How does different mikro-orm packages versions correspond to each other? Could I possibly use #mikro-orm/core 4.0.0 and #mikro-orm/nestjs 3.1.0 or other variations of different #mikro-orm packages and their versions? Should all #mikro-orm packages be installed with same version?
It's 3 questions but I feel they are pretty much the same since they try to clarify concept of version matching in mikro-orm for me.
All packages that come from the main repository are released together, you should always align their versions.
https://github.com/mikro-orm/mikro-orm/tree/master/packages
The rest is not dependent on exact version, but in general, use the most up to date one. There are currently 3 packages that live outside of the main repo, the nest adapter you mentioned and 2 highlighters.
Btw there is no such release as #mikro-orm/nestjs 3.1.0, first release was 4.0.0 and current is 4.2.0.
edit: apparently lerna is aligning only minor/feature releases, so it can happen that some packages are not on the very latest patch version, example of that are mongo and reflection packages, that are still on 4.1.0, while the rest is on 4.1.1. but again, use the latest everywhere and you will be fine. Your IDE should guide you in knowing the latest versions.
Related
Recently new versions of packages came out, which required new versions of another library (which in turn broke my production builds). However, they both only increased their patch version number (one was #types/prettier and the other one cheerio).
My projects use these libs only indirectly, so even though I set all my dependencies to a fixed version number, these changes affected my builds and cause a lot of grief.
If I could tell NPM not to consider newer versions of a package and always use only the specified one, this kind of problem would probably not appear. Is it possible to force NPM not to install newer versions of dependencies, even if they allow ranges?
what is the best practice to upgrade the dependency v-calendar from beta to the latest version v2.3.0?
I know the question is opinion based, but I am new to the field, what are the pros and cons of the way to do the upgrade.
We use "v-calendar": "~1.0.0-beta.14" in production. The latest version is currently v.2.3.0
I can think of two ways:
update to the latest version with yarn add v-calendar#latest?
upgrade incrementally until the latest version is reached with yarn upgrade "v-calendar"?
What should I do to reach the latest version? thank you
ps. we are using vue: ~2.6.10
Unless the package you are using has an upgrade guide (99.99% of them don't), there is absolutely no point in doing an incremental upgrade. If it has an upgrade guide, read and follow its instructions.
The easiest way to upgrade is to change the package version to latest (in most IDE's if you press Ctrl/Cmd and hover the package number shown in package.json a tooltip will show you currently installed version, latest wanted version and latest available version). After you changed it (by typing the latest version in), run yarn install.
In the vast majority of cases, that's all you need to do, because most packages are built with backwards compatibility (existing features remain and new features are being added). If that's not true in your case, you'll have to reimplement it following their documentation. Typically it's no big deal.
Also, note there is no risk in attempting to change to a newer version. If things break, you just go back to package.json, change version back to lower, run yarn install again and everything is back to square one.
We have a private nexus repository and publishing all the npm modules there. We have Module A and Module B, B is dependent on A. Here I am getting an issue with installing the latest SNAPSHOT version. For example:
Module A has published versions like
'1.0.0-SNAPSHOT', '1.0.1-SNAPSHOT', and '1.0.0'
In Module B package.json, I added the dependency like
"Module A": "^1.0.0-SNAPSHOT"
As I mentioned "^" in the dependency, it should install the latest version (i.e, 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT), But I am not sure why it is installing '1.0.0' instead '1.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Avoid releasing and using snapshot dependencies. When you publish a release, it should not contain -SNAPSHOT. Referring to a proper release is mandatory in order to be sure you are testing/executing the right code without side effects due to regression problems. You need to know in every moment which version you are using, that is very important, so relying on latest versions of your modules might not be the best solution, it doesn't worth it either if you are precise with major, minor and patch bits in order to avoid breaking changes or unexpected behaviors.
If you really need to develop them together you can use npm link command instead.
Some time after the release of Elm19 I published a library, which I needed for an Elm18 code base: thought2/elm-wikimedia-commons.
This worked well, it's listed in the community driven Elm18 package database: https://dmy.github.io/elm-0.18-packages/, can be installed and all good. Except the fact that the documentation is not shown in the package details, but that I heard is a known bug there. (But still I think this is very bad)
But the main problem is now, how to migrate the library to Elm 19: The actual migration steps are done and live in the master branch of the repo: http://github.com/thought2/elm-wikimedia-commons
The Elm18 versions proceeded to 1.1.0 in the meanwhile and after the migration there had to be done an API change, so I'd assume the latest version to become 2.0.0. If I add this to elm.json, the command elm publish tells me that this would be the first version and I should change this. Which is not right.
After a bit of research, I found out that the package (among other 18 ones that have been published in the same time period) is not listed in this json: https://package.elm-lang.org/all-packages This should contain all packages regardless of versions.
Any ideas what to do? This is really blocking my development, as I'm stuck in both lands now: 18 and 19. Would appreciate a lot if someone has some hints or solutions for me!
You shouldn't need to mess with the version number specified in elm.json.
If you set it back to the version of the package that is already published and run elm bump the elm program will look at the changes you've made to the package's API and set the new version accordingly.
Looking at https://github.com/thought2/elm-wikimedia-commons it doesn't look like any of your upgrade changes were breaking changes to your package API so the version won't be a 2.x.x, it will be a 1.x.x.
You'll need to remove the 2.0.0 git tag as well and instead add a tag for the version that elm bump tells you that your package is.
We have a custom Suse Linux Enterprise repository, that we want to ship to customers in the future. In there right now are a lot of different versions of the same packages, some obsolete and some needed as a dependency for other packages, so the whole repo is quite large.
I guess what im trying to do, is find a query to list all packages that have newer versions in the repository, and have no other package that needs this version as a dependency.
Is there an elegant way, to find the not needed packages ?