACE. Have tried both Unicode and multi-byte, works both ways for Win32 console application, fails both ways for MFC GUI. How is this possible?
If I F11 through the Win32 console application, I eventually see the CreateInstance get to a QueryInterface on IUnknown [which succeeds]. If I F11 through the MFC GUI, it never gets to the QueryInterface.
I've seen some talk about ADO versions/upgrades being relevant, but here is one system that succeeds for Win32 console application and fails for MFC GUI. How?
Update: I was mistakenly allowing the WinDDK comip.h to be used instead of the VS2010 comip.h. But even after correcting that, the problem remains.
Also discovered that the same MFC GUI project and source compiled on a 64 bit machine does NOT fail. Only my 32 bit machine does. Both get to QueryInterface in the CreateInstance call stack, but the 32 bit machine returns failure, whereas the 64 bit machine returns success.
Courtesy of MSDN tech support, I was enlightened that MFC GUIs do not support the "free threading" that COM requires.

C++/CLI 64-bit COM

I have a C++/CLI assembly that wraps a native 32-bit dll.
The assembly is used both from .Net and COM (office).
Now I have a customer that runs 64-bit office.
Is it possible to create a C++/CLI assembly that uses a native 32-bit dll and exports a 64-bit com interface?
No, you can't mix code with different bitness in one process on Windows. You need to force 32-bit code into a separate process or convert that DLL.
The latter can likely be achieved by using COM+ (or DCOM which is mostly the same). This is what we usually do with native C++ code. I'm not sure about how easy it is with C++/CLI assemblies.
In a manner of speaking, yes.
Continue to compile the C++/CLI code as 32-bit so it can use the native library using C++ interop.
Then you will have to configure it to load as an out-of-process COM server when acting as an Office 64 plugin. With native COM code, midl automatically generates the 64-bit proxy. There should be some similar capability to create a proxy when registering .NET classes marked COMVisible.
The 64-bit COM interface will be contained in the auto-generated 64-bit proxy DLL, so this doesn't violate the rule that the bitness of all modules in a process must be the same.

Services 32bit dlls on 64bit machine

I've built and installed my service from vs2010 onto a 64bit machine.
My problem comes in when my service references 32 bit dlls (spssio32.dll to be precise) - I get the error in my event viewer : "System.BadImageFormatException: An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007000B)"
Any help on the matter would be appreciated.
Regards,
Byron Cobb.
Is your service code written in a .NET language? If so, you need to mark it as targeting x86 rather than Any CPU (via Project properties / Build / Platform target).
(By default, .NET code targets Any CPU, meaning that on 64-bit machines it will compile into x64 machine code. Because such 64-bit code can't load 32-bit DLLs, that can lead to failures like the one you're seeing. Where code has a dependency on a 32-bit DLL, it needs to always compile to 32-bit machine code even on 64-bit machines, hence setting the target platform to x86.)
You can use a COM surrogate
http://www.dnjonline.com/article.aspx?id=jun07_access3264
The other variant is to spawn an external 32 Bit server-process and add a .NET remoting interface to it and your 64 bit application, so you can use .NET remoting for interprocess communication.